throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 22
`Date: January 19, 2021
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`IMPLICIT, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2020-00585, IPR2020-00586, IPR2020-00587,
`IPR2020-00590, IPR2020-00591, and IPR2020-005921
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, BARBARA A. PARVIS,
`SHEILA F. McSHANE, and NABEEL U. KHAN,
`Administrative Patent Judges. 2
`
`PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The parties may not use this caption for any subsequent papers without
`prior Board authorization.
`2 This is not an order from an expanded panel of the Board. Administrative
`Patent Judges of each of the three-member panels from all the respective
`proceedings are listed.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00585 (Patent 8,694,683 B2)
`IPR2020-00586 (Patent 9,270,790 B2)
`IPR2020-00587 (Patent 9,591,104 B2)
`IPR2020-00590 (Patent 10,027,780 B2)
`IPR2020-00591 (Patent 10,033,839 B2)
`IPR2020-00592 (Patent 10,225,378 B2)
`
`
`On January 15, 2021, pursuant to the Board’s authorization, Juniper
`Networks, Inc. (“Petitioner”) and Implicit, LLC (“Patent Owner”) filed a
`joint motion in each of the cases3 to terminate each of the instant inter partes
`reviews pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. Paper 22
`(“Joint Motion” or “Mot.”).4 The Joint Motion was accompanied by a true,
`unredacted copy of a Settlement Agreement (Exhibit 2016). The parties also
`request that the Settlement Agreement be treated as business confidential
`information, to be kept separate from the patent file, pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Mot. 3.
`In its Joint Motion, the parties jointly request termination of the
`proceedings. Mot. 1. The parties state that they have settled their disputes
`regarding the challenged patents and filed a stipulation of dismissal on
`January 4, 2021 in the parallel litigation. Id. at 2. The parties state that
`“[g]iven the early stages of this proceeding, the Parties submit it is
`appropriate to terminate review under Section 317(a) and not proceed to a
`final written decision.” Id. at 3.
`The Board generally expects that “a proceeding will terminate after
`the filing of a settlement agreement, unless the Board has already decided
`
`
`3 The challenged patents in these proceedings are, respectively, U.S. Patent
`Nos. 8,694,683 B2, 9,270,790 B2, 9,591,104 B2, 10,027,780 B2, 10,033,839
`B2, and 10,225,378 B2.
`4 For purposes of expediency, we cite to the Motion and Exhibits filed in
`IPR2020-00585, unless otherwise indicated. The parties filed
`similar Motions and Exhibits in IPR2020-00586, IPR2020-00587,
`IPR2020-00590, IPR2020-00591, and IPR2020-00592.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00585 (Patent 8,694,683 B2)
`IPR2020-00586 (Patent 9,270,790 B2)
`IPR2020-00587 (Patent 9,591,104 B2)
`IPR2020-00590 (Patent 10,027,780 B2)
`IPR2020-00591 (Patent 10,033,839 B2)
`IPR2020-00592 (Patent 10,225,378 B2)
`
`the merits.” Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, 86 (Nov. 2019),
`https://go.usa.gov/xpvPF; see also 35 U.S.C. § 327; 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`Here, although the Board has instituted inter partes review of the challenged
`patents, the Board has not decided the merits of the proceeding. Under these
`circumstances, therefore, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate this
`proceeding with respect to both Petitioner and Patent Owner. Accordingly,
`we grant the parties’ Joint Motions to terminate.
`We also determine that the parties have complied with the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to have the Settlement Agreement
`treated as business confidential information and kept separate from the files
`of the challenged patents in these proceedings. Thus, we grant the parties’
`request to treat the Settlement Agreement as business confidential.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the Joint Motions to terminate the instant proceedings
`are GRANTED;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request to treat the parties’
`Settlement Agreement (IPR2020-00585, Exhibit 2016; IPR2020-00586,
`Exhibit 2015; IPR2020-00587, Exhibit 2015; IPR2020-00590, Exhibit 2015;
`IPR2020-00591, Exhibit 2015; IPR2020-00592, Exhibit 2015) as business
`confidential information, to be kept separate from the patent file, is
`GRANTED; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the instant proceedings are
`TERMINATED.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-00585 (Patent 8,694,683 B2)
`IPR2020-00586 (Patent 9,270,790 B2)
`IPR2020-00587 (Patent 9,591,104 B2)
`IPR2020-00590 (Patent 10,027,780 B2)
`IPR2020-00591 (Patent 10,033,839 B2)
`IPR2020-00592 (Patent 10,225,378 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Jonathan Lindsay
`David McPhie
`Dennis J. Courtney
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`jlindsay@irell.com
`dmcphie@irell.com
`dcourtney@irell.com
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Christian Hurt
`William E. Davis, III
`DAVIS FIRM, PC
`churt@davisfirm.com
`bdavis@davisfirm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket