throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`__________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________________
`
`
`INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ETHICON LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00880
`Patent 7,490,749
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`

`
`
`
`

`

`Proceeding No. IPR2019-00880
`Attorney Docket No. 11030-0052IP1
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper 8),
`
`Petitioner submits this Request for Oral Argument on July 9, 2020 to address all of
`
`the instituted grounds of unpatentability regarding the challenged claims of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,490,749. Petitioner requests 30 minutes for each side to present
`
`arguments (60 minutes total).
`
`Specifically, Petitioner requests (without waiving consideration of any issue
`
`not listed below) to address the following issues:
`
`1. Whether claims 1 and 3 are anticipated and/or rendered obvious by
`
`Shelton II;
`
`2. Whether claims 1 and 3 are anticipated and/or rendered obvious by
`
`Swayze;
`
`3. Whether claims 1 and 3 are anticipated by Shelton I;
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`To the extent the Board decides to conduct the hearing in-person, Petitioner
`
`requests to use video equipment to display exhibits, including the use of a
`
`projector/screen for a PowerPoint display or the like.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 22, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Control No. IPR2019-00880)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Proceeding No. IPR2019-00880
`Attorney Docket No. 11030-0052IP1
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/Kenneth Wayne Darby Jr./
`Steven R. Katz, Reg. No. 43,706
`Joshua A. Griswold, Reg. No. 46,310
`Kenneth W. Darby, Jr., Reg. No. 65,068
`John C. Phillips, Reg. No. 35,322
`Ryan P. O’Connor, Reg. No. 60,254
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`2 
`
`

`

`Proceeding No. IPR2019-00880
`Attorney Docket No. 11030-0052IP1
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e)(4), the undersigned certifies that on May 22,
`
`2020, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument was
`
`provided via email, to the Patent Owner by serving the email correspondence
`
`addresses of record as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Anish R. Desai
`Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser
`Adrian Percer
`Christopher T. Marando
`Christopher M. Pepe
`Kathryn M. Kantha
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`767 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`
`Ethicon.IPR.Service@weil.com
`
`Email:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Christine Rogers/
`Christine Rogers
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(650) 839-5092
`
`3 
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket