throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 16
`
`Entered: December 17, 2019
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., INSTAGRAM, LLC, and WHATSAPP INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2019-00942
`Patent 8,677,250 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before MIRIAM L. QUINN, GARTH D. BAER, and AARON W. MOORE,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BAER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Mark R. Weinstein
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00942
`Patent 8,677,250 B2
`
`
`On December 12, 2019, Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC, and
`WhatsApp Inc. (“Petitioners”) filed a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`of Mr. Mark R. Weinstein (Paper 14, “Motion”) in this proceeding, as well
`as a supporting declaration from Mr. Weinstein (Ex. 1015), and a biography
`of Mr. Weinstein (Ex. 1014).
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In
`authorizing a motion for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires the
`moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause for
`the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration
`of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See Paper 5, 2 (citing
`Unified Patents (representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac
`Vice Admission”)).
`Having reviewed Petitioners’ Motion and supporting declaration,
`good cause has been shown for granting admission pro hac vice to Mr.
`Weinstein in this proceeding.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is therefore,
`ORDERED that Petitioners’ Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Mark R. Weinstein in this proceeding is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Weinstein is authorized to represent
`Petitioners as back-up counsel only in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners are to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in this proceeding;
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00942
`Patent 8,677,250 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Weinstein shall comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, as updated by the August 2018 Update,
`83 Federal Register 39,989 (Aug. 13, 2018), and the July 2019 Update (84
`Fed. Reg. 33,925 (July 16, 2019)), and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Weinstein shall be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), as well as the
`Office’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101
`et seq.
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00942
`Patent 8,677,250 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Heidi Keefe
`hkeefe@cooley.com
`
`Andrew Mace
`amace@cooley.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jim Glass
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Sam Stake
`samstake@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Ognjen Zivojnovic
`ogizivojnovic@quinnemaneul.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket