throbber
(cid:56)(cid:74)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:90)(cid:88)(cid:88)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:17)(cid:5)(cid:88)(cid:89)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:88)(cid:17)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:78)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:75)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:31)(cid:5)(cid:77)(cid:89)(cid:89)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:31)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:92)(cid:92)(cid:92)(cid:19)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:77)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:19)(cid:83)(cid:74)(cid:89)(cid:20)(cid:85)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:30)(cid:21)(cid:26)(cid:22)(cid:21)(cid:26)
`
`(cid:47)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:3)(cid:57)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:92)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:81)
`(cid:57)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:75)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:87)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:47)(cid:56)(cid:49)(cid:56)(cid:31)(cid:5)(cid:47)(cid:84)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:83)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:84)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:74)(cid:89)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:49)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:85)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:20)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:84)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:74)(cid:89)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:49)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:85)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:123)(cid:5)(cid:43)(cid:74)(cid:71)(cid:87)(cid:90)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:27)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:84)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:31)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:50)(cid:74)(cid:73)
`
`(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)
`(cid:30)
`
`(cid:24)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:17)(cid:5)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:90)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:31)
`
`(cid:40)(cid:77)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:87)(cid:90)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:90)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:82)
`(cid:46)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:70)(cid:5)(cid:58)(cid:83)(cid:78)(cid:91)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:78)(cid:89)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:72)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:84)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:50)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:74)
`
`(cid:23)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:58)(cid:39)(cid:49)(cid:46)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:25)(cid:17)(cid:29)(cid:30)(cid:26)(cid:5)(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:52)(cid:43)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:42)
`
`(cid:55)(cid:42)(cid:38)(cid:41)(cid:56)
`(cid:24)(cid:22)(cid:30)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:84)(cid:82)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:84)(cid:5)(cid:92)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:80)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:88)(cid:31)
`
`(cid:41)(cid:84)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:55)(cid:84)(cid:71)(cid:84)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:5)(cid:38)(cid:88)(cid:88)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:89)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:40)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:42)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:84)(cid:82)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:5)(cid:39)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:78)(cid:89)(cid:5)(cid:73)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:5)(cid:49)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:85)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:5)(cid:55)(cid:70)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:51)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:77)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:84)(cid:82)(cid:94)(cid:36)(cid:5)(cid:59)(cid:78)(cid:74)(cid:92)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:89)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:5)(cid:75)(cid:84)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:92)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:92)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:90)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:70)(cid:73)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:71)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:40)(cid:77)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:87)(cid:90)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:90)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:21)(cid:24)(cid:5)(cid:38)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:78)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:25)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:57)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:90)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:77)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:86)(cid:90)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:77)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:82)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:73)(cid:84)(cid:92)(cid:83)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:70)(cid:73)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:75)(cid:78)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:19)
`
`1
`
`IS 1020
`Intuitive Surgical v. Ethicon
`IPR2019-00880
`
`

`

`SCIENTIFIC PAPER
`
`Laparoscopic Vascular Control Techniques in Donor
`Nephrectomy: Effects on Vessel Length
`
`Jonathan E. Bernie, Chandru P. Sundaram, MD, Amy I. Guise
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Background: Various techniques for vascular control
`have been used during urologic laparoscopic procedures.
`The importance of optimizing the vessel length and se-
`curing reliable vascular control are critical for procedures
`like laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. We aimed to de-
`termine the length of vessel
`lost by using 4 common
`techniques of vascular control in a fresh human cadaveric
`vascular model.
`
`Methods: The techniques include application of 2 non-
`absorbable polymer-ligating clips (10-mm Hem-o-Lok
`MLX Weck Closure Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC),
`Endo-GIA II stapler (30-mm length, 2.5-mm staples, Auto
`Suture, US Surgical, Norwalk, CT), Endopath ETS35 sta-
`pler (35mm length, 2.5mm staples, Ethicon Endo-Sur-
`gery), and the Endo Ta-30 stapler (30-mm length, 2.5-mm
`staples, Auto Suture, US Surgical, Norwalk, CT).
`
`Results: The Endo-TA-30 stapler and the polymer clips
`resulted in significantly less compromise of the vessel
`length, when compared with the other methods of vascu-
`lar control.
`
`Conclusions: The Endo-TA-30 stapler and the polymer
`clips can be applied during laparoscopic procedures
`where optimizing vascular length is important.
`
`Key Words: Stapler, Vascular, Laparoscopy, Donor, Ne-
`phrectomy.
`
`Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, In-
`diana, USA (all authors).
`
`Address reprint requests to: Chandru P. Sundaram, MD, Associate Professor, De-
`partment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 N Barnhill Dr,
`Suite 420, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5289, USA. Telephone: 317 278 3098, Fax: 317 274
`0174, E-mail: sundaram@iupui.edu
`
`© 2006 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. Published by
`the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Inc.
`
`Stapling devices have been used for intestinal, pulmonary,
`and vascular applications.1–5 Laparoscopic donor ne-
`phrectomy has been used since 1995 and has become the
`preferred procedure for live renal transplantation at many
`centers in the world. The benefits of laparoscopic surgery
`over open procedures include more rapid recovery, di-
`minished analgesic requirements, improved cosmesis, and
`equivalent graft function.6 –11 One disadvantage of the
`laparoscopic approach, albeit rare, is failure of the lapa-
`roscopic staplers, which can result in significant bleeding.
`Additionally, vascular ligation may result in some loss of
`blood vessel length when compared with that in open
`techniques. This may become increasingly important with
`the increasing rates of donation and subsequent use of
`right-sided donors.11,12 We aimed to investigate the
`amount of vessel length lost with various common tech-
`niques of vascular control in a human cadaveric vascular
`model.
`
`METHODS
`
`The inferior vena cava, iliac veins, renal veins, aorta, and
`iliac arteries were harvested from 3 fresh human cadavers
`through a midline incision. The vessels were then pre-
`pared, secured to a board with pins, and 4 common
`techniques of vascular division were used:
`
`(1) 2 nonabsorbable polymer ligating clips (10-mm Hem-
`o-Lok MLX Weck Closure Systems, Research Triangle,
`NC);
`
`(2) Endo-GIA II stapler (30-mm length, 2.5-mm staples,
`Auto Suture, US Surgical, Norwalk, CT);
`
`(3) Endopath ETS35 stapler (35-mm length, 2.5-mm sta-
`ples, Ethicon Endo-Surgery) and;
`
`(4) Endo Ta-30 stapler (30-mm length, 2.5-mm staples,
`Auto Suture, US Surgical, Norwalk, CT).
`
`We attempted to determine the length of blood vessel lost
`with each method of vascular division. The Endo-GIA
`stapler fires 6 rows of staggered staples, and cuts between
`rows 3 and 4. We trimmed the stapled end to measure the
`amount of vessel lost. The Endo Ta-30 stapler deploys 3
`
`JSLS (2006)10:141–144
`2
`
`141
`
`

`

`Laparoscopic Vascular Control Techniques in Donor Nephrectomy: Effects on Vessel Length, Bernie JE et al.
`
`rows of staggered staples, but does not cut. With this
`stapler, we sharply divided the “graft” side of the vessel
`and left the 3 rows of staples with the “patient” side to
`measure the vessel length. Two 10-mm Hem-o-Lok clips
`were placed as close together as possible on the “patient”
`side of the vessel and the vessel then sharply transected
`by the second clip, leaving a 1-mm cuff of tissue. Each
`technique was applied, and the length recorded by the
`same investigator using calipers. Fifteen attempts were
`made using each method.
`
`Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA to com-
`pare the vessel-length data among the 4 kinds of staples,
`followed by a post-hoc pair-wise comparison between
`groups. A Box-Cox transformation was performed for the
`length data to comply with the normal distribution as-
`sumption. Length differences were based on squared
`lengths.
`
`RESULTS
`Using the Endo-TA-30, the length lost was 0.50⫾0.13 cm,
`which was significantly shorter (P⬍0.001) than that with
`the 2 Hem-o-Lok clips, where the average vessel length
`lost was 0.77⫾0.05cm. The use of 2 Hem-o-Lok clips was
`associated with significantly smaller vessel loss (P⬍0.001)
`when compared with loss with the Endo-GIA II
`(1.01⫾0.07 cm) (Figures 1 and 2). Vascular division
`using the Endo-GIA resulted in significantly less
`(P⬍0.003) vessel loss when compared with loss with the
`Endopath ETS35 (1.08⫾0.05 cm) (Table 1). No significant
`
`Figure 1. Nonabsorbable polymer ligating clips (10-mm Hem-
`o-Lok MLX Weck Closure Systems), Endo Ta-30 stapler (30-mm
`length, 2.5-mm staples, Auto Suture), and Endo-GIA II stapler
`(35-mm length, 2.5-mm staples, Auto Suture). From top to bot-
`tom.
`
`Figure 2. Stapler heads of Endo GIA II and Endo-TA-30 staplers,
`and 10-mm polymer ligating clips. From left to right.
`
`difference existed in the loss of vascular lengths between
`the arteries and veins.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has duplicated the suc-
`cess of open surgery, while minimizing patient morbidity
`and analgesic requirement. With continued and increased
`use of laparoscopy for donor nephrectomy, safety for the
`donor and adequate graft quality are critical. One impor-
`tant requirement is obtaining adequate vessel length. This
`is especially true for right-sided donors where the vein
`tends to be shorter and in patients with multiple arteries.13
`Suture ligation is the standard method of vascular control
`during open donor nephrectomy. However, this cannot
`be expeditiously done via the laparoscopic approach.
`Practical issues with the vascular staplers are important to
`understand. Staplers, while generally reliable, can mal-
`function. Deng et al14 reported 55 cases from the Food and
`Drug Administration database of endovascular gastroin-
`testinal stapling device complications. Twenty-two events
`occurred during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy but did
`not result in graft dysfunction or loss. Chan et al15 reported
`a series of 10 cases of endovascular stapler malfunction
`during 565 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies using the
`Endo-GIA. Although the failure rate was only 1.7%, this is
`a salient concern for those performing laparoscopic donor
`nephrectomy using staplers. The Endo TA stapler is po-
`tentially safer than the other 2 staplers that divide the
`vessels between 3 rows of staples on each side. The
`
`142
`
`JSLS (2006)10:141–144
`3
`
`

`

`Table 1.
`Vascular Ligation and Blood Vessel Length Lost
`
`Ligation Technique
`
`#Trials
`
`Endo-TA-30
`2 Hem-o-Lok clips
`Endo-GIA II
`Endopath ETS35
`
`15
`15
`15
`15
`
`Mean Length
`(cm)
`
`0.50 (0.23 to 0.67)
`0.77 (0.69 to 0.85)
`1.01 (0.92 to 1.14)
`1.08 (0.96 to 1.15)
`
`Standard
`Deviation
`
`0.13
`0.05
`0.07
`0.05
`
`P Value
`
`⬍0.001
`⬍0.001
`⬍0.003
`—
`
`Endopath ETS35 stapler does not open easily when max-
`imally articulated. The Endo-GIA, while reliable and artic-
`ulating, requires 2 hands to operate. The Endo-TA does
`not articulate. This could result in some vessel length loss
`if the stapler is not placed flush with the vessel. This could
`be a significant drawback if an appropriately placed trocar
`is not used during a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
`The future development of the TA stapler with articulation
`could overcome this problem. We use the most medial
`trocar for the Endo TA to achieve the best possible angle
`with the origin of the renal artery. The smaller length of
`the clip compared with the Hemo-o-Lok TA stapler allows
`the clip to be accurately applied on the artery close to its
`origin from the aorta, even when the trocar is not ideally
`placed. If 2 polymer clips are used, the warm ischemia
`time could be increased due to the need to reload clips.
`Having a second clip applier could minimize this. We
`currently use Hem-o-Lok clips or the Endo-TA stapler for
`the vessels, depending on the vascular anatomy and rela-
`tionship of the vessels to the trocars.
`
`Meng et al16 described their experience with laparoscopic
`donor nephrectomy in 97 patients. The initial 15 patients
`had both vessels transected with the Endo-GIA stapler.
`One of these patients required open conversion due to
`significant bleeding at the renal arterial staple line. In the
`remaining 82 patients, 1 polymer clip and 1 titanium clip
`were placed on the artery, while the Endo-TA stapler was
`used on the vein. Janetschek et al17 described,
`in 20
`patients undergoing radical nephrectomy, a technique
`that provides safety with vascular control while avoiding
`the use of stapling devices. In this series, after the renal
`artery is divided, a suture is passed around the renal vein,
`tied down extracorporeally to shrink the renal vein, a
`polymer clip placed, and the vessel divided. The assertion
`here was that this method provides for safe and secure
`vascular ligation, while obviating the cost (Table 2) of a
`stapler and potential for stapler failure. Recent studies
`have demonstrated the safety of polymer clips, and no
`reports exist of polymer clips dislodging postoperative-
`
`Table 2.
`List Prices of Staplers and Reloads
`
`Device
`
`List Price
`
`US Surgical Endo-GIA ⫹ cartridge
`US Surgical Endo-GIA reload
`US Surgical Endo TA-30⫹ cartridge
`US Surgical Endo TA-30 reload
`Ethicon ATW35 Stapler
`Ethicon TR35W Reload
`Weck 10-mm Clip applier
`Weck 10-mm Hem-o-Lok Cartridge (6 clips)
`Weck 5-mm Clip applier
`Weck 5-mm Hem-o-Lok Cartridge (6 clips)
`
`$499
`$258
`$375
`$176
`$184
`$80
`$1395
`$21
`$1195
`$27
`
`ly.18,19 The clip may become dislodged if not applied
`correctly. We have observed this during surgery where the
`second clip is dislodged when the vessel is divided flush
`with the clip. It is therefore important to leave a sleeve of
`vessel distal to the second clip. When the clip is used, the
`artery must be circumferentially dissected to ensure that
`perivascular tissue does not impede secure locking of the
`clip. Though the initial cost of the reusable (Weck) clip
`applier is high, the cost of the applier and clips averaged
`over 50 cases is only $49 per patient. Considerable savings
`are realized if clips are used instead of staplers. The
`inadvertent entrapment of previously placed clips on ad-
`jacent vessels, within the jaws of the staplers can result in
`stapler malfunction. At our institution, we minimize sta-
`pler failure by using bipolar coagulation for control of the
`tributaries of the renal vein, which avoids placing clips
`near the renal hilum.
`
`Although statistical significance was determined between
`all methods of vascular division, the clinical significance
`may be minimal in the vast majority of patients as the
`mean difference in length lost between the Endo-TA and
`
`JSLS (2006)10:141–144
`4
`
`143
`
`

`

`Laparoscopic Vascular Control Techniques in Donor Nephrectomy: Effects on Vessel Length, Bernie JE et al.
`
`10. Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng S, Palmer E. Open donor, laparoscopic
`donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a
`comparison of outcomes. J Urol. 2001;166:1270 –1273.
`
`11. Mandal AK, Cohen C, Montgomery RA. Should the indica-
`tions for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kid-
`ney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal
`vasculature is not a contraindication to laparoscopic left donor
`nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2000;71:660 – 664.
`
`12. Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S. Increased rates of dona-
`tion with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 2000;3:
`392– 400.
`
`13. Buell JF, Edye M, Johnson M. Are concerns over right lapa-
`roscopic donor nephrectomy warranted? Ann Surg. 2001;233:
`645– 651.
`
`14. Deng DY, Meng MV, Nguyen HT. Laparoscopic linear cut-
`ting stapler failure. Urology. 2002;60:49 –53.
`
`15. Chan D, Bishoff JT, Ratner L. Endovascular gastrointestinal
`stapler device malfunction during laparoscopic nephrectomy:
`early recognition and management. J Urol. 2000;164:319 –321.
`
`16. Meng MV, Freise CE, Kang SM. Techniques to optimize
`vascular control during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urol-
`ogy. 2003;61(1):93–98.
`
`17. Janetschek G, Bagheri F, Abdelmaksoud A. Ligation of the
`renal vein during laparoscopic nephrectomy: an effective and
`reliable method to replace vascular staplers. J Urol. 170(4 pt
`1):1295–1297, 2003.
`
`18. Joseph J, Leung YY, Eichel L. Comparison of the Ti-knot
`Device and Hem-o-lok Clips with other devices commonly used
`for laparoscopic renal-artery ligation. J Endourol. 2004;18(2):
`163–166.
`
`19. Yip SK, Tan YH, Cheng C. Routine vascular control using the
`Hem-o-lok clip in laparoscopic nephrectomy: animal study and
`clinical application. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):77– 81.
`
`the Endopath ETS35 is less than 1cm (0.50cm vs 1.08cm).
`A small addition of transplant renal vascular length may be
`significant in situations like right-sided donor nephrecto-
`mies, multiple arteries, and in some recipients due to the
`recipient vascular anatomy or body habitus.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Various techniques are used to divide the blood vessels
`during procedures, such as laparoscopic donor nephrec-
`tomy. In this cadaveric model, the Endo-TA-30 stapler and
`the placement of 2 polymer locking clips resulted in sig-
`nificantly less compromise of the vessel
`length, when
`compared with the other vascular staplers. These 2 tech-
`niques could be applied during laparoscopic procedures
`where optimizing vascular length is important. The appro-
`priate technique for vascular control can be individualized
`to each patient during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy,
`depending on the vascular anatomy.
`
`References:
`
`1. Ravitch MM, Steichen FM. Techniques of staple suturing in
`the gastrointestinal tract. Ann Surg. 1972;175:815– 837.
`
`2. Blumenberg RM, Gelfand ML. Application of intestinal sta-
`plers to aortoiliac surgery. Am J Surg. 1982;144:198 –202.
`
`3. Papalois VE, Romangnoli J, Hakim NS. Use of vascular clo-
`sure staples in vascular access for dialysis, kidney and pancreas
`transplantation. Int Surg. 1998;83:177–180.
`
`4. Ravitch MM, Steichen FM, Fishbein RH. Clinical experiences
`with Soviet mechanical bronchus staplers. J Thorac Cardiovasc
`Surg. 1964;47:446 – 454.
`
`Lindsey ES, Ono K, Pearce MB. Use of vascular stapler in
`5.
`clinical renal transplantation. JAMA. 1968;205(3):130 –131.
`
`6. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG. Laparoscopic live donor
`nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1995;60:1047–1049.
`
`7. Fabrizio MD, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA. Laparoscopic live
`donor nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1999;26:247–256.
`
`8. Yang SC, Ko WJ, Byun YJ. Retroperitoneoscopy assisted live do-
`nor nephrectomy: the Yonsei experience. J Urol. 2001;165:1099–1102.
`
`9. Wolf JS, Merion RM, Leichtman AB. Randomized controlled
`trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live do-
`nor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2001;72:284 –290.
`
`144
`
`
`
`View publication statsView publication stats
`
`JSLS (2006)10:141–144
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket