`
`PTO/AIA/15 (03-13)
`Approved for use through 01/31/2014. 0MB 0651-0032
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Panerwork Reduction Act of 1995 no nersons are renuired to resnond to a collection of information unless it disnlavs a valid 0MB control number
`"\
`A-1441-US-DIV
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`
`First Named Inventor
`
`Joseph SHULTZ
`
`Title
`
`Capture PurI1IcatIon Processes 1or Proteins Expressed In a Non-Mammalian System
`
`UTILITY
`PATENT APPLICATION
`TRANSMITTAL
`
`\...
`
`(Only for new non provisional applications under 37 CFR 1.53/b))
`
`Express Moil Lobel No.
`
`APPLICATION ELEMENTS
`See MPEP chapter 600 concerning utility patent application contents.
`
`1. □ Fee Transmittal Form
`(PTO/SB/17 or equivalent)
`2. □ Applicant asserts small entity status.
`See 37 CFR 1.27
`3. □ Applicant certifies micro entity status. See 37 CFR 1.29.
`Applicant must attach form PTO/SB/15A or B or equivalent.
`[Toto/ Pages 38
`4.0 Specification
`Both the claims and abstract must start on a new page.
`(See MPEP § 608.01/a) for information on the preferred arrangement)
`l
`l
`
`5. 0
`
`Drawing(s) (35 U.S.C. 113)
`
`[Toto/ Sheets 5
`
`[Toto/ Pages
`6. Inventor's Oath or Declaration
`(including substitute statements under 37 CFR 1. 64 and assignments
`serving as an oath or declaration under 37 CFR 1. 63/e))
`
`a. D
`
`Newly executed (original or copy)
`
`b. D
`
`A copy from a prior application (37 CFR 1.63(d))
`
`* See note below.
`7.0 Application Data Sheet
`See 37 CFR 1.76 (PTO/AIA/14 or equivalent)
`
`8.
`
`CD-ROM or CD-R
`in duplicate, large table, or Computer Program (Appendix)
`
`□ Landscape Table on CD
`
`9. Nucleotide and/or Amino Acid Sequence Submission
`(if opplicob/e, items o. - c. ore required)
`
`a. D
`
`Computer Readable Form (CRF)
`
`b. D
`
`Specification Sequence Listing on:
`
`i. D CD-ROM or CD-R (2 copies); or
`
`ii.D Paper
`
`c. D
`
`Statements verifying identity of above copies
`
`ADDRESS TO:
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`ACCOMPANYING APPLICATION PAPERS
`Assignment Papers
`(cover sheet & document(s))
`Name of Assignee
`
`10. D
`
`l 11.D 37 CFR 3.73(c) Statement
`(when there is an assignee)
`12. □ English Translation Document
`(if applicable)
`13. □ Information Disclosure Statement
`(PTO/SB/08 or PT0-1449)
`
`D
`
`Power of Attorney
`
`D
`Copies of citations attached
`14. □ Preliminary Amendment
`15. □ Return Receipt Postcard
`(MPEP § 503) (Should be specifically itemized)
`16. □ Certified Copy of Priority Document(s)
`(if foreign priority is claimed)
`17. □ Nonpublication Request
`Under 35 U.S.C. 122(b)(2)(B)(i). Applicant must attach form PTO/SB/35
`or equivalent.
`18. □ Other:
`
`*Note: (1) Benefit claims under 37 CFR 1. 78 and foreign priority claims under 1.55 must be included in an Application Data Sheet (ADS).
`(2) For applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111, the application must contain an ADS specifying the applicant if the applicant is an
`assignee, person to whom the inventor is under an obligation to assign, or person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary
`interest in the matter. See 37 CFR 1.46(b).
`19. CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
`
`The address associated with Customer Number: 21069
`
`0
`
`OR □ Correspondence address below
`
`Name
`
`Address
`
`City
`
`Country
`
`State I
`I
`I Telephone I
`
`I Zip Code
`I
`
`
`Signature
`
`Name
`(Print/Type)
`
`/Raymond M. Doss/
`Raymond M. Doss
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.53(b). The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO
`to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 minutes to complete,
`including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on
`the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND
`TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`If you need assistance in completing the form, ca/11-800-PTO-9199 and select option 2.
`
`Date
`
`January 16, 2015
`Registration No. 61,000
`
`(Attorney/Agent)
`
`1 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`Privacy Act Statement
`
`The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection with your
`submission of the attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly, pursuant to the
`requirements of the Act, please be advised that: (1) the general authority for the collection of this information is
`35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2) furnishing of the information solicited is voluntary; and (3) the principal purpose for which
`the information is used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is to process and/or examine your submission
`related to a patent application or patent.
`If you do not furnish the requested information, the U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office may not be able to process and/or examine your submission, which may result in termination
`of proceedings or abandonment of the application or expiration of the patent.
`
`The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses:
`
`1. The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the Freedom of
`Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C 552a). Records from this system of
`records may be disclosed to the Department of Justice to determine whether disclosure of these
`records is required by the Freedom of Information Act.
`2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of presenting
`evidence to a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures to opposing counsel in
`the course of settlement negotiations.
`3. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of Congress
`submitting a request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when the individual has
`requested assistance from the Member with respect to the subject matter of the record.
`4. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the Agency
`having need for the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of information shall be
`required to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
`552a(m).
`5. A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in this
`system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of the World
`Intellectual Property Organization, pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
`6. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal agency for
`purposes of National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act
`(42 U.S.C. 218(c)).
`7. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the Administrator, General
`Services, or his/her designee, during an inspection of records conducted by GSA as part of that
`agency's responsibility to recommend improvements in records management practices and programs,
`under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. Such disclosure shall be made in accordance with the
`GSA regulations governing inspection of records for this purpose, and any other relevant (i.e., GSA or
`Commerce) directive. Such disclosure shall not be used to make determinations about individuals.
`8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the public after either
`publication of the application pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b) or issuance of a patent pursuant to 35
`U .S.C. 151. Further, a record may be disclosed, subject to the limitations of 37 CFR 1.14, as a routine
`use, to the public if the record was filed in an application which became abandoned or in which the
`proceedings were terminated and which application is referenced by either a published application, an
`application open to public inspection or an issued patent.
`9. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal, State, or local
`law enforcement agency, if the USPTO becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or
`regulation.
`
`2 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`CAPTURE PURIFICATION PROCESSES FOR PROTEINS EXPRESSED IN A NON(cid:173)
`
`MAMMALIAN SYSTEM
`
`This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.
`
`61/220,477 filed June 25, 2009, which is incorporated by reference herein.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates generally to processes for purifying proteins
`
`expressed in non-mammalian systems in both non-native soluble and non-native
`
`insoluble forms, and more particularly to the direct capture of such proteins from a refold
`
`mixture or a cell lysate pool by a separation matrix.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Fe-containing proteins are typically expressed in mammalian cells, such as CHO
`
`cells. The use of affinity chromatography to purify Fe-containing proteins is documented
`
`(see, e.g., Shukla et al., (2007) Journal of Chromatography B 848(1):28-39) and is
`
`successful, in part, due to the degree of Fe structure observed in proteins expressed in
`
`such systems. Fe-containing proteins expressed in non-mammalian cells, however, are
`
`often deposited in the expressing cells in limited solubility forms, such as inclusion
`
`bodies, that require refolding, and this has been a limiting factor in selecting non(cid:173)
`
`mammalian systems for expressing Fe-containing proteins.
`
`A drawback to the use of Protein A, Protein G and other chemistries is that in
`
`order for a protein comprising an Fe region to associate with the Protein A or Protein G
`
`molecule, the protein needs to have a minimum amount of structure. Often, the requisite
`
`amount of structure is absent from proteins expressed recombinantly in a soluble, but
`
`non-native, form and consequently Protein A chromatography is not performed in a
`
`purification process.
`
`In the case of a protein expressed in an insoluble non-native form, Protein A
`
`chromatography is typically not performed in a purification process until after the protein
`
`has been refolded to a degree that it can associate with the Protein A molecule and has
`
`been subsequently diluted out of its refold solution. This is because it was believed that
`
`1
`
`3 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`after a protein has been refolded it was necessary to dilute or remove the components of
`
`the refold mixture in a wash step, due to the tendency of the components that typically
`
`make up a refold solution to disrupt interactions between the target protein and the
`
`Protein A molecules (Wang et al., (1997). Biochem. J 325(Part 3):707-710). This
`
`dilution step can consume time and resources which, when working at a manufacturing
`
`scale of thousands of liters of culture, can be costly.
`
`The present disclosure addresses these issues by providing simplified methods of
`
`purifying proteins comprising Fe regions that are expressed in non-mammalian
`
`expression systems in a non-native soluble form or in a non-native insoluble form.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`A method of purifying a protein expressed in a non-native soluble form in a non(cid:173)
`
`mammalian expression system is provided. In one embodiment the method comprises (a)
`
`lysing a non-mammalian cell in which the protein is expressed in a non-native soluble
`
`form to generate a cell lysate; (b) contacting the cell lysate with an separation matrix
`
`under conditions suitable for the protein to associate with the separation matrix; ( c)
`
`washing the separation matrix; and ( d) eluting the protein from the separation matrix.
`
`The protein can be a complex protein, such as a protein is selected from the group
`
`consisting of a multimeric protein, an antibody and an Fe fusion protein. The non(cid:173)
`
`mammalian expression system can comprise bacteria or yeast cells. The separation
`
`matrix can be an affinity resin, such as an affinity resin selected from the group
`
`consisting of Protein A, Protein G and a synthetic mimetic affinity resin, or it can be a
`
`non-affinity resin, such as a non-affinity resin selected from the group consisting of ion
`
`exchange, mixed mode, and a hydrophobic interaction resin. The cell lysate can be
`
`filtered before it is contacted with the separation matrix. Although not required, the
`
`method can further comprise refolding the protein to its native form after it is eluted from
`
`the separation matrix.
`
`A method of purifying a protein expressed in a non-native limited solubility form
`
`in a non-mammalian expression system is provided. In one embodiment that method
`
`comprises (a) expressing a protein in a non-native limited solubility form in a non(cid:173)
`
`mammalian cell; (b) lysing a non-mammalian cell; ( c) solubilizing the expressed protein
`
`2
`
`4 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`in a solubilization solution comprising one or more of the following: (i) a denaturant; (ii)
`
`a reductant; and (iii) a surfactant; ( d) forming a refold solution comprising the
`
`solubilization solution and a refold buffer, the refold buffer comprising one or more of
`
`the following: (i) a denaturant; (ii) an aggregation suppressor; (iii) a protein stabilizer;
`
`and (iv) a redox component; (e) applying the refold solution to a separation matrix under
`
`conditions suitable for the protein to associate with the matrix; (f) washing the separation
`
`matrix; and (g) eluting the protein from the separation matrix.
`
`The non-native limited solubility form can be a component of an inclusion body.
`
`The protein can be a complex protein, such as a complex protein selected from the group
`
`consisting of a multimeric protein, an antibody, a peptibody, and an Fe fusion protein.
`
`The non-mammalian expression system can be bacteria or yeast cells. The denaturant
`
`can comprise one or more of urea, guanidinium salts, dimethyl urea, methylurea and
`
`ethyl urea,
`
`the reductant can comprise one or more of cysteine, DTT, beta(cid:173)
`
`mercaptoethanol and glutathione, the surfactant can comprise one or more of sarcosyl and
`
`sodium dodecylsulfate, the aggregation suppressor can be selected from the group
`
`consisting of arginine, proline, polyethylene glycols, non-ionic surfactants, ionic
`
`surfactants, polyhydric alcohols, glycerol, sucrose, sorbitol, glucose, tris, sodium sulfate,
`
`potassium sulfate and osmolytes, the protein stabilizer can comprise one or more of
`
`arginine, proline, polyethylene glycols, non-ionic surfactants,
`
`ionic surfactants,
`
`polyhydric alcohols, glycerol, sucrose, sorbitol, glucose, tris, sodium sulfate, potassium
`
`sulfate and osmolytes, and the redox component can comprise one or more of
`
`glutathione-reduced, glutathione-oxidized, cysteine, cystine, cysteamine, cystamine and
`
`beta-mercaptoethanol. The separation matrix can be an affinity resin such as an affinity
`
`resin selected from the group consisting of Protein A, Protein G, and synthetic mimetic
`
`affinity resin or the separation matrix can be a non-affinity resin selected from the group
`
`consisting of ion exchange, mixed mode, and a hydrophobic interaction resin.
`
`In other embodiments, the disclosed methods can further comprise the steps of (a)
`
`washing the separation matrix with a regeneration reagent; and (b) regenerating the
`
`separation matrix. The regeneration reagent can be one of a strong base, such as sodium
`
`hydroxide or a strong acid, such as phosphoric acid. The regenerating can comprise
`
`washing the separation matrix with a solution comprising one or both of a chaotrope
`
`3
`
`5 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`present at a concentration of 4-6 M and a reductant. The chaotrope can be one of urea,
`
`dimethyl urea, methylurea, ethylurea, and guanidinium, and the reductant can be one of
`
`cysteine, DTT, beta-mercaptoethanol and glutathione. In a particular embodiment the
`
`regenerating comprises washing the separation matrix with a solution comprising 50mM
`
`Tris, lOmM citrate, 6M urea, 50mM DTT at pH 7.4.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Figure 1 is a plot demonstrating the binding of refolded, non-mammalian non(cid:173)
`
`native limited solubility fraction complex protein, to Protein A media; in the figure the X
`
`denotes resin loading at a 9.32 min residence time, star denotes resin loading at a 7.68
`
`min residence time and solid circles denote resin loading at a 6 min residence time.
`
`Figure 2 is a table demonstrating purification of a complex protein comprising an
`
`F c domain using Protein A resin.
`
`Figure 3 is a table demonstrating the reusability of Protein A resin when used to
`
`capture a non-mammalian non-native limited solubility complex protein over 150 cycles
`
`using the disclosed methods.
`
`Figure 4 is a plot demonstrating the binding profiles of a refolded, non(cid:173)
`
`mammalian non-native limited solubility complex protein to six different ion exchange
`
`resins (IEX Resins 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, corresponding to Toyopearl SP550C™, Toyopearl
`
`SP650M™, GigaCAP S™, POROS HS50™, Toyopearl SP650C™ and GE Healthcare
`
`SPxL™, respectively) and a mixed-mode resin (MMC Resin 1, GE Healthcare MMC™)
`
`following capture using the disclosed methods.
`
`Figure 5 is a table demonstrating purification levels achieved for a protein
`
`comprising an Fe domain using one anion exhange resin (Fractogel TMAE™) and one
`
`cation exchange resin (Fractogel SO3-™).
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present disclosure provides methods of capturing on a separation matrix non(cid:173)
`
`native proteins produced in microbial cells. In the case of the direct capture of a protein
`
`expressed in a non-native soluble form the advantages of the present invention over
`
`typical processes include enhanced protein concentration, volume reduction, and
`
`4
`
`6 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`increased recovery over traditional methods, improved protein stability, and ultimately
`
`process cost savings.
`
`In the case of the direct capture of a protein expressed in a non-native limited
`
`solubility form, the advantages of the present invention over typical processes include the
`
`elimination of the need to dilute the protein out of a refold solution prior to capturing it
`
`on a separation matrix.
`
`Another advantage of the disclosed methods is that they may be performed at a
`
`range of scales, from laboratory scale ( typically milliliter or liter scale), a pilot plant scale
`
`(typically hundreds of liters) or on an industrial scale (typically thousands of liters). The
`
`application of the disclosed methods on large scales may be particularly desirable , due to
`
`the potential savings in time and resources.
`
`Non-mammalian, e.g., microbial, cells can naturally produce, or can be
`
`engineered to produce, proteins that are expressed in either a soluble or a limited
`
`solubility form. Most often, engineered non-mammalian cells will deposit the
`
`recombinant proteins into large limited solubility aggregates called inclusion bodies.
`
`However, certain cell growth conditions (e.g., temperature or pH) can be modified to
`
`drive the recombinant proteins to be expressed as intracellular, soluble monomers. As an
`
`alternative to producing a protein of interest in cells in which the protein is expressed in
`
`the form of limited solubility inclusion bodies, cell growth conditions can be modified
`
`such that proteins are expressed in a non-native yet soluble form. The cells can then be
`
`lysed and the protein can be isolated by capturing it directly from cell lysate using ion
`
`exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography or mixed mode chromatography, as
`
`described herein. The method can be particularly useful for purifying proteins
`
`comprising an F c region.
`
`In one aspect, therefore, the present disclosure relates to a method of isolating a
`
`protein of interest comprising an Fe region that is expressed in a non-mammalian cell in a
`
`non-native, yet soluble form, from a pool of lysate generated from the cell in which the
`
`protein was expressed. The method employs a separation matrix, such as Protein A. One
`
`beneficial aspect of the disclosed method is that it eliminates the need for a refolding step
`
`before the protein is applied to the separation matrix. That is, non-mammalian cells
`
`expressing the protein of interest in a non-native soluble form can be lysed, the lysate
`
`5
`
`7 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`applied directly to the separation matrix and the protein subsequently eluted from the
`
`separation matrix. This process allows the separation of proteins from cell cultures in
`
`highly concentrated pools that can be subsequently refolded at high concentrations and
`
`can be of benefit when producing large quantities of protein, particularly since the
`
`method is scalable from bench scale, which involves cultures on the order of several
`
`liters, up to production scale, which involves cultures of thousands of liters.
`
`Following isolation by the separation matrix, the protein of interest can optionally
`
`be subsequently refolded using any technique known or suspected to work well for the
`
`protein of interest.
`
`In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method of isolating a protein
`
`of interest comprising an Fe region that is expressed in a non-native limited solubility
`
`form, for example in inclusion bodies, that needs to be refolded and isolated from the
`
`refold mixture. Commonly, a refold solution contains a denaturant (e.g., urea or other
`
`chaotrope, organic solvent or strong detergent), an aggregation suppressor (e.g., a mild
`
`detergent, arginine or low concentrations of PEG), a protein stabilizer (e.g., glycerol,
`
`sucrose or other osmolyte, salts) and/or a redox component (e.g., cysteine, cystine,
`
`cystamine, cysteamine, glutathione ). While often beneficial for refolding proteins, these
`
`components can inhibit purification (see, e. g., Wang et al., (1997) Biochemical Journal
`
`325 (Part 3):707-710) and it is necessary to isolate or dilute the protein from these
`
`components for further processing, particularly before applying the protein to a
`
`separation matrix.
`
`In one embodiment of the disclosed method, purification is achieved by directly
`
`applying a protein of interest, which is present in a refold mixture, to a separation matrix.
`
`In this approach, following a refold step the entire refold mixture, including the protein of
`
`interest, is applied directly to a separation matrix, such as a Protein A or G resin. The
`
`protein of interest associates with the matrix in the presence of the components of refold
`
`buffer, impurities are washed away and the protein is eluted. Since the method omits the
`
`need for removing any components of the refold mixture before the refold mixture is
`
`applied to a separation matrix, the method can have the effect of saving steps, time and
`
`resources that are typically expended on removing the protein from refolding and dilution
`
`6
`
`8 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`buffers in purification processes. In some cases, the method can also reduce or eliminate
`
`the need for subsequent purification steps.
`
`The disclosed methods can also be employed to purify proteins expressed in a
`
`non-native soluble and non-native limited solubility forms
`
`in a non-mammalian
`
`expression system that have subsequently been derivatized. For example, following
`
`expression a protein comprising an Fe region can be associated with a small molecule,
`
`such as a toxin. Such conjugates can be purified using the methods described herein.
`
`As used herein, the terms "a" and "an" mean one or more unless specifically
`
`I.
`
`Definitions
`
`indicated otherwise.
`
`As used herein, the term "non-mammalian expression system" means a system for
`
`expressing proteins in cells derived from an organism other than a mammal, including but
`
`not limited to, prokaryotes, including bacteria such as E. coli, and yeast. Often a non(cid:173)
`
`mammalian expression system is employed to express a recombinant protein of interest,
`
`while in other instances a protein of interest is an endogenous protein that is expressed by
`
`a non-mammalian cell. For purposes of the present disclosure, regardless of whether a
`
`protein of interest is endogenous or recombinant, if the protein is expressed in a non(cid:173)
`
`mammalian cell then that cell is a "non-mammalian expression system." Similarly, a
`
`"non-mammalian cell" is a cell derived from an organism other than a mammal,
`
`examples of which include bacteria or yeast.
`
`As used herein, the term "denaturant" means any compound having the ability to
`
`remove some or all of a protein's secondary and tertiary structure when placed in contact
`
`with the protein. The term denaturant refers to particular chemical compounds that affect
`
`denaturation, as well as solutions comprising a particular compound that affect
`
`denaturation. Examples of denaturants that can be employed in the disclosed method
`
`include, but are not limited to urea, guanidinium salts, dimethyl urea, methylurea,
`
`ethylurea and combinations thereof.
`
`As used herein, the term "aggregation suppressor" means any compound having
`
`the ability to disrupt and decrease or eliminate interactions between two or more proteins.
`
`Examples of aggregation suppressors can include, but are not limited to, amino acids
`
`7
`
`9 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`such as arginine, proline, and glycine; polyols and sugars such as glycerol, sorbitol,
`
`sucrose, and trehalose; surfactants such as, polysorbate-20, CHAPS, Triton X-100, and
`
`dodecyl maltoside; and combinations thereof.
`
`As used herein, the term "protein stabilizer" means any compound having the
`
`ability to change a protein's reaction equilibrium state, such that the native state of the
`
`protein is improved or favored. Examples of protein stabilizers can include, but are not
`
`limited to, sugars and polyhedric alcohols such as glycerol or sorbitol; polymers such as
`
`polyethylene glycol (PEG) and a-cyclodextrin; amino acids salts such as arginine,
`
`proline, and glycine; osmolytes and certain Hoffmeister salts such as Tris, sodium sulfate
`
`and potassium sulfate; and combinations thereof.
`
`As used herein, the terms "Fe" and "Fe region" are used interchangeably and
`
`mean a fragment of an antibody that comprises human or non-human (e.g., murine) Ctt2
`
`and Cm immunoglobulin domains, or which comprises two contiguous regions which are
`
`at least 90% identical to human or non-human Ctt2 and Cm immunoglobulin domains.
`
`An Fe can but need not have the ability to interact with an Fe receptor. See, e.g.,
`
`Hasemann & Capra, "Immunoglobulins: Structure and Function," in William E. Paul, ed.,
`
`Fundamental Immunology, Second Edition, 209, 210-218 (1989), which is incorporated
`
`by reference herein in its entirety.
`
`As used herein, the terms "protein" and "polypeptide" are used interchangeably
`
`and mean any chain of at least five naturally or non-naturally occurring amino acids
`
`linked by peptide bonds.
`
`As used herein, the term "complex molecule" means any protein that is (a) larger
`
`than 20,000 MW, or comprises greater than 250 amino acid residues, and (b) comprises
`
`two or more disulfide bonds in its native form. A complex molecule can, but need not,
`
`form multimers. Examples of complex molecules include but are not limited to,
`
`antibodies, peptibodies and polypeptides comprising an Fe domain and other large
`
`proteins. Peptibodies are described in US Patent No 6,660,843, US Patent No 7,138,370
`
`and US Patent No 7,511,012.
`
`As used herein, the term "peptibody" refers to a polypeptide comprising one or
`
`more bioactive peptides joined together, optionally via linkers, with an Fe domain. See
`
`8
`
`10 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`US Patent No 6,660,843, US Patent No 7,138,370 and US Patent No 7,511,012 for
`
`examples of peptibodies.
`
`As used herein, the terms "F c fusion" and "F c fusion protein" are used
`
`interchangeably and refer to a peptide or polypeptide covalently attached to an Fe
`
`domain.
`
`As used herein the term "Protein A" means any protein identical or substantially
`
`similar
`
`to Staphylococcal Protein A,
`
`including commercially available and/or
`
`recombinant forms of Protein A. For the purposes of this invention, Protein A
`
`specifically includes engineered Protein A derived media, such as Mab Select SuRe™
`
`media (GE Healthcare), in which a single subunit (e.g., the B subunit) is replicated two
`
`or more times and joined in a contiguous sequence to form a recombinant Protein A
`
`molecule, and other non-naturally occurring Protein A molecules.
`
`As used herein, the term "Protein G" means any protein identical or substantially
`
`similar to Streptococcal Protein G, including commercially available and/or recombinant
`
`forms of Protein G.
`
`As used herein, the term "substantially similar," when used in the context of a
`
`protein, including Protein A, means proteins that are at least 80%, preferably at least 90%
`
`identical to each other in amino acid sequence and maintain or alter in a desirable manner
`
`the biological activity of the unaltered protein.
`
`Included in amino acids considered
`
`identical for the purpose of determining whether proteins are substantially similar are
`
`amino acids that are conservative substitutions, unlikely to affect biological activity,
`
`including the following: Ala for Ser, Val for Ile, Asp for Glu, Thr for Ser, Ala for Gly,
`
`Ala for Thr, Ser for Asn, Ala for Val, Ser for Gly, Tyr for Phe, Ala for Pro, Lys for Arg,
`
`Asp for Asn, Leu for Ile, Leu for Val, Ala for Glu, Asp for Gly, and these changes in the
`
`reverse. See, e.g., Neurath et al., The Proteins, Academic Press, New York (1979). The
`
`percent identity of two amino sequences can be determined by visual inspection and
`
`mathematical calculation, or more preferably, the comparison is done by comparing
`
`sequence information using a computer program such as the Genetics Computer Group
`
`(GCG; Madison, Wis.) Wisconsin package version 10.0 program, "GAP" (Devereux et
`
`al., 1984, Nucl. Acids Res. 12: 387) or other comparable computer programs. The
`
`preferred default parameters for the "GAP" program includes: (1) the weighted amino
`
`9
`
`11 of 196
`
`Fresenius Kabi
`Exhibit 1033
`
`
`
`acid comparison matrix of Gribskov and Burgess ((1986), Nucl. Acids Res. 14: 6745), as
`
`described by Schwartz and Dayhoff, eds., Atlas of Polypeptide Sequence and Structure,
`
`National Biomedical Research Foundation, pp. 353-358 (1979), or other comparable
`
`comparison matrices; (2) a penalty of 30 for each gap and an additional penalty of 1 for
`
`each symbol in each gap for amino acid sequences; (3) no penalty for end gaps; and (4)
`
`no maximum penalty for long gaps. Other programs used by those skilled in the art of
`
`sequence comparison can also be used.
`
`As used herein, the terms "isolate" and "purify" are used interchangeably and
`
`mean to reduce by 1 %, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%,
`
`50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90% or 95%, or more, the amount of
`
`heterogenous elements, for example biological macromolecules such as proteins or DNA,
`
`that may be present in a sample comprising a protein of interest. The presence of
`
`heterogenous proteins can be assayed by any appropriate method including High(cid:173)
`
`performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), gel electrophoresis and staining and/or
`
`ELISA assay. The presence of DNA and other nucleic acids can be assayed by any
`
`appropriate method including gel electrophoresis and staining and/or assays employing
`
`polymerase chain reaction.
`
`As used herein, the term "separation matrix" means any adsorbent material that
`
`utilizes specific, reversible interactions between synthetic and/or biomolecules, e.g., the
`
`property of Protein A to bind to an Fe region of an IgG antibody or other Fe-containing
`
`protein, in order to effect the separation of the protein from its environment. In other
`
`embodiments the specific, reversible interactions can be base on a property such as
`
`isoelectric point, hydrophobicity, or size.
`
`In one particular embodiment, a separation
`
`matrix comprises an adsorbent, such as Protein A, affixed to a solid support. See, e.g.,
`
`Ostrove (1990) in "Guide to Protein Purification," Methods in Enzymology 182: 357-379,
`
`