throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 10
`Entered: June 19, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`IPR2020-00441
`Patent 8,949,954 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before PATRICK M. BOUCHER, STACY B. MARGOLIES, and
`MICHAEL T. CYGAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`BOUCHER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`35 U.S.C. § 314(a)
`
`Subsequent to the filing of the Petition and Preliminary Response in
`
`this proceeding, the Office designated as precedential Apple Inc. v. Fintiv,
`
`Inc., IPR2020-00019, Paper 11 (PTAB Mar. 20, 2020) (precedential). In
`
`accordance with our authorization, the parties filed a Reply and a Sur-Reply
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00441
`Patent 8,949,954 B2
`
`addressing the impact of that designation on Patent Owner’s argument that
`
`we should exercise our discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) to deny the
`
`Petition in light of the advanced state of related district court litigation.
`
`Papers 8, 9.
`
`Subsequent to that briefing, the district court issued an order
`
`transferring the district court litigation to the Northern District of California.
`
`Ex. 1034. In considering the issue raised by Patent Owner’s argument, the
`
`panel would benefit from a more clear understanding of whether a schedule
`
`has been set in the transferred case, and if not, the parties’ expectations
`
`regarding the case schedule. In addition, the parties should address any
`
`effect on the NHK/Fintiv factor of “investment in the parallel proceeding by
`
`the court and parties,” including whether either party anticipates seeking to
`
`revisit issues previously decided in the Eastern District of Texas, such as
`
`claim-construction rulings.
`
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that each of Petitioner and Patent Owner is authorized to
`
`file, by June 24, 2020, a paper of no more than two pages in length,
`
`summarizing its position regarding the status and anticipated progression of
`
`the transferred district court proceeding.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00441
`Patent 8,949,954 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Naveen Modi
`Joseph E. Palys
`Daniel Zeilberger
`Arvind Jairam
`Jason Heidemann
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com
`arvindjairam@paulhastings.com
`jasonheidemann@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Ryan Loveless
`Brett Mangrum
`James Etheridge
`Brian Koide
`Jeffrey Huang
`ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`jim@etheridgelaw.com
`brian@etheridgelaw.com
`jeff@etheridgelaw.com
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket