throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 37
`Entered: July 15, 2020
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`IPA TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811,
`IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813, IPR2019-00814
`(Patent 6,851,115 B1)
`and
`Cases IPR2019-00835, IPR2019-00836,
`IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`_____________
`
`
`
`Before LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, MINN CHUNG, and KEVIN C. TROCK,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`ORDER1
`Granting Requests for Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 We issue one Order to be filed in each case. The parties are not authorized
`to use a multi-case caption.
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811, IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813,
`IPR2019-00814 (Patent 6,851,115 B1) and Cases IPR2019-00835, IPR2019-
`00836, IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`
`
`
`On June 10, 2020, Petitioner and Patent Owner filed requests for oral
`argument in these proceedings. See Papers 32, 33.2 The parties request that
`oral argument in cases IPR2019-00810, -811, -812, -813, and -814, currently
`scheduled for July 27, 2020, be consolidated with the oral argument for
`cases IPR2019-00835, -836, and -837, currently scheduled for July 28, 2020,
`given the substantial similarity in the issues between the proceedings. Paper
`32, 1; Paper 33, 1. The parties request two hours (120 minutes) of argument
`per side for the consolidated hearing. Id. A conference call was held with
`counsel for the parties on July 14, 2020, to discuss the parties’ hearing
`requests and other matters. During the conference call, the parties agreed to
`a consolidated hearing for all eight cases to be held on two consecutive days,
`July 27 and 28, 2020, limited to two hours of hearing each day. The parties
`agreed to confer and make a recommendation about how the allotted time
`might best be utilized by the parties each day.
`The parties’ requests for oral argument are granted to the extent we
`describe herein, and a consolidated oral argument for all eight cases will be
`held by video conference on July 27 and 28, 2020, commencing at 1:00 p.m.
`Eastern Time for two (2) hours each day. The Board expects lead counsel
`for each party to be present. However, lead or backup counsel may put
`forward a party’s arguments. If either party anticipates that its lead counsel
`will not be present, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference
`
`
`2 Citations are to IPR2019-00810 unless otherwise noted.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811, IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813,
`IPR2019-00814 (Patent 6,851,115 B1) and Cases IPR2019-00835, IPR2019-
`00836, IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`
`
`with the Board no later than two (2) business days prior to the oral hearing to
`discuss the matter.
`The parties are directed to contact the Board at least five (5) business
`days in advance of the hearing if there are any concerns about disclosing
`confidential information. The Board will provide a court reporter for the
`hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the
`hearing.
`To facilitate planning, each party must contact PTAB Hearings at
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov five (5) business days prior to the oral hearing
`date to receive video set-up information. As a reminder, all arrangements
`and the expenses involved with appearing by video, such as the selection of
`the facility from which a party will attend by video, must be borne by that
`party. If a video connection cannot be established, the parties will be
`provided with dial-in connection information, and the oral hearing will be
`conducted telephonically. No party may attend the hearing at any USPTO
`location.
`If one or both parties would prefer to participate in the oral hearing
`telephonically, they should notify PTAB Hearings at the above email
`address five (5) business days prior to the hearing to receive dial-in
`connection information.
`Each party will have one hundred twenty (120) minutes of total
`argument time for the consolidated hearing. Petitioner bears the ultimate
`burden of proof that the challenged claims are unpatentable. Therefore,
`subject to the parties’ recommendation, Petitioner will proceed first, and will
`3
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811, IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813,
`IPR2019-00814 (Patent 6,851,115 B1) and Cases IPR2019-00835, IPR2019-
`00836, IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`
`
`present its arguments with regard to the challenged claims and grounds on
`which we instituted trial. Petitioner may reserve some of its time for
`rebuttal. Patent Owner may respond to Petitioner’s arguments and present
`arguments with regard to Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude, and may also
`reserve some of its time for rebuttal. Petitioner may then use its rebuttal
`time to respond to Patent Owner’s arguments, and Patent Owner may use its
`rebuttal time to respond to Petitioner’s arguments. As noted above, because
`this is a consolidated hearing being held over two consecutive days, the
`parties may recommend an agreed procedure for utilizing the allotted time
`for each day.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), any demonstrative exhibits to be
`presented at the hearing should be served seven (7) business days before the
`hearing. The parties, however, have requested permission to stipulate to a
`shorter period of time in these cases, which we grant. Any demonstratives,
`however, shall be filed with the Board no later than three (3) business days
`before the hearing. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits should be
`resolved at least two (2) business days prior to the hearing by way of a joint
`telephone conference call to the Board. Any objection to demonstrative
`exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered waived. For
`guidance on appropriate content in demonstrative exhibits, the parties are
`directed to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC,
`IPR2013-00033, Paper 118 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013).
`The panel will have access to all papers filed with the Board,
`including demonstratives. The parties are reminded that demonstratives are
`4
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811, IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813,
`IPR2019-00814 (Patent 6,851,115 B1) and Cases IPR2019-00835, IPR2019-
`00836, IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`
`
`for illustrative or explanatory purposes only and are not evidence
`themselves. During the oral hearing, the parties are advised to identify
`clearly and specifically each demonstrative referenced (e.g., by slide or
`screen number) to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the court reporter’s
`transcript. In addition, the parties are advised to identify themselves each
`time they speak. Furthermore, the remote nature of the oral hearing may
`result in an audio lag, and the parties are advised to observe a pause prior to
`speaking to avoid speaking over others.
`If the parties have any questions not specifically addressed above,
`they may contact the Board at PTABHearings@uspto.gov.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811, IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813,
`IPR2019-00814 (Patent 6,851,115 B1) and Cases IPR2019-00835, IPR2019-
`00836, IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Joseph Micallef
`Scott Border
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Steven Hartsell
`Alexander Gasser
`Sarah Spires
`SKIERMONT DERBY LLP
`shartsell@skiermontderby.com
`agasser@skiermontderby.com
`sspires@skiermontderby.com
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket