throbber
446
`
`and hypoechogenic pancreas. Endoscopy revealed superficial
`gastric and duodenal erosions.
`Drug-induced pancreatitis was suspected and mesalazine was
`stopped and parenteral nutrition started. The abdominal pain
`disappeared and amylase activity fell to normal. 48 h later, with the
`patient’s consent, the drug was reintroduced, and within 12 h the
`pain recurred and amylase activity rose. The drug was stopped and
`after a few days of parenteral nutrition the patient was discharged
`free of symptoms.
`The positive rechallenge confirms our suspicion of 5-ASA
`pancreatic toxicity. The mechanism is unknown. Pancreatitis
`should be suspected if a patient with Crohn’s disease presents with
`new abdominal complaints while on treatment not only with
`azathioprine, corticosteroids, or sulphasalazine but also with
`5-ASA.
`
`trial" of naloxone is required, it is our experience that for adults a
`smaller initial dose (0-4-0-8 mg; 5-10 µg/kg) will usually result in
`the desired clinical effect with minimum signs of withdrawal. Only a
`few narcotic overdoses or types of opioids require larger initial doses
`of naloxone to reverse the effects and in these cases it can be given
`in incremental amounts. In cases where the confirmation of narcotic
`use is not urgent-ie, the patient is haemodynamically stable
`without respiratory depression-we suggest that the use of
`naloxone be deferred until more important diagnostic procedures
`have been done.
`
`Department of Laboratory Medicine,
`Johns Hopkins Hospital,
`Baltimore, MD 21205, USA, and
`Division of Emergency Medicine,
`Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
`
`CAROLINE POPPER
`GABOR D. KELEN
`GAIL CUNNINGHAM
`
`Department of Medicine,
`Division of Gastroenterology,
`Cllniques Universitaires Saint-Luc,
`Catholic University of Louvain,
`B1200 Brussels, Belgium
`
`P. DEPREZ
`CH. DESCAMPS
`R. FIASSE
`
`1. Goldfrank LR, ed. Toxicologic emergencies: a comprehensive handbook in problem
`solving. New York- Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1982: 3-18: 126-27.
`2. Rumack BH, ed. The treatment of poisoning: a systemic approach. Denver: Rocky
`Mountain Poison Center, 1978: 326-58.
`
`1. Altman HS, Phillips G, Bank S, Klotz H. Pancreatitis associated with duodenal
`Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1983; 78: 174-77.
`2. Mallory A, Kem F. Drug-induced pancreatitis: a critical review. Gastroenterology
`1980; 78: 813-20.
`3. Block MB, Genant HK, Kirsner JB. Pancreatitis as an adverse reaction to
`salicylazosulfapyridine. N Engl J Med 1970; 282: 380-82.
`4. Faintuch J, Mott CB, Machado MC. Pancreatitis and pancreatic necrosis during
`sulfasalazine therapy. Int Surg 1988; 70: 271-72.
`5. Suryapranata H, De Vries H. Pancreatitis associated with sulphasalazine. Br Med J
`1986; 292: 732.
`6. Poldermans D, van Blankenstein M. Pancreatitis induced by disodium azodisalicylate.
`Am J Gastroenterol 1988; 83: 578-80.
`7. Grimaud JC, Maillot A, Bremondy A, Thervet L, Salducci J. Faut-il toujours accuser
`la sulfapyridine? A propos d’un cas de pancréatite aigue induite par la mésalazine.
`Gastroenterol Clin Bwl 1989; 13: 432.
`8- Sachedina B, Saibil F, Cohen LB, Whittey J. Acute pancreatitis due to 5-
`ammosalicylate. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110: 490-92.
`
`NALOXONE HAZARD IN DRUG ABUSER
`
`SIR,-Naloxone is widely believed to be innocuous. We disagree
`with this view and share Dr Gibbs and colleagues’ (July 15, p 159)
`opinion, that "naloxone should be used cautiously in opioid-
`dependent patients". We report a case of extreme agitation
`following the administration of naloxone to an adult opiate abuser
`who was a victim of a motor vehicle accident.
`A 35-year-old woman was the belted driver in a head-on collision
`(35-40 mph). She was immobilised on a back-board in the
`ambulance and was in a somewhat confused lethargic state on
`arrival at hospital. She had a forehead laceration, but it was unclear
`whether she had transiently lost consciousness. Blood pressure was
`150/80 mm Hg, pulse 110/min, and respiratory rate 12/min. She
`was uncooperative. Needle track marks were noted in both
`antecubital fossae, and 2 mg naloxone was given intravenously.
`Within 3 min the patient became very agitated and combative,
`requiring physical restraint. It was difficult to maintain venous
`access and radiography was impossible. A total of 4 mg morphine
`sulphate and 25 mg droperidol was given intravenously without
`subsequent change in her agitation. A further 5 mg of droperidol
`also failed to have an effect. After 47 min the patient’s state
`continued to hinder diagnostic evaluation and it was felt that her
`agitation could aggravate injuries she may have sustained. She was
`therefore intubated and ventilated following the administration of
`pancuronium (20 mg) We could then examine the head, cervical
`spine, and abdomen by computed tomography (CT). CT scans,
`radiographs, arterial blood gases, haematocrit, serum electrolytes,
`and urinalysis were normal. Toxicological analysis revealed the
`presence of large quantities of opiates and cocaine. Her family later
`confirmed that she had used large amounts of heroin shortly before
`the accident. It is likely that the administration of naloxone either
`precipitated acute opiate withdrawal or allowed the effects of
`another drug to predominate.
`This case illustrates the management dilemma and the possible
`iatrogenic complications that can arise following the routine
`administration of opiate antagonists in this setting. If a "diagnostic
`
`SEX RATIO OF INFANTS FOLLOWING ASSISTED
`REPRODUCTION
`
`SIR,-Dr Thatcher and colleagues (May 6, p 1025) reported a
`significantly high sex ratio in favour of male infants following
`in-vitro fertilisation, and Mr Al-Shawaf and Professor Craft (July 1,
`p 53) reported that 13 babies born after gamete intrafallopian
`transfer (GIFT) were boys.
`I have found much evidence that the sex of human zygotes is
`affected by parental hormones-high levels of oestrogen favouring
`male infants.1,2 Thatcher et al say their regimen may result in high
`oestradiol levels. To control ovarian stimulation, Al-Shawaf and
`Craft used goserelin acetate, a gonadotropin releasing hormone
`(GnRH) analogue: and 209 women treated with another GnRH
`analogue, leuprolide acetate (also for the control of ovarian
`stimulation) were reported to have higher peripheral serum
`osetradiol2 levels than did 202 controls.3 Many data from other IVF
`centres suggest that in general IVF births show no disturbance of
`the sex ratio. I suggest that the high male sex ratios in the two
`examples cited above result from the high maternal oestrogen levels
`induced in these fertility centres rather than from the use of either
`technique.
`
`MRC Mammalian Development Unit,
`University College London,
`London NW1 2HE
`
`WILLIAM H. JAMES
`
`1. James WH. The human sex ratio, part 1: a review of the literature. Hum Biol 1987; 59:
`721-52.
`2. James WH. The human sex ratio, part 2: a hypothesis and a program of research. Hum
`Bwl 1987; 59: 873-900.
`3. Stone BA, Serafini PC, Quinn K, Quinn P, Kerin JF, Marrs RP. Gonadotropin and
`estradiol levels during ovarian stimulation in women treated with leuprolide
`acetate. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 990.
`
`BRAIN DAMAGE BY NEONATAL HYPOGLYCAEMIA
`
`SIR,-Your April 22 editorial draws attention to two 1988
`papers1,2 and suggests that plasma glucose levels below 2-6 mmoljl
`in the neonatal period may be dangerous, even in symptom-free
`babies. If this is so there are important implications for clinical
`practice.
`Koh et all examined evoked potentials in 17 children and
`recorded changes at different levels of blood glucose. Only 5
`patients were newborn. Weights and gestations are not given. All
`had brainstem auditory responses (ABR) measured. Normal
`patterns were seen at blood glucose levels between 19 and 4.2
`mmol/1. Blood glucose values before the first abnormal finding were
`0-7,1 -4,1 -4,1 ’9, and 2-5 mmol/l-ie, below 2 mmol/1 in four babies.
`The baby with an abnormal ABR at 25 mmol/1 was being fasted
`and was described as drowsy. This baby was 1 of 2 in whom the
`ABR remained abnormal despite raising the blood glucose: the
`
`Adapt & Opiant Exhibit 2019
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Adapt Pharma Limited et al.
`IPR2019-00693
`Page 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket