throbber
Case 4:18-cv-00670-HSG Document 85 Filed 08/24/18 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`M. ELIZABETH DAY (SBN 177125)
`eday@feinday.com
`DAVID ALBERTI (SBN 220265)
`dalberti@feinday.com
`MARC BELLOLI (SBN 244290)
`mbelloli@feinday.com
`FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI LIM &
`BELLOLI LLP
`1600 El Camino Real, Suite 280
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Tel: 650.618.4360
`Fax: 650.618.4368
`
`Hao Ni (pro hac vice)
`hni@nilawfirm.com
`NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC
`8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500
`Dallas, TX 75231
`Telephone: (972) 331-4600
`Facsimile: (972) 314-0900
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Hypermedia Navigation LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jonathan J. Lamberson (SBN 239107)
`lamberson@fr.com
`Meghana RaoRane (SBN 253531)
`Raorane@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Telephone: (650) 839-5070
`Facsimile: (650) 839-5071
`
`Indranil Mukerji (MA SBN 644059)
`Mukerji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`901-15th Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
`
`Ricardo Bonilla (TX SBN 24082704)
`rbonilla@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1717 Main Street, Suite 5000
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: (214) 747-5070
`Facsimile: (214) 747-2091
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Microsoft Corporation
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`
`
`HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`Case No. 4:18-cv-00670-HSG
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND
`PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT (4-3)
`4:18-CV-00670-HSG - PAGE i
`
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1033
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-00670-HSG Document 85 Filed 08/24/18 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-3, Plaintiff Hypermedia Navigation LLC (“Plaintiff”) and
`
`Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Defendant”) hereby jointly submit this Joint Hearing
`
`Statement for U.S. Patent Nos. 7,383,323 (the “’323 Patent”), 7,383,324 (the “’324 Patent”),
`
`7,424,523 (the “’523 Patent”), 7,478,144 (the “’144 Patent”), 7,769,830 (the “’830 Patent”),
`
`8,250,173 (the “’173 Patent”), 9,083,672 (the “’672 Patent”), 8,259,170 (the “’170 Patent”),
`
`7,216,155 (the “’155 Patent”), 9,772,814 (the “’814 Patent”), and 9,864,575 (the “’575 Patent”)
`
`(collectively, the “Patents-In-Suit”).
`
`A.
`
`AGREED UPON CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`The parties identify the following terms on which they agree:
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`“the first media element”
`
`‘173 claim 2
`
`“the plurality of second
`video media”
`
`‘173 claim 6
`
`“the plurality of video
`media elements”
`
`‘173 claim 11
`
`“the plurality of video
`elements”
`
`‘323 claim 28
`
`“the plurality of video
`media elements”
`
`‘830 claim 7 & 18
`
`“map area”
`
`‘323 claims 10, 28
`‘324 claim 1
`‘144 claims 40, 44, 46, 49
`‘830 claim 1, 12, 15, 24
`‘170 claim 14,
`‘173 claim 1, 15, 24
`‘672 claim 14,
`‘814 claim 14
`‘575 claim 1, 10, 20
`
`first video media
`“the
`element”
`
`“the plurality of second video
`media elements”
`
`“the plurality of second video
`media elements”
`
`“the plurality of video media
`elements”
`
`“the plurality of second video
`media elements”
`
`“a user interface or a part
`thereof displaying at least a
`portion of a linear path”
`
`Hypermedia has agreed to withdraw the following asserted claim: ‘173 claim 20.
`
`B.
`
`EACH PARTY’S PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF DISPUTED TERMS
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT (4-3)
`4:18-CV-00670-HSG - PAGE 1
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1033
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-00670-HSG Document 85 Filed 08/24/18 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`The parties’ proposed construction are attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`C.
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF TERMS MOST SIGNIFICANT TO THE
`RESOLUTION OF THE CASE
`
`The parties identify the following terms as the most significant to resolution of the case:
`
`Plaintiff: “linear”
`
`Defendant: “icon,” “instructions for…”
`D.
`ANTICIPATED LENGTH OF TIME NECESSARY AND ORDER OF
`PRESENTATION FOR THE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`
`The parties estimate that the Claim Construction Hearing will require three hours. If claim
`
`construction in this matter is consolidated with claim construction in Hypermedia’s litigation
`
`against Facebook, then an additional hour will be required.
`
`Absent contrary instruction from the Court, the parties agree that, for each claim term in
`
`dispute, the party that originally proposed the claim term for construction will initially present its
`
`contended construction and associated arguments. The other party may then subsequently respond
`
`with its contended construction and associated arguments. For a claim term that has been proposed
`
`by both parties, Plaintiff will initially present, followed by Defendant.
`
`E.
`
`PRESENTATION OF WITNESS TESTIMONY
`
`Neither party anticipates the presentation of any witnesses for purposes of claim
`
`construction.
`
`F. IDENTIFICATION OF FACTUAL FINDINGS REQUESTED FROM THE
`COURT RELATED TO CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`None requested at this time.
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT (4-3)
`4:18-CV-00670-HSG - PAGE 2
`
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1033
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-00670-HSG Document 85 Filed 08/24/18 Page 4 of 5
`
` NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC
`
`By: /s/ Hao Ni______
` Hao Ni
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff Hypermedia
`Navigation LLC
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Jonathan Lamberson
`Jonathan Lamberson
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney for Defendant
` Microsoft Corporation
`
`
`
`Dated: August 24, 2018
`
`Dated: August 24, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT (4-3)
`4:18-CV-00670-HSG - PAGE 3
`
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1033
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-00670-HSG Document 85 Filed 08/24/18 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`FILER’S ATTESTATION
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Hao Ni, attest that concurrence in
`
`the filing of this document has been obtained.
`
`Dated: August 24, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Hao Ni
`Hao Ni
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that all counsel of record is being served on August 24, 2018, with a copy of this
`
`document via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Hao Ni
`Hao Ni
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT (4-3)
`4:18-CV-00670-HSG - PAGE 4
`
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1033
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-00670-HSG Document 85-1 Filed 08/24/18 Page 1 of 4
`EXHIBIT A –Disputed Constructions
`
`Hypermedia Navigation LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 4:18-cv-00670-HSG
`
`Claim Terms, Phrases or Clauses
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed Construction
`
`Defendant’s Proposed Construction 1
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Not subject to 35 U.S.C. § 112(f).
`
`Plain meaning
`
`
`
`
`“instructions for … creating a linear
`Web tour …”
`
`(’155 Claim 1)
`
`“instructions for … selecting a
`plurality of video media elements
`for presentation to the subscriber
`station…”
`
`(’323 Claim 28)
`
`“instructions for … providing a
`hypermedia resource
`program …”
`
`(’170 Claim 14)
`
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Subject to 35 U.S.C. § 112(f).
`
`Function:
` “creating a linear Web tour” (’155
`Claim 1)
` “selecting a plurality of video media
`elements for presentation to the
`subscriber station” (’323 Claim 28)
` “providing a hypermedia resource
`program” (’170 Claim 14)
`
`
`Corresponding structure:
`None
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`
`6:45-8:43, 9:3-19
`
`“linear Web tour”
`
`“linear Web program”
`
`“linear program”
`
`
`1 Column: line citations are to the ‘323 patent; the same disclosure, however, can be found in each of the asserted patents.
`
`Proposed Construction
` “linear” = “no more than one exclusive
`forward link and one exclusive backward
`link”
`
`Proposed Construction
`“a selected group of media elements that are
`associated by a series of exclusive forward
`and backward links”
`
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1033
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-00670-HSG Document 85-1 Filed 08/24/18 Page 2 of 4
`
`(‘155 Claim 1)
`(‘523 Claim 6, 11-12)
`(‘672 Claim 14, 18-19)
`(‘814 Claim 14, 17-18, 20)
`(‘575 All Claims)
`
`“hypermedia resource program”
`
`(‘170 Claim 14, 17)
`
`
`
`“search criteria”
`
`(‘155 Claim 1)
`(‘323 Claims 11, 12, 29, 30)
`(‘324 Claims 1, 4)
`(‘144 Claim 39, 44)
`(‘830 Claims 2, 3, 5, 16)
`(‘173 Claims 7, 9, 15)
`(‘672 Claim 19)
`(‘575 Claim 5, 15, 20)
`
`
`“icon”
`
`(‘323 Claim 10, 28)
`(‘324 Claim 1)
`
`
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13
`
`1:33-38; 3:13-37; 4:2-11; 4:65-5:14; 6:59-67;
`8:46-9:2
`Proposed Construction
`Plain meaning
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13
`
`1:33-38; 3:13-37; 4:2-11; 4:65-5:14; 6:59-67;
`8:46-9:2
`
`Proposed Construction
`“input(s) used to determine search results”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Figs. 11, 12, 14.
`
`1:39-48; 7:21-67; 8:13-26
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary –
`Tenth Edition – 1998 – “criteria”
`Proposed Construction
`
`Plain meaning.
`
`2
`
`Alternative: “linear” - allowing for both
`forward and backwards traversal.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`
`3:13-4:17, Figs. 3-4, 6:1-30, 8:44-9:2
`Proposed Construction
`“a selected group of media elements that are
`associated by a series of exclusive forward
`and backward links”
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`
`3:13-4:17, Figs. 3-4, 6:1-30, 8:44-9:2
`
`Proposed Construction
`Plain meaning.
`
`Alternatively: “a criteria for a search.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`
`7:20-8:25
`
`Proposed Construction
`“A graphical symbol. Text, or a graphical
`depiction of a media element, are not an
`‘icon.’”
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1033
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-00670-HSG Document 85-1 Filed 08/24/18 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`3:65-4:2
`‘672 Patent Claims 4, 5, 10, 14
`‘814 Patent Claims 4, 5, 10, 14
`‘575 Patent Claim 11
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`
`McGraw-Hill Electronics Dictionary, Sixth
`Edition p.219 (1997) – definition of “icon”
`Proposed Construction
`
` a
`
` showing of scenes from the first video
`media element
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`
`Webster’s New World College Dictionary,
`Third Edition p.1068 (1997) – definition of
`“preview”
`Proposed Construction
`
`Indefinite.
`
`Alternatively: “each of the first plurality of
`video media elements and the second plurality
`of video media elements are stored on the
`same server as the Web site.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`
`(‘830 Claim 1, 12, 15, 24)
`(‘173 Claim 1, 15, 24)
`(‘672 Claim 14)
`(‘814 Claim 14)
`(‘575 Claim 11)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`
`Fig. 4
`3:57-4:17
`
`“preview of a first video media
`element”
`
`(‘173 Claim 1)
`
`
`Proposed Construction
`Plain meaning
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Fig. 4
`4:18-55; 6:4-31
`
`“each of the first plurality of video
`media video elements and the
`second plurality of vide media
`elements are associated with the
`Web site”
`
`(’324 Claim 2)
`
`
`Proposed Construction
`Plain meaning
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Fig. 4
`4:18-55; 5:15-23; 6:4-31
`
`
`
`3
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1033
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-00670-HSG Document 85-1 Filed 08/24/18 Page 4 of 4
`
`“the plurality of media elements”
`
`(‘144 Claim 47)
`
`
`Proposed Construction
`“the plurality of found and second media
`elements.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`’144 Patent, claim 44
`
`Abstract, Fig. 1, 2:45-61, 3:36-54, 4:16-34,
`6:61-65, 9:31-52
`Proposed Construction
`Indefinite
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`None
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1033
`Page 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket