`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`REMBRANDT WIRELESS
`TECHNOLOGIES, LP,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00025-JRG
`
`ORDER
`Before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Stay Proceedings (the
`
`“Motion to Stay”), wherein Apple requests that “this Court to stay all proceedings pending the
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s resolution of Apple’s petition for writ of
`
`mandamus.” (Dkt. No. 109 at 1.) Also, before the Court is Apple’s Notice of Order Issued in
`
`Federal Circuit (Dkt. No. 160), wherein Apple advises the Court of the Federal Circuit’s Order on
`
`Apple’s mandamus petition, requesting supplemental briefing due March 18, 2020 and setting oral
`
`argument for March 23, 2020 (Dkt. No. 160-1). In light of the Federal Circuit’s interest in the
`
`merits of Apple’s petition, the Court is of the opinion that Apple’s Motion to Stay should be and
`
`hereby is GRANTED.
`
`It is therefore ORDERED that, except as noted below,1 all deadlines in the above-
`
`captioned action are hereby STAYED until further order of the Court. It is further ORDERED
`
`1 This stay shall not apply to Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to the Renewed Motion of Non-Parties
`Broadcom Inc. and Broadcom Corporation for a Protective Order Regarding Plaintiff’s July 23,
`2014 Agreement with Broadcom, to Strike Certain Testimony of Dr. Robert K. Morrow, Jr., and
`for Attorneys’ Fees. (Dkt. No. 159.) No reply or sur-reply thereto shall be filed without leave of
`the Court.
`
`Roku Exhibit 1033
`Roku, Inc. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
`Page 00001
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00025-JRG Document 176 Filed 03/17/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 11033
`
`that the parties shall file a joint status report within three (3) days of any decision issued by the
`
`Federal Circuit in this matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of March, 2020.
`
`Roku Exhibit 1033
`Page 00002
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
