throbber
r
`
`BRITISH
`PHARMACEUTICAL
`CODEX
`1973
`
`Prepared in the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
`of the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
`and published by direction of the Society's Council
`
`LONDON
`THE PHARMACEUTICAL PRESS
`17 BLOOMSBURY SQUARE WCIA 2NN
`
`

`

`Copyright © I973
`by the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
`
`Rs1s1
`,3
`.1'sf
`/~7j
`
`Made and printed in Great Britain by
`William Clowes & Sons, Limited, London, Beccles and Colchester
`
`

`

`( ' ' ..
`
`. .,.
`
`. . .. ...
`
`- - - - -1
`L
`. ··-
`. ·-
`
`.
`
`-
`
`-- .
`
`-
`
`.
`
`.
`
`'
`
`.
`
`antimony trichloride solution, at the maximum
`at about 500 nm, using ethylene chloride as the
`blank.
`The amount of calciferol, in mg, in the weight of
`sample taken is given by the formula:
`
`0·04(e1 - e2)
`(e3 -
`e1)
`
`DETERMINATION OF VITAMINS
`911
`where e1 = the extinction due to the solution in
`the first tube,
`e2 = the extinction due to the solution in the
`second tube, and
`e3 = the extinction due to the solution in the
`third tube.
`Each mg of calciferol is equivalent to 40,000 Units
`of vitamin D.
`
`Appendix 25
`
`Powders and Suspensions
`
`A. Classification of Powders
`The descriptive term used to indicate the degree
`of comminution of substances employed in the
`manufacture of preparations in the British Pharma(cid:173)
`ceutical Codex can usually be related to the size
`of the mesh of the sieve or sieves through which
`the whole or a portion of the powder is able to
`pass. The wire sieves used in sifting powders are
`distinguished by numbers and should comply with
`the requirements of British Standard 410: 1969.
`In the British Pharmacopoeia and the British
`Pharmaceutical Codex, sieves were formerly
`designated by the mesh count or mesh number
`which was the number of meshes per inch. Sieves
`are now designated by aperture size and the
`numbers
`indicate the nominal aperture size,
`measured in millimetres for aperture sizes of
`1 mm or greater and in micrometers (µm) for
`aperture sizes of less than 1 mm.
`The table below relates the sieve numbers now
`used to the mesh numbers formerly used. The
`relationship of the mesh number to the actual
`number of meshes per inch depends on the wire
`diameter and should be taken as an approximation.
`
`Sieve
`Number
`
`Mesh
`Sieve
`Mesh
`Number Number Number
`
`mm
`4·00
`3·35
`2·80
`1-70
`µm
`710
`500
`
`4
`5
`6
`10
`
`22
`30
`
`µm
`355
`250
`180
`150
`125
`106
`75
`
`44
`60
`85
`100
`120
`150
`200
`
`The following terms are used in the description
`of powders:
`COARSE POWDER. A powder of which all the par(cid:173)
`ticles pass through a No. 1·70 sieve and not more
`40·0 per cent pass through a No. 355 sieve.
`MODERATELY COARSE POWDER. A powder of which
`all the particles pass through a No. 710 sieve and
`not more than 40·0 per cent pass through a
`No. 250 sieve.
`MODERATELY FINE PoWDE~. A powder of which
`all the particles pass through a No. 355 sieve and
`not more than 40·0 per cent pass through a
`No. 180 sieve.
`
`FINE POWDER. A powder of which all the particles
`pass through a No. 180 sieve.
`VERY FINE POWDER. A powder of which all the
`particles pass through a No. 125 sieve.
`ULTRA-FINE POWDER. A powder of which the
`maximum diameter of 90 per cent of the particles
`is not greater than 5 µm and of which the
`diameter of none of the particles is greater than
`50 µm.
`When the degree of comminution of a powder is
`defined by means of a number, the whole of the
`powder passes through the sieve described by that
`number.
`
`B. Determination of the Surface Area of
`Bephenium Hydroxynaphthoate
`Determine by the air-permeability method de(cid:173)
`scribed by F. M. Lea and R. W. Nurse, J. Soc.
`Chem. Ind., Lond. (Transactions), 1939, 58, 277-
`283, using a compact 2·54 cm in diameter, 1 ·00 cm
`in height, and having a porosity within the range
`0·475 to 0·525.
`For the purpose of the calculations, the density
`of the particles may be assumed to be 1 ·298 g
`per cm3•
`
`C. Determination of Particle Size in
`Suspensions
`The following method is
`to be used, when
`directed, to determine the particle size of a sus(cid:173)
`pended solid in a preparation:
`Dilute a suitable quantity of the preparation with
`an equal volume of glycerol and further dilute, if
`necessary, with a mixture of equal volumes of
`glycerol and water; alternatively, where specified
`in the individual monograph, use liquid paraffin as
`the diluent.
`Mount the diluted preparation on a slide and
`examine random fields microscopically using a
`microscope providing adequate resolution for the
`observation of small particles.
`Observe that there are no particles (or, if stated,
`not more than a few particles) above the maxi(cid:173)
`mum size permitted in the individual mono(cid:173)
`graph.
`Count the numbers of particles having maximum
`diameters above and/or below the limiting sizes
`permitted in the individual monographs and
`hence calculate the percentages of particles having
`maximum diameters within the stated limits.
`The percentages should be calculated from
`observations on at least 1000 particles.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket