throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 21
`
`Entered: February 11, 2020
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., INSTAGRAM, LLC, and WHATSAPP INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2019-00942
`Patent 8,677,250 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before MIRIAM L. QUINN, GARTH D. BAER, and AARON W. MOORE,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BAER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioners’ Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Yuan Liang
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00942
`Patent 8,677,250 B2
`
`
`On February 6, 2020, Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC, and WhatsApp
`Inc. (“Petitioners”) filed a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Mr. Yuan
`Liang (Paper 19, “Motion”) in this proceeding, as well as a supporting
`declaration from Mr. Liang (Ex. 1017), and a biography of Mr. Liang (Ex.
`1016). Petitioners represent that Patent Owner does not oppose the Motion.
`Motion 1.
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In
`authorizing a motion for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires the
`moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause for
`the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration
`of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See Paper 5, 2 (citing
`Unified Patents (representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac
`Vice Admission”)).
`Having reviewed Petitioners’ Motion and supporting declaration,
`good cause has been shown for granting admission pro hac vice to Mr.
`Liang in this proceeding.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is therefore,
`ORDERED that Petitioners’ Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Yuan Liang in this proceeding is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Liang is authorized to represent
`Petitioners as back-up counsel only in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners are to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in this proceeding;
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00942
`Patent 8,677,250 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Liang shall comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)), and the
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code
`of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Liang shall be subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), as well as the Office’s
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00942
`Patent 8,677,250 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONERS:
`
`Heidi L. Keefe
`hkeefe@cooley.com
`
`Andrew C. Mace
`amace@cooley.com
`
`Mark R. Weinstein
`mweinstein@cooley.com
`
`Yuan Liang
`yliang@cooley.com
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`James M. Glass
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Sam Stake
`samstake@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Ogi Zivojnovic
`ogizivojnovic@quinnemaneul.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket