throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`IMPLICIT, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`Case: IPR2020-00587
`Patent No. 9,591,104
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`WILLIAM ELLSWORTH DAVIS, III
`
`I. RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to Rule 42.10(c), Patent Owner Implicit, LLC (“Implicit”)
`
`respectfully requests pro hac vice admission of William E. Davis, III as counsel
`
`in this proceeding.
`
`II. GOVERNING LAW, RULES, AND PRECEDENT
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) states as follows:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a
`
`proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and
`
`to any other conditions as the Board may impose. For
`
`example, where the lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon
`
`showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney
`
`and has an established familiarity with the subject matter
`
`at issue in the proceeding.
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Based on the following statement of facts, and supported by the Declaration
`
`of William E. Davis, III submitted herewith (Exhibit 2014), Implicit, LLC submits
`
`that a showing of good cause has been made and respectfully requests the pro hac
`
`vice admission of William E. Davis, III in this proceeding:
`
`1. Mr. Davis is an experienced litigation attorney and has an established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Mr. Davis
`
`has been practicing law since 2004 and has extensive experience
`
`litigating patent infringement cases in many different District Courts
`
`across the country. Among his experience in patent litigation matters,
`
`Mr. Davis has been lead counsel in multiple trials, Markman hearings,
`
`patent summary judgment proceedings, and other patent- related
`
`hearings and pleadings concerning, inter alia, patent validity and
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`infringement issues.
`
`2. Mr. Davis is familiar with U.S. Patent Nos. 8,694,683 (“the ’683
`
`Patent”); 9,270,790 (“the ’790 Patent”); 9,591,104 (“the ’104 Patent”);
`
`10,027,780 (“the ’780 Patent”); 10,033,839; (“the ’839 Patent”) and
`
`10,225,378 (“the ’378 Patent”). Mr. Davis has been representing Patent
`
`Owner Implicit in pending District Court litigation against Petitioner
`
`asserting the ’683, ’790, ’104, ’780, ’839 and ’378 Patents. Among other
`
`things, Mr. Davis has been involved in the infringement, claim
`
`construction, and validity issues with regard to the ’683, ’790, ’104, ’780,
`
`’839 and ’378 Patents.
`
`3. Mr. Davis is currently admitted pro hac vice before the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board in Sonos, Inc. v. Implicit, LLC; IPR2018-00766 (Patent
`
`7,391,791 B2) and Sonos, Inc. v. Implicit, LLC IPR2018-00767 (Patent
`
`8,942,252 B2).
`
`IV. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR PRO HAC ADMISSION
`
`
`
`The facts outlined above in the Statement of Facts, and contained in the
`
`Declaration William E. Davis, III (Ex. 2014), establish that there is good cause to
`
`admit Mr. Davis pro hac vice in this proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10.
`
`Petitioner’s lead counsel and first back-up counsel are registered practitioners. Mr.
`
`Davis is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`the subject matter at issue.
`
`V. NO OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION
`
`Patent Owner, Implicit, LLC has conferred with Petitioner with regard to
`
`this Motion, and Petitioner confirmed that it would not oppose the motion.
`
`VI. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons as well as the reasons contained in the declaration
`
`entered as Exhibit 2014, Implicit respectfully requests admission of William E.
`
`Davis, III as counsel pro hac vice.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`THE DAVIS FIRM, P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Christian Hurt Reg.No.63,659
` Christian Hurt
`
`
`
`DAVIS FIRM, PC
`213 N. Fredonia Street, Suite 230
`Longview, Texas 75601
`903-230-9090
`churt@davisfirm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on July 23, 2020, a true copy of the following
`
`document(s):
`
`PATENT OWNER IMPLICIT, LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO
`HAC VICE ADMISSION OF WILLIAM E. DAVIS, III UNDER 37 C.F.R. §
`42.10)C) and EXHIBIT 2014 were served as follows:
`Juniper-Implicit@irell.com
`Jonathan M. Lindsay
`David McPhie
`Courtney Dennis
`Irell & Manella LLP
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, CA 92660
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`
`America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 23, 2020 at
`
`Dallas, Texas.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Christian J. Hurt
`Christian J. Hurt
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket