`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 25
`Entered: November 21, 2019
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NALOX-1 PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ADAPT PHARMA OPERATIONS LIMITED, and
`OPIANT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2019-00685, Patent 9,211,253 B2
`IPR2019-00688, Patent 9,468,747 B2
`IPR2019-00694, Patent 9,629,965 B2
`
`____________
`
`Before: ERICA A. FRANKLIN, ZHENYU YANG, and MICHAEL A.
`VALEK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Patent Owner Adapt Pharma Operations Limited’s
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Ana C. Reyes
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00685, Patent 9,211,253 B2
`IPR2019-00688, Patent 9,468,747 B2
`IPR2019-00694, Patent 9,629,965 B2
`
`
`On November 19, 2019, in each of the three above-captioned
`
`proceedings, Patent Owner filed an Amended Mandatory Notice, adding
`
`Adapt Pharma Operations Limited (“Adapt”) as Patent Owner. Paper 19.
`
`Adapt also filed a Power of Attorney, appointing Jessamyn S. Berniker
`
`(Reg. No. 72,328) as the lead counsel. Paper 20. Adapt further filed a
`
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Ana C. Reyes (Paper 21), supported
`
`by the Declaration of Ms. Reyes (Ex. 2038). Adapt represents that Petitioner
`
`does not oppose this Motion. Paper 21, 7.
`
`Upon review, we determine that Adapt’s Motion satisfies the
`
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), and there is good cause to admit
`
`Ms. Reyes pro hac vice in these proceedings.
`
`
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that Adapt’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Ana
`
`C. Reyes is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Reyes is authorized to represent
`
`Adapt only as back-up counsel in the above-referenced proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Adapt is to continue to have a registered
`
`practitioner represent it as lead counsel in the above-referenced proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Reyes shall comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, as updated by the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide August 2018 Update, 83 Fed. Reg. 39,989 (Aug. 13, 2018) and the
`
`July 2019 Update (84 Fed. Reg. 33,925 (July 16, 2019)), and the Board’s
`
`Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R; and
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00685, Patent 9,211,253 B2
`IPR2019-00688, Patent 9,468,747 B2
`IPR2019-00694, Patent 9,629,965 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Reyes shall be subject to the Office’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the Office’s Rules
`
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Yelee Kim
`Janine Carlan
`Richard Berman
`Bradford Frese
`Christopher Yaen
`yelee.kim@arentfox.com
`janine.carlan@arentfox.com
`richard.berman@arentfox.com
`bradford.frese@arentfox.com
`christopher.yaen@arentfox.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER OPIANT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.:
`
`Robert F. Green
`Jessica Tyrus Mackay
`rgreen@greengriffith.com
`jmackay@greengriffith.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
