throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 13
`Entered: October 31, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., INSTAGRAM, LLC,
`and WHATSAPP INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2019-00516
`Case IPR2019-00528
`Case IPR2019-00899
`Patent 8,279,173 B2
`
`Case IPR2019-00706
`Patent 9,349,120 B21
`
`Before MICHAEL R. ZECHER, MIRIAM L. QUINN, ROBERT L.
`KINDER, JACQUELINE T. HARLOW, and AARON W. MOORE,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`1 In IPR2019-00937, Snap Inc. filed a petition and a motion for joinder to
`IPR2019-00899, both of which have been granted. Therefore, Snap Inc. has
`been joined as a petitioner in IPR2019-00899. This Order addresses an issue
`common to the identified proceedings. We exercise our discretion to issue
`one Order. The parties are not authorized to use this style heading.
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00516 (Patent 8,279,173 B2)
`IPR2019-00528 (Patent 8,279,173 B2)
`IPR2019-00706 (Patent 9,349,120 B2)
`IPR2019-00899 (Patent 8,301,713 B2)
`
`
`
`ORDER2
`Granting Petitioner’s Unopposed Motions
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mark R. Weinstein
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`On October 16, 2019, Petitioner filed motions requesting pro hac vice
`
`admission of Mark R. Weinstein. Paper 18 (“Motions”).3 Petitioner
`
`submitted declarations from Mr. Weinstein in support of the Motions.
`
`Ex. 1029 (“Declarations”). Patent Owner has not opposed the Motions.
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In
`
`authorizing a motion for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires the
`
`moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause for
`
`the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice and an affidavit or declaration
`
`of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See Unified Patents,
`
`Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013).
`
`Based on the facts set forth in the Motions and the accompanying
`
`Declarations, we conclude that Mr. Weinstein has sufficient legal and
`
`technical qualifications to represent Petitioner in the above-identified
`
`
`2 This is not a decision by an expanded panel of the Board. Judges Moore
`and Quinn are paneled in IPR2019-00706, IPR2019-00899, IPR2019-00516,
`and IPR2019-00528. Judge Harlow is paneled in IPR2019-00516 and
`IPR2019-00528. Judge Zecher is paneled in IPR2019-00706. Judge Kinder
`is paneled in IPR2019-00899.
`
`3 We cite to documents filed in IPR2019-00899. Similar documents were
`filed in IPR2019-00516, IPR2019-00528, and IPR2019-00706.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00516 (Patent 8,279,173 B2)
`IPR2019-00528 (Patent 8,279,173 B2)
`IPR2019-00706 (Patent 9,349,120 B2)
`IPR2019-00899 (Patent 8,301,713 B2)
`
`
`proceedings, that Mr. Weinstein has demonstrated sufficient familiarity with
`
`the subject matter, and that Petitioner’s desire to include counsel from the
`
`corresponding district court proceedings is reasonable. Accordingly, we
`
`conclude that Petitioner has established good cause for pro hac vice
`
`admission of Mr. Weinstein.
`
`
`
`
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission of
`
`Mark R. Weinstein are granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner continue to have a registered
`
`practitioner represent it as lead counsel in the above-identified proceedings,
`
`and that Mr. Weinstein is authorized to act only as back-up counsel;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Weinstein comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, including the August 2018 Update (83 Fed. Reg.
`
`39,989 (Aug. 13, 2018)) and the July 2019 Update (84 Fed. Reg. 33,925
`
`(July 16, 2019)), and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in
`
`Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Weinstein is subject to the Office’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00516 (Patent 8,279,173 B2)
`IPR2019-00528 (Patent 8,279,173 B2)
`IPR2019-00706 (Patent 9,349,120 B2)
`IPR2019-00899 (Patent 8,301,713 B2)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Heidi Keefe
`hkeefe@cooley.com
`
`Andrew Mace
`amace@cooley.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`James Glass
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Richard Lowry
`richardlowry@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Ognjen Zivojnovic
`ogizivojnovic@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Sam Stake
`samstake@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Alex Wolinksky
`alexwolinsky@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Michael T. Hawkins
`hawkins@fr.com
`
`Thao Thai
`tahothai@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Nien-Ping Wang
`ianwang@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00516 (Patent 8,279,173 B2)
`IPR2019-00528 (Patent 8,279,173 B2)
`IPR2019-00706 (Patent 9,349,120 B2)
`IPR2019-00899 (Patent 8,301,713 B2)
`
`
`Nicholas Stephens
`nstephens@fr.com
`
`Craig A. Deutsch
`deutsch@fr.com
`
`Kim Leung
`leung@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket