`
`Ficure3: (a) Light of certain wavelengths is led by an optic fibre from the light source to a hand piece with a micro-Charge Couple Device
`video camera. (b) The image can be captured and saved forlater analysis. Computer program: QLF 1.97e Inspector Research System BV,
`Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
`
`
`
`
`
`(b)
`
`Ficure4: (a) The LF device operates with light from a diode laser transmitted through a descendentoptic fibre to a hand held probe with a
`fibre optic eye. The emitted fluorescence is collected through the tip, passes into ascendingfibres, andis finally processed and presented on
`the display as an integer between 0 and 99. (b) In the presence ofcarious tooth substance, fluorescence increases.
`
`is a poor correlation between LF readings and the mineral
`content, but possibly better correlation with the presence of
`infected dentin.
`in vivo studies of LF for occlusal caries
`In general,
`detection indicate moderate to high sensitivity and lower
`specificity [24, 60, 66, 68]. Lack of specificity, the increased
`likelihood offalse-positive readings due to stain and plaque,
`and the absence of a single threshold are factors underlying
`the reluctance among authors to recommend the LF method
`unequivocally for caries detection. Therefore, the LF device
`should be regarded at most as a supplementary aid for
`detection of caries on coronal surfaces.
`
`3.3. Transillumination with Near-Infrared Light. The caries
`lesion may also be examined by shining white light through
`the tooth. Wavelengthsin the visible range (400-700 nm) are
`limited by stronglightscattering, makingit difficult to image
`through more than 1mm or 2mm oftooth structure [79].
`Therefore, methods employing wavelengths in the visible
`range of the electromagnetic spectra (400-700 nm) such as
`QLF [40] (A > 520nm), LF [58] (A = 655 nm), and Digital
`Imaging Fiber-Optic Transillumination (DIFOTI)
`[80]—
`which uses high intensity white light—are highly limited
`
`by scattering. Methods that use longer wavelengths, such
`as in the NIR spectra (780 to 1550 nm), can penetrate the
`tissue more deeply. This deeper penetration is crucial for
`the transillumination (TI) method. Research has shown that
`enamelis highly transparent in the NIR range (750 nm to
`1500 nm) due to the weak scattering and absorptionin dental
`hard tissue at these wavelengths [81-86]. Therefore,
`this
`region of the electromagnetic spectrum is ideally suited to
`the development of new optical diagnostic tools based on
`TI. Figure 5 illustrates the typical experimentalset-up of a TI
`system with an NIR light source, an imaging camera such as
`a charge-coupled device (CCD), and software for computer-
`controlled acquisition. The image can be captured, saved,
`andstored in digital format.
`This is a promising imaging technique for detecting
`the presence of caries and measuring its severity. The
`TI
`image is presented as a visually recognizable image,
`which is preferred by the average clinician. The method is
`nondestructive, nonionising, and reportedly more sensitive
`to detect early demineralisation than dental X-rays [83].
`Identification of dental caries by TI is based on the fact
`that increased mineral loss in an enamel lesion leads to a
`twofold increase in scattering coefficient at a wavelength of
`
`Page 2251
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`Page 2251
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`
`
`
`IN 4
`
`Lens
`
`Lens
`
`Polarizer
`
`Polarizer
`
`%&
`
`St
`
`q
`Tooth specimen
`
`International Journal of Dentistry
`
`can indicate the relative position of a lesion on approximal
`surfaces by calculating the ratio of contrast values obtained
`by dluminating tooth from the lingual or buccal surface,
`respectively. The method uses a range of wavelengths where
`low-costlight sources are available and the transmitted image
`can be detected by an ordinary CCD camera, similar to
`the one in mobile phones. The method can therefore be
`developed at reasonable cost as a fibre optic probe for
`intraoral use, connected to an ordinary computerscreen.
`The LF method generates a simple numerical index of
`de- and remineralisation in enamel and dentin that can be
`recorded in the patient’s file and monitored over time. The
`instrumentis easy to handle and can also be purchased at a
`reasonable price. New methods should be critically appraised
`according to strict criteria. Among LF studiesthere is a wide
`variation in specific design features (the number ofteeth
`included, the threshold for LF scores, validation methods,
`the outcomes expressed, etc.). In vivo studies highlight the
`importanceof rigorous clinical studies to confirm promising
`laboratory results. Results of the LF method in vivo have been
`somewhat contradictory. Therefore, The LF device should
`be regarded at most as a supplementary aid for detection of
`caries on coronal surfaces, pending the publication of further
`clinical studies.
`
`References
`
`[1] P.E. Petersen, D. Bourgeois, H. Ogawa,S. Estupinan-Day, and
`C. Ndiaye, “The global burden of oral diseases andrisks to oral
`health,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 83, no.
`9, pp. 661-669, 2005.
`[2] I. Mejare, H. Stenlund, and C. Zelezny-Holmlund, “Caries
`incidence and lesion progression from adolescence to young
`adulthood: a prospective 15-year cohort study in Sweden,”
`Caries Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 130-141, 2004.
`J. D. B. Featherstone, “Dental caries: a dynamic disease
`process,” Australian Dental Journal, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 286-291,
`2008.
`
`[3]
`
`[4] O. Fejerskov and E. Kidd, Dental Caries: The Disease and
`Its Clinical Management, chapter 4, Blackwell Munksgaard,
`Copenhagen, Denmark, 2ndedition, 2008.
`[5] L.-P. Choo-Smith, C. C. S. Dong, B. Cleghorn, and M. Hewko,
`“Shedding new light on early caries detection,” Journal of the
`Canadian Dental Association, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 913-918,
`2008.
`
`[6] B. Angmar-Mansson, “How to measure the effects of fluoride
`treatments in clinical trials? Assessment: modern versustradi-
`tional methods,” Caries Research, vol. 35, no. 1, supplement1,
`pp. 30-33, 2001.
`[7] I. A. Pretty, “Caries detection and diagnosis: novel technolo-
`gies,” Journal ofDentistry, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 727-739, 2006.
`[8] R. H. Selwitz, A. I. Ismail, and N. B. Pitts, “Dental caries,” The
`Lancet, vol. 369, no. 9555, pp. 51-59, 2007.
`J. D. Bader, D. A. Shugars, and A. J. Bonito, “A systematic
`review of the performance of methods foridentifying carious
`lesions,” Journal of Public Health Dentistry, vol. 62, no. 4, pp.
`201-213, 2002.
`
`[9]
`
`[10] M. S. Hopcraft and M. V. Morgan, “Comparison of radio-
`graphic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal
`dental caries in a young adult population,” Community
`
`Figure 5: Transillumination (TI) with Near-Infrared (NIR)light.
`experimental set-up of the TI system. The tooth is illuminated
`with NIR light. Polarizers are used to experimentally block out the
`ambient light from saturating the detector, a Charge Couple Device
`(CCD).
`
`1.3m [82, 83]. Caries thus appear as dark regions, since
`less light reaches the detector. Most research to date has used
`this wavelength, where low-cost light sources are available.
`Whenlight Wluminates the tooth the strong scattering effect
`in the enamel caries lesion results in less transparency. The
`decreased light transmission associated with the lesion can
`be detected when comparedto that of the surrounding sound
`tissue.
`The use of dental radiography should always be limited,
`even thoughit is the most often employed concept of routine
`examination. Dental radiographsalso lack the sufficient abil-
`ity for early caries detection [13, 16]. An initial caries lesion
`may be missed or underestimated in size in radiographs due
`to low attenuation of radiation in lesion, particular physical
`properties of the tooth structure, and imperfect technique
`such as overlapping. In contrast, the TI method offers the
`advantage of allowing for repeated projection to overcome
`someofthese limitations.
`The importance of the location of the caries lesion and
`how the resolution differs when the resultant image has to
`traverse a thick part versus a thinner part of the tooth to
`reach the detector is also of interest. Contrast calculation of
`the signal generated by a single lesion located near versus far
`from the CCD camera can be estimated. The ratio between
`the contrasts of images captured from bothsides of the tooth
`can estimate the more precise location of the caries lesion on
`the approximal surface.
`
`4. Summary
`
`Both QLF and the TI methods enable imaging detection
`of enamel caries that can be digitally stored and viewed
`later. The QLF method also includes image analysis software
`which measures the difference in fluorescence between sound.
`and demineralised enamel. Changes in fluorescent radiance
`and lesion area can be followed over time,
`to measure
`lesion development. The method seemsto have been rapidly
`adopted as a standard reference measure in clinical tests of
`the efficacy of preventive measures.
`Transillumination of enamel with NIR light is a promis-
`ing technique for the detection and imaging of occlusal
`and approximal
`lesions. Application of repeatable, non-
`ionising radiation of the tooth allows the TI method to
`be used without restriction to monitor the caries process.
`The method overcomes some of the limitations of dental
`radiography such as overlapping. Moreover,
`the method
`
`Page 2252
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`Page 2252
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`
`
`International Journal of Dentistry
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`
`16
`
`21 22
`
`[17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 212-218,
`2005.
`
`K. Ridell, H. Olsson, and I. Mejare, “Unrestored dentin caries
`and deep dentin restorations in Swedish adolescents,” Caries
`Research, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 164-170, 2008.
`The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health
`Care, “Caries—diagnosis, risk assessment and non-invasive
`treatment,” Tech. Rep. 510-39, 2008.
`J. Yang and V. Dutra, “Utility of radiology, laser fluorescence,
`and transillumination,” Dental Clinics of North America, vol.
`49, no. 4, pp. 739-752, 2005.
`D. G. Altman and J. M. Bland, “Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity
`and specificity,” British Medical Journal, vol. 308, no. 6943, p.
`1552, 1994.
`
`The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health
`Care, “Karies—diagnostik, riskbedémning och icke-invasiv
`behandling,” no. 188:84, 2007.
`J. D. Bader, D. A. Shugars, and A. J. Bonito, “Systematic
`reviews of selected dental caries diagnostic and management
`methods,” Journal ofDental Education, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 960—
`968, 2001.
`
`I. A. Pretty and G. Maupome, “A closer look at diagnosis
`in clinical dental practice: part 5. Emerging technologies for
`caries detection and diagnosis,” Journal of the Canadian Dental
`Association, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 540a—540i, 2004.
`G. K. Stookey and C. Gonzalez-Cabezas, “Emerging methods
`of caries diagnosis,” Journal of Dental Education, vol. 65, no.
`10, pp. 1001—1006, 2001.
`G. Stookey, Proceedings of the First Annual Indiana Conference:
`Early Detection of Dental Caries, Indiana University School of
`Dentistry, Indiana, Ind, USA, 1996.
`G. Stookey, Proceedings of the Second Annual Indiana Con-
`ference: Early Detection of Dental Caries, Indiana University
`Schoolof Dentistry, Indianapolis, Ind, USA, 2000.
`G. Stookey, Proceedings of the Third Annual Indiana Con-
`ference: Early Detection of Dental Caries, Indiana University
`Schoolof Dentistry, Indianapolis, Ind, USA, 2004.
`B. Angmar-Mansson,S. Al-Khateeb, and S. Tranaeus, “Moni-
`toring the caries process. Optical methodsfor clinical diagno-
`sis and quantification of enamel caries,” European Journal of
`OralSciences, vol. 104, no. 4, part 2, pp. 480-485, 1996.
`B. Angmar-Mansson andJ. J. ten Bosch, “Advances in methods
`for diagnosing coronal caries—a review,” Advances in Dental
`Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 70-79, 1993.
`J. D. Bader and D. A. Shugars,
`“A systematic review of
`the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting
`caries,” Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 135,
`no. 10, pp. 1413-1426, 2004.
`J. D. Bader and D. A. Shugars, “The evidence supporting
`alternative managementstrategies for early occlusal caries and
`suspected occlusal dentinalcaries,” Journal of Evidence-Based
`Dental Practice, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 91-100, 2006.
`A. Hall and J. M. Girkin, “A review of potential new diagnostic
`modalities for caries lesions,” Journal of Dental Research, vol.
`83, supplement 1, pp. C89-C94,2004.
`L. Karlsson and S. Tranzus, “Supplementary methods for
`detection and quantification of dental caries,” Journal Laser
`Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 8-16, 2008.
`A. Lussi, R. Hibst, and R. Paulus, “DIAGNOdent: an optical
`method for caries detection,” Journal of Dental Research, vol.
`83, supplement1, pp. C80-C83, 2004.
`
`[41]
`
`[25]
`
`yy X
`
`Page 2253
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`[29]
`
`[30]
`
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`
`36
`
`
`
`37 38
`
`K. W. Neuhaus, C. Longbottom, R. Ellwood, and A. Lussi,
`“Novellesion detection aids,” Monographs in OralScience, vol.
`21, pp. 52-62, 2009.
`A.C.Pereira, H. Eggertsson, E. A. Martinez- Mier, F. L. Mialhe,
`G. J. Eckert, and D. T. Zero, “Validity of caries detection on
`occlusal surfaces and treatment decisions based on results
`from multiple caries-detection methods,” European Journal of
`Oral Sciences, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 51-57, 2009.
`G. K. Stookey, “Optical methods—quantitative light fluores-
`cence,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 83, supplement 1, pp.
`C84—C88, 2004.
`S. Tranaeus, X.-Q. Shi, and B. Angmar-Mansson, “Caries
`risk assessment: methods available to clinicians for caries
`detection,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol.
`33, no. 4, pp. 265-273, 2005.
`D. A. Young, “New caries detection technologies and modern
`caries management: merging the strategies,” General Dentistry,
`vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 320-331, 2002.
`A. FEZandonaandD.T. Zero, “Diagnostic tools for early caries
`detection,” Journal of the American Dental Association,vol. 137,
`no. 12, pp. 1675-1684, 2006.
`J. R. Zijp, “Optical properties of dental hardtissue,” in Intro-
`duction, chapter 1, Groningen Rijksuniversiteit, Groningen,
`The Netherlands, 2001.
`H. C. Benedict, “A note on the fluorescence of teeth in ultra-
`violet rays,” Science, vol. 67, no. 1739, p. 442, 1928.
`E. Borisova, T. Uzunov, and L. Avramov, “Laser-induced
`autofluorescence study of caries model in vitro,” Lasers in
`Medical Science, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 34-41, 2006.
`H. Bjelkhagen, F. Sundstrém, B. Angmar-Mansson, and H.
`Rydén, “Early detection of enamel caries by the luminescence
`excited by visible laser light,” Swedish Dental Journal, vol. 6,
`no. 1, pp. 1-7, 1982.
`S$. Montan, U. Hafstrom-
`F. Sundstrém, K. Fredriksson,
`Bjorkman, and J. Strém, “Laser-induced fluorescence from
`sound and carious tooth substance: spectroscopic studies,”
`Swedish Dental Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 71-80, 1985.
`E. de Josselin de Jong, F. Sundstrom, H. Westerling, S.
`Tranaeus, J. J. ten Bosch, and B. Angmar-Mansson, “A new
`methodfor in vivo quantification of changes in initial enamel
`caries with laser fluorescence,” Caries Research, vol. 29, no. 1,
`pp. 2-7, 1995.
`B. Angmar-ManssonandJ. J. ten Bosch, “Quantitative light-
`induced fluorescence (QLF): a method for assessment of
`incipientcaries lesions,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 30,
`no.6, pp. 298-307, 2001.
`S. Tranaeus, S$. Al-Khateeb, S. Bjorkman, S. Twetman, and B.
`Angmar-Mansson, “Application of quantitative light-induced
`fluorescence to monitor incipient
`lesions in caries-active
`children. A comparative study of remineralisation by fluoride
`varnish and professional cleaning,” European Journal of Oral
`Sciences, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 71-75, 2001.
`M. H. van der Veen and E. de Josselin de Jong, “Application
`of quantitative light-induced fluorescence for assessing early
`caries lesions,’ Monographs in Oral Science, vol. 17, pp. 144—
`162, 2000.
`S. Al-Khateeb, J. M. ten Cate, B. Angmar-Mansson,et al.,
`“Quantification of formation and remineralization of artificial
`enamel
`lesions with a new portable fluorescence device,”
`Advances in Dental Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 502-506, 1997.
`R. Gmur, E. Giertsen, M. H. van der Veen, E. de Josselin de
`Jong,J. M. ten Cate, and B. Guggenheim,“In vitro quantitative
`light-induced fluorescence to measure changes in enamel
`
`Page 2253
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`
`
`International Journal of Dentistry
`
`[61] S. Akarsu and H. Koprulu, “In vivo comparison ofthe efficacy
`of DIAGNOdentby visual inspection and radiographic diag-
`nostic techniques in the diagnosis of occlusal caries,” Journal
`of Clinical Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 53-58, 2006.
`Vv. Angnes, G. Angnes, M. Batisttella, R. H. M. Grande,
`A. D. Loguercio, and A. Reis, “Clinical effectiveness of
`laser fluorescence, visual inspection and radiography in the
`detection of occlusal caries,” Caries Research, vol. 39, no. 6, pp.
`490-495, 2005.
`V. Anttonen, L. Seppa, and H. Hausen, “A follow-up study
`of the use of DIAGNOdent for monitoring fissure caries in
`children,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol.
`32, no. 4, pp. 312-318, 2004.
`A. Astvaldsdottir, W. P. Holbrook, and S. Tranaeus, “Consis-
`tency of DIAGNOdentinstruments for clinical assessment of
`fissure caries,” Acta Odontologica Scandinavica,vol. 62, no. 4,
`pp. 193-198, 2004.
`M. Bamzahim, A. Aljehani, and X.-Q. Shi, “Clinical perfor-
`mance of DIAGNOdentin the detection of secondary carious
`lesions,” Acta Odontologica Scandinavica,vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 26—
`30, 2005.
`Cc. H. Chu, E. C. M. Lo, and D. S. H. You, “Clinical
`diagnosisof fissure caries with conventional and laser-induced
`fluorescence techniques,” Lasers in Medical Science, pp. 1-8,
`2009.
`
`M. A. Khalife, J. R. Boynton, J. B. Dennison, P. Yaman, and
`J. C. Hamilton, “In vivo evaluation of DIAGNOdentfor the
`occlusal dental caries,’ Operative Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 2, pp.
`136-141, 2009.
`A. Reis, F. M. Mendes, V. Angnes, G. Angnes, R. H. M.
`Grande, and A. D. Loguercio, “Performance of methods of
`occlusal caries detection in permanentteeth underclinical and
`laboratory conditions,” Journal ofDentistry, vol. 34, no. 2, pp.
`89—96, 2006.
`R. O. Rocha, T. M. Ardenghi, L. B. Oliveira, C. R. M. D.
`Rodrigues, and A. L. Ciamponi, “In vivo effectiveness of laser
`fluorescence compared to visual Inspection and radiography
`for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth,” Caries
`Research, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 437-441, 2003.
`S. Tranaeus, L.-E. Lindgren, L. Karlsson, and B. Angmar-
`Mansson, “In vivo validity and reliability of IR fluores-
`cence measurements for caries detection and quantification,”
`Swedish Dental Journal, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 173-182, 2004.
`A. Lussi and E. Hellwig, “Performance of a new laser
`fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in
`vitro,” Journal ofDentistry, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 467-471, 2006.
`K. C. Huth, K. W. Neuhaus, M. Gygax, et al., “Clinical
`performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection
`of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars,” Journal of
`Dentistry, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1033-1040, 2008.
`A. Aljehani, M. Bamzahim, M. A. Yousif, and X. Q. Shi,
`“In vivo reliability of an infrared fluorescence method for
`quantification of cariouslesions in orthodontic patients,” Oral
`Health & Preventive Dentistry, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 145-150, 2006.
`A. Andersson, K. Skold-Larsson, A. Hallgren, L. G. Peters-
`son, and S. Twetman, “Effect of a dental cream containing
`amorphous cream phosphate complexes on white spot lesion
`regression assessed by laser fluorescence,’ Oral Health &
`Preventive Dentistry, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 229-233, 2007.
`K. Skold-Larsson, A.-C. Fornell, A. Lussi, and S. Twetman,
`“Effect of topical applications of a chlorhexidine/thymol-
`containing varnish on fissure caries assessed bylaser fluores-
`cence,” Acta Odontologica Scandinavica,vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 339—
`342, 2004.
`
`]
`
`[68
`
`70
`
`73
`
`71
`
`72
`
`[75
`
`[62
`
`]
`
`[65
`
`]
`
`[66
`
`]
`
`[67
`
`]
`
`[46]
`
`[48]
`
`[51
`
`[52]
`
`[53]
`
`[54]
`
`[55]
`
`[57]
`
`[58
`
`[59]
`
`mineralization,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 10, no. 3, pp.
`187-195, 2006.
`J. Kuhnisch, M. Van der veen, E.
`R. Heinrich-Weltzien,
`de Josselin de Jong, and L. Stosser, “Quantitative light-
`induced fluorescence (QLF)—a potential method for the
`dental practitioner,” Quintessence International, vol. 34, no. 3,
`pp. 181-188, 2003.
`N. B. Pitts and J. W. Stamm, “International consensus work-
`shop on caries clinical trials (ICW-CCT)—final consensus
`statements: agreeing where the evidence leads,” Journal of
`Dental Research, vol. 83, supplement 1, pp. C125—C128, 2004.
`Y. Feng, W. Yin, D. Hu, Y. P. Zhang, R. P. Ellwood, and
`I. A. Pretty, “Assessment of autofluorescence to detect the
`remineralization capabilities of sodium fluoride, monoflu-
`orophosphate and non-fluoride dentifrices: a single-blind
`cluster randomizedtrial,” Caries Research, vol. 41, no. 5, pp.
`358-364, 2007.
`L. Karlsson, L.-E. Lindgren, K. Trollsas, B. Angmar-Mansson,
`and S. Tranaeus, “Effect of supplementary amine fluoride
`gel in caries-active adolescents. a clinical QLF study,” Acta
`Odontologica Scandinavica, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 284-291, 2007.
`O. Kronenberg, A. Lussi, and S. Ruf, “Preventive effect of
`ozone on the development of white spot
`lesions during
`multibracket appliance therapy,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 79,
`no.1, pp. 64-69, 2009.
`1. A. Pretty, J. A. Tavener, D. Browne,D.S. Brettle, H. Whelton,
`and R. P. Ellwood, “Quantification of dental fluorosis using
`fluorescence imaging,” Caries Research, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 426—
`434, 2006.
`M.A.Ablal, J. S. Kaur, L. Cooper, et al., “The erosive potential
`of some alcopops using bovine enamel: an in vitro study,’
`Journal ofDentistry, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 835-839, 2009.
`V. Elton, L. Cooper, S. M. Higham, and N. Pender, “Validation
`of enamelerosionin vitro,” Journal ofDentistry, vol. 37, no. 5,
`pp. 336-341, 2009.
`A. A. Adeyemi, N. Pender, and S. M. Higham, “The suscepti-
`bility of bleached enamelto staining as measured by Quantita-
`tive Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF),” International Dental
`Journal, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 208-212, 2008.
`A. A. Adeyemi, F. D. Jarad, E. de Josselin de Jong, N. Pender,
`and S. M. Higham,“The evaluation of a novel method com-
`paring quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) with
`spectrophotometry to assess staining and bleachingof teeth,”
`Clinical OralInvestigations, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 19-25, 2010.
`A. M. Taylor, R. P. Ellwood, I. A. Pretty, and N. Mohan,
`“Quantitative stain detection in vivo using fluorescent imag-
`ing,” Journal ofDentistry, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 397-405, 2009.
`M. H. van der Veen, R. Z. Thomas, M. C. Huysmans, andJ.
`J. de Soet, “Red autofluorescence of dental plaque bacteria,”
`Caries Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 542-545, 2006.
`R. Hibst and R. Gall, “Development of a diode laser-based
`fluorescence caries detector,” Caries Research, vol. 32, no. 4,
`article 294, 1998.
`H. V. Gostanian, Z. Shey, C. Kasinathan, J. Caceda, and M.
`N. Janal, “An in vitro evaluation of the effect of sealant
`characteristics on laser fluorescence for caries detection,”
`Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 445-450, 2006.
`C. Abalos, M. Herrera, A. Jimenez-Planas, and R. Llamas,
`“Performanceof laser fluorescence for detection of occlusal
`dentinal caries lesions in permanent molars: an in vivo study
`with total validation of the sample,” Caries Research, vol. 43,
`no. 2, pp. 137-141, 2009.
`
`Page 2254
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`Page 2254
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`
`
`International Journal of Dentistry
`
`[76] L. Karlsson, E. Johansson, and S. Tranaeus, “Validity and
`reliability of laser-induced fluorescence measurements on
`carious root surfaces in vitro,” Cartes Research, vol. 43, no. 5,
`pp. 397-404, 2009.
`[77] M. J. Wicht, R. Haak, H. Stutzer, D. Strohe, and M. J. Noack,
`“Intra- and interexaminer variability and validity of laser
`fluorescence andelectrical resistance readings on root surface
`lesions,” Caries Research,vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 241-248, 2002.
`[78] W. Zhang, C. McGrath, and E. C. M. Lo, “A comparison
`of root caries diagnosis based on visual-tactile criteria and
`DIAGNOdentin vivo,” Journal ofDentistry, vol. 37, no. 7, pp.
`509-513, 2009.
`[79] C. L. Darling and D. Fried, “Real-time near IR (1310 nm)
`imaging of CO2laser ablation of enamel,” Optics Express, vol.
`16, no. 4, pp. 2685-2693, 2008.
`[80] A. Schneiderman, M. Elbaum, T. Shultz, S. Keem, M.
`Greenebaum,andJ. Driller, “Assessment of dental caries with
`digital imagingfiber-optic translllumination (DIFOTI’™): in
`vitro Study,” Caries Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 103-110, 1997.
`[81] C. M. Buhler, P. Ngaotheppitak, and D. Fried, “Imaging of
`occlusal dental caries (decay) with near-IR light at 1310-nm,”
`Optics Express, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 573-582, 2005.
`[82] C. L. Darling and D.Fried, “Optical roperties of natural caries
`lesions in dental enamel at 1310-nm,” in Lasers in Dentistry
`XI, P. Rechmannand D.Fried, Eds., vol. 5687 of Proceeding of
`SPIE, pp. 102-110, San Jose, Calif, USA, January 2005.
`[83] C. L. Darling, G. D. Huynh, and D.Fried, “Light scattering
`properties of natural and artificially demineralized dental
`enamel at 1310 nm,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 11, no.
`3, Article ID 034023, 2006.
`[84] D. Fried, R. E. Glena, J. D. B. Featherstone, and W. Seka,
`“Nature of light scattering in dental enamel and dentin at
`visible and near-infrared wavelengths,” Applied Optics, vol. 34,
`no. 7, pp. 1278-1285, 1995.
`[85] R. S. Jones, G. D. Huynh, G. C. Jones, and D. Fried, “Near-
`infrared transillumination at 1310-nm for the imagingofearly
`dental decay,” Optics Express, vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 2259-2265,
`2003.
`
`[86]
`
`J. Wu and D. Fried, “High contrast near-infrared polarized
`reflectance images of demineralization on tooth buccal and
`occlusal surfaces at A = 1310-nm,” Lasers in Surgery and
`Medicine, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 208-213, 2009.
`
`Page 2255
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`Page 2255
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`
`
`Electronic AcknowledgementReceipt
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`MohammedN.Islam
`
`Customer Number:
`
`109543
`
`David S. Bir/Theresa Good
`
`Filer Authorized By:
`
`David S.Bir
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`OMNIO105PUSP
`
`Receipt Date:
`
`Filing Date:
`
`13-MAY-2014
`
`17-DEC-2013
`
`Time Stamp:
`
`09:54:41
`
`Application Type:
`
`Utility under 35 USC 111)
`
`SHORT-WAVE INFRARED SUPER-CONTINUUM LASERS FOR DETECTING
`COUNTERFEIT ORILLICIT DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICAL PROCESS CONTROL
`
`Paymentinformation:
`
`Submitted with Payment
`
`File Listing:
`
`Pages
`Multi
`File Size(Bytes)/
`DocumentDescription
`Document
`
`
`
`Number Message Digest|Part/.zip|P (if appl.)
`
`;
`;
`Information Disclosure Statement (IDS)
`Form (SB08)
`
`IDS9.pdf
`
`34cb3525be998f9844c07126654322Icdab}
`
`616096
`
`59d0f
`
`Page 2256
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref1_Hazen.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref2_Malin.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref3_Thennadil.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref4_Troy.pdf
`
`173650
`
`fc64a78cf5384f08e67cfc3a48da07ce02d8f|
`af3
`
`125805
`
`d211855c1d7e418c1b38bf81cbcd572736f|
`Jeacd
`
`159465
`
`688508e1 97fcff74dc10093fa5f0a2ea00feff
`d9
`
`145228
`
`30f10ef25706d766f8a1 e93e1e9ef7cfe2b65
`66e
`
`f6ec6
`
`bb1ddeaa8119714b080d6404b9d4aa3bcaf
`ce5f9
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref5_Blank.pdf
`
`1885fb0761 9f2502207fe89192eca9b93846}
`123d
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref6_Yeh.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref7_Marbach.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref8_Enejder.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref9_Olesberg.pdf
`
`234134
`
`¢7461a73907da5d0b23f8e459c747e49409
`04038
`
`883654
`
`232061
`
`2264efa568227ff5 108b54dff48b0e78d186
`6dc9
`
`144511
`
`1a13d047858e641 fal 7b082c859bd5ce2cbh
`
`Page 2257
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref10_Olesberg.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref11_Harman.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref12_Kim.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref13_Smith.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref14_Pezzaniti.pdf
`
`103737
`
`fa2252421b9ea1255d27300c4840fd62e95
`Oc72c
`
`989607
`
`184776
`
`6545f3afa30eIbb13595024c8f6f0944c13d
`edd1
`
`1905614
`
`€6676436836669206626d 1 6bf696d57def9
`033d4,
`
`125975
`
`cdd51adf907d8435ea02f9665delbe5f2d0
`d5afl
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`aef2baf2d5b57d2499b2e7dc418d72254f9a
`5f6c
`
`8bc9
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref15_Lussi.pdf
`
`e676975dff961 6e7b2dbb1 cd9c18bf84266
`6edcb
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref16_Reese.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref17_Zakian.pdf
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Ref18_Belikov.pdf
`
`437031
`
`66416381 1da9e2c8b5b3f9ccfed86b4b77
`3db7e
`
`151598
`
`913a64bb05f4613395824b30dd5cb3be6fc|
`b9323
`
`116447
`
`24e4f3febb360df24.ae8d27844254.a52f39
`
`Page 2258
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`
`
`Ref19_Karlsson.pdf
`Non Patent Literature
`73811e2b122c06746b50f264e0cd8a8137b}
`fdd56
`
`172800
`
`the application.
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`If a new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/RO/105)will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shownon this AcknowledgementReceiptwill establish the international filing date of
`
`This AcknowledgementReceipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTOofthe indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable.It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`If a new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary componentsfora filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)-(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shownonthis
`AcknowledgementReceiptwill establish thefiling date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`If a timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/EO/903indicating acceptanceof the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`Page 2259
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`Page 2259
`
`OMNI 2019 - IPR2020-00209
`
`
`
`SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
`
`
`Near-Infrared Imaging of
`Dental Decay at 1310 nm
`
`Daniel Fried, PhD*, Michal Staninec, DDS, Cynthia L. Darling, PhD
`
`University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California
`* Principal and corresponding author
`
`
`
`__ Inthis review paper wepresentan__
`overview. of our research which
`has shown: that dental enamel
`manifests high transparencyin the
`3
`near-infrared: (NIR) and suggests
`"that NIR light at 1310 nmis ideally 3
`suited for the imaging of catious
`3
`lesions on proximal and occlusal
`tooth surfaces. NIR-sensitive
`
`imaging systems with broadband
`light sources centered at 1310 nm
`were used to acquire NIR images
`of lesions in extracted teeth and
`
`proximal lesions in vivo. Stains
`and noncalcitied plaque are not
`visible in the NIR, enabling better
`discrimination of defects, cracks,
`and demineralized areas. Carious
`lesions were visible in the NIR
`
`with high contrast and can be
`viewed from multiple surfaces to
`aid in diagnosis. These studies
`indicate that NIR imaging may
`offer significant advantages over
`the conventional visual, tactile,
`and radiographic caries-detection
`methods.
`
`been reported between the wave-
`length range of 200-1550 nm. For
`enamel, absorption is very weak in
`the visible range (u, < lem!,A =
`400-700 nm).’ For dentin in the
`400-700 nm wavelength range, the
`absorptioncoefficient is essentially
`wavelength-independent with a
`value of p, ~ 4 cm'l.§ Scattering in
`enamelis strong in the visible (ys
`= 60 cm:! at 632 nm) and decreases
`~ 3 with increasing wavelength to
`a value of only 2-3 cm! at 1810 nm
`and 1550 nm in the NIR.O”
`
`Therefore, enamel is virtually
`transparent in the NIR with optical
`attenuation 1-2 orders of magni-
`tude less than in the visible range.
`
`J Laser Dent 2010;18(1):8-16
`
`
`
`Editor’s note: Dr. Daniel Fried is the Academy of Laser Dentistry’s 2009
`T.-H. Maiman award winnerfor dental research. His article gives a
`summary of his work at the University of California San Francisco School
`of Dentistry on using a 13810-nm laser for imaging dental carious lesions.
`
`CARIES DETECTION
`AND NEW OPTICAL
`DIAGNOSTIC
`TECHNOLOGIES
`During the past century, the nature
`of dental decay or dental caries in
`the United States has changed
`markedly due to the introduction of
`fluoride to drinking water, the use
`of fluoride dentifrices and rinses,
`application of topical fluoride in the
`dental office, and improved dental
`hygiene. In spite of these advances,
`dental decay continuesto be the
`leading cause of tooth loss in the
`United St