throbber

`
`
`
`
` Paper 44
` Date: June 14, 2021
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822

`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION and HP INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SYNKLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-00316
`Patent 9,098,526 B1
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JESSICA C. KAISER, and
`SCOTT RAEVSKY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s and
`Petitioner’s Motions to Seal
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.14, 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00316
`Patent 9,098,526 B1
`
`
`Motions to Seal
`In its unopposed Motion to Seal, Patent Owner seeks to seal Exhibits
`2029 and 2030. Paper 29 (“PO Mot.”). Patent Owner represents that Exhibit
`2030 is a license agreement with a third party licensee and “is confidential by
`its terms.” Id. at 3.1 Patent Owner represents that Exhibit 2029 is an
`“associated claim chart,” that apparently includes information of the third
`party’s product. Id. at 2. Patent Owner argues that making either exhibit
`public “would potentially vitiate the license as a possible breach thereof
`and/or expose PO to liability.” Id. at 3. Petitioner filed an unredacted version
`of its Reply under seal. Paper 32. Petitioner also filed an unopposed motion
`to seal its unredacted Reply. Paper 34 (“Pet. Mot.”). In its Motion to Seal,
`Petitioner argues that its Reply quotes and discusses, in detail, Exhibits 2029
`and 2030, and thus, “includes sensitive business information.” Id. at 3.
`There is a strong public policy that favors making information filed in
`an inter partes review open to the public. Garmin Int’l, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed
`Techs. LLC, IPR2012-00001, Paper 34, 1–2 (PTAB Mar. 14, 2013). The
`standard for granting a motion to seal is good cause. 37 C.F.R. § 42.54. That
`standard includes showing that the information addressed in the motion to seal
`is truly confidential, and that such confidentiality outweighs the strong public
`interest in having the record open to the public. See Garmin at 2–3.
`We have considered the arguments presented by the parties in their
`respective motions and determine that good cause has been established for
`sealing the documents identified in both motions. Specifically, Patent Owner
`demonstrates that the information sought to be sealed per its motion contains
`
`                                                            
`1 The pages of the Motion are not numbered. We refer to the numbers of the
`pages beginning with the title page as number 1.
`2

`
`

`

`IPR2020-00316
`Patent 9,098,526 B1
`
`confidential information regarding “a license between the owner of the ’526 Patent
`and a recognized corporation, in consideration of payment and fees, along with an
`associated claim chart.” PO Mot. 2. Accordingly, we grant Patent Owner’s
`Motion to Seal, including Patent Owner’s unopposed request for entry of the
`Proposed Stipulated Protective Order (Exhibit 2036), which is similar to the
`Board’s default protective order provided in the Office Patent Trial Practice
`Guide. See Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide
`(Nov. 2019), https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated,
`(Appendix B).
`Accordingly, the record will be preserved in its entirety, and Exhibits
`2029 and 2030 and Petitioner’s unredacted Reply will not be expunged or
`made public, pending the outcome of any appeal taken from the Final Written
`Decision. At the conclusion of any appeal, or, if no appeal is taken, after the
`time for filing a notice appeal has expired, the documents may be made public.
`See id. at 21–22. At that time, either party may file a motion to expunge
`sealed documents from the record pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56.
`Order
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibits 2029 and 2030 and Paper 32 will
`remain sealed as outlined per this order.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00316
`Patent 9,098,526 B1
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Joseph Micallef
`Scott Border
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`sborder@sidely.com
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Gregory Gonsalves
`Yeasun Yoon
`CAPITOL IP LAW GROUP, PLLC
`gonsalves@capitoliplaw.com
`yoon@capitoliplaw.com
`
`

`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket