`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 38
`
` Date: February 26, 2021
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BROADCOM CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2019-01040
`Patent 8,284,844 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Commissioner for Patents, Performing the
`Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
`Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, SCOTT
`R. BOALICK, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and JACQUELINE WRIGHT
`BONILLA, Deputy Chief Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-01040
`Patent 8,284,844 B2
`
`
`The Office has received a request for Precedential Opinion Panel (POP)
`review of an issue raised in this case. See Ex. 3001. The request was referred to
`the POP panel referenced above.
`Upon consideration of the request, it is ORDERED that:
`The request for POP review is denied; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the original panel maintains authority over all
`matters, including considering the submitted rehearing request.
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Jonathan Bockman
`jbockman@mofo.com
`
`Shouvik Biswas
`sbiswas@mofo.com
`
`Fahd Hussein Patel
`fpatel@mofo.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER
`
`John M. Caracappa
`jcaracap@steptoe.com
`
`Katherine D. Cappaert
`kcappaert@steptoe.com
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`