throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 43
`Entered: July 2, 2020
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`ETHICON LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2019-00880
`Patent 7,490,749 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, BENJAMIN D. M. WOOD, and
`MATTHEW S. MEYERS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEYERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00880
`Patent 7,490,749 B2
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner both request an opportunity to present
`oral argument pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 33, 30. The requests
`are granted to the extent set forth below and subject to the following
`conditions.
`Oral arguments will commence at 9:00 AM Eastern Time on
`Thursday, July 9, 2020, by video. The parties are directed to contact the
`Board at least 10 days in advance of the hearing if there are any concerns
`about disclosing confidential information. The Board will provide a court
`reporter for the hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the
`official record of the hearing.
`If at any time during the proceeding you encounter technical or other
`difficulties that fundamentally undermine your ability to adequately
`represent your client, please let the panel know immediately, and
`adjustments will be made.1
`To facilitate planning, each party must contact PTAB Hearings at
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov five business days prior to the oral hearing date
`to receive video set-up information. As a reminder, all arrangements and the
`expenses involved with appearing by video, such as the selection of the
`facility to be used from which a party will attend by video, must be borne by
`that party. If a video connection cannot be established, the parties will be
`provided with dial-in connection information, and the oral hearing will be
`conducted telephonically.
`If one or both parties would prefer to participate in the oral hearing
`telephonically, they should notify PTAB Hearings at the above email
`
`
`1 For example, if a party is experiencing poor video quality, the Board may
`provide alternate dial-in information.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00880
`Patent 7,490,749 B2
`
`address five business days prior to the hearing to receive dial-in connection
`information.
`Petitioner requests 30 minutes for argument. Paper 33, 1. Patent
`Owner requests 45 minutes for argument. Paper 30, 1. Accordingly, the
`Board determines that each party shall be allotted 45 minutes of total time to
`present argument. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the
`patent claims at issue are unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will open the
`hearing by presenting its case regarding the challenged claims for which we
`instituted trial. Petitioner may reserve some of its argument time for
`rebuttal. Absent special circumstances, Petitioner will not be permitted to
`reserve for rebuttal more than half the total time allotted for argument.
`Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s presentation and
`present its argument regarding its motion to amend. Patent Owner also may
`reserve some of its argument time for a brief sur-rebuttal.
`Either party may request a pre-hearing conference. See Consolidated
`Trial Practice Guide November 2019, 82 (“The purpose of the pre-hearing
`conference is to afford the parties the opportunity to preview (but not argue)
`the issues to be discussed at the oral hearing, and to seek the Board’s
`guidance as to particular issues that the panel would like addressed by the
`parties.”). If either party desires a pre-hearing conference, the parties should
`jointly contact the Board by July 6, 2020 to request a conference call for that
`purpose.
`Demonstrative exhibits used at the final hearing are aids to oral
`argument and not evidence, and should be clearly marked as such. For
`example, each slide of a demonstrative exhibit may be marked with the
`words “DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE” in the footer.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00880
`Patent 7,490,749 B2
`
`Demonstrative exhibits must not include new evidence and each must
`include citations to the record sufficient to establish that the exhibit contains
`no new argument or evidence not already of record in the proceeding(s) in
`which it is offered. The parties are directed to serve demonstrative exhibits
`on opposing counsel at least seven days before the hearing date. As all
`members of the panel will attend the hearing electronically from a remote
`location, it is necessary that the parties provide a copy of any demonstrative
`exhibits to the Board at least seven days prior to the hearing by emailing
`them to PTABHearings@uspto.gov. Notwithstanding 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b),
`the parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in the record of this
`proceeding without prior authorization from the Board.
`The Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith
`to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits, but if such objections
`cannot be resolved, the parties may file any objections to demonstrative
`exhibits with the Board at least four days before the hearing. Any objection
`to demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection and include a short (one sentence or
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`reserve ruling on the objections until the oral argument. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27,
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00880
`Patent 7,490,749 B2
`
`2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits.
`The Board generally expects lead counsel for each party to be present
`by video at the oral hearing. Any counsel of record may present the party’s
`argument as long as that counsel is present by video.
`Any special requests for audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov. A party may also indicate any special requests
`related to appearing at a video oral hearing, such as a request to
`accommodate visual or hearing impairments, and indicate how the PTAB
`may accommodate the special request. Any special requests must be
`presented in a separate communication not less than five days before the
`hearing.
`Please unmute yourself only when speaking. The panel will have
`access to all papers filed with the Board, including demonstratives. During
`the oral hearing, the parties are advised to identify clearly and specifically
`each demonstrative referenced (e.g., by slide or screen number) to ensure the
`clarity and accuracy of the court reporter’s transcript. The parties are also
`advised to identify themselves each time they speak. Furthermore, the
`remote nature of the oral hearing may result in an audio lag, so the parties
`are advised to observe a pause prior to speaking to avoid speaking over
`others.
`Members of the public may request to listen in on this oral hearing. If
`resources are available, the Board generally expects to grant such requests.
`If either party objects to the Board granting such requests, for example,
`because confidential information may be discussed, the party must notify the
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00880
`Patent 7,490,749 B2
`
`Board by contacting PTABHearings@uspto.gov at least five business days
`prior to the oral hearing date.
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the parties’ requests for oral hearing (Papers 33 and
`30) are granted subject to the conditions set forth in this Order; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that oral hearing, conducted pursuant to the
`procedures outlined above, shall commence at 9:00 AM Eastern Time on
`July 9, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00880
`Patent 7,490,749 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`Steven R. Katz
`Joshua A. Griswold
`Kenneth W. Darby, Jr.
`John C. Phillips
`Ryan P. O’Connor
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`katz@fr.com
`griswold@fr.com
`kdarbyfr.com
`phillips@fr.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Anish R. Desai
`Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser
`Adrian Percer
`Christopher T. Marando
`Christoper M. Pepe
`WEIL, GOTSCHAL & MANGES LLP
`anish.desai@weil.com
`elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`christopher.pepe@weil.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket