`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Date: September 14, 2020
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-00582 (Patent 7,292,485 B1)
` IPR2020-00583 (Patent 7,606,983 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before THU A. DANG, BART A. GERSTENBLITH, and
`KIMBERLY McGRAW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GERSTENBLITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`S. Calvin Walden
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use a multi-case caption.
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00582 (Patent 7,292,485 B1)
`IPR2020-00583 (Patent 7,606,983 B2)
`
`
`DISCUSSION
`Intel Corporation (“Petitioner”) filed a motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Mr. S. Calvin Walden in each of the above-captioned
`proceedings. Paper 14.2 Each motion is accompanied by a declaration from
`Mr. Walden. Ex. 1023.3 Each motion states that “Patent Owner indicates
`that it does not oppose this motion.” See, e.g., IPR2020-00582, Paper 14 at
`1.
`
`Having reviewed the motion and declaration4 in each proceeding, we
`conclude that Mr. Walden has sufficient qualifications to represent Petitioner
`in each proceeding and that Petitioner has shown good cause for pro hac
`vice admission of Mr. Walden. See Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron,
`LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Order Authorizing
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission) (setting forth the requirements for pro
`hac vice admission). Mr. Walden will be permitted to appear pro hac vice in
`each proceeding as back-up counsel only. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`ORDER
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for pro hac vice admission of
`Mr. S. Calvin Walden in each proceeding is granted, and Mr. Walden is
`authorized to represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in each
`proceeding;
`
`
`2 The Motion is Paper 17 in IPR2020-00583.
`3 Mr. Walden’s Declaration is Exhibit 1023 in each proceeding.
`4 The Declaration refers to “part 42 of the C.F.R.,” which omits reference to
`Title 37. Ex. 1023 ¶ 15. We deem this harmless error.
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00582 (Patent 7,292,485 B1)
`IPR2020-00583 (Patent 7,606,983 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in each proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Walden is to comply with the Patent
`Trial and Appeal Board’s Consolidated Trial Practice Guide
`(November 2019), available at
`https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated, and the Board’s
`Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of
`Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Walden is subject to the USPTO’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO’s Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth at 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00582 (Patent 7,292,485 B1)
`IPR2020-00583 (Patent 7,606,983 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Taeg Sang Cho
`Donald Steinberg
`WILMER, CUTLER, PICKERING, HALE AND DORR LLP
`tim.cho@wilmerhale.com
`don.steinberg@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Kenneth Weatherwax
`Nathan Lowenstein
`Bridget Smith
`Flavio Rose
`Edward Hsieh
`Parham Hendifar
`Patrick Maloney
`Jason Linger
`LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`weatherwax@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`lowenstein@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`smith@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`rose@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`hseih@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`hendifar@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`maloney@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`linger@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
