`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 9
`Date: June 15, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`IMMERVISION, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2020-00179 (Patent 6,844,990 B2)
`IPR2020-00195 (Patent 6,844,990 B2)1
`
`Before KRISTINA M. KALAN, WESLEY B. DERRICK, and
`KIMBERLY MCGRAW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`DERRICK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order applies to both listed cases. The parties may not use this style
`heading unless authorized.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00179 (Patent 6,844,990 B2)
`IPR2020-00195 (Patent 6,844,990 B2)
`
`On June 11, 2020, in an email (Ex. 3001), Petitioner requested
`authorization to file a motion to submit supplemental information pursuant
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.123(a). Petitioner identifies the supplemental information
`as:
`
`Code V Designer’s Manual: System of Optical Design
`1)
`Programs, 2nd ed., Optical Research Associates (1978) (Ex. 1014);
`2)
`Excerpts of the Code V Reference Manual, Version 7.60,
`Optical Research Associates (Feb. 1994) (Ex. 1015);
`3)
`“A Technical Overview of CODE V Version 7” by Bruce
`R. Irving of Optical Research Associates, Proceedings Volume 0766
`of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE),
`Recent Trends in Optical Systems Design and Computer Lens Design
`Workshop (1987) (Ex. 1016); and
`4)
`A supplemental declaration from Petitioner’s expert
`(Ex. 1017) that authenticates the above three additional pieces of
`evidence and notes that they corroborate his opinion in his original
`declaration that the Code V lens design software would render the
`same results in 2001 as it did at the time of his declaration.
`Ex. 3001. Petitioner also represents that Patent Owner “do[es] not oppose
`Petitioner’s motion to submit the above-referenced exhibits.” Id. (emphasis
`omitted).
`Petitioner’s unopposed request for authorization to file a motion to
`submit supplemental information is granted. Petitioner shall file its motion,
`limited to five (5) pages, within seven (7) days of this Order. Patent Owner
`is also authorized to file a reply, if desired, limited to five (5) pages, within
`seven (7) days of Petitioner’s motion. Filing of exhibits, including those
`identified above, is not authorized at this time.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00179 (Patent 6,844,990 B2)
`IPR2020-00195 (Patent 6,844,990 B2)
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for authorization to file a motion
`to submit supplemental information is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file its motion, limited to
`five (5) pages, within seven (7) days of this Order;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file a reply,
`if desired, to Petitioner’s motion; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall file its reply, limited
`to five (5) pages, within seven (7) days of Petitioner’s motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00179 (Patent 6,844,990 B2)
`IPR2020-00195 (Patent 6,844,990 B2)
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Dion Bregman
`dion.bregman@morganlewis.com
`
`Bradford Cangro
`bradford.cangro@morganlewis.com
`
`Andrew Devkar
`andrew.devkar@morganlewis.com
`
`Collin Park
`collin.park@morganlewis.com
`
`Jeremy Peterson
`jpeterson@morganlewis.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Stephen Murray
`smurray@panitchlaw.com
`
`John Simmons
`jsimmons@panitchlaw.com
`
`Dennis Butler
`dbutler@panitchlaw.com
`
`Keith Jones
`kjones@panitchlaw.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
