throbber
Demonstratives of Petitioner Google LLC
`
`Inter Partes Review of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,949,954
`
`IPR2020-00441
`
`Oral Hearing: April 21, 2021
`
`1
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1036
`Google LLC v. Uniloc 2017 LLC
`IPR2020-00441
`
`

`

`Instituted Grounds
`
`• Ground 1: Claims 1–4, 6, 12, and 14 are obvious in view of Steinberg and
`Oberheide
`
`• Ground 2: Claim 9 is obvious in view of Steinberg, Oberheide and
`McDowell
`
`• Ground 3: Claim 13 is obvious in view of Steinberg, Oberheide and Yasushi
`
`• Ground 4: Claims 1–4, 6, 9, 12, and 14 are obvious in view of Steinberg,
`Oberheide and McDowell
`
`• Ground 5: Claim 13 is obvious in view of Steinberg, Oberheide, McDowell
`and Yasushi
`
`Pet. at 3; Inst. Dec. at 9-10, 44
`
`2
`
`

`

`Claim 1 of the ’954 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001, 12:2–34 (Claim 1)
`
`3
`
`

`

`Claim 1 of the ’954 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001, 12:2–34 (Claim 1)
`
`4
`
`

`

`Claim Construction
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Resp. at 7
`
`5
`
`

`

`Claim Construction
`
`Petition
`
`Pet. at 10-11
`
`6
`
`

`

`Claim Construction
`
`Institution Decision
`
`Inst. Dec. at 18
`
`7
`
`

`

`A Notification of the Request to an
`Address of a Separate Device Specified by the Customer
`
`Steinberg
`
`Pet. at 46; Reply at 9-10
`
`8
`
`Ex. 1005 at FIG. 8
`
`

`

`A Notification of the Request to an
`Address of a Separate Device Specified by the Customer
`
`Steinberg
`
`Pet. at 44-45
`
`Ex. 1005 at ¶[0053]
`
`9
`
`

`

`A Notification of the Request to an
`Address of a Separate Device Specified by the Customer
`
`Steinberg
`
`Ex. 1005 at ¶[0014]
`
`Pet. at 44-45
`
`10
`
`

`

`A Notification of the Request to an
`Address of a Separate Device Specified by the Customer
`
`Steinberg
`
`Ex. 1005 at ¶[0045]
`
`Pet. at 15, 19, 45; Reply at 6
`
`11
`
`

`

`A Notification of the Request to an
`Address of a Separate Device Specified by the Customer
`
`Steinberg
`
`Ex. 1005 at ¶[0048]
`
`Pet. at 46; Reply at 6
`
`12
`
`

`

`A Notification of the Request to an
`Address of a Separate Device Specified by the Customer
`
`Steinberg
`
`Ex. 1005 at ¶[0049]
`
`Reply at 6, 10
`
`13
`
`

`

`A Notification of the Request to an
`Address of a Separate Device Specified by the Customer
`
`Steinberg
`
`Ex. 1005 at ¶[0045]
`
`Reply at 7
`
`Ex. 1005 at ¶[0045]
`
`14
`
`

`

`Petitioner’s Position Is Supported by Expert Testimony
`
`Dr. Monrose
`
`Ex. 1002 at ¶[0145]
`
`Pet. at 46-47; Reply at 7-8
`
`15
`
`

`

`Patent Owner’s Response Concedes the
`Cell Phone in Steinberg Is Identified
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Resp. at 29
`
`16
`
`

`

`The ’954 Patent Only Discloses Using a Phone Number or
`Email Address to Specify the Separate Device
`
`’954 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001, 8:30-32
`
`Ex. 1001, 4:61-62
`
`Inst. Dec. at 27-28; Reply at 9, 14
`
`Ex. 1001, 9:35-39
`
`17
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Incorrectly Characterizes
`Petitioner’s Reply Regarding the ’954 Patent
`
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`Sur-Reply at 10-11
`
`18
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Incorrectly Characterizes
`Petitioner’s Reply Regarding the ’954 Patent
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply at 14-15
`
`19
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Incorrectly Characterizes
`Petitioner’s Statements in District Court
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Resp. at 21-22
`
`20
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Incorrectly Characterizes
`Petitioner’s Statements in District Court
`
`Markman Hearing Transcript
`
`Ex. 2003, 43:9-21
`
`Reply at 13 n.3
`
`21
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Incorrectly Accuses Petitioner of “Eviscerating the Distinction”
`Between Specifying a Separate Device and an Address of a Separate Device
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Resp. at 19
`
`22
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Incorrectly Accuses Petitioner of “Eviscerating the Distinction”
`Between Specifying a Separate Device and an Address of a Separate Device
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply at 11-12
`
`23
`
`

`

`The ’954 Patent’s Fingerprint-Related Disclosures
`Are Not Relevant to the Claimed “Separate Device”
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Resp. at 29 n.4
`
`24
`
`

`

`The ’954 Patent’s Fingerprint-Related Disclosures
`Are Not Relevant to the Claimed “Separate Device”
`
`’954 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001, 2:19-22
`
`Ex. 1001, 4:57-61
`
`Reply at 10-11
`
`25
`
`

`

`The ’954 Patent’s Fingerprint-Related Disclosures
`Are Not Relevant to the Claimed “Separate Device”
`
`’954 Patent
`
`Reply at 10-11; see also Sur-Reply at 12-13
`
`Ex. 1001, 11:41-55
`
`26
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Incorrectly Characterizes
`Petitioner’s Reply Regarding Exhibits 2007 & 2008
`
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`Sur-Reply at 19
`
`27
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Incorrectly Characterizes
`Petitioner’s Reply Regarding Exhibits 2007 & 2008
`
`Exhibit 2007
`
`Reply at 17
`
`28
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Incorrectly Characterizes
`Petitioner’s Reply Regarding Exhibits 2007 & 2008
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply at 17
`
`29
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket