throbber
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CANON, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00546
`
`vs.
`TCL ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS LTD., et
`al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF CANON’S SECOND AMENDED PATENT RULE 3-1 AND 3-2
`DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Pursuant to Section 3(a)(i) of the Discovery Order (Dkt. No. 78), Plaintiff Canon, Inc.
`
`(“Canon”) serves a Second Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement
`
`Contentions and accompanying disclosure on Defendants TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd.
`
`(formerly known as TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings, Ltd.), TCL Corporation (“TCL
`
`Corp.”), Shenzen TCL New Technologies Co. Ltd., and TCL King Electrical Appliances
`
`(Huizhou) Co., Ltd.’s (collectively, “TCL” or “Defendants”).
`
`As contended in Canon’s initial September 6, 2019 Patent Rule 3-1 and 3-2 disclosures,
`
`a number of limitations of the Asserted Claims are software limitations, and these software
`
`limitations are performed by source code in the Roku, Inc. (“Roku”) OS running on all the
`
`accused TCL Roku TV products. Canon served a subpoena on Roku on December 20, 2019 that
`
`sought, inter alia, production of Roku’s source code relating to the accused functionalities. On
`
`January 17, 2020 Roku responded to Canon’s subpoena and indicated “it is not withholding any
`
`source code on account of its objections” to Canon’s subpoena. Beginning in early February,
`
`Roku made a number of productions of source code. Contrary to its representation in January,
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Roku, Inc. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`Roku withheld a substantial amount of source code relating to the accused functionalities, and
`
`Canon identified specific and numerable deficiencies in Roku’s productions. On February 19,
`
`Roku represented it intended to produce its full OS to address Canon’s complaints, echoing its
`
`original representation in January.
`
`Over the course of subsequent communications, Roku withdrew that representation, and
`
`did not produce any additional source code. As a result, Canon informed Roku it intended to
`
`bring a motion to compel production of the full Roku OS source code that Roku earlier
`
`represented it would produce. During a meet and confer on March 24, 2020, Roku again agreed
`
`to produce its full OS source code with “two security carve-outs” in view of Canon’s anticipated
`
`motion to compel.
`
`Because of various restrictions imposed by state governments due to the COVID-19
`
`outbreak, the parties thereafter disputed the location and manner in which Roku’s responsive
`
`source code would be produced. In particular, Roku sought to produce its source code in
`
`locations where Canon’s retained source code experts were either unable to travel due to shelter-
`
`in-place orders or that would require the experts to expose themselves or at-risk members of
`
`their household to possible infection in order to travel to those locations. Disputes on the manner
`
`in which Roku produced its source code remain pending. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 146 (Plaintiff
`
`Canon, Inc.’s Opposed Motion to Modify the Protective Order to Permit Remote Review of
`
`Source Code); Case No. 3:20-mc-80079 (N.D. Cal. May 4, 2020) (Roku, Inc.’s Motion to
`
`Modify and/or Quash Plaintiff Canon Inc.’s Subpoena and for a Protective Order to Prevent
`
`Remote Source Code Review (“Roku’s motion to prevent remote source code review”)). Despite
`
`Canon’s complaints as to the manner and logistics of Roku’s source code production, Canon
`
`diligently sought to inspect Roku’s source code, including by retaining an additional source
`
`2
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00002
`
`

`

`code reviewer.
`
`On April 15, 2020, despite its outstanding disputes, less than two weeks after Roku
`
`purportedly made its OS source code available for inspection, Canon first inspected Roku’s
`
`production of source code it first promised in January. Canon confirmed that Roku’s code
`
`production on April 15 contained hundreds of thousands more files than its earlier productions,
`
`including files relating to functionality requested numerous times by Canon. Canon has
`
`diligently continued its review of Roku’s source code, including with its additional retained
`
`source code expert, and now provides its disclosure of source code that satisfies the software
`
`limitations of the Asserted Claims under section 3(a)(i) of the Discovery Order, 30 days after
`
`its first inspection of Roku’s purported production of its full OS source code. See, e.g., CXT
`
`Sys., Inc. v. Acad., Ltd., No. 2:18-c-171-RWS-RSP, at *2 (E.D. Tex. June 5, 2019).
`
`These contentions are based on information reasonably available to Canon at this time.
`
`Canon’s investigation of facts relevant to this case is ongoing. Further, important information
`
`about many or all of TCL’s products is not publicly available, including information relevant to
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 7,746,413 (“’413 Patent”), 8,078,767 (“’767 Patent”), 8,346,986 (“’986
`
`Patent”), 8,713,206 (“’206 Patent”), and 7,810,130 (“’130 Patent”) (collectively, “Asserted
`
`Patents”) and these Infringement Contentions. Canon, therefore, reserves the right to modify
`
`and/or supplement these disclosures as information becomes available, and/or based on
`
`positions taken by TCL.
`
`For example, based on filings made in connection with Roku’s motion to prevent remote
`
`source code review, it appears that source code and/or documentation relating to a “native
`
`development kit” made available to certain Roku partners, including Hulu, LLC, has not been
`
`provided to Canon. See Case No. 3:20-mc-80079 (N.D. Cal. May 13, 2020), Dkt. No. 19-1 at
`
`3
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00003
`
`

`

`3:23–4:1. The functionality allowed by Roku’s NDK appears to be relevant to at least receiving,
`
`playing, buffering, and accessing a URL of streaming content, all which were requests in
`
`Canon’s December 20, 2019 subpoena. See id. at 19-10 (Declaration of Brett Henry in support
`
`of brief of amicus curiae Hulu, LLC) ¶¶ 15–18. Canon reserves the right to further supplement
`
`its contentions under section 3(a)(i) of the Discovery Order in view of this new information.
`
`A.
`
`P.R. 3-1(a): Identification of Asserted Claims
`
`Based on the information presently available, Canon hereby discloses, for purposes of
`
`3-1(a), the claims of each Asserted Patent that it contends are infringed (directly and/or
`
`indirectly, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by each of the Defendants, through
`
`their manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation into the United States of the
`
`accused products identified further below:
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`’413 Patent: Claims 1-2, 4-8, 10-11;
`’767 Patent: Claims 1-3, 6, 7, 10-14;
`’986 Patent: Claims 1-4, 6, 7, 9-11;
`’206 Patent: Claims 1-5, 7-11, 13-14;
`’130 Patent: Claims 1-8.
`
`Canon expressly reserves the right to modify, amend and/or supplement the foregoing
`
`in light of new information made available to Canon, and/or based on positions taken by TCL.
`
`B.
`
`P.R. 3-1(b): Identification of Accused Instrumentalities
`
`For purposes of P.R. 3-1(b), and based on the information presently and publicly
`
`available, Canon hereby identifies the following Accused Instrumentalities of which it is
`
`
`
`
`
`currently aware:
`
`•
`
`’413 Patent, Claims 1-2, 4-8, 10-11: Accused products include, but are not
`limited to, the following TCL Roku TVs:
`o 3-series TV systems (e.g., 32S301; 40S303, 43S303, 49S303; 28S305,
`32S305, 40S305, 43S305, 49S305; 32S321; 32S325, 40S325, 43S325,
`
`4
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00004
`
`

`

`•
`
`49S325; 32S327);
`o 4-series TV systems (e.g., 55S401, 65S401; 43S403, 49S403, 55S403,
`65S403; 43S405, 49S405, 55S405, 65S405; 43S421, 50S421, 55S421,
`65S421; 43S423, 50S423, 55S423, 65S423, 75S423; 43S425, 49S425,
`50S425, 55S425, 65S425, 75S425);
`o 5-series TV systems (e.g., 43S515, 49S515, 55S515, 65S515; 43S517,
`49S517, 55S517, 65S517; 43S525, 50S525, 55S525, 65S525)
`o 6-series TV systems (e.g., 55R615, 65R615, 75R615; 55R617, 65R617,
`75R617; 55R625, 65R625)
`o P6-series TV systems (e.g., 55P605; 55P607)
`o C8-series TV systems (e.g., 55C803, 75C803; 55C807, 65C807, 75C807)
`o S-series TV systems (e.g., 55US57; 55US5800, 65US5800; 32S3700,
`48FS3700, 55FS3700; 28S3750, 32S3750, 40FS3750, 48FS3750,
`55FS3750; 32S3800, 40FS3800, 50FS3800; 32S3850A, 32S3850B,
`32S3850P, 32S3850, 40FS3850, 50FS3850, 55FS3850; 32FS4610R,
`40FS4610R, 48FS4610R, 55FS4610R);
`o P-series TV systems (e.g., 43FP110, 49FP110; 43UP120, 50UP120,
`55UP120; 43UP130, 50UP130, 55UP130);
`o 8-series TV systems (e.g., 65Q825, 75Q825).
`’767 Patent, Claims 1-3, 6, 7, 10-14: Accused products include, but are not
`limited to, the following TCL Roku TVs:
`o 3-series TV systems (e.g., 32S301; 40S303, 43S303, 49S303; 28S305,
`32S305, 40S305, 43S305, 49S305; 32S321; 32S325, 40S325, 43S325,
`49S325; 32S327);
`o 4-series TV systems (e.g., 55S401, 65S401; 43S403, 49S403, 55S403,
`65S403; 43S405, 49S405, 55S405, 65S405; 43S421, 50S421, 55S421,
`65S421; 43S423, 50S423, 55S423, 65S423, 75S423; 43S425, 49S425,
`50S425, 55S425, 65S425, 75S425);
`o 5-series TV systems (e.g., 43S515, 49S515, 55S515, 65S515; 43S517,
`49S517, 55S517, 65S517; 43S525, 50S525, 55S525, 65S525)
`o 6-series TV systems (e.g., 55R615, 65R615, 75R615; 55R617, 65R617,
`75R617; 55R625, 65R625)
`o P6-series TV systems (e.g., 55P605; 55P607)
`o C8-series TV systems (e.g., 55C803, 75C803; 55C807, 65C807, 75C807)
`o S-series TV systems (e.g., 55US57; 55US5800, 65US5800; 32S3700,
`48FS3700, 55FS3700; 28S3750, 32S3750, 40FS3750, 48FS3750,
`55FS3750; 32S3800, 40FS3800, 50FS3800; 32S3850A, 32S3850B,
`32S3850P, 32S3850, 40FS3850, 50FS3850, 55FS3850; 32FS4610R,
`40FS4610R, 48FS4610R, 55FS4610R);
`o P-series TV systems (e.g., 43FP110, 49FP110; 43UP120, 50UP120,
`55UP120; 43UP130, 50UP130, 55UP130);
`
`5
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00005
`
`

`

`•
`
`•
`
`o 8-series TV systems (e.g., 65Q825, 75Q825).
`’986 Patent, Claims 1-4, 6, 7, 9-11: Accused products include, but are not limited
`to, the following TCL Roku TVs:
`o 3-series TV systems (e.g., 32S301; 40S303, 43S303, 49S303; 28S305,
`32S305, 40S305, 43S305, 49S305; 32S321; 32S325, 40S325, 43S325,
`49S325; 32S327);
`o 4-series TV systems (e.g., 55S401, 65S401; 43S403, 49S403, 55S403,
`65S403; 43S405, 49S405, 55S405, 65S405; 43S421, 50S421, 55S421,
`65S421; 43S423, 50S423, 55S423, 65S423, 75S423; 43S425, 49S425,
`50S425, 55S425, 65S425, 75S425);
`o 5-series TV systems (e.g., 43S515, 49S515, 55S515, 65S515; 43S517,
`49S517, 55S517, 65S517; 43S525, 50S525, 55S525, 65S525)
`o 6-series TV systems (e.g., 55R615, 65R615, 75R615; 55R617, 65R617,
`75R617; 55R625, 65R625)
`o P6-series TV systems (e.g., 55P605; 55P607)
`o C8-series TV systems (e.g., 55C803, 75C803; 55C807, 65C807, 75C807)
`o S-series TV systems (e.g., 55US57; 55US5800, 65US5800; 32S3700,
`48FS3700, 55FS3700; 28S3750, 32S3750, 40FS3750, 48FS3750,
`55FS3750; 32S3800, 40FS3800, 50FS3800; 32S3850A, 32S3850B,
`32S3850P, 32S3850, 40FS3850, 50FS3850, 55FS3850; 32FS4610R,
`40FS4610R, 48FS4610R, 55FS4610R);
`o P-series TV systems (e.g., 43FP110, 49FP110; 43UP120, 50UP120,
`55UP120; 43UP130, 50UP130, 55UP130);
`o 8-series TV systems (e.g., 65Q825, 75Q825).
`’206 Patent, Claims 1-5, 7-11, 13-14: Accused products include, but are not
`limited to, the following TCL Roku TVs:
`o 3-series TV systems (e.g., 32S301; 40S303, 43S303, 49S303; 28S305,
`32S305, 40S305, 43S305, 49S305; 32S321; 32S325, 40S325, 43S325,
`49S325; 32S327);
`o 4-series TV systems (e.g., 55S401, 65S401; 43S403, 49S403, 55S403,
`65S403; 43S405, 49S405, 55S405, 65S405; 43S421, 50S421, 55S421,
`65S421; 43S423, 50S423, 55S423, 65S423, 75S423; 43S425, 49S425,
`50S425, 55S425, 65S425, 75S425);
`o 5-series TV systems (e.g., 43S515, 49S515, 55S515, 65S515; 43S517,
`49S517, 55S517, 65S517; 43S525, 50S525, 55S525, 65S525)
`o 6-series TV systems (e.g., 55R615, 65R615, 75R615; 55R617, 65R617,
`75R617; 55R625, 65R625)
`o P6-series TV systems (e.g., 55P605; 55P607)
`o C8-series TV systems (e.g., 55C803, 75C803; 55C807, 65C807, 75C807)
`o S-series TV systems (e.g., 55US57; 55US5800, 65US5800; 32S3700,
`48FS3700, 55FS3700; 28S3750, 32S3750, 40FS3750, 48FS3750,
`
`6
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00006
`
`

`

`•
`
`55FS3750; 32S3800, 40FS3800, 50FS3800; 32S3850A, 32S3850B,
`32S3850P, 32S3850, 40FS3850, 50FS3850, 55FS3850; 32FS4610R,
`40FS4610R, 48FS4610R, 55FS4610R);
`o P-series TV systems (e.g., 43FP110, 49FP110; 43UP120, 50UP120,
`55UP120; 43UP130, 50UP130, 55UP130);
`o 8-series TV systems (e.g., 65Q825, 75Q825).
`’130 Patent, Claims 1-8: Accused products include, but are not limited to, the
`following TCL Roku TVs:
`o 3-series TV systems (e.g., 32S301; 40S303, 43S303, 49S303; 28S305,
`32S305, 40S305, 43S305, 49S305; 32S321; 32S325, 40S325, 43S325,
`49S325; 32S327);
`o 4-series TV systems (e.g., 55S401, 65S401; 43S403, 49S403, 55S403,
`65S403; 43S405, 49S405, 55S405, 65S405; 43S421, 50S421, 55S421,
`65S421; 43S423, 50S423, 55S423, 65S423, 75S423; 43S425, 49S425,
`50S425, 55S425, 65S425, 75S425);
`o 5-series TV systems (e.g., 43S515, 49S515, 55S515, 65S515; 43S517,
`49S517, 55S517, 65S517; 43S525, 50S525, 55S525, 65S525)
`o 6-series TV systems (e.g., 55R615, 65R615, 75R615; 55R617, 65R617,
`75R617; 55R625, 65R625)
`o P6-series TV systems (e.g., 55P605; 55P607)
`o C8-series TV systems (e.g., 55C803, 75C803; 55C807, 65C807, 75C807)
`o S-series TV systems (e.g., 55US57; 55US5800, 65US5800; 32S3700,
`48FS3700, 55FS3700; 28S3750, 32S3750, 40FS3750, 48FS3750,
`55FS3750; 32S3800, 40FS3800, 50FS3800; 32S3850A, 32S3850B,
`32S3850P, 32S3850, 40FS3850, 50FS3850, 55FS3850; 32FS4610R,
`40FS4610R, 48FS4610R, 55FS4610R);
`o P-series TV systems (e.g., 43FP110, 49FP110; 43UP120, 50UP120,
`55UP120; 43UP130, 50UP130, 55UP130);
`o 8-series TV systems (e.g., 65Q825, 75Q825).
`
`
`The identification of the accused products is based on information reasonably available
`
`to Canon at this time. Canon reserves the right to supplement these Infringement Contentions
`
`based on information developed in the course of this lawsuit through discovery or additional
`
`factual investigation, or as other circumstances may require. Specifically, should discovery
`
`reveal that TCL has committed acts of infringement related to any products other than those
`
`listed above, Canon reserves the right to supplement these contentions.
`
`C.
`
`P.R. 3-1(c): Claim Charts
`
`7
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00007
`
`

`

`For purposes of P.R. 3-1(c), Canon attaches hereto the following appendices identifying
`
`specifically where each element of each asserted claim is found within exemplary Accused
`
`
`
`Instrumentalities:
`
`Appendix 1 (’130 Patent), Appendix 2 (’767 Patent), Appendix 3 (’986 Patent),
`
`Appendix 4 (’206 Patent), and Appendix 5 (’413 Patent).
`
`As further support for identification of the exemplary Accused Instrumentalities in
`
`Appendices 1–5 as representative of all Accused Instrumentalities, Canon also provides the
`
`following additional appendices:
`
`Appendix 6; Appendices 1-a, 1-b, 1-c, 1-d, 1-e, and 1-f (’130 Patent), Appendices 2-a,
`
`2-b, 2-c, 2-d, 2-e, and 2-f (’767 Patent), Appendices 3-a, 3-b, 3-c, 3-d, 3-e, and 3-f (’986 Patent),
`
`Appendices 4-a, 4-b, 4-c, 4-d, 4-e, and 4-f (’206 Patent), and Appendices 5-a, 5-b, 5-c, 5-d, 5-e,
`
`and 5-f (’413 Patent).
`
`These appendices and claim charts are based on information reasonably available to
`
`Canon at this time. Canon reserves the right to supplement these Infringement Contentions based
`
`on information developed in the course of this lawsuit through discovery or additional factual
`
`investigation, or as other circumstances may require.
`
`D.
`
`P.R. 3-1(d): Literal Infringement and
`Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents
`
`
`For purposes of P.R. 3-1(d), Canon asserts that each element of each claim is literally
`
`present in each of the Accused Instrumentalities. To the extent any claim limitation is found to
`
`not be literally present, Canon asserts that such limitation is present under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents in each of the Accused Instrumentalities. By asserting that a claim element may be
`
`present under the doctrine of equivalents, Canon does not waive its right to assert literal
`
`infringement of that claim element. Additional, exemplary information about infringement
`
`8
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00008
`
`

`

`under the doctrine of equivalents is set forth in the attached claim charts.
`
`E.
`
`P.R. 3-1(e): Priority Based on Earlier Applications
`
`For purposes of P.R. 3-1(e), Canon asserts that the Asserted Patents are entitled to claim
`
`priority to at least the following applications:
`
`•
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`’413 Patent: JP2003-150212, filed May 28, 2003; JP2004-154154, filed May 25,
`2004;
`’767 Patent: JP2008-141678, filed May 29, 2008;
`’986 Patent: JP2008-141678, filed May 29, 2008;
`’206 Patent: JP2008-141678, filed May 29, 2008;
`’130 Patent: JP2002-295062, filed Oct. 8, 2002.
`
`
`F.
`
`P.R. 3-1(f): Identification of Any Canon
`Instrumentalities that Practice Claimed
`Inventions
`
`Based on
`
`its current
`
`investigation, Canon
`
`
`identifies
`
`the
`
`following Canon
`
`instrumentalities that practice the claimed inventions:
`
`Canon contends at least the Canon SX80 and SX80 Mark II practices one or more claims
`
`of the ’767 patent, as set forth in Appendices A and F.
`
`Canon contends at least the Canon SX80 and SX80 Mark II practices one or more claims
`
`of the ’986 patent, as set forth in Appendices B and G.
`
`Canon contends at least the Canon SX80 and SX80 Mark II practices one or more claims
`
`of the ’206 patent, as set forth in Appendices C and H.
`
`Canon reserves the right to modify, amend and/or supplement the foregoing based on
`
`information developed in the course of this lawsuit through discovery or additional factual
`
`investigation, based on positions taken by TCL, or as other circumstances may require.
`
`G.
`
`Discovery Order (Dkt. No. 78), 3(a): Source Code
`
`For purposes of the Court’s Discovery Order, section 3(a)(i), Canon asserts that elements
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00009
`
`

`

`of the ’413, ’767, ’986, ’206, and ’130 Patents are software limitations. Canon supplements its
`
`infringement contentions for the the ’413, ’767, ’986, ’206, and ’130 Patents under this section
`
`of the Discovery Order.
`
`H.
`
`Document Production Accompanying Disclosure
`
`For purposes of P.R. 3-2, Canon hereby discloses the following documents
`
`accompanying its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions that correspond
`
`
`
`to the following categories:
`
`P.R. 3-2(a): Based on its reasonable search and investigation, Canon states that it does
`
`not have any documents that fall within this category.
`
`P.R. 3-2(b): Based on its reasonable search and investigation, Canon states that it does
`
`not have any documents that fall within this category.
`
`P.R. 3-2(c): A copy of the file history of each of the asserted patents is being produced
`
`concurrently herewith at Bates Nos. CANONTCL00000001 - CANONTCL00001911,
`
`CANONTCL00007210 - CANONTCL00007554.
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00010
`
`

`

`DATED: May 15, 2020
`
`
`
`
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`By: /s/ David Okano
`Yar R. Chaikovsky
`yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com
`Hiroyuki Hagiwara
`hiroyukihagiwara@paulhastings.com
`Kyotaro Ozawa
`kyotaroozawa@paulhastings.com
`David Okano
`davidokano@paulhastings.com
`1117 S. California Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304-1106
`Telephone: (650) 320-1800
`Facsimile: (650) 320-1900
`
`Harry L. Gillam, Jr.
`TX Bar No. 07921800
`GILLAM & SMITH LLP
`303 S. Washington Ave.
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`gil@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Canon, Inc.
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00011
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 15, 2020, I caused a copy of PLAINTIFF CANON INC.’S
`
`SECOND AMENDED PATENT RULE 3-1 AND 3-2 DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED
`
`CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS to be served on counsel of record via
`
`FTP link.
`
`Andrew Thomases andrew.thomases@ropesgray.com
`Andrew Radsch andrew.radsch@ropesgray.com
`Christopher Bonny christopher.bonny@ropesgray.com
`Jennifer Doan jdoan@haltomdoan.com
`Joshua Thane jthane@haltomdoan.com
`
`
`
`
`/s/ C. Daniel Treviño
` C. Daniel Treviño
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Roku Exhibit 1038
`Page 00012
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket