`(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
` Shelton, IV et al. (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 10, 2006
`
`US 20060175375Al
`
`(54) SURGICAL STAPLING INSTRUMENT
`INCORPORATING A MULTI-STROKE
`
`Publication Classification
`
`FIRING MECHANISM WITH RETURN
`SPRING ROTARY MANUAL RETRACTION
`SYSTEM
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`A613 17/10
`(52) US. Cl.
`........................................... 227/176.1; 227/19
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Frederick E. Shelton IV, Hillsboro,
`OH (US); Kevin Ross Doll, Mason, OH
`(US); Douglas B. Hoflman, Harrison,
`OH (US); Michael Earl Setser,
`Burlington, KY (US); Jeffrey S.
`Swayze, Hamilton, OH (US)
`
`Correspondence Address:
`FROST BROWN TODD, LLC
`2200 PNC CENTER
`201 E. FIFTH STREET
`CINCINNATI, OH 45202 (US)
`
`(73) Assignee: Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`
`11/052,337
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Feb. 7, 2005
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A surgical stapling and severing instrument particularly
`suited to endoscopic procedures incorporates a handle that
`produces separate closing and firing motions to actuate an
`end effector. In particular,
`the handle produces multiple
`firing strokes 1n order to reduce the requlred amount of force
`required to fire (i.e., staple and sever) the end effector. A
`linked transmission reduces the required handle longitudinal
`length, yet achieves a rigid, strong configuration when
`straightened for firing. A traction biased firing mechanism
`avoids binding in driving this straightened linked rack in
`cooperation with an anti-backup mechanism, with a lockout
`.
`.
`.
`.
`mecham sm that prevents releasmg the closure trigger during
`firing. Furthermore, an external indicator gives feedback to
`the surgeon as to how far firing has progressed, as well as
`providing a manual retraction capability.
`
`30
`
`250
`
`15‘240
`210
`196a
`
`242
`
`230
`
`10
`
`
`
`15
`
`194 165 168
`164
`'
`204 ’
`202
`
`34
`
`26
`
`1
`
`IS 1004
`
`25254 220 222
`252
`195
`256 /';
`266
`264 // "
`
`22
`
`/g;i ’45”,
`[18 24 28 32
`“—__../,./%';§.TiF—"’
`fiatgjfiflfl_'a‘
`
`== Trig—”P
`
`
`" I
`_—-:—;—__—-#=_i§r
`\
`«iq3‘1“»
`\§==A—_
`260
`
`253
`
`IS 1004
`
`1
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 1 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`a/
`upan
`
`
`
`Ill‘i‘I.3.‘~.‘u_-“Ii‘-‘~
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 2 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 3 of 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 4 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 Al
`
`‘O
`N
`
`‘g
`
`QOF
`
`
`
`IIIIII‘IVII.1IiII
`
`
`
`
`
`\L‘h“--‘-~‘\“§‘\“h‘“‘\au‘“~\\-~kV‘N“‘-‘\‘~‘§S“\L‘N‘:‘\‘~\‘\-\\\‘~\“‘\‘~‘bw‘WK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`we..
`
`we
`
`
`
`we
`
`an
`
`
`
`AIn...I.|_Ihli_ili.ll§_lli_';li_lliulli_lli_lli_lll
`
`
`
`a1‘FLn?W1..I.i|l
`
`AIl‘_!@—E§E§_§_§a....._=1](I;J1.l..iilsiiiiii:
`fi‘fil.Iiii
`
`
`N:a:
`
`
`
`on.n.usnunsn-uunuuuu-u-auusnug-usumn-u-n-n-u-n-n-u
`yrsnug-u-u-u-uunuun-u-uzn
`m-------u-=-‘
`
`
`AIfi‘ll‘lflfl"“““““"|“"'Na
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 5 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`E
`
`U
`
`“EV 6’
`
`5/5
`
`= /= v» _/
`
`150
`
`0
`
`F
`
` 240242230
`
`54"? q:
`
`‘
`
`I.‘
`
`25822022221
`
`195 52/ ‘
`
`254
`
`26
`
`
`
`E:
`
`FIG7
`
`6
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 6 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`VN
`
`7
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 7 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 8 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`60....
`
`NF...
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006
`
`Sheet 9 of 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`10
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 11 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`12
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 13 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`14
`
`14
`
`
`
`Patent Application
`
`Publication
`
`Aug. 10, 2006
`
`Sheet 14 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 15 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`FIG. 22
`
`FIG- 23
`
`
`
`16
`
`16
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 16 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`17
`
`17
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006
`
`Sheet 17 of 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`18
`
`18
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 18 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`19
`
`19
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 19 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 20 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`21
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 21 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`FIG.
`
`31
`
`22
`
`22
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 22 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`23
`
`23
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 23 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`24
`
`24
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 24 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`25
`
`25
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 25 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`I
`
`13
`0
`.-
`Lg, ,
`'-
`55:—
`
`¢
`8
`
`" 2
`
`6
`
`26
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 26 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`to
`
`m 9 I
`
`%1032
`
`1264
`
`...
`
`27
`
`27
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 27 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`: “Erik
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`28
`
`28
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006
`
`Sheet 28 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`mm.o_.._
`
`29
`
`29
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 29 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`30
`
`30
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 30 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`HQ.40
`
`31
`
`31
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006
`
`Sheet 31 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`3.0;
`
`32
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006
`
`Sheet 32 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`33
`
`33
`
`
`
`
`
`34
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 34 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`35
`
`35
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 35 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`1230
`
`[/1010
`
`
`will!”
`
`
`FIG.45
`
`36
`
`36
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 36 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`HQ.46
`
`37
`
`37
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 37 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`Du.o_.._
`
`38
`
`38
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 38 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`uommme
`
`min.o_.._
`
`39
`
`39
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 39 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 Al
`
`NI
`
`")
`N
`
`F|G.49
`
`40
`
`40
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 40 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`FIG.
`
`50A
`
`FIG.
`
`41
`
`41
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 41 of 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`<3.o_.._
`
`42
`
`42
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 42 of 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`
`
`43
`
`43
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 43 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`A c-II
`
` HII
`
`___'J
`
`HE!
` LEA:J
`
`ill
`
`
`
`‘39
`
`
`
`k1402
`
`N)
`L0
`
`0'
`C
`
`44
`
`53A’
`
`9'
`L1.
`
`44
`
`
`
`Patent Application Publication Aug. 10, 2006 Sheet 44 0f 44
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
` FIG.54
`
`45
`
`45
`
`
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`Aug. 10, 2006
`
`SURGICAL STAPLING INSTRUMENT
`INCORPORATING A MULTI-STROKE FIRING
`MECHANISM WITH RETURN SPRING ROTARY
`MANUAL RETRACTION SYSTEM
`
`CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`[0001] The present application is related to commonly-
`owned US. patent application Ser. No.
`filed on even
`date herewith, entitled “SURGICAL STAPLING INSTRU-
`MENT INCORPORATING A MULTI-STROKE FIRING
`MECHANISM WITH AUTOMATIC END OF FIRING
`
`TRAVEL RETRACTION”, to Kevin Ross Doll, Jeffrey S.
`Swayze, Frederick E. Shelton IV, Douglas B. Hoffman, and
`Michael Earl Setser,
`the disclosure of which is hereby
`incorporated by reference in its entirety.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0002] The present invention relates in general to surgical
`stapler instruments that are capable of applying lines of
`staples to tissue while cutting the tissue between those staple
`lines and, more particularly,
`to improvements relating to
`stapler instruments and improvements in processes for form-
`ing various components of such stapler instruments that
`accomplish firing with multiple strokes of a trigger.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`instruments are often pre-
`[0003] Endoscopic surgical
`ferred over traditional open surgical devices since a smaller
`incision tends to reduce the post-operative recovery time and
`complications. Consequently, significant development has
`gone into a range of endoscopic surgical instruments that are
`suitable for precise placement of a distal end effector at a
`desired surgical site through a cannula of a trocar. These
`distal end effectors engage the tissue in a number of ways to
`achieve a diagnostic or therapeutic effect (e.g., endocutter,
`grasper, cutter, staplers, clip applier, access device, drug/
`gene therapy delivery device, and energy device using
`ultrasound, RF, laser, etc.).
`
`[0004] Known surgical staplers include an end effector
`that simultaneously makes a longitudinal incision in tissue
`and applies lines of staples on opposing sides of the incision.
`The end effector includes a pair of cooperating jaw members
`that, if the instrument is intended for endoscopic or laparo-
`scopic applications, are capable of passing through a can-
`nula passageway. One of the jaw members receives a staple
`cartridge having at least two laterally spaced rows of staples.
`The other jaw member defines an anvil having staple-
`forming pockets aligned with the rows of staples in the
`cartridge. The instrument includes a plurality of reciprocat-
`ing wedges which, when driven distally, pass through open-
`ings in the staple cartridge and engage drivers supporting the
`staples to effect the firing of the staples toward the anvil.
`
`[0005] An example of a surgical stapler suitable for endo-
`scopic applications is described in US. Pat. No. 5,465,895,
`which advantageously provides distinct closing and firing
`actions. Thereby, a clinician is able to close the jaw members
`upon tissue to position the tissue prior to firing. Once the
`clinician has determined that the jaw members are properly
`gripping tissue, the clinician can then fire the surgical stapler
`with a single firing stroke, thereby severing and stapling the
`tissue. The simultaneous severing and stapling avoids com-
`
`plications that may arise when performing such actions
`sequentially with different surgical tools that respectively
`only sever or staple.
`
`[0006] One specific advantage of being able to close upon
`tissue before firing is that the clinician is able to verify via
`an endoscope that a desired location for the cut has been
`achieved, including a sufficient amount of tissue has been
`captured between opposing jaws. Otherwise, opposing jaws
`may be drawn too close together, especially pinching at their
`distal ends, and thus not effectively forming closed staples
`in the severed tissue. At the other extreme, an excessive
`amount of clamped tissue may cause binding and an incom-
`plete firing.
`
`[0007] Generally, a single closing stroke followed by a
`single firing stroke is a convenient and efficient way to
`perform severing and stapling. However, in some instances,
`it would be desirable for multiple firing strokes to be
`required. For example, surgeons are able to select from a
`range of jaw sizes with a corresponding length of staple
`cartridge for the desired length of cut. Longer staple car-
`tridges require a longer firing stroke. Thus,
`to effect the
`firing, a hand-squeezed trigger is required to exert a larger
`force for these longer staple cartridges in order to sever more
`tissue and drive more staples as compared to a shorter staple
`cartridge. It would be desirable for the amount of force to be
`lower so as not
`to exceed the hand strength of some
`surgeons. In addition, some surgeons, not familiar with the
`larger staple cartridges, may become concerned that binding
`or other malfunction has occurred when an unexpectedly
`higher force is required.
`[0008] One approach for lowering the required force for a
`firing stroke is a ratcheting mechanism that allows a firing
`trigger to be stroked multiple times, as described in US. Pat.
`Nos. 5,762,256 and 6,330,965. These known surgical sta-
`pling instruments with multiple-stroke firing mechanisms do
`not have the advantages of a separate closure and firing
`action. Moreover, the ratcheting mechanism relies upon a
`toothed rack and driving pawl to achieve the ratcheting
`motion, with the length of a handle encompassing these
`components thus increased to accommodate the toothed
`rack. This increased length is inconvenient given the close
`confines and increasing amount of equipment associated
`with a surgical procedure.
`[0009] While these multiple firing stroke mechanisms
`would have advantages, some features of a single firing
`stroke mechanism have advantages as well. For instance, a
`single-stroke firing trigger may be directly coupled to the
`firing mechanism even during release of the firing trigger.
`Thus, any spring bias on the single-stroke firing trigger
`assists in retracting the knife from the end effector. If
`binding occurs,
`the surgeon may urge the firing trigger
`outward to effect retraction since the firing trigger is directly
`coupled to the firing mechanism.
`[0010] By contrast,
`the multiple-stroke firing trigger is
`uncoupled from the firing mechanism during return strokes.
`While a retraction bias force is advantageously incorporated
`to retract the knife from the staple applying assembly, this
`retraction force thus needs to be prevented from performing
`retraction of the knife before full firing travel is achieved.
`Thus, the retraction force is desirably moderated so as to not
`increase the manual
`loads felt at
`the firing trigger.
`In
`addition, the retraction force is moderated as well so as to
`not over power an anti-backup mechanism.
`
`46
`
`46
`
`
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`Aug. 10, 2006
`
`instances occur when assistance is
`[0011] However,
`required to retract the firing mechanism. Otherwise, it may
`be difficult to release the end effector from clamped tissue to
`complete the surgical procedure. For instance, tissue may
`cause binding in the instrument. As another example, a
`malfunction may occur that increases binding within the
`instrument or otherwise reduces the retraction force. With
`
`the multiple stroke firing trigger uncoupled during return
`strokes, another way to effect retraction of the firing mecha-
`nism is desirable. As another example, firing may have
`commenced partially, but the surgeon decides that firing
`must be stopped and the end effector opened. This may occur
`if an expended staple cartridge was in the end effector and
`partial firing occurred until the instrument locked out further
`firing.
`
`[0012] Consequently, a significant need exists for a sur-
`gical stapling instrument having a multiple stroke firing
`mechanism with automatically retraction after full firing
`travel.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0013] The invention overcomes the above-noted and
`other deficiencies of the prior art by providing a surgical
`stapling and severing instrument that includes an end effec-
`tor responsive to a longitudinal firing motion to perform a
`surgical operation. This end effector is positioned through a
`body opening (e.g., cannula of a trocar) by externally
`manipulating a handle that is attached to the end effector via
`a shaft. The handle produces a firing motion that is imparted
`by a firing mechanism through a rack to a firing member that
`is slidingly received in the shaft. A gear mechanism rotates
`with the rack to run a retraction member that is externally
`visible on the handle. Thereby, the user is able to manually
`assist in retracting the firing mechanism.
`
`In one aspect of the invention, a handle of the
`[0014]
`surgical instrument has a firing mechanism that is responsive
`to a plurality of firing strokes from a firing trigger causing
`the rack and thus the firing member to advance down the
`shaft. A retraction spring biases the firing member proxi-
`mally away from the shaft to assist in retraction. To prevent
`inadvertent retraction between firing strokes, an anti -backup
`mechanism binds the firing member in response to a proxi-
`mal movement thereof. After firing, an anti-backup release
`mechanism disengages the anti-backup mechanism for
`retraction. Advantageously, a manual retraction mechanism
`has a transmission gear coupled by a one-way clutch to an
`externally accessible actuator. Thus, assistance may be given
`when the automatic retraction is incapable of retraction. This
`avoids situations where the end effector may otherwise
`remain in a closed and clamped condition onto stapled and
`severed tissue.
`
`[0015] These and other objects and advantages of the
`present invention shall be made apparent from the accom-
`panying drawings and the description thereof.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
`
`[0016] The accompanying drawings, which are incorpo-
`rated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate
`embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general
`description of the invention given above, and the detailed
`description of the embodiments given below, serve to
`explain the principles of the present invention.
`
`[0017] FIG. 1 is a right side elevation view of a surgical
`stapling and severing instrument (traction biased pawl) in an
`open (start) condition, with a shaft partially cut away to
`expose a closure tube and firing rod.
`
`[0018] FIG. 2 is a left side elevation view taken along line
`2-2 in the longitudinal cross section of an end effector at a
`distal portion of the surgical stapling instrument of FIG. 1.
`
`[0019] FIG. 3 is a front perspective view of the end
`effector of FIG. 2.
`
`[0020] FIG. 4 is a perspective, exploded view of an
`implement portion of the surgical stapling and severing
`instrument of FIG. 1.
`
`[0021] FIG. 5 depicts a left side elevation view in section
`of the end effector of FIG. 3 of the surgical instrument of
`FIG. 1, the section generally taken along lines 5-5 of FIG.
`3 to expose portions of a staple cartridge but also depicting
`the firing bar along the longitudinal centerline.
`
`[0022] FIG. 6 depicts a left side elevation view in section
`of the end effector of FIG. 5 after the firing bar has fully
`fired.
`
`[0023] FIG. 7 is a left side elevation view of the handle of
`the surgical stapling and severing instrument of FIG. 1 with
`a left handle housing removed.
`
`[0024] FIG. 8 is a perspective, exploded view of the
`handle of FIG. 7.
`
`[0025] FIG. 9 is a perspective view from an elevated, aft,
`left vantage point of the linked transmission firing mecha-
`nism of the handle of FIG. 7.
`
`[0026] FIG. 10 is a detail left side elevation view of the
`linked rack of the firing mechanism of FIG. 9.
`
`[0027] FIGS. 11-14 are left side elevation views in cross
`section generally along the longitudinal axis of the ramped
`central track of the linked rack and the pawl of the firing
`mechanism, and additionally showing the firing trigger,
`biasing wheel and ramp of the traction biasing mechanism,
`depicting a sequence during a firing stroke.
`
`[0028] FIG. 15 is a right-side elevation view partially
`disassembled to expose a distal portion of an anti-backup
`mechanism (lateral kick-out type) in a locked condition in
`the surgical stapling and severing instrument of FIG. 1.
`
`[0029] FIG. 16 is a perspective view from a top, aft, right
`vantage point of the anti-backup mechanism of FIG. 15 with
`the anti-backup cam tube removed.
`
`[0030] FIG. 17 is a right-side elevation view partially
`disassembled to expose a distal portion of an anti-backup
`mechanism in an unlocked condition in the surgical stapling
`and severing instrument of FIG. 1.
`
`[0031] FIG. 18 is a right-side elevation view partially
`disassembled to expose a distal portion of an anti-backup
`mechanism in an unlocked condition in the surgical stapling
`and severing instrument of FIG. 1.
`
`[0032] FIG. 19 is a rear elevation view of the surgical
`stapling and severing instrument of FIG. 1 with the right
`half shell of the handle housing removed to expose the
`anti-backup release lever in phantom in a locking condition
`and in an unlocked condition.
`
`47
`
`47
`
`
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`Aug. 10, 2006
`
`[0033] FIGS. 20-25 are detail views of the anti-backup
`release lever of FIG. 18 depicting respectively a firing
`sequence of unfired, one firing stroke, two firing strokes,
`three firing strokes, returning or release button pushed, and
`fully returned.
`
`[0034] FIGS. 26-27 are perspective views from a top, left,
`distal vantage point of the surgical stapling and severing
`instrument with the right half shell of the handle housing
`removed to expose a closure release lockout mechanism,
`respectively in an initial position with lockout removed and
`closure release button depressed, and then a lockout being
`activated during initial firing.
`
`[0035] FIG. 28 is perspective view of a surgical stapling
`and severing instrument in an open condition similar to FIG.
`1 but incorporating a top-accessible retraction lever.
`
`[0036] FIG. 29 is a left side elevation view of the surgical
`stapling and severing instrument of FIG. 28 with the left
`half shell of the handle housing removed to expose an
`intermittently toothed indicator gear presenting a first dwell
`area to the idler gear.
`
`[0037] FIG. 30 is a left side elevation view of the surgical
`stapling and severing instrument of FIG. 28 with the left
`half shell of the handle housing removed to expose an
`intermittently toothed indicator gear presenting a second
`dwell area to the idler gear.
`
`[0038] FIG. 31 is a left front perspective view of an
`alternate surgical stapling and severing instrument (spring
`biased side pawl) with an alternate handle portion including
`a first alternative (link triggered) automatic retraction and an
`alternative (ratcheting) manual retraction mechanism.
`
`[0039] FIG. 32 is a right aft perspective view of the
`surgical stapling and severing instrument of FIG. 31 with a
`portion of an elongate shaft cutaway and a right half shell of
`a handle housing removed to expose an automatic end-of-
`firing travel retraction mechanism and a manual
`firing
`retraction mechanism.
`
`[0040] FIG. 33 is a right aft perspective disassembled
`view of the handle portion and an elongate shaft of the
`surgical stapling and severing instrument of FIG. 31.
`
`[0041] FIG. 34 is right aft perspective view of the surgical
`stapling and severing instrument of FIG. 31 with a right half
`shell and outer portions of the implement portion removed
`to expose the closure and firing mechanisms in an initial
`state.
`
`[0042] FIG. 35 is a right side view in elevation of the
`partially disassembled surgical stapling and severing instru-
`ment of FIG. 34.
`
`[0043] FIG. 36 is a right aft perspective view of the
`partially disassembled surgical stapling and severing instru-
`ment of FIG. 34 with a closure mechanism closed and
`
`clamped and side pawl firing mechanism completing a first
`stroke and with a manual retraction mechanism removed to
`
`expose a distal link of the linked rack that triggers automatic
`retraction of the firing mechanism.
`
`[0044] FIG. 37 is a right aft perspective view of the
`partially disassembled surgical stapling and severing instru-
`ment of FIG. 35 with the side pawl firing mechanism
`disengaged and the distal link approaching automatic retrac-
`tion.
`
`[0045] FIG. 38 is left side view in elevation of the
`partially disassembled surgical stapling and severing instru-
`ment of FIG. 35 in an initial state of an end effector open and
`a anti-backup mechanism engaged.
`
`[0046] FIG. 39 is a left side detail view of the right half
`shell and a first alternative anti-backup release lever (i.e.,
`link triggered) of the handle portion of FIG. 38.
`
`[0047] FIG. 40 is a left side detail view in elevation of the
`disassembled surgical stapling and severing instrument of
`FIG. 31 with the closure trigger clamped, the firing trigger
`performing a final stroke and the distal link positioned to trip
`automatic retraction.
`
`[0048] FIG. 41 is a left side detail in elevation of the
`disassembled surgical stapling and severing instrument of
`FIG. 40 immediately after the distal link has actuated and
`locked forward the anti-backup release lever allowing the
`linked rack to retract.
`
`[0049] FIG. 42 is a right disassembled perspective view of
`the idler and aft gears and manual retraction lever and
`ratcheting pawl of a manual retraction mechanism of the
`alternative (spring-biased side pawl) surgical stapling and
`severing instrument of FIG. 31.
`
`[0050] FIG. 43 is a right perspective view of the manual
`retraction mechanism of FIG. 42 with the manual retraction
`
`lever partially cut away to expose a smaller diameter ratchet
`gear on the aft gear engaging the ratcheting pawl.
`
`[0051] FIG. 44 is a partially disassembled left side view
`in elevation of the alternative surgical stapling and severing
`instrument (spring-biased side pawl) of FIG. 31 with the
`anti-backup mechanism engaged to the fully fired linked
`rack that is disconnected from a combination tension/com-
`
`pression spring prior to actuation of the manual retraction
`lever of FIG. 42.
`
`[0052] FIG. 45 is a partially disassembled left side view
`in elevation of the alternative surgical stapling and severing
`instrument of FIG. 44 with hidden portions of the anti-
`backup release lever, aft gear, and manual firing release lever
`shown in phantom.
`
`[0053] FIG. 46 is a partially disassembled left side view
`in elevation of the alternative surgical stapling and severing
`instrument of FIG. 45 after actuation of the manual firing
`release lever has manually retracted the linked rack.
`
`[0054] FIG. 47 is a partially disassembled left side view
`in elevation of the alternative surgical stapling and severing
`instrument of FIG. 46 with the linked rack omitted depicting
`the manual firing release lever disengaging the anti-backup
`mechanism.
`
`[0055] FIG. 48 is a left side detail view of a second
`alternative anti-backup release lever (gear forward cammed)
`and handle housing for the surgical stapling and severing
`instrument (spring biased side pawl) of FIG. 31.
`
`[0056] FIG. 49 is left a perspective disassembled view of
`the second alternative anti-backup release lever (gear for-
`ward cammed), aft gear axle, and automatic retraction cam
`wheel of FIG. 48.
`
`[0057] FIG. 50 is a right side view in elevation of the
`second alternative anti-backup release mechanism of FIG.
`48 with the linked rack in a retracted position and the
`
`48
`
`48
`
`
`
`US 2006/0175375 A1
`
`Aug. 10, 2006
`
`anti-backup release lever proximally positioned with the
`anti-backup plate engaged to the firing rod.
`
`[0058] FIG. 50A is a right detail side view in elevation of
`the aft gear, automatic retraction cam wheel and distal-most
`link of FIG. 50.
`
`[0059] FIG. 51 is a right side view in elevation of the
`second alternative anti-backup release mechanism of FIG.
`50 after a first firing stroke.
`
`[0060] FIG. 51A is a right detail side view in elevation of
`the aft gear, automatic retraction cam wheel and a second
`link of FIG. 51.
`
`[0061] FIG. 52 is a right side view in elevation of the
`second alternative anti-backup release mechanism of FIG.
`51 after a second firing stroke.
`
`[0062] FIG. 52A is a right detail side view in elevation of
`the aft gear, automatic retraction cam wheel and third link of
`FIG. 52.
`
`[0063] FIG. 53 is a right detail side view in elevation of
`the second alternative anti-backup release mechanism of
`FIG. 52 after a third firing and final stroke.
`
`[0064] FIG. 53A is a right detail side view in elevation of
`the aft gear, automatic retraction cam wheel and proximal-
`most fourth link of FIG. 53.
`
`[0065] FIG. 54 is a right side view in elevation of the
`second alternative automatic release mechanism of FIG. 53
`
`after a further firing stroke causes the automatic retraction
`cam wheel to distally slide and lock the second alternative
`anti-backup release lever disengaging the anti-backup
`mechanism.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`stapling and severing instrument,
`[0066] A surgical
`whether with a conventional solid or linked rack as advan-
`
`incorporates a
`tageously depicted for a shorter handle,
`multiple firing stroke capability allowing greater firing travel
`without an excessive amount of force required to squeeze a
`firing trigger. Between firing strokes, an anti-backup mecha-
`nism is incorporated so that a firing retraction bias does
`inadvertently cause firing retraction.
`
`In FIGS. 1-30, a first version of the surgical
`[0067]
`stapling and severing instrument incorporates a side moving
`anti-backup release mechanism that causes automatic retrac-
`tion at the end of firing travel. This version also includes a
`first version of a manual retraction assistance capability to
`overcome binding. In FIGS. 31-54, a second version of a
`surgical
`stapling and severing instrument mechanism
`includes two more anti-backup release mechanisms for
`automatic retraction at the end of firing travel. Further, the
`first version of the surgical stapling and severing instrument
`of FIGS. 1-30 couples the firing motion from a firing trigger
`to a linked rack transmission by means of a frictionally
`biased top pawl, and is further described in US. patent
`application Ser. No. 10/673,930 entitled “SURGICAL STA-
`PLING INSTRUMENT INCORPORATING A FIRING
`MECHANISM HAVING A LINKED RACK TRANSMIS-
`
`SION”, to Jeffrey S. Swayze, Frederick E. Shelton IV, filed
`29 Sep. 2003, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated
`by reference in its entirety.
`
`[0068] The second version of the surgical stapling and
`severing instrument of FIGS. 31-54 couples the firing
`motion of a firing trigger to a linked rack transmission by
`means of a spring-biased side pawl. Furthermore, the second
`version of the surgical stapling and severing instrument in
`FIGS. 32-41 depicts a rack-triggered automatic retraction
`capability with a ratcheting manual retraction mechanism as
`an alternative to the kick-out, anti-backup release lever of
`FIGS. 1-30. In FIGS. 42-47, a ratcheting manual retraction
`mechanism is depicted in more detail, corresponding to what
`is generally depicted in FIGS. 32-41. FIGS. 48-54 depict a
`gear driven automatic retraction feature built into the indi-
`cation and ratcheting manual retraction mechanism as a
`further alternative to the kick-out anti-backup release lever
`of FIGS. 1-30 and the rack-triggered anti-backup release
`lever of FIGS. 31-47.
`
`[0069] Turning to the Drawings, wherein like numerals
`denote like components throughout the several views, FIGS.
`1 and 2 depict a surgical stapling and severing instrument 10
`that
`is capable of practicing the unique benefits of the
`present invention. The surgical stapling and severing instru-
`ment 10 incorporates an end effector 12 having an anvil 14
`pivotally attached to an elongate channel 16, forming oppos-
`ing jaws for clamping tissue to be severed and stapled. The
`end effector 12 is coupled by a shaft 18 to a handle 20 (FIG.
`1). An implement portion 22, formed by the end effector 12
`and shaft 18, is advantageously sized for insertion through
`a trocar or small laparoscopic opening to perform an endo-
`scopic surgical procedure while being controlled by a sur-
`geon grasping the handle 20. The handle 20 advantageously
`includes features that allow separate closure motion and
`firing motion, lockouts to prevent inadvertent or ill-advised
`firing of the end effector, as well as enabling multiple firing
`strokes to effect firing (i.e., severing and stapling) of the end
`effector 12 while indicating the degree of firing to the
`surgeon.
`
`To these ends, a closure tube 24 of the shaft 18 is
`[0070]
`coupled between a closure trigger 26 (FIG. 1) and the anvil
`14 to cause closure of the end effector 12. Within the closure
`
`tube 24, a frame 28 is coupled between the elongate channel
`16 and the handle 20 to longitudinally position and support
`the end effector 12. A rotation knob 30 is coupled with the
`frame 28, and both elements are rotatably coupled to the
`handle 20 with respect to a rotational movement about a
`longitudinal axis of the shaft 18. Thus, the surgeon can rotate
`the end effector 12 by turning the rotation knob 30. The
`closure tube 24 is also rotated by the rotation knob 30 but
`retains a degree of longitudinal movement relative thereto to
`cause the closure of the end effector 12. Within the frame 28,
`a firing rod 32 is positioned for longitudinal movement and
`coupled between the anvil 14 of the end effector 12 and a
`multiple-stroke firing trigger 34. The closure trigger 26 is
`distal to a pistol grip 36 of the handle 20 with the firing
`trigger 34 distal to both the pistol grip 36 and closure trigger
`26.
`
`In endoscopic operation, once the implement por-
`[0071]
`tion 22 is inserted into a patient to access a surgical site, a
`surgeon refers to an endoscopic or other diagnostic imaging
`device to position tissue between the anvil 14 and elongate
`channel 16. Grasping the closure trigger 26 and pistol grip
`36, the surgeon may repeatedly grasp and position the tissue.
`Once satisfied as to the location of the tissue relative to the
`
`end effector 12 and the amount of tis