`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. & PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PACKET INTELLIGENCE LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2020-00335
`U.S. Patent No. 6,651,099
`
`____________
`
`PETITIONER JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.’S UNOPPOSED
`MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00335
`U.S. Patent No. 6,651,099
`
`In conjunction with filing its Unopposed Motion for Entry of a Modified
`
`Protective Order, and pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Petitioner Juniper
`
`Networks, Inc. respectfully submits this motion to seal confidential business
`
`information contained in portions of its Motion to Disqualify Patent Owner’s
`
`Expert Dr. Kevin Almeroth and Exhibits 1104, 1106, and 1110. The motion and
`
`exhibits contain Juniper’s confidential information regarding the technical
`
`functionality of Juniper’s products as well as communications and draft
`
`declarations exchanged between Juniper’s counsel and expert Dr. Kevin Almeroth.
`
`I.
`
`Good Cause Exists For Sealing Certain Confidential Information
`
`In determining whether to grant a motion to seal, the Board must find “good
`
`cause” and “strike a balance between the public’s interest in maintaining a
`
`complete and understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly
`
`sensitive information.”1 As provided in its Trial Practice Guide, the Board
`
`identifies “confidential information in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret
`
`or other confidential research, development, or commercial information.”2 And the
`
`Trial Practice Guide also instructs filing a motion to seal containing a proposed
`
`
`1 37 C.F.R. § 42.54(a); 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,760 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`2 Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide (Nov. 2019), 19
`(citing 37 C.F.R. § 42.54).
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00335
`U.S. Patent No. 6,651,099
`
`protective order and a certification that the moving party has in good faith
`
`conferred with the opposing party in an effort to come to an agreement as to the
`
`scope of the proposed protective order.3
`
`The exhibits that Juniper seeks to seal comprise Juniper’s highly
`
`confidential, competitively-sensitive information relating to products developed by
`
`Juniper, as well as communications and draft expert declarations exchanged
`
`between Juniper’s counsel and Dr. Almeroth. Juniper relies on this confidential
`
`information in support of its Motion to Disqualify Patent Owner’s Expert Dr.
`
`Kevin Almeroth. Public disclosure of this highly confidential, competitively-
`
`sensitive information would likely harm Juniper by providing technical and
`
`litigation strategy information to competitors and others.
`
`Specifically, Juniper’s motion and exhibits that contain confidential
`
`information are:
`
`• The Motion to Disqualify Patentee’s Expert Dr. Kevin Almeroth, which,
`on pages 6-8, contains highly confidential, competitively sensitive
`information regarding Juniper’s products as well as communications and
`draft expert declarations exchanged between Juniper’s counsel and Dr.
`Almeroth.
`• Exhibit 1104 is the declaration of David McPhie, which, on pages 4-5,
`contains highly confidential, competitively sensitive information
`
`
`3 Id., 19-20 (citing § 42.54).
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00335
`U.S. Patent No. 6,651,099
`
`regarding Juniper’s products as well as descriptions of communications
`and draft expert declarations exchanged between Juniper’s counsel and
`Dr. Almeroth.
`• Exhibit 1106 is the Declaration of Kevin C. Almeroth previously filed
`under seal in IPR2013-00369 as Ex. 2095, which, on pages 44-48,
`contains highly confidential, competitively-sensitive information
`regarding Juniper’s products.4
`• Exhibit 1110 is an excerpted draft declaration from Dr. Almeroth relating
`to IPR2013-00369, which contains highly confidential, communications
`and draft expert declarations exchanged between Juniper’s counsel and
`Dr. Almeroth.5
`
`As detailed in its Motion to Disqualify, Juniper relies on Exhibits 1104,
`
`1106, and 1110 to establish Dr. Almeroth received highly confidential,
`
`competitively-sensitive information regarding Juniper’s products as part of a
`
`confidential relationship with Juniper. Also, Juniper relies on Exhibits 1104 and
`
`
`4 When Declaration of Kevin C. Almeroth was previously filed under seal on
`March 28, 2014 as Ex. 2095 in IPR2013-00369, this declaration included
`additional redactions of Palo Alto Network’s confidential information on pages 44,
`45, 48, and 72.
`5 As with Ex. 1106, the excerpt of Dr. Almeroth’s draft declaration for IPR2013-
`00369 includes additional redactions of Palo Alto Network’s confidential
`information on pages 8-10 and 13-14.
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00335
`U.S. Patent No. 6,651,099
`
`1110 to establish Dr. Almeroth had confidential and privileged communications
`
`with Juniper’s lawyers.
`
`Because the Motion and Exhibits 1104, 1106, and 1110, which are
`
`designated PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL — ATTORNEY’S EYES
`
`ONLY, contain highly confidential information relevant to these proceedings,
`
`Juniper respectfully requests the Board grants its motion to seal the motion and
`
`exhibits. Also, Juniper provides public, redacted versions of its Motion to
`
`Disqualify and Exhibits 1104 and 1106.6 These redactions are narrowly tailored to
`
`remove just Juniper’s confidential information while revealing to the public as
`
`much as possible.
`
`II. Certification of Conference with Parties Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`Juniper has conferred with Petitioner Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Patentee
`
`Packet Intelligence LLC regarding filing these exhibits under seal subject to the
`
`proposed modified protective order. Palo Alto Networks and Packet Intelligence do
`
`not oppose.
`
`
`6 Exhibit 1107 is the redacted version of Exhibit 1106. Exhibits 1106 and 1107
`contain all the non-confidential information present in Exhibit 1110.
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00335
`U.S. Patent No. 6,651,099
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`Based on the highly confidential nature of these exhibits and the scope of
`
`protection sought, there is good cause to grant this motion to seal Juniper’s Motion
`
`to Disqualify Patentee’s Expert Dr. Kevin Almeroth and Exhibits 1104, 1106, and
`
`1110. Thus, Juniper respectfully requests that the Board grant this motion to seal.
`
`
`
`Date: July 22, 2020
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
` /Joseph F. Edell/
`Joseph F. Edell (Reg. No. 67,625)
`FISCH SIGLER LLP
`5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW
`Fourth Floor
`Washington, DC 20015
`Phone: +1.202.362.3524
`Email: Joe.Edell.IPR@fischllp.com
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00335
`U.S. Patent No. 6,651,099
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing PETITIONER
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SEAL was
`
`served via electronic mail to the following attorneys of record for the Patent
`
`Owner listed below:
`
`R. Allan Bullwinkel – Lead Counsel
`Reg. No. 77,630
`Heim Payne & Chorush, LLP
`1111 Bagby Street, Suite 2100
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: 713-221-2000
`Facsimile: 713-211-2021
`abullwinkel@hpcllp.com
`
`Michael F. Heim – Back-up Counsel
`Reg. No. 32,702
`Heim Payne & Chorush, LLP
`1111 Bagby Street, Suite 2100
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: 713-221-2000
`Facsimile: 713-211-2021
`mheim@hpcllp.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 22, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
` /Joseph F. Edell/
`
`Joseph F. Edell (Reg. No. 67,625)
`FISCH SIGLER LLP
`5301 Wisconsin Ave NW
`Fourth Floor
`Washington, DC 20015
`202.362.3524
`Email: Joe.Edell.IPR@fischllp.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
