`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 84
`Entered: March 5, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING INC,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SLEEP NUMBER CORPORATION
`f/k/a SELECT COMFORT CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00500 (Patent 9,737,154 B2)
`IPR2019-00514 (Patent 5,904,172)
`____________
`
`
`Before SCOTT A. DANIELS, FRANCES L. IPPOLITO, and
`ALYSSA A. FINAMORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`DANIELS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00500 (Patent 9,737,154 B2)
`IPR2019-00514 (Patent 5,904,172)
`
`
`NEW DUE DATES 4–8
`
`Because related case IPR2019-00497 has been accorded a revised
`
`schedule in light of Patent Owner filing a revised motion to amend in that
`
`proceeding, we provide this combined Revised Scheduling Order for
`
`IPR2019-00500 and IPR2019-00514 corresponding to the same revised
`
`schedule as for DUE DATES 4–8 in IPR2019-00497.
`
`Further to our initial Scheduling Orders in IPR2019-00500 (Paper 12)
`
`and IPR2019-00514 (Paper 11), entered July 24, 2019 and August 5, 2019
`
`respectively, this Order changes DUE DATES 4–8 as set forth below. This
`
`Revised Scheduling Order modifies and supersedes DUE DATE 4 and
`
`subsequent due dates as presented in our original Scheduling Orders. To the
`
`extent that our original Scheduling Orders provide instructions that are not
`
`addressed in this Revised Scheduling Order, the original instructions remain
`
`in effect.
`
`No other changes to the Scheduling Orders have been made. This
`
`Order also does not affect any previously filed joint stipulations to modify
`
`the schedule. See, e.g., IPR2019-00514, Papers 36, 60.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00385
`Patent 6,218,930
`
`
`REVISED DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`NEW DUE DATE 4 ........................................................... April 8, 2020
`
`Request for oral argument (may not be extended by stipulation)
`
`NEW DUE DATE 5 ........................................................... April 29, 2020
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`NEW DUE DATE 6 ........................................................... May 6, 2020
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`Request for prehearing conference
`
`NEW DUE DATE 7 ........................................................... May 13, 2020
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`NEW DUE DATE 8 ........................................................... May 20, 2020
`
`Oral Argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00385
`Patent 6,218,930
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Kyle L. Elliott
`Kevin S. Tuttle
`Jaspal S. Hare
`Brian T. Bear
`SPENCER FANE LLP
`kelliott@spencerfane.com
`ktuttle@spencerfane.com
`jhare@spencerfane.com
`bbear@spencerfane.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Steven A. Moore
`Kecia J. Reynolds
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`steve.moore@pillsburylaw.com
`kecia.reynolds@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Luke Toft
`Andrew Hansen
`Archana Nath
`Elizabeth A. Patton
`FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
`ltoft@foxrothschild.com
`ahansen@foxrothschild.com
`anath@foxrothschild.com
`epatton@foxrothschild.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
