`
`V.
`Uniloc 2017 LLC
`
`IPR2019-00973 (Patent 7,075,917 B2)
`
`Patent Owner’s Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`Before Sally C. Medley, Kalyan K. Deshpande, and Robert J.
`Weinschenk, Administrative Patent Judges
`
`August 20, 2020
`
`
`
`Overview
`
`¢ Petitioner fails to show that a POSITA
`would modify TR25.835 with Abrol
`
`¢ TR25.835 does not teach “a physical layer
`of a receiving side is provided for testing
`the correct reception of the coded
`transport block”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE — NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`
`
`Attempt to Argue Prima Facie Casein Petition
`
`A.
`
`TR25.835
`
`TR25.835 (Ex. 1005) was published by 3GPP in 2000 and publicly available
`
`on the 3GPPfile server no later than September 13, 2000. See Rodermund Decl., Ex.
`
`1004, § 25, see also id. at J] 12-24. It thus qualifies as prior art underat least Sections
`
`102(a) and (b)!.
`
`Petition (Paner 7) at 10.
`
`3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE — NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Overview
`
`¢ Failure to show TR25.832 is a printed
`publication
`
`¢ TR25.835 does not teach “a physical layer
`of a receiving side is provided for testing
`the correct reception of the coded
`transport block”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE — NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`
`
`POSITA would not have modified TR25.835 with Abrol
`
`¢ Petitioner fails to meet its burden to prove obviousness of
`“storing abbreviated sequence numbers whose length
`depends on the maximum number of coded transport
`blocks to be stored and which can be shown unambiguously
`In a packet data unit sequence number’
`
`¢ Petitioner fails to prove POSITA would have found it obvious
`to modify TR25.835 (EX1005) using the teachings of Abrol
`(EX1007)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE — NOT EVIDENCE
`PO Resnonse (Paper 9) at 31-38: PO Sur-Renlv (Paver 13) at 13-20.
`5
`
`
`
`Overview
`
`¢ Failure to show TR25.832 is a printed
`publication
`
`¢ Petitioner fails to show that a POSITA
`would modify TR25.835 with Abrol
`
`¢ TR25.835 does not teach “a physical layer
`of a receiving side is providedfor testing
`the correct reception of the coded
`transport block”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE — NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`
`
`Petition’s Element1.5 relies on TR25.835 exclusively
`
`¢ TR25.835 does not teach “a physical layer of a receiving
`side is provided for testing the correct reception of the
`codedtransport block”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE — NOT EVIDENCE
`PO Resnonse (Paper 9) at 38-43: PO Sur-Renlv (Paver 13) at 20-23.
`7
`
`