throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 23
`Entered: March 23, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MICHIGAN MOTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-00455
`Patent 7,116,081 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before NEIL T. POWELL, BARBARA A. PARVIS, and
`SCOTT B. HOWARD, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00455
`Patent 7,116,081 B2
`
`
`On March 19, 2021, with Board authorization, Petitioner and Patent
`
`Owner filed a joint motion to dismiss the petition and terminate the above-
`
`captioned proceeding. Paper 21. Along with the motion, the parties filed a
`
`copy of a Confidential Agreement (Ex. 1100), as well as a joint request to
`
`treat the Confidential Agreement as business confidential information
`
`(Paper 22). See 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (a party to a settlement may request
`
`that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential and be kept
`
`separate from the patent file).
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” It is
`
`also provided in 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) that if no petitioner remains, the Office
`
`may terminate the inter partes review.
`
`In this case, the Board issued a decision to institute inter partes
`
`review. Paper 10. However, the Board has not yet decided the merits of the
`
`proceeding or entered a final written decision. In the joint motion, the
`
`parties state that they have settled their dispute and they jointly request
`
`termination of this inter partes review. Paper 21, 1. Accordingly, in the
`
`circumstances present here, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate
`
`the proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a). This Order does not constitute a final
`
`written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`The parties also ask that the Confidential Agreement be treated as
`
`business confidential information and be kept separate from the file of the
`
`challenged patents. Paper 22. We determine that it is appropriate to treat
`
`the Confidential Agreement as business confidential information, and to
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00455
`Patent 7,116,081 B2
`
`keep that document separate from the files of the challenged patents,
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`The parties further ask the Board to order that, “in the event a person
`
`or entity makes a written request, as stated in 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)(1)-(2), for
`
`access to the [Confidential Agreement], that any such written request be
`
`served upon the parties on the day the written request is provided to the
`
`Board.” Paper 22, 1. The statutory and regulatory provisions governing
`
`access to such settlement agreements stand on their own, and therefore, we
`
`deny the parties’ request here.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, it is:
`
`ORDERED that the joint motion is granted and this proceeding is
`
`terminated with respect to Petitioner and Patent Owner;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request that the Confidential
`
`Agreement (Ex. 1100) be treated as business confidential information, to be
`
`kept separate from the patent file, is granted in this proceeding; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request that the Board order that,
`
`in the event a person or entity makes a written request for access to the
`
`Confidential Agreement, that any such written request be served upon the
`
`parties on the day the written request is provided to the Board, is denied in
`
`this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00455
`Patent 7,116,081 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Michael Specht
`Jason Fitzsimmons
`Kyle Conklin
`Daniel Yonan
`Trevor O’Neill
`STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`mspecht-ptab@sternekessler.com
`jfitzsimmons-ptab@sternekessler.com
`kconklin-ptab@sternekessler.com
`dyonan-ptab@sternekessler.com
`toneill-ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Timothy Devlin
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket