throbber
Appl. No.: 09/333,245
`
`Filed:
`
`Jun. 15, 1999
`
`Related US. Application Data
`
`
`
`21
`
`22
`
` 56
`
`62
`
`Division of application No. 08/827,510, Mar. 28, 1997, Pat.
`No. 5,952,300.
`Provisional application No. 60/015,638, Apr. 19, 1996.
`60
`Int. Cl.7 ....................... A61K 38/00
`51
`52 US. Cl.
`. 514/11; 924/499
`
`
`Field of Search ............
`58
`514/11; 424/465,
`424/499; 530/317
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5,037.644
`5,120,859
`5,336,756
`5,378,804
`5,466,781
`5,514.650
`5,552,521
`5,665,760
`
`.
`
`8/1991 Shaked et al.
`6/1992 Webb .
`8/1994 Schwartz et al. .
`1/1995 Balkovcc ct al.
`11/1995 Dorin et al.
`,
`5/1996 Balkovec et al. .
`9/1996 Belyk et al.
`.
`.
`9/1997 Brown et al.
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`....................... 530/317
`
`“The Merck Manual,” 16th edition. Berkovv, editor. (1992)
`(Merck & Co, lnc.: Rahway NJ), p. 159—171.
`The Merck Manual, 16” Edition, pp. 159—171 (1992).
`Remington’s Pharma. Sciences, pp.
`146371469
`1478—1484 (1980).
`Remington’s Pharma. Sciences. p. 238 (1980).
`The Determination of Ionization Constants, 3"1 Edition,
`Chapman & Hall, p. 74 (1984), by Albert, et a1.
`Remington’s Pharma. Sciences, 18“ Edition, Chapter 17,
`pp. 241—243 (1990).
`
`and
`
`[19]
`United States Patent
`6,136,783
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`Neururkar et al. Oct. 24, 2000 [45] Date of Patent:
`
`
`
`U8006136783A
`
`[54] ANTIFUNGAI. COMPOSITIONS
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Maneesh J. Neururkar, Lansdale;
`Michael J. Kaufman, New Hope;
`William A. Hunke, Harleysville, all of
`Pa.
`
`73
`
`Assignee: Merck & C0., Inc., Rahway, NJ.
`
`Primary Examiner—Irene Marx
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Elliott Korsen; Mark R. Daniel
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The invention is a pharmaceutical composition for intrave—
`nous administration to a patient comprising
`
`a pharmaceutically effective amount of a compound
`a)
`having the formula
`
`(I)
`
`
`
`and the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof;
`
`b) a pharmaceutically acceptable amount of an excipient
`such as a bulking agent effective to form a lyophilized cake;
`and
`
`c) a pharmaceutically acceptable amount of acetate buffer
`elIective to provide a pH of between about 4 and 7.
`
`6 Claims, N0 Drawings
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`

`

`6,136,783
`
`1
`ANTIFUNGAL COMPOSITIONS
`
`This application is a division of Ser. No. 08/827,510 filed
`Mar. 28, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,952,300, and a provi-
`sional application Ser. No. 60/015,638 filed Apr. 19, 1996.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`This invention relates to compositions for treating and/or
`preventing ilngal infections.
`
`There is an increasing need for novel antifungal agents
`
`which are e ‘ective against opportunistic mycotic infections
`by such agents as Candida, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus and
`Pneunmcystzls carinii. The present treatments, i.e., amphot-
`ericin B and fluconazole, are inadequate due to their toxicity
`and resistance selection. The compositions of the present
`invention are considered to be both safe and fungicidal.
`The compositions of the present
`invention contain a
`compound which is useful as an antibiotic, especially as an
`antifungal agent or as an antiprotozoal agent. As an anti-
`fungal agent, it is useful for the control of both filamentous
`fungi and yeast. It is especially adaptable to be employed for
`the treatment of mycotic infections in mammals, especially “
`those caused by Candida species such as C. albicans, C.
`tropicalis, C. krusei, C. g/abram and C. pseudofmpicalis,
`and Aspergillus species such as A. fumnigalus, A. flavus and
`A. niger. In particular, the compositions contain a compound
`which has been found effective against putatively Ampho-
`tericin B and Fluconazole-resistant Candida isolates. The
`compositions are also useful for the treatment and/or pre-
`vention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia to which
`immune compromised patients, such as those suffering from
`AIDS, are especially susceptible.
`The compositions of the present invention are safe, stable,
`lyophilized dosage forms for reconstitution which are par-
`ticularly usefill for delivering antifungal agents to patients in
`need of such agents.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`2
`c) a pharmaceutically acceptable amount of an excipient
`such as a sucrose/mannitol mixture to form a lyophilized
`cake.
`In a specific embodiment of this invention, the formula-
`tion is prepared as a solution of 42 mg/ml of compound I, 30
`mg/ml of sucrose, 20 mg/ml of mannitol, 1.5 mg/ml (25
`mM) of acetic acid, which is adjusted to about pH 6 with
`sodium hydroxide. The solution is subsequently filled in a
`Vial at a volume of 1.25 ml and lyophilized, The lyophilized
`cake thus produced contains 52.5 mg of compound I, 62.5
`mg of the sugars and 31.25 micromoles of acetate buffer per
`via]. The lyophilized cake is then reconstituted for use by
`dilution with 21 m1 of a diluent. 20 m1 of the diluent is
`withdrawn and reconstituted into a 200 ml infiision bag. The
`patient is then infused with this solution comprising about
`0.25 lug/ml of compound I, about 0.03 millimoles or 0.15
`millimolar acetate buffer, about 0.3 mg/ml of bulking agents,
`with the resultant composition having a pH of about 5 to 7.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`The formulations of the invention provide enhanced
`chemical stability to the pharmaceutical compositions. One
`advantage of such stability is extended pharmaceutical prod—
`uct shelf life. Prior formulations employing a tartrate buffer
`contained pharmaceutically significant amounts of
`unwanted degradation products. The use of an acetate buff-
`ered formulation results in the generation of fewer degra-
`dates and a more stable formulation. Extended pharmaceu—
`tical shelf life offers significant economic advantages.
`It has been found that the compound of the formula
`
`(I)
`
`
`
`The invention relates to a pharmaceutical composition
`comprising:
`a) a pharmaceutically effective amount of a compound
`(also referred to herein as the “active ingredient”) having the
`formula
`
`40
`
`(I)
`
`
`
`and the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof,
`b) a pharmaceutically acceptable amount of an acetate
`buffer effective to provide a pH of between about 4 and 7;
`and
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`and the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof are sig-
`nificantly more stable on storage when formulated in the
`presence of an acetate buffer.
`Compound I is claimed and described in US. Pat. No.
`5,378,804. Methods for its preparation are disclosed in that
`patent as well as in US. Pat. No. 5,552,521 which issued on
`Sep. 3, 1996,
`The compound by itself is highly unstable and degrades
`by various pathways including, but not
`limited to,
`hydrolysis, dimerization and oxidation. However, this insta-
`
`
`bility was previously combated by lyophilizing the com-
`
`
`pound in a tartrate bu ered formulation, This formulation,
`however, while relatively stable, resulted in the generation
`of degradates at a relatively high rate.
`By switching to an acetate buffer, the lyophilized product
`is more stable, contains less of unwanted degradates while
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`

`

`6,136,783
`
`
`
`15
`
`30
`
`3
`extending the shelf life of the composition. This makes it
`attractive as a commercial product.
`The present invention also relates to a method for treating
`fungal infections caused by Candida, As wergillus and Pneu-
`mucystis carim'i which comprises administering the compo-
`
`sition containing the compound of formula I to a patient in
`
`need of such treatment in an amount e ‘ective to treat the
`fungal
`infection. The invention additionally relates to a
`method for preventing Pneunmcystzls carinii infections in a
`patient which comprises administration of a preventative
`amount of the compound of formula I.
`The acetate buffered formulation of the invention includes
`an amount of acetate effective to provide a pharmaceutically
`acceptable pH, e.g. to provide a pH environment in the range
`of 5 to 8, preferably about 6 to about 7. In order to provide
`a pharmaceutically acceptable amount of acetate butfer
`effective to achieve the desired pH, suitable amounts of
`
`sodium acetate and acetic acid or suitable amounts of acetic
`
`
`
`acid and sodium hydroxide can be used. The bu er is
`typically present in the range of about 12.5 mM to about 200
`mM with a preferred range of about 25 mM to about 50 mM.
`Excipients such as bulking agents, i.e., excipient sugars, “
`are used to provide an aesthetically suitable lyophilized
`cake, solid dilution of the active ingredient, and sorption of
`available moisture. Sugars useful in the invention include
`sucrose, lactose, mannitol or combinations thereof. It has
`been found that sucrose and mannitol provide a more stable
`formulation and form a pharmaceutically elegant cake for
`the composition. The excipients are generally present in
`amounts of about 10—200 mg/ml with a preferred amount of
`about 40760 mg/ml.
`The compositions are not limited to the active ingredient,
`acetate buffer and bulking agent and may also include other
`pharmaceutically acceptable diluents, excipients or carriers.
`The formulations are suitable for long-term storage in glass
`containers commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry,
`e.g., in concentrated form in standard USP Type I borosili-
`cate glass containers.
`The compositions of the invention are generally prepared
`as follows:
`1) a bulking agent or combination of agents is dissolved
`in water;
`2) acetic acid is added and the pH is adjusted to about 3.7,
`if required;
`is added and dissolved with the pH
`3) compound I
`subsequently adjusted to about 5 to about 6 with base;
`4) the solution is filtered and filled into a lyophilization
`vial and frozen at —50° C.;
`5) the frozen formulation is freeze dried at —20° C., with
`a secondary drying at 15° C. (the complete cycle takes over
`two days); and
`6) lyophilized vials are stoppered and stored at about 5°
`C.
`
`35
`
`40
`
`The lyophilized formulations of the compositions can be
`diluted at the time of administration with a suitable diluent
`to obtain a finished concentration, for example, of about 5.0
`mg/ml, which is suitable for transfer to an infusion bag for
`use by the patient in need of the desired active ingredient.
`The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salts” means non-
`toxic salts of the active ingredient, including the mono—, di—
`and tri-acid forms, which are generally prepared by reacting
`the free base with a suitable organic or inorganic acid.
`Pharmaceutically acceptable salts suitable as acid addition
`salts as well as salts providing the anion of the quaternary
`salt are those from acids such as hydrochloric, hydrobromic,
`phosphoric, sulfuric, maleic, citric, acetic, tartaric, succinic,
`oxalic, malic, glutamic, pamoic and the like, and include
`other acids related to the pharmaceutically acceptable salts
`listed in Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 66, 2 (1977).
`The term “pharmaceutically effective amount” shall mean
`that amount of active ingredient that will elicit the biological
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`or medical response of a tissue, system or animal that is
`being sought by a researcher or clinician.
`
`Compositions of the invention may be administered to
`patients Where treatment and/or prevention of fungal infec—
`tions is desired. They are useful in the treatment of Candida
`species such as C. albicans, C.
`tropicalis, C. krusei, C.
`glabrata and C. pseudotropicalis, and Aspergillus species
`such asA. fumigatus, A. flavus and A. niger. They are also
`useful for the treatment and/or prevention of Pneumocystis
`carinii pneumonia to which immune compromised patients,
`such as those suffering from AIDS, are especially suscep—
`tible.
`
`The dosage regimen utilizing the compositions of the
`present invention is selected in accordance with a variety of
`factors including type, species, age, weight, sex and medical
`condition of the patient; the severity of the condition to be
`treated;
`the route of administration; the renal and hepatic
`function of the patient; and the particular active ingredient or
`salt thereof employed. An ordinarily skilled physician can
`readily determine and prescribe the effective amount of the
`drug required to prevent, counter, or arrest the progress of
`the condition.
`
`Intravenously, the most preferred doses of active ingre-
`dient will range from about 1.67 to about 33 Mg/kg/minute
`with an infusion rate of about 200 ml/hour. In order to
`administer this amount of active ingredient, a composition
`of the invention should have 0.025 to 0.50 mg/ml of active
`ingredient based on a 50 kg patient.
`
`Compound I, the active ingredient, is generally prepared
`as follows:
`
`Starting compound II of the formula:
`
`(II)
`
`
`
`(SEQ ID No. 1)
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`

`

`5
`is reduced to afford Compound III of the formula:
`
`6,136,783
`
`(III)
`
`(Iv—a)
`
`15
`
`(SEQ ID No. 1)
`
`
`
`(SEQ IL) No. 1)
`
`Which is subsequently converted to Compound IV of the 30
`formula :
`
`(IV)
`
`Compound IV—a is subsequently reduced to Compound IV of
`the formula:
`
`(IV)
`
`35
`
`4O
`
`50 55
`
`(SEQ ID No. 1)
`
`which is stereoselectively converted to Compound I by
`displacement of the phenylthio group.
`
`60
`
`In an alternative process, Compound II is reacted with 65
`thiophenol to afford Compound IV—a of the formula:
`
`
`
`(SEQ ID No. 1)
`
`which is stereoselectively converted to Compound I by the
`displacement of the phenylthio group.
`PREPARATION OF COMPOUND I
`a) Synthesis and separation of Compound III
`Compound II (15.9 g, 89 area % pure, 3.4 wt % water,
`0.0128 mol) was added to dry THF (0.64 I.) and the
`suspension was dried to <10 mol % water by refluxing
`through a bed of 3A molecular sieves. Additional dry 'l‘l-IF
`was added to reconstitute the mixture to the original volume
`and the suspension was cooled to <4° C. with an ice/water/
`methanol bath.
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`

`

`6,136,783
`
`7
`Neat BH3.SMe2 (10.91 g, 0.144 mol) was added over ten
`minutes and the reaction mixture was maintained at 0—4° C.
`The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC until the
`ratio of starting material to product was 1:1 indicating the
`end of the reaction age (3.5 h). At 4 hours, the mixture was
`cooled to —12° C. and slowly quenched with 2N HCl (0.036
`L). This solution was diluted to 1.14 Lwith water. The assay
`yield of Compound III was 6.60 g (47%).
`The quenched solution was diluted to 4 L and loaded onto
`a medium-pressure column of LiChroprep RP-C18 adsor-
`bent (158 g). After loading, the column was washed with 1.2
`L water and the amine was eluted with 1.9 L of 1:4 v/v
`acetonitrile/water, and then 0.38 L of 1:3 v/v acetonitrile/
`water.
`
`
`
`8
`aged an additional 1 h. The crystalline solid was collected on
`a sintered—glass funnel and washed with a solution of
`ethanol/ethyl acetate/water (6 mL/9 mL/0.5 mL,
`respectively). The wet cake was dried with a nitrogen flow
`to give 1.91 g (1.75 assay g, 88% recovery) of the diacetate
`salt of compound I—1.
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`Preparation Of Formulation 1
`
`Ingredient
`
`Compound I
`sucrose
`mannitol
`acetic acid
`sodium hydroxide
`
`Amount
`
`42 mg/ml
`30 mg/ml
`20 mg/ml
`1.5 mg/ml
`q.s. to pH 5 to 6.2
`
`fill volume—0.875 ml to 1.8 ml
`
`Typically, to a 25 mL volumetric flask was added 0.75 g
`of sucrose and 0.5 g of mannitol, about 17.5 mL of water, 0.5
`mL of a 75 mg/mL acetic acid solution, and 42 mg/ml
`equivalent of Compound I. The solution was mixed and the
`pH was adjusted to 6 using 1M NaOH. The volume was
`adjusted with water and the pH was confirmed. The solution
`was filtered through a Millex-GV syringe filter and filled
`into 10 mL tubing glass vials at 1.75 mL each. The vials
`were partially stoppered with lyophilization stoppers and
`lyophilized to yield a solid lyophilized cake at the bottom of
`the vial.
`
`The lyophilized formulation is diluted with 10.5 ml, and
`10 ml is withdrawn and diluted into 200 ml resulting in a
`finished concentration of 0.25 mg/ml prior to administration
`to the patient.
`formulations were prepared as described
`Additional
`above containing the following ingredients (each of the
`formulations was prepared at a solution concentration of
`40—42 mg/ml of active ingredient):
`
`TABLE 1
`
`Ex
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`
`
`Buffer
`Tartrate 50 mM
`(7.5 mg/ml)
`Tartrate 50 mM
`(7.5 mg/ml)
`Tartrate 50 mM
`(7 5 mg/ml)
`Acetate 25 mM
`(1.5 mg/ml)
`Tartrate 50 mM
`(7.5 mg/ml)
`Acetate 25 mM
`(1.5 mg/ml)
`Acetate 50 mM
`(3.0 mg/ml)
`
`Sugar(s)
`None
`
`Lactose (30 mg/mL)
`Mannitol (20 mg/mL)
`Mannitol (50 mg/mL)
`
`Lactose (30 mg,’mL)
`Mannitol (20 rug/mL)
`Sucrose (50 rug/mL)
`
`Sucrose (50 rug/mL)
`
`Lactose (30 lug/ml.)
`Mannitol (20 rug/mL)
`
`The formulations were stored in the lyophilized state at 5°
`C. and tested at about 4 week intervals for stability. Stability
`and formation of degradates was determined by gradient
`HPLC using standard methods known to one skilled in the
`art.
`
`It was surprisingly found that Formulations 1, 5, 7 and 8
`were significantly more stable and showed significantly less
`of the unwanted degradates than the other formulations.
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`The rich cuts (>80 area %) were combined and diluted
`with water to a 1:7.3 v/v acetonitrile/water solution (1.70 L
`total). This mixture was loaded to the same column
`described above, and the column was washed with 0.57 L
`water. The desired compound was eluted with 0.57 L metha-
`nol. The rich cut fractions (>85 area %) were combined and
`concentrated by rotary evaporation and static high vacuum
`0 give 6.81 g (87 wt % pure, 6.8 wt % water) containing ~
`5.92 g of compound III (where R1 is dimethyltridecyl)
`1ydrochloride salt for an isolated yield of 43%.
`3) Preparation of the phenylsulfide (Compound IV)
`Compound III (5.80 g assay, 0.00533 mol) was charged to
`0.23 Lof dry acetonitrile and cooled to —5° C. at which point
`hiophenol (3.10 g, 0.028 mol) was added. TFA (36 g, 24.5
`mL, 0.318 mol) was added over 20 minutes in order to keep
`he temperature of the reaction mixture below 0° C. The
`reaction was aged at —10° to 0° C. until HPLC analysis
`showed <3 area % starting material (3.75 h). At this time,
`chilled water (0.56 L) was added slowly (1 h) while cooling
`he reaction mixture to maintain the temperature below 5° C.
`The assay yield of the (x— and B—phenylsulfide adduct as the
`rifluoroacetate salt was 4.82 g (71%).
`This solution was loaded on the same column described in
`step a and the column was washed with water (0.57 L), then
`he adsorbed organic compounds were eluted with methanol
`(0.50 L). The rich cuts were concentrated by rotary evapo—
`ration and static high vacuum. This yielded 7.20 g (57 wt %
`aure, 5.1 wt % water) of crude phenylsulfide trifluroacetate
`salt as an amorphous foamy solid. The corrected isolated
`step yield for the phenylsulfide was 4.10 g (61 %) as a 93:7
`mixture of the ot— and B—aminal diastereomers.
`c) Conversion of Compound IV to Compound l-1
`The crude phenylsulfide trifiuoromethanesulfonate salt
`(8.4 g crude, 57 wt % pure, 0.00377 mole) was added to
`ethylenediamine (24 mL) while stirring at ambient tempera-
`ture. The resulting solution was stirred 1.5 h to complete the
`displacement, then methanol (40 mL) was added followed
`by acetic acid (45 mL), keeping the temperature below 25°
`C. with ice-bath cooling. A thick slurry resulted. Water (160 _
`mL) was added to dissolve the slurry, and the aqueous layer
`was extracted by gentle shaking with hexanes (75 mL). The
`hexanes layer was back-extracted with water (40 mL) and
`the combined aq.
`layer was filtered through a medium-
`porosity sintered glass funnel, then purified by prep HPLC
`rising a 50 mm diameter
`(318 column,
`rising 22%
`acetonitrile/78% 0.15% aq. acetic acid as eluent. The rich
`cut was lyophilized to provide 4.2 g of 85 wt % pure
`Compound I—l as the diacetate salt in 78% isolated step
`yield.
`d) Crystallization of Compound I-l
`The solid (2.3 g) was dissolved in ethanol (25 mL) and
`water (2.7 mL) was then added. The solution was passed
`through a sintered glass funnel to remove extraneous matter.
`To this filtrate was added acetic acid (0.14 mL) followed by
`the slow addition (1.75 h) of ethyl acetate (14 mL). The
`solution was seeded and the seed bed was aged for 1 h. The
`remaining ethyl acetate (32 mL) was added over 5 h and
`
`15
`
`35
`
`40
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`

`

`6,136,783
`
`10
`
`SEQUENCE LISTING
`
`( 1) GENERAL INFORMATION:
`
`(iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES:
`
`l
`
`(2)
`
`INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:1:
`
`(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
`(A) LENGTH:
`6 amino acids
`(B) TYPE: amino acid
`(C) STRANDEDNESS: unknown
`(D) TOPOLOGY: circular
`
`(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide
`
`(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: no
`
`(iv) ANTI—SENSE: NO
`
`(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID N021:
`Xaa Thr Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa
`l
`5
`
`What is claimed is:
`
`1. A method for treating an infection caused by Candida
`Sp, in a patient which comprises administering intravenously
`to said patient an effective amount of a composition com-
`prising 42 mg/ml of a compound having the formula
`
`30
`
`(I)
`
`35
`
`(I)
`
`
`
`110
`
`or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, 25 mM of an
`acetate buffer, 30 mg/ml of sucrose, 20 mg/ml of mannitol,
`and water.
`
`2. A method for treating an infection caused by Candida
`Sp. in a patient which comprises administering intravenously
`to said patient an effective amount of a composition corri-
`prising 42 mg/ml of a compound having the formula
`
`4O
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, 50 mM of an
`acetate buffer, 30 mg/ml of sucrose, 20 m g/ml of mannitol,
`and water.
`
`3. A method for treating an infection caused by Aspergil-
`lus sp. in a patient which comprises administering intrave-
`nously to said patient an effective amount of a composition
`comprising 42 mg/ml of a compound having the formula
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`

`

`6,136,783
`
`(I)
`
`12
`
`(l)
`
`
`
`
`
`or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, 25 mM of an
`
`acetate bu er, 30 mg/ml of sucrose, 20 mg/ml of mannitol,
`and water.
`4. A metiod for treating an infection caused by Aspergil—
`lus sp. in a patient which comprises administering intrave-
`nously to said patient an effective amount of a composition
`comprising 42 mg/ml of a compound having the formula
`
`
`
`(I)
`
`
`
`
`
`or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, 50 mM of an
`
`
`acetate bu ‘er, 30 mg/ml of sucrose, 20 mg/ml of mannitol,
`and water.
`5. A method for treating or preventing an infection or
`condition caused by Pneumocystis carinii in a patient in
`need of such treatment or prevention which comprises
`administering intravenously to said patient a preventative or
`therapeutic amount of a composition comprising 42 mg/ml
`of a compound having the formula
`
`15
`
`30
`
`4O
`
`55
`
`
`
`or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, 25 mM of an
`acetate buffer, 30 mg/ml of sucrose, 20 mg/ml of mannitol,
`and water.
`
`6. A method for treating or preventing an infection or
`condition caused by Pneumocystis carinii in a patient in
`need of such treatment or prevention Which comprises
`administering intravenously to said patient a preventative or
`therapeutic amount of a composition comprising 42 mg/ml
`of a compound having the formula
`
`(I)
`
`
`
`or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, 50 111M of an
`acetate buifer, 30 mg/ml of sucrose, 20 mg/ml of mannitol,
`and water.
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`AMNEAL EX. 1005
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket