`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 23
`Entered: March 23, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MICHIGAN MOTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-00455
`Patent 7,116,081 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before NEIL T. POWELL, BARBARA A. PARVIS, and
`SCOTT B. HOWARD, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00455
`Patent 7,116,081 B2
`
`
`On March 19, 2021, with Board authorization, Petitioner and Patent
`
`Owner filed a joint motion to dismiss the petition and terminate the above-
`
`captioned proceeding. Paper 21. Along with the motion, the parties filed a
`
`copy of a Confidential Agreement (Ex. 1100), as well as a joint request to
`
`treat the Confidential Agreement as business confidential information
`
`(Paper 22). See 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (a party to a settlement may request
`
`that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential and be kept
`
`separate from the patent file).
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” It is
`
`also provided in 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) that if no petitioner remains, the Office
`
`may terminate the inter partes review.
`
`In this case, the Board issued a decision to institute inter partes
`
`review. Paper 10. However, the Board has not yet decided the merits of the
`
`proceeding or entered a final written decision. In the joint motion, the
`
`parties state that they have settled their dispute and they jointly request
`
`termination of this inter partes review. Paper 21, 1. Accordingly, in the
`
`circumstances present here, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate
`
`the proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a). This Order does not constitute a final
`
`written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`The parties also ask that the Confidential Agreement be treated as
`
`business confidential information and be kept separate from the file of the
`
`challenged patents. Paper 22. We determine that it is appropriate to treat
`
`the Confidential Agreement as business confidential information, and to
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00455
`Patent 7,116,081 B2
`
`keep that document separate from the files of the challenged patents,
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`The parties further ask the Board to order that, “in the event a person
`
`or entity makes a written request, as stated in 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)(1)-(2), for
`
`access to the [Confidential Agreement], that any such written request be
`
`served upon the parties on the day the written request is provided to the
`
`Board.” Paper 22, 1. The statutory and regulatory provisions governing
`
`access to such settlement agreements stand on their own, and therefore, we
`
`deny the parties’ request here.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, it is:
`
`ORDERED that the joint motion is granted and this proceeding is
`
`terminated with respect to Petitioner and Patent Owner;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request that the Confidential
`
`Agreement (Ex. 1100) be treated as business confidential information, to be
`
`kept separate from the patent file, is granted in this proceeding; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request that the Board order that,
`
`in the event a person or entity makes a written request for access to the
`
`Confidential Agreement, that any such written request be served upon the
`
`parties on the day the written request is provided to the Board, is denied in
`
`this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00455
`Patent 7,116,081 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Michael Specht
`Jason Fitzsimmons
`Kyle Conklin
`Daniel Yonan
`Trevor O’Neill
`STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`mspecht-ptab@sternekessler.com
`jfitzsimmons-ptab@sternekessler.com
`kconklin-ptab@sternekessler.com
`dyonan-ptab@sternekessler.com
`toneill-ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Timothy Devlin
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`