`
`_________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2020-00101
`Patent 8,495,359
`
`
`_________________
`
`
`PETITION’S REQUEST FOR
`REFUND OF THE POST-INSTUTUTION FEE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00101
`Patent 8,495,359
`
`On November 1, 2019, Microsoft Corporation (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition
`
`for Inter Partes Review seeking review of claims 1-15 of U.S. Patent No. 8,495,359.
`
`Patent Owner Uniloc 2017 LLC (“Patent Owner”), submitted its Preliminary
`
`Response on February 7, 2020 (Paper No. 8). On May 6, 2020, the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board issued its Decision denying institution of Petitioner’s Inter Partes
`
`Review (Paper No. 9).
`
`Petitioner challenged 15 claims, and Petitioner paid a post-institution fee of
`
`$15,000 calculated as follows:
`
`•
`
`$15,000 (up to 15 claims per 37 CFR § 42.15(a)(2)).
`
`Accordingly, Petitioner is entitled to a refund of $15,000.
`
`The post-institution fee was paid on November 1, 2019 from Deposit Account
`
`02-4550, and the appropriate fee may be credited back to the Deposit Account.
`
`Upon review and approval of this request, Petitioner respectfully request that
`
`the Board credit the post-institution fee to Deposit Account 02-4550.
`
`Dated: June 5, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Todd M. Siegel/
`Todd M. Siegel (Reg. No. 73,232)
`todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`Andrew M. Mason (Reg. No. 64,034)
`andrew.mason@klarquist.com
`Robert F. Scotti (Reg. No. 39,830)
`robert.scotti@klarquist.com
`Joseph T. Jakubek, Reg. No. 34,190
`joseph.jakubek@klarquist.com
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Refund of the Post-Institution Fee
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00101
`Patent 8,495,359
`
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Refund of the Post-Institution Fee
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00101
`Patent 8,495,359
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on June 5, 2020, a true and correct copy of
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Refund of the Post-Institution Fee was served on
`
`counsel for Uniloc 2017 LLC via electronic mail as follows:
`
`Ryan Loveless – Lead Counsel
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`Brett Mangrum – Back-up Counsel
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`James Etheridge – Back-up Counsel
`jim@etheridgelaw.com
`Jeffrey Huang – Back-up Counsel
`jeff@etheridgelaw.com
`Etheridge Law Group
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Todd M. Siegel/
`Todd M. Siegel (Reg. No. 73,232)
`todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`Andrew M. Mason (Reg. No. 64,034)
`andrew.mason@klarquist.com
`Robert F. Scotti (Reg. No. 39,830)
`robert.scotti@klarquist.com
`Joseph T. Jakubek, Reg. No. 34,190
`joseph.jakubek@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
