throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`NALOX-1 PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`ADAPT PHARMA OPERATIONS LIMITED, AND
`OPIANT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
`Patent Owners.
`_____________________
`
`CASE IPR2019-00688
`U.S. Patent No. 9,468,747
`_____________________
`
`PETITIONER NALOX-1 PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC’s
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00688 – U.S. Patent No. 9,468,747
` Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Scheduling Order entered on
`
`
`
`September 9, 2019, and the Conduct of Proceedings Order entered on November
`
`25, 2019, Petitioner Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Petitioner”) respectfully
`
`requests oral argument on May 19, 2020. Petitioner proposes (and Patent Owners
`
`agree) that the Board conduct a consolidated proceeding in Inter Partes Review
`
`Nos. IPR2019-00685, -00688, and -00694, as well as any matters joined therewith,
`
`as these cases all are scheduled for hearing on the same date, relate to related
`
`patents, and the challenge is on identical art.
`
`For these proceedings, the parties have agreed that Petitioner will have a
`
`total of forty-five (45) minutes to present its arguments, including time to be
`
`reserved for rebuttal, and that Patent Owners will have a total of forty-five (45)
`
`minutes to present its responsive arguments, subject to approval by the Board.
`
`The parties will exchange demonstrative exhibits seven (7) business days in
`
`advance of the oral hearing in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b). The parties
`
`have agreed that any demonstratives will address the issues for all three of
`
`IPR2019-00685, -00688, and -00694 per side, and that any references to exhibits
`
`and papers will be made to the exhibits and papers filed in IPR2019-00688 for
`
`issues common across all IPRs, except that references to other proceedings’
`
`pleadings and exhibits may be made only when necessary to address issues specific
`
`to those proceedings.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00688 – U.S. Patent No. 9,468,747
` Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Without waiving any issue not specifically listed below, Petitioner identifies
`
`the following issues to be argued at the May 19, 2020 hearing:
`
`1) Whether it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in
`
`the art (“POSA”) to use benzalkonium chloride (“BAC”) in an intranasal naloxone
`
`formulation;
`
`2) Whether the claimed dose of 4 mg of naloxone hydrochloride would
`
`have been obvious to a POSA;
`
`3) Whether any evidence of secondary considerations supports
`
`patentability, including the following:
`
`a. Unexpected results;
`
`b. Skepticism;
`
`c. Failure of others;
`
`d. Long-felt but unresolved need; and
`
`e. Commercial success.
`
`4)
`
`Arguments and evidence presented in any motions to exclude
`
`evidence or response thereto.
`
`5)
`
`Any other issues that the Board deems necessary to issue a final
`
`written decision.
`
`Petitioner
`
`requests
`
`the use of audio/visual equipment
`
`to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a document camera or “Elmo,” and a
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00688 – U.S. Patent No. 9,468,747
` Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`computer/projector/screen system. In accordance with Trial Practice Guide, 77
`
`Fed. Reg. at 48768, Petitioner will work with the Board Trial Division regarding
`
`this request.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Date: April 6, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00688 – U.S. Patent No. 9,468,747
` Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Yelee Y. Kim
`Yelee Y. Kim, Reg. No. 60,088
`ARENT FOX LLP
`1717 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`202.857.6000
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00688 – U.S. Patent No. 9,468,747
` Certificate of Service
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e), 42.105(a))
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above-captioned “Petitioner Nalox-
`
`1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC’s Request for Oral Argument,” was served in its entirety
`
`on April 6, 2020, upon the following parties via e-mail:
`
`Jessamyn S. Berniker (jberniker@wc.com)
`Ana C. Reyes (areyes@wc.com)
`David M. Krinsky (dkrinsky@wc.com)
`Anthony H. Sheh (asheh@wc.com)
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 434-5000
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Adapt Pharma Operations Limited
`
`Jessica Tyrus Mackay (jmackay@greengriffith.com)
`Ann K. Kotze (akotze@greengriffith.com)
`GREEN, GRIFFITH & BORG-BREEN, LLP
`676 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 3900
`Chicago, IL 60611
`(313) 883-8000
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Yelee Y. Kim
`Yelee Y. Kim, Reg. No. 60,088
`ARENT FOX LLP
`1717 K Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`(202) 857-6000
`yelee.kim@arentfox.com
`
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket