`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`NVIDIA CORPORATION, SEMICONDUCTOR
`COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC, DBA ON
`SEMICONDUCTOR,
`Appellees
`______________________
`
`2022-1112, 2022-1113
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-
`00602, IPR2020-00603.
`______________________
`
`JUDGMENT
`______________________
`
`RICHARD L. RAINEY, Covington & Burling LLP, Wash-
`ington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by
`TAREK AUSTIN; NITIN SUBHEDAR, San Francisco, CA.
`
` STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper US LLP,
`San Diego, CA, argued for appellee NVIDIA Corporation.
`Also represented by CLAYTON W. THOMPSON, II, YAKOV
`ZOLOTOREV, East Palo Alto, CA.
`
`
`
`Case: 22-1112 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 03/22/2023
`
`
`
`
` MICHAEL HAWES, Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX, for
`appellee Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC.
`Also represented by ROGER FULGHUM; BRETT J. THOMPSEN,
`McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Austin, TX.
` ______________________
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
` PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, SCHALL, and TARANTO, Cir-
`cuit Judges).
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`
` ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`
`March 22, 2023
`Date
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`