`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`PARUS HOLDINGS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00686
`U.S. Patent No. 7,076,431
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00686
`Patent No. 7,076,431
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s September 23, 2020
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper 10), Patent Owner Parus Holdings, Inc. (“Patent Owner”)
`
`submits this Request for Oral Argument and respectfully requests an opportunity to
`
`present oral argument on all issues in this proceeding. Oral argument in this
`
`proceeding is presently scheduled for June 22, 2021, together with oral argument in
`
`IPR2020-00687. Given the similarity of the issues in both proceedings, Patent
`
`Owner requests that the Board authorize the parties to present their arguments in a
`
`single, consolidated hearing.
`
`Patent Owner intends to address at least the following issues during oral
`
`argument:
`
`1.
`
`All grounds on which trial was instituted, including all issues raised by
`
`the parties’ papers;
`
`2.
`
`Any issue raised by either party in a request for oral argument, a motion
`
`to exclude, objections to demonstrative exhibits (if any), or any other motion or
`
`paper filed by either party before oral argument;
`
`3.
`
`Rebuttal to any issue raised by Petitioner in its presentation at the oral
`
`argument; and
`
`4.
`
`Any additional issue on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`Patent Owner requests that each side be provided 45 minutes of argument time
`
`for the consolidated hearing in these proceedings, inclusive of any rebuttal time
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00686
`Patent No. 7,076,431
`either party wishes to reserve at the hearing. If oral argument takes place via live
`
`testimony at USPTO offices, Patent Owner also respectfully requests the ability to
`
`use audio-visual equipment to display demonstratives and exhibits, including the use
`
`of a computer, projector, ELMO, and screen. Should oral argument be conducted
`
`remotely by video or telephone, Patent Owner requests that appropriate audio-visual
`
`alternatives, including the use of an online slide deck of demonstratives, be allowed.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Michael J. McNamara/
`Michael J. McNamara (Reg. No. 52,017)
`Michael T. Renaud (Reg. No. 44,299)
`William A. Meunier (Reg. No. 41,193)
`Andrew H. DeVoogd (pro hac vice to be filed)
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY
`AND POPEO, P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`Telephone: 617-348-1884
`Facsimile: 617-542-2241
`E-mails: mmcnamara@mintz.com
` mtrenaud@mintz.com
` wameunier@mintz.com
` ahdevoogd@mintz.com
`
`3
`
`Dated: May 12, 2021
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00686
`Patent No. 7,076,431
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that a copy of Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument Pursuant
`
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) is being served by electronic mail on the following counsel
`
`of record:
`
`Lead Counsel
`Jennifer C. Bailey (Reg. No. 52,583)
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`7015 College Blvd., Ste. 700
`Overland Park, Kansas 66211
`Telephone: (913) 777-5600
`Facsimile: (913) 777-5601
`Jennifer.Bailey@eriseip.com
`
`Backup Counsel
`Adam P. Seitz (Reg. No. 52,206)
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`7015 College Blvd., Ste. 700
`Overland Park, Kansas 66211
`Telephone: (913) 777-5600
`Facsimile: (913) 777-5601
`Adam.Seitz@eriseip.com
`
`Dated: May 12, 2021
`
`/Michael J. McNamara/
`Michael J. McNamara (Reg. No. 52,017)
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
