`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`DATASPEED INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SUCXESS, LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`_______________
`
`IPR2020-00116
`Patent 9,871,671 B2
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`DATASPEED INC.,
`v.
`SUCXESS, LLC
`
`IPR2020-00116 (Patent 9,871,671 B2)
`IPR2020-00147 (Patent 10,027,505 B2)
`
`Oral Hearing Date: February 11, 2021
`
`Before Hon. Trevor M. Jefferson, Minn Chung, and Nathan A. Engels,
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`
`
`Summary of Asserted Grounds and Prior Art (’671)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`IPR2020‐00116, Paper 12, p. 7
`
`
`
`Summary of Asserted Grounds and Prior Art (’505)
`
`3DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2020‐00147, Paper 10, pp. 5‐6
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,871,671 B2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Exhibit 1001, Page 1;
`11:18‐35; 11:45‐53; 12:10‐21
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`5
`
`’671 Patent: Independent Claim 1
`
`Claim
`
`1. A method, comprising:
`
`providing a vehicle having a factory-installed first apparatus
`including a processor, programmed to communicate with a
`factory-installed second apparatus through a vehicle data
`bus with a first message having an identifier;
`electrically disconnecting the vehicle data bus between the
`factory-installed first apparatus and the factory-installed
`second apparatus;
`adding a second data bus to the vehicle;
`
`-00116 Petition
`Citations
`Petition p. 18
`
`Petition pp. 18-22
`
`Petition pp. 22-23
`
`Petition p. 24
`
`electrically connecting a retrofit apparatus to the vehicle
`data bus and to the second data bus;
`
`Petition p. 24
`
`electrically connecting the factory-installed first apparatus
`to the second data bus; and
`
`Petition p. 24
`
`transmitting a second message from the retrofit apparatus to
`the factory-installed first apparatus through the second data
`bus, the second message being indistinguishable from the
`first message.
`
`Petition pp. 24-26
`
`Evidence Relied upon
`
`Munoz; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶219-220
`Munoz, Negley, Bosch,
`SAE; Leale Declaration
`¶¶55, 61, 67-71, 133-
`145, 151, 221-226
`Munoz; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶139-145,
`154, 227-228
`Munoz; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶139, 142,
`155
`Munoz; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶128-132,
`137-139, 157
`Munoz; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶134-144,
`159, 229-234
`Munoz; Negley, Leale
`Declaration ¶¶143-145,
`149-161, 235-241
`IPR2020‐00116 Petition
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`’671 Patent: Independent Claims 6, 10
`
`Claim
`
`6. A vehicle, comprising:
`
`-00116 Petition
`Citations
`Petition p. 28
`
`Evidence Relied
`upon
`
`Munoz
`
`a factory-installed first apparatus including a first
`processor which is programmed to receive a first
`message on a vehicle data bus from a factory-installed
`second apparatus; and
`a retrofit apparatus connected to the vehicle data bus
`including a second processor programmed to transmit a
`second message which mimics the first message through
`a second data bus.
`10. A vehicle, comprising:
`
`Petition pp. 29-30 Munoz, Negley,
`Bosch, SAE; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶134,
`172
`Petition pp. 30-31 Munoz; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶128-
`132, 174, 253-254,
`256-261
`Munoz
`
`Petition p. 34
`
`a factory-installed first apparatus including a first
`processor, programmed to receive a first message via a
`vehicle data bus from a factory-installed second
`apparatus, the first message having a message identifier;
`and
`a retrofit apparatus, operatively connected to the vehicle
`data bus, including a second processor programmed to
`send a second message having the same message
`identifier, wherein the factory-installed first apparatus
`communicates with the retrofit apparatus through a
`second data bus.
`
`Petition pp. 35-36 Munoz, Negley,
`Bosch, SAE; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶122-
`148, 184-185, 271-275
`
`Petition pp. 36-37 Munoz, Negley,
`Bosch, SAE; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶128-
`132, 134, 139, 141,
`142, 187, 189, 276-
`281
`IPR2020‐00116 Petition, p.
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,027,505 B2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`7
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Exhibit 1101, Page 1;
`11:18‐35; 11:45‐53; 12:10‐21
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`8
`
`’505 Patent: Independent Claim 1
`
`Claim
`
`1. A method, comprising:
`
`providing a vehicle having a factory-installed first
`apparatus including a processor, programmed to
`communicate with a factory-installed second apparatus
`through a vehicle data bus with a first message having an
`identifier;
`electrically disconnecting the vehicle data bus between
`the factory-installed first apparatus and the factory-
`installed second apparatus;
`electrically connecting a retrofit apparatus to the vehicle
`data bus; and
`
`transmitting a second message from the retrofit
`apparatus to the factory-installed first apparatus, the
`second message being indistinguishable from the first
`message.
`
`-00147 Petition
`Citations
`Petition p. 13
`
`Evidence Relied
`upon
`
`Munoz
`
`Petition pp. 13-17 Munoz, Negley,
`Bosch, SAE; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶53-85,
`133-145, 151-152
`
`Petition p. 18-19
`
`Petition pp. 17-18 Munoz; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶139-
`145, 153-154
`Munoz; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶127-
`148, 155-156
`Munoz; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶143-
`145, 160-161
`
`Petition p. 19-20
`
`
`
`’505 Patent: Independent Claims 6, 10
`
`Claim
`
`6. A vehicle, comprising:
`
`-00147 Petition
`Citations
`Petition pp. 23, 53 Munoz, Allen
`
`Evidence Relied upon
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`Munoz, Negley, Bosch,
`SAE, Allen; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶53-85,
`134, 167-169, 294
`Munoz, Allen, Negley,
`Bosch; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶128-132,
`170-171, 289-310
`Munoz, Allen, Lobaza
`
`Munoz, Negley, Bosch,
`SAE, Allen; Leale
`Declaration ¶¶126-148,
`180-181, 184, 293-294,
`323-330, 352-355
`Munoz, Allen, Negley,
`SAE, Bosch, Lobaza;
`Leale Declaration ¶¶53-
`85, 128-132, 134, 139,
`141, 182-183, 187, 331-
`336, 356-357
`
`a factory-installed first apparatus including a first processor
`which is programmed to receive a first message on a
`vehicle data bus from a factory-installed second apparatus;
`and
`a retrofit apparatus connected to the vehicle data bus
`including a second processor programmed to transmit a
`second message which mimics the first message.
`
`Petition pp. 23-25,
`53-54
`
`Petition pp. 25-26,
`54-58
`
`10. A vehicle, comprising:
`
`a factory-installed first apparatus including a first
`processor, programmed to receive a first message via a
`vehicle data bus from a factory-installed second apparatus,
`the first message having a message identifier; and
`
`Petition pp. 29, 60,
`65
`Petition p. 29-30,
`61, 65-66
`
`a retrofit apparatus, operatively connected to the vehicle
`data bus, including a second processor programmed to send
`a second message having the same message identifier.
`
`Petition p. 30-31,
`61-62, 66-67
`
`
`
`Comparison of Challenged Claims
`’505 Patent
`’671 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Exhibit 1001 (‘671
`patent): 11:18‐12:52
`
`IPR2020‐00147 Exhibit 1101 (‘505
`patent): 11:18‐12:45
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s ArgumentsPatent Owner’s Arguments
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`These features are all taught by Munoz alone or in combination with
`Negley, SAE, and Bosch.
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), pp. 2‐3;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`Munoz’s Controls for Roof Control Electronics 110 in Dashboard 105Munoz’s Controls for Roof Control Electronics 110 in Dashboard 105
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 18;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 16;
`Exhibit 1004, 6:26‐30
`
`
`
`
`
`Munoz’s Controls for Roof Control Electronics 110 in Dashboard 105Munoz’s Controls for Roof Control Electronics 110 in Dashboard 105
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 4;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 4;
`Exhibit 1004, 6:26‐31
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Position is in Conflict with Munoz: Roof ControlsPatent Owner’s Position is in Conflict with Munoz: Roof Controls
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 6;
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 17 (PO Response), pp. 35‐36;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 6;
`IPR2020‐00147 Paper 15 (PO Response), p. 33
`
`
`
`
`
`Munoz Teaches Terminating the Original Data ConnectionMunoz Teaches Terminating the Original Data Connection
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 15;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 14;
`Exhibit 1004, Figs. 1‐2
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Position Conflicts with Munoz: Data ConnectionPatent Owner’s Position Conflicts with Munoz: Data Connection
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), pp. 5‐6;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 5;
`Exhibit 1004, Fig. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony: Original Data ConnectionShahbakhti Testimony: Original Data Connection
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 20;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 18;
`Exhibit 1020, 95:13‐22
`
`
`
`
`
`Munoz Discloses Adding a Second Bus (-00116 Case)Munoz Discloses Adding a Second Bus (-00116 Case)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 15; Pet., p. 22 n.10
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 14;
`Exhibit 1004, 6:37‐40, Figs. 1‐2
`
`
`
`
`
`Roof Control Module 100 is Added (Part of Device 200)Roof Control Module 100 is Added (Part of Device 200)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 14;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 13;
`Exhibit 1004, 5:40‐42; id 6:37‐40
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony: Roof Control Module 100Shahbakhti Testimony: Roof Control Module 100
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`Exhibit 1020, 90:20‐22 (excerpt)
`
`Exhibit 1020, 91:1‐5 (excerpt);
`see also IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 16;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 15
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Position is in Conflict with Munoz: Second BusPatent Owner’s Position is in Conflict with Munoz: Second Bus
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 6;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), pp. 5‐6;
`Exhibit 1004, 6:37‐40, Fig. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`All Communication Goes Through Roof Control Module 100All Communication Goes Through Roof Control Module 100
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 22;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 20;
`Exhibit 1004, Fig. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Position Conflicts with Munoz: All CommunicationsPatent Owner’s Position Conflicts with Munoz: All Communications
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), pp. 6‐7;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 6;
`Exhibit 1004, Fig. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Munoz Teaches Roof Control Module Removing or Altering DataMunoz Teaches Roof Control Module Removing or Altering Data
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`24
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 17;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 15;
`Exhibit 1004, Fig. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Position Conflicts with Munoz: GatewayPatent Owner’s Position Conflicts with Munoz: Gateway
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 6;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 6;
`Exhibit 1004, Fig. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Munoz Teaches Spoofing AND a GatewayMunoz Teaches Spoofing AND a Gateway
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`26
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 7;
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 17 (PO Response), pp. 39, 49;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 7;
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Response Confirms: Separate Buses Facilitate SpoofingPatent Owner Response Confirms: Separate Buses Facilitate Spoofing
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`27
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 17 (PO Response), 40; id p. 49
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Declaration: SpoofingShahbakhti Declaration: Spoofing
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 8; Exhibit 2028, ¶30
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 8; Exhibit 2028, ¶27
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony: SpoofingShahbakhti Testimony: Spoofing
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`29
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 8;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 8;
`Exhibit 1020, 81:22‐82:17
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Interpretation Addresses Munoz’s Switch 120Petitioner’s Interpretation Addresses Munoz’s Switch 120
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 22;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 20;
`Exhibit 1004, 6:32‐36
`
`
`
`
`
`Munoz Discloses Switch 120; Patent Owner Ignores ItMunoz Discloses Switch 120; Patent Owner Ignores It
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), pp. 7;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), pp. 6‐7;
`Exhibit 1004, 6:32‐36, Fig. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Declaration: Switch 120Shahbakhti Declaration: Switch 120
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 23; Exhibit 2028, ¶84
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 21; Exhibit 2028, ¶80
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony: Switch 120Shahbakhti Testimony: Switch 120
`
`Exhibit 1020, 73:22‐24 (excerpt)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`Exhibit 1020, 71:3‐11 (excerpt)
`
`Exhibit 1020, 72:4 (excerpt);
`see also IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 23;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 21
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Arguments Are WrongPatent Owner’s Arguments Are Wrong
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`34
`
`MUNOZ teaches
`splitting a CAN
`bus to establish a
`second data bus,
`and spoofing /
`mimicking a first
`message with a
`second message
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), pp. 2‐3;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`There is Motivation to Combine the Asserted ArtThere is Motivation to Combine the Asserted Art
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 12;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), pp. 10‐11
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Does Not Argue The Lobaza FeaturesPatent Owner Does Not Argue The Lobaza Features
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 25;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 22
`
`
`
`Munoz Fig. 1 (annotated)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`37
`
`Exhibit 1007;
`see also IPR2020‐00116 Petition, p. 19;
`IPR2020‐00147 Petition, p. 14
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`38
`
`Slide
`
`39
`
`43
`
`45
`
`50
`
`52
`
`56
`
`Other Issues
`
`Issue
`
`Patent Owner’s Discussion of Various Convertible Cars Is Irrelevant to Munoz’s
`Teachings
`Patent Owner’s “Diagnostic Message” Theory is Not Supported by Munoz
`
`Munoz Teaches Gateway Functions Performed by Roof Control Module, and
`Taube is Consistent with Munoz
`Munoz’s Figs. 3-7 Do Not Refute Petitioner’s Interpretation of Munoz
`
`Claims 6-12 are unpatentable over the combination of Allen, Negley, SAE, and
`Bosch (the “Allen Challenge”)
`Claims 10 and 14-16 are unpatentable over the combination of Lobaza, Allen,
`Negley, SAE, and Bosch (the “Lobaza Challenge”)
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`Issue #1:
`
`Patent Owner’s Discussion of Various Convertible Cars Is Irrelevant to Munoz’s Teachings
`
`Issue
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s ResponsePatent Owner’s Response
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`40
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 17, p. 38; IPR2020‐00147 Paper 15, p. 35;
`IPR2020‐00116 Exhibit 2028, ¶60; IPR2020‐00147 Exhibit 2028, ¶57
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s ResponsePatent Owner’s Response
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`41
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 17, p. 36; IPR2020‐00147 Paper 15, pp. 33‐34
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti TestimonyShahbakhti Testimony
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 5;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 5;
`Exhibit 1020, 91:14‐92:2
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`43
`
`Issue #2:
`
`Patent Owner’s “Diagnostic Message” Theory is Not Supported by Munoz
`
`Issue
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`44
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 9;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 8;
`Exhibit 1004, 3:54‐64
`
`MunozMunoz
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`45
`
`Issue #3:
`
`Munoz Teaches Gateway Functions Performed by Roof Control Module, and Taube is
`Consistent with Munoz
`
`Issue
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony: Gateways are UsefulShahbakhti Testimony: Gateways are Useful
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`46
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 10;
`Exhibit 1020, 16:14‐18; id 18:8‐18
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony: Gateway Between BusesShahbakhti Testimony: Gateway Between Buses
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`47
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 11;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 10;
`Exhibit 1020, 85:11‐13
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony on Taube (Ex. 1015)Shahbakhti Testimony on Taube (Ex. 1015)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`48
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 18;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 16;
`Exhibit 1020, 17:6‐18:3
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony: Switch 120Shahbakhti Testimony: Switch 120
`
`Exhibit 1020, 73:22‐24 (excerpt)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`49
`
`Exhibit 1020, 71:3‐11 (excerpt)
`
`Exhibit 1020, 72:4 (excerpt);
`see also IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 23;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 21
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`50
`
`Issue #4:
`
`Munoz’s Figs. 3-7 Do Not Refute Petitioner’s Interpretation of Munoz
`
`Issue
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`51
`
`IPR2020‐00116 Paper 20 (Pet. Reply), p. 24;
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 9;
`Exhibit 1004, 6:44‐46; id 7:15‐65; id Fig. 3
`
`MunozMunoz
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`52
`
`Issue #5:
`
`Issue
`
`Claims 6‐12 are unpatentable over the combination of Allen,
`Negley, SAE, and Bosch (the “Allen Challenge”)
`
`
`
`
`
`Allen ChallengeAllen Challenge
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`53
`
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), pp. 22‐23;
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony on AllenShahbakhti Testimony on Allen
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`54
`
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 23;
`Exhibit 1020, 131:22‐132:5; 132:24‐133:1;
`IPR2020‐01147 Petition, p. 53; Exhibit 1018, Fig. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony on AllenShahbakhti Testimony on Allen
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`55
`
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 23;
`Exhibit 1018, [0021]; Exhibit 1020, 142:3‐11
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`56
`
`Issue #6:
`
`Issue
`
`Claims 10 and 14‐16 are unpatentable over the combination of
`Lobaza, Allen, Negley, SAE, and Bosch (the “Lobaza Challenge”)
`
`
`
`
`
`Lobaza ChallengeLobaza Challenge
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`57
`
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 25;
`
`
`
`
`
`Lobaza Fig. 3Lobaza Fig. 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`58
`
`Q: Can Lobaza’s Pre‐Impact
`System be Added By Retrofit?
`
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), pp. 26‐27;
`Exhibit 1014, p.3
`
`
`
`
`
`Shahbakhti Testimony on Lobaza’s Pre-Impact System 104 as a RetrofitShahbakhti Testimony on Lobaza’s Pre-Impact System 104 as a Retrofit
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`59
`
`IPR2020‐01147 Paper 18 (Pet. Reply), p. 26;
`Exhibit 1020, 129:14‐130:16
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on February 10, 2021, a true and correct copy of the
`
`
`
`foregoing Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibits was served via email, by consent, to
`
`Patent Owner by serving the correspondence email addresses of record as follows:
`
`Axel Nix
`Smartpat PLC 400
`Renaissance Center, Suite 2600
`Detroit, MI 48243
`Telephone: (248) 854-2233
`axel.nix@smartpat.net
`max@maxwellgoss.com
`admin@maxwellgoss.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` By: /s/ Wayne M. Helge
`
`Wayne M. Helge
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
