throbber
RICHARD T. MIHRAN, PH.D.
`
`Department of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering
`University of Colorado
`Campus Box 425
`Boulder, CO 80309-0425 USA
`(720) 565-1197
`mihran@colorado.edu
`
`
`
`Education
`Ph.D. Electrical Engineering, 1990
`University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
`M. S. Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1988
`University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
`B. S. Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, 1982
`Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
`
`
`Professional Academic Experience
`UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, Department of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Boulder, Colorado.
`Professor Adjunct, Assistant Research Professor and Lecturer, June 1990 to present
`Teaching and research in electrical and biomedical engineering in the electrical and aerospace engineering
`departments in the areas of electronic, optical, and ultrasonic systems and devices.
`
`Representative Courses Taught (University of Colorado, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1990-present)
`
`Design of Implantable Medical Devices (ECEN 4021/5021): Senior/Graduate - level course covering
`engineering applications in medicine emphasizing design of implantable devices, including cochlear implants,
`spinal cord stimulators, injectable microstimulators, retinal and visual-cortex implants, and the artificial -cell;
`biomaterials and tissue/material interface processes, electrochemical and optical sensors, and engineering
`analysis applied to physiological systems.
`Engineering Applications in Medicine and Biology (ECEN 4011/5011): Senior/Graduate - level
`courses covering engineering applications in medicine, emphasizing implantable devices for the cardiovascular
`system, such as pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, total artificial hearts, left-ventricular assist
`devices, and associated sensors and sensing systems.
`Microelectronic Devices (ECEN 3250): Lecture and laboratory course covering active CMOS, BJT and
`GaAs semiconductor devices and circuits, including device physics, software-based modeling and simulation,
`analog and digital discrete and integrated circuit applications, semiconductor lasers, LEDs,
`photodiodes/transistors.
`Introduction to Signal Processing (ECEN 2260): Lecture and laboratory covering signal processing
`circuits, systems, and software algorithms, including frequency domain analysis and second-order system
`response in the time and frequency domains.
`Circuits and Electronics I (ECEN 2250): Lecture and laboratory covering fundamental principles of AC
`and DC electronic circuits, systems, and devices, software-based modeling and simulation.
`Introduction to Optical Electronics (ECEN 4645/5645): Lecture course covering gas and solid state
`laser theory, Gaussian optics, single/multimode wave propagation in optical fibers, optoelectronic
`modulators, nonlinear optics, electrooptical sensors and detectors, and related optical devices and systems.
`Introduction to Digital and Analog Electronics (ECEN 1400): Lecture and laboratory covering analog
`and digital circuit analysis and design.
`Neural Signals (ECEN 4811/5811): Lecture course covering biophysical bases of electrical signal
`generation and propagation in nerve cells and other excitable tissues. Topics include membrane
`electrochemical equilibrium, generation of transmembrane potentials, control of ionic conductance, sensory
`transduction, synaptic transmission, and active transport processes.
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 15
`
`MEDTRONIC EXHIBIT 2003
`Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.
`IPR2020-00712
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`RICHARD T. MIHRAN, PH.D.
`
`Doctoral Dissertation Research Supervision/Committees:
`
`
`Characterization and Design of Low-power Wireless Power Delivery Systems; E. Falkenstein, doctoral
`dissertation, 2011. RF front ends and multi-band antenna/rectenna elements for harvesting broadband (2.4-
`24 GHz) power/telecom applications.
`Broadband Components for RF Front Ends; E. Cullens, doctoral dissertation, 2009-10. Microwave front
`ends and multi-band antenna elements for broadband (2.4-24 GHz) telecommunications/radar applications.
`Telementoring using Haptic Communication; G. Gruener, doctoral dissertation, 1998. Design of haptic
`interfaces for providing touch/tactile feedback for virtual environments/telementoring.
`Nonlinear Analytical Model of the Autonomic Basis of Heart Rate Variability (HRV); D. Becker,
`Ph.D., 2000. Time-dependent spectral analysis and signal processing techniques.
`Prediction and Verification of Internal Electric Current Distribution in Muscle from Surface
`Application; W. Waugaman, Ph.D., 1999. Application of Finite Element Method (FEM) to modeling of
`current densities in tissue.
`Automated tissue classification and feature extraction from digital images using artificial fuzzy
`neural networks; Mehdi Sedighi, Ph.D., 1998. Optical image processing and feature extraction.
`Fast Electromagnetic Simulations using Wavelets; David L. Gines, Ph.D., 1997. Wavelet methods for
`computationally intensive electromagnetic simulations for GHz waveguide designs.
`Super-Resolution Methods for Single Trial Neuromagnetometry; John W. Hobbs, Ph.D., 1997. Signal
`processing/filtering and feature extraction from neuromagnetometry data.
`The Effects of DC and ELF AC Magnetic Fields on the Division Rate of Mastocytoma Cells;
`Cynthia Leigh Bingham, Ph.D., 1996. Electromagnetic field interaction with biological systems.
`
`UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Department of Experimental Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands
`Visiting Scientist, 1982 - 1984. Development of glucose sensor and wearable insulin infusion system.
`
`UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boulder, Colorado.
`Research Assistant, 1985 to 1990. Development of laser-based devices and systems; high-power ultrasound
`modulation of nerve and cardiac tissue.
`
`CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, Department of Artificial Organs, Cleveland, OH
`Research Associate, 1979-1982. Fabrication/mechanical design of insulin-infusion devices.
`
`
`
`Professional and Technical Consulting:
`
`Technical Consultant, St. Jude Medical Inc., 2014-2016
` Technical consulting directed to far-field RF communication protocols with implanted medical devices.
` Technical consulting directed to pulse generators used in Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
` Technical consulting directed to MRI-compatible leads
`
`Technical Consultant, Greatbatch-QIG Group (later Nuvectra) Broomfield CO, 2010
` Technical consulting directed to implantable pulse generators used in Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), and
`general neuromodulation applications.
`
`
`Technical Consultant, Echostar Communications (Dish Network), Englewood CO, 2009 – 2012
` Technology analysis and intellectual property assessment for DVR technology and transmitted packet
`processing used in Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) digital television networks.
`
`
`
`
`Technical Consultant, VUE Technology, Lake Forest CA, 2005 – 2008 (Acquisition by Tyco International, Oct 2008)
` Technology analysis and development and intellectual property assessment for radio-frequency (RF)
`network system designs, networked antenna systems and data networks for radio frequency identification
`systems.
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 2 of 15
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`RICHARD T. MIHRAN, PH.D.
`
`
`
` Technical Consultant, HID Corp./Assa Abloy Corp, 1995 – 2015
` Contactless Smart Card systems and networks, radio frequency identification systems, access networks
`and systems. Technology development and analysis, intellectual property assessment, reverse engineering
`of RFID transponders and readers.
` Evaluation of intellectual property portfolios associated with due diligence in corporate acquisitions.
`
`Technical Consultant, Intrado, Inc., Longmont, CO, 2008
` Consulting addressing cellular telecommunication network technologies for emergency response systems.
`
`Technical Consultant, Boston Scientific Corp, 2004 – 2005
` Technology analysis and intellectual property portfolio assessment associated with due diligence activities
`during/following acquisition of Advanced Bionics, Corp. in the areas of Spinal Cord Simulation (SCS),
`cochlear implant, and BION microstimulator technologies.
`
`
`Technical Consultant, Synthes, Inc., West Chester, PA, 2007-2012
` Development of measurement and analysis system for 2-dimensional mapping of pressure v. position
`profiles over compliant, contoured surfaces.
` Technical consulting addressing mechanical characterization, stress analysis of cervical and lumbar spinal
`implant devices.
`
`Technical Consultant, Terraspark Geosciences, Inc., Denver, CO, 2007 – 2009
` Technology analysis of feature extraction/pattern recognition algorithms and related software technology
`applied to the analysis of 3D seismic data for gas and oil exploration.
`
`
`Technical Consultant, FreeWave Technologies, Inc., Boulder, CO, 2006
` Comprehensive analysis of 900 MHz spread-spectrum radio data transceivers and technology used in
`point-to-point and point-to-multipoint data telemetry networks.
` Analysis of emerging and competitive broadband wireless data technologies and platforms.
`
`Technical Consultant, Maxtor Corporation, 1997 – 2006
`Product analysis and intellectual property assessment for computer disk drive and data storage systems.
` Technical analysis in support of licensing/ cross-licensing negotiations with major competitors
` Reviewed and assessed entire Maxtor/Quantum US Patent portfolio as part of acquisition of Quantum
`Corporation (approx. 850 patents).
` Reverse engineering of data storage products.
` Analysis of emerging data storage technologies/ manufacturing data.
` Technical presentations to Board of Directors
`
`
` Technical Consultant, Sokymat, SA, Granges Switzerland, 2005
` Analysis and reverse engineering of radio-frequency identification (RFID) transponders and RF reader
`systems.
`
`
`
`
` Technical Consultant, Sonic Innovations, Inc. Salt Lake City, UT, 2004-2007
` Analysis of digital signal processing algorithms for auditory prostheses.
`
` Technical Consultant, Synthes, Inc., West Chester, PA, 2007-2012
` Development of measurement and analysis system for 2-dimensional mapping of pressure v. position
`profiles over compliant, contoured surfaces.
` Technical consulting addressing mechanical characterization, stress analysis of cervical and lumbar spinal
`implant devices.
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 3 of 15
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`RICHARD T. MIHRAN, PH.D.
`
`
`
`Technical Consultant, Destron Fearing Corp, Inc., St. Paul, MN, 2000-2002
` Development and analysis of far-field RF communication technologies for syringe-implantable micro-
`transponders/transmitters.
`Integration of temperature sensing and data transmission in syringe-implantable RFID devices.
`
`
`
`Technical Consultant, PixSys, Inc./ SNT, Boulder CO, 1994-6
` Development of diffractive lens system and associated electro-optical systems for CCD camera arrays
`utilized for real-time three-dimensional tracking of surgical instruments with mapping to CT/MRI data
`sets.
`
`
`Technical Consultant, Interim Director of Research and Development, DDX, Inc., 1992 – 1993
` Development of laser-based optical biosensor technology and RF wireless data telemetry systems for
`agricultural management systems.
` Principle investigator on successful phase I and II SBIR proposals for development of semiconductor
`laser optical sensor/assay system based on patterned bioactive sensors formed on silicon substrates.
`
`
`Doppler Radar Signal Processing Algorithm/Software Development
` Development of Doppler radar hardware and signal processing algorithms and software implementations
`in Delphi Pascal and C++ for monitoring flight parameters of small projectiles. Two patents issued and
`licensed: “Spin Determination for a Rotating Object” (US 6,244,971 B1) and “Launch and Aim Angle
`Determination for an Object” (US 6,547,671).
`
`
`
`
`
`Legal and Litigation Consulting, Trial and Deposition Testimony:
` Testimony in seven District Court Trials and Two International Trade Commission (ITC) Hearings in the
`areas of wireless technologies, medical devices/systems, telecommunications/networking, RF networks,
`RFID devices and systems, computing, signal processing, and related fields.
`IAM 1000 “Recommended” Technical Expert Witness (2015): One of only 27 technical expert witnesses
`named as “recommended,” and identified as one of the “leading testifying experts” in the United States.
`
`Summary of Trial Testimony Experience:
` District Court Trials:
`
`Bridgestone Americas v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, et al., U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No.
`13-763-GMS.
`Subject: Expert witness testimony at jury trial for non-infringement of two patents directed to power
`management and wireless transmission capabilities of RFID/TPMS devices on behalf of Defendant Schrader
`International. Prepared and submitted expert report addressing non-infringement of both patents; testimony
`at trial and in deposition, 2014-2015.
`Result: Both patents found not infringed by DE District Court Jury at trial, June 2015.
`
`USEI v. Texas Instruments No. 6:11-cv-491-LED (E.D. Tex.); USEI v. Ricoh, et al. No. 6:12-cv-235
`Subject: Expert witness on behalf of Defendants, testifying at trial on three patents addressing network
`interface controllers and network adapter technology, Ethernet MACs. June 2013 – June 2014
`Result: Two of three patents dropped after invalidity trial, third patent ruled invalid in post-trial ruling.
`
`DNT, LLC v. Sprint-Nextel Corp., et al., U.S. Dist. Court for the Eastern Dist. of VA, Richmond Division, Case No.
`3:09-cv-0021(JRS),
`Subject: Expert testimony at trial and deposition on behalf of Defendants. Patent asserted against cellular
`providers and wireless network adapters providing Internet connectivity over cellular broadband networks.
`Result: Patent found invalid and not infringed in jury trial, December 2009
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Page 4 of 15
`
`

`

`
`
`RICHARD T. MIHRAN, PH.D.
`
`Fujitsu Limited v. Belkin Intl., Inc., D-Link Corp., NetGear, Inc., Zyxel Comm. Corp
`Subject: Expert witness on behalf of Defendants. Twice-reexamined patent asserted against defendants’
`wireless network adapters and routers/access points providing connectivity in wireless local area networks
`(LANs). Trial testimony as invalidity expert on behalf of defendants, Nov-Dec. 2012.
`Result: Patent found invalid by jury at trial, San Jose, CA, Dec. 2012.
`
`KBA-Giori SA. v. Muhlbauer, Inc. U.S. Dist. Court for the Eastern Dist. of VA, Norfolk Division, Civil Action No 08-
`CV-34-HCM-FBS
`Subject: Expert testimony at trial and deposition on behalf of plaintiff KBA-Giori, SA. Asserted patent
`addresses high-speed digital image processing algorithms and systems. 2008 - 2009
`Result: Patent found to be valid and infringed in jury trial, October 2009
`
`Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Guidant Corporation and Eli Lilly and Co., Plaintiffs, v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., PaceSetter, Inc.,
`and Ventritex, Inc., Cause No. IP96-1718-C H/G: 2000-2001; 2004-2007(Remand following appeal).
`Subject: Expert witness testimony at jury trial on behalf of St. Jude rebutting assertions of patent infringement
`and testifying on invalidity of patent covering cardiac electrical signal processing algorithms and therapies for
`implantable cardioverter devices (ICDs). Patent non-infringement/invalidity analyses with accompanying
`expert reports submitted to District Court, trial and deposition testimony on behalf of St. Jude (Defendant).
`Result: Patent found non-infringed by jury, patent ruled invalid by Judge in post-trial motion (2001), remanded
`for new trial on appeal (2004). Patent again ruled by Judge in post-trial motion (2001), remanded for new trial
`on appeal (2004). Patent again ruled invalid (anticipation) on Summary Judgment (2007).
`
`Destron/IDI, Inc. v. Infopet Identification Systems, Inc., United States District Court, District of Colorado, Civil Action No.
`93-Z-2348; Electronic Identification Systems et al. V. Destron/IDI Inc., v. Trovan, Ltd. (Third Party Defendant), Civil
`Act 94-Z-819: 1993-94
`Subject: Expert witness testimony at jury trial for Destron/IDI of infringement of patent claiming syringe-
`implantable implantable radio-frequency identification technology. Patent infringement/validity analysis with
`accompanying expert reports submitted to District Court, trial testimony to jury on behalf of Destron/IDI.
`Result: Jury upheld validity of Destron patent, found willful infringement, court issued Permanent Injunction
`of infringing products.
`
`
` 
`
` Hearing/Trial Testimony at the International Trade Commission
`
`
`Immersion Corp. (complainant) v. Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC (respondents), United States International Trade
`Commission: Certain Mobile and Portable Electronic Devices Incorporating Haptics (Including Smartphones and Laptops) and
`Components thereof, and; Certain Mobile Electronic Devices Incorporating Haptics (Including Smartphones and Smartwatches)
`and Components thereof, Investigation Nos. 337-TA-1004/990.
`Subject: Expert witness for Apple and AT&T for invalidity and Apple for non-infringement of patent directed
`to mobile devices having touchscreen HCIs incorporating haptic feedback. Prepared expert reports and gave
`trial and deposition testimony addressing invalidity and non-infringement.
`Result: Trial concluded May 2017, settled 2018.
`
`HTC Corp. v. Apple Inc., United States International Trade Commission: Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related
`Software, Investigation No. 337-TA-721
`Subject: Expert witness providing technology tutorial before the International Trade Commission, and expert
`testimony at ITC trial defending validity of two of Complainant HTC’s patents. Asserted patents address
`power management and data preservation methods for smart phones and portable electronic devices. 2010 –
`2012.
`Result: Both patents found to be valid by ALJ.
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`Page 5 of 15
`
`

`

`RICHARD T. MIHRAN, PH.D.
`
`
`
`
`General Litigation Support Experience as Technical Expert Witness - Previous 5 years and additional
`matters:
`
`
`Medical Devices and Systems:
`
`
`
`
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Boston Scientific and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp
`Subject: Expert witness in IPR filings challenging patents directed to implantable neurostimulators and systems
`for neuromodulation therapies for spinal cord stimulation, 2020-present.
`Status: Expert declarations filed in support of petitions, pending institution, 2020.
`Counsel: Aiken Gump, Washington, D.C.
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Boston Scientific and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp., Nevro
`Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp. and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp., Case No. 3:16-cv-06830-VC, 2017 – 2018.
`Subject: Technical expert witness for Boston Scientific defending assertions of patent infringement and
`opining on invalidity of seven patents covering high pulse-rate neuromodulation therapies for implantable
`spinal cord stimulation systems. Patent infringement/validity analyses with accompanying expert reports
`submitted to Federal Court, deposition testimony on behalf of Boston Scientific (Defendant).
`Status: Majority of asserted claims across seven patents ruled invalid. Remaining claims ruled non-infringed,
`2018.
`Counsel: Arnold Porter, Palo Alto, CA
`
`Technical Expert Witness for LivaNova Neuromodulation, Inc.
`Subject: Expert witness in IPR filings challenging patent directed to implantable neurostimulators for vagal
`nerve stimulation applications, 2018 - 2020. Expert declarations and deposition testimony on invalidity.
`Status: IPR instituted 2019, all challenged claims ruled unpatentable, 2020.
`Counsel: Haynes and Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX.
`
`Technical Expert Witness at the International Trade Commission for Dexcom Dexcom Corp. v.
`AgaMatrix, In the Matter of CERTAIN ELECTROCHEMICAL GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEMS
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF, 2017 – present.
`Subject: Technical expert witness for Dexcom supporting assertions of patent infringement and validity of two
`patents covering wearable glucose sensor and monitoring systems. Patent infringement/validity analyses with
`accompanying expert reports submitted to the International Trade Commission
`Status: In process.
`Counsel: Dentons, Washington, D.C.
`
`Technical Expert Witness for St. Jude Medical, Pacesetter, Inc, Pacesetter, Inc. v. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.,
`Civil File No. 02-01908 (C.D. Cal.): 2002-2006
`Subject: Technical expert witness for St. Jude/Pacesetter supporting assertions of infringement of four patents
`covering cardiac electrical signal processing algorithms and therapies for implantable pacemaker and
`cardioverter devices. Prepared/submitted multiple expert reports, testimony at deposition.
`Status: Settled, 2006.
`Counsel: Sidley Austin Brown and Wood, Los Angeles, CA; Gibson Dunn, Palo Alto, CA
`
`
`Technical Expert Witness for St. Jude Medical, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Guidant Corporation and Eli Lilly and
`Co., Plaintiffs, v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., PaceSetter, Inc., and Ventritex, Inc., Cause No. IP96-1718-C H/G: 2000-2001;
`2004-2007(Remand following appeal).
`Subject: Testimony at trial on behalf of St. Jude defending assertions of patent infringement and arguing
`invalidity of patent covering cardiac electrical signal processing algorithms and therapies for implantable
`cardioverter devices (ICDs). Patent infringement/validity analyses with accompanying expert reports
`submitted to Federal Court, trial and deposition testimony on behalf of St. Jude (Defendant).
`
`Page 6
`
`Page 6 of 15
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`RICHARD T. MIHRAN, PH.D.
`
`Status: Patent found non-infringed by jury, patent ruled invalid by Judge in post-trial motion (2001), remanded
`for new trial on appeal (2004). Patent again ruled invalid (anticipation) on Summary Judgment (2007). Final
`settlement of these and other matters, 2010.
`Counsel: Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Los Angeles, CA; Gibson Dunn, Palo Alto, CA
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Defendants Advanced Bionics and Boston Scientific, Advanced
`Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp., Civil Action No. 4:04cv131 (E.D. Tex).
`Subject: Technical Expert consulting on behalf of Advanced Bionics and Boston Scientific against assertions of
`infringement of patent addressing spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices. Identification and analysis of key
`prior art leading to settlement, 2004-2006.
`Status: Settled, 2006.
`Counsel: Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Los Angeles, CA.
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Defendants Boston Scientific Corp and Radio Therapeutics, Corp.,
`RITA Medical Systems, Inc. v. Radio Therapeutics Corporation Civil Action No C-01-3267.
`Subject: Expert testimony on behalf of Boston Scientific and RTC against assertions of infringement of
`multiple patents addressing devices and methods for radio frequency ablation. Affidavit covering patent claim
`construction analysis submitted to San Francisco Federal Court for Markman hearing, deposition testimony
`on claim construction.
`Status: Settled, April 2003.
`Counsel: Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Los Angeles, CA.
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Plaintiff Intermedics, Intermedics, Inc. v. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., United States
`District Court, District of Minnesota Civil Action No. 4-95-716:
`Subject: Assertion by plaintiff of infringement of multiple patents claiming various aspects of microprocessor-
`controlled cardiac pacemakers. Patent infringement/validity analyses with accompanying expert reports and
`affidavits submitted to Federal Court, Deposition testimony on behalf of Intermedics (plaintiff). 1997- 1999.
`Status: Settled before trial.
`Counsel: Lyon and Lyon, Los Angeles, CA
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Plaintiff Destron, Destron/IDI, Inc. v. Infopet Identification Systems, Inc., United
`States District Court, District of Colorado, Civil Action No. 93-Z-2348; Electronic Identification Systems et al. V.
`Destron/IDI Inc., v. Trovan, Ltd. (Third Party Defendant), Civil Act 94-Z-819: 1993-94
`Subject: Assertion by Destron/IDI of infringement of patent claiming implantable radio-frequency
`identification technology. Patent infringement/validity analysis with accompanying expert reports submitted
`to Federal Court, trial testimony to jury on behalf of Destron/IDI.
`Status: Jury upheld validity of Destron patent, found willful infringement, court issued Permanent Injunction
`of infringing products.
`Counsel: Sheridan Ross, Denver, Co; Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, New York, NY
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Plaintiff Digital Angel Corp., Digital Angel Corp. v. Datamars, SA., United
`States District Court, District of Minnesota, Civil Action No. 04-4544: Oct. 2005 – 2007
`Subject: Assertion by Digital Angel Corp. of infringement of a patent claiming syringe-implantable radio-
`frequency identification technology.
`Status: Settled.
`Counsel: Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, New York, NY
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Plaintiff Fischer Imaging Corp., Fischer Imaging Corporation v. Lorad
`Corporation/Trex Medical Corporation; Civil Action No. 98-N-772(consolidated with Civil Action No. 98-N-772)
`Subject: Assertion by Fischer Imaging of infringement of patent directed to stereoscopic, image-guided biopsy
`system. Patent infringement/validity analysis with accompanying expert reports submitted to Federal Court.
`Status: Settled, 2001.
`Counsel: Sheridan Ross, Denver,
`
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 7 of 15
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`RICHARD T. MIHRAN, PH.D.
`
`Technical Expert for Sonic Innovations, Inc. Sonic Innovations, Inc. v. Starkey Laboratories, Inc. and MicroEar
`Technology, Inc., Case No. 2:03CV00670 DAK.
`Subject: Technical consulting on behalf of Sonic Innovations defending against assertions (in countersuit) of
`infringement of a patent directed to digital hearing prostheses systems and devices, including invalidity
`analysis. Presentation of technical analysis at mediation conference. 2004-2005.
`Status: Settled, 2005.
`Counsel: Thelen Reid and Priest LLP, San Jose, CA
`
`Technical Expert for Sonic Innovations, Inc. ETG, Inc. v. Sonic Innovations, Inc., U.S. District Court of
`Delaware, Case No. 1:05-CV-00422-GMS.
`Subject: Technical expert witness on behalf of Sonic Innovations defending against assertions of infringement
`of two patents involving digital signal processing technology and programming of digital prostheses systems
`and devices. 2004-2007.
`Status: Settled, 2007.
`Counsel: Holland and Hart, Salt Lake City, UT
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Plaintiff, AMD v. Erchonia Medical, Inc.: Civil Action No. 1:05-cv- 02325-WYD-
`MJW
`Subject: Assertion by AMD of infringement of patent claiming hand-held semiconductor laser apparatus.
`Status: Settled, 2007.
`Counsel: Sheridan Ross, Denver, CO.
`
`
`
`Wireless/Cellular Technology, Smartphones/Mobile Devices:
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Apple, Inc. and Broadcom, Inc.: Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP v. Apple Inc., Case No. 2:19-cv-00025-JRG
`Subject: Expert witness for defendants Apple and Broadcom for invalidity and non-infringement of patents
`asserted against mobile devices incorporating Bluetooth Enhanced Data Rate (EDR) functionality employing
`multiple RF modulation methods and data rates. Prepared expert reports and provided deposition testimony
`addressing both invalidity and non-infringement.
`Status: Settled prior to trial, 2020
`Counsel: Ropes and Gray, Palo Alto, CA; Kilpatrick Townsend, Denver, CO.
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Google, LLC.
`Subject: SEVEN Networks v. Google. Expert witness in IPR filing challenging patent addressing data
`synchronization in networks for use with mobile devices.
`Status: Settled, 2019.
`Counsel: Paul Hastings, LLP, Washington, DC.
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Apple, Inc.
`Subject: Expert witness in two IPR filings challenging patents addressing user interfaces/feedback in portable
`devices.
`Status: Settled, 2019
`Counsel: O’Melveny and Myers, LLP, San Francisco, CA.
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Respondent Apple, Inc.: Immersion Corp. (complainant) v. Apple, Inc. and
`AT&T Mobility, LLC (respondents), United States International Trade Commission: Certain Mobile and Portable
`Electronic Devices Incorporating Haptics (Including Smartphones and Laptops) and Components thereof, and; Certain Mobile
`Electronic Devices Incorporating Haptics (Including Smartphones and Smartwatches) and Components thereof, Investigation
`Nos. 337-TA-1004/990.
`Subject: Expert witness for Apple and AT&T for invalidity and Apple for non-infringement of patent directed
`to mobile devices having touchscreen HCIs incorporating haptic feedback. Prepared expert reports and gave
`trial and deposition testimony addressing invalidity and non-infringement.
`Page 8
`
`Page 8 of 15
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`RICHARD T. MIHRAN, PH.D.
`
`Status: Trial concluded 2017, settled prior to ruling, 2018.
`Counsel: DLA Piper, Palo Alto, CA
`
`Technical Expert Witness for all Defendants: In Re: TransData, Inc. Smart Meters Patent Litigation, U.S. District
`Court, Western District of Oklahoma, CA No. 12-ML-2309-C.
`Subject: Expert witness on behalf of multiple defendants. Prepared and submitted expert reports addressing
`invalidity and non-infringement of three patents directed to wireless transmission capabilities integrated with
`digital electric meters used in RF mesh networks. Expert Reports and deposition testimony, 2013-2016.
`Status: Settled, 2016.
`Counsel: Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA; Ballard Spahr, Atlanta, GA; Yetter Coleman, Houston, TX.
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Verizon Wireless and AT&T Mobility: Solocron Media, LLC v.
`Verizon Communications, Inc., et al., United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division, Case No. 2:13-CV-
`1059-JRG-RSP.
`Subject: Expert witness on behalf of Defendants Verizon and AT&T before the Patent Trial and Appeals
`Board. Prepared and submitted three expert declarations for IPR Petitions addressing invalidity of patents
`directed portable electronic devices, including cellular telephones, which may be programmed with audio files
`selected by the user.
`Status: Settled, 2015
`Counsel: Wiley Rein LLC, Washington DC; McKool Smith, PC, Dallas TX
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Defendants Sprint-Nextel Corp., Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile USA, US
`Cellular, Kyocera Wireless, Novatel Wireless, and Sierra Wireless: DNT, LLC v. Sprint-Nextel Corp., et
`al., U.S. Dist. Court for the Eastern Dist. of VA, Richmond Division, Case No. 3:09-cv-0021(JRS),.
`Subject: Expert testimony at trial and deposition on behalf of Defendants. Patent asserted against cellular
`providers and wireless network adapters providing Internet connectivity over cellular broadband networks.
`Status: Patent found invalid and not infringed in jury trial, December 2009
`Counsel: Nixon Peabody, LLP (Sprint-Nextel; Sierra Wireless), Wiley Rein, LLP (Verizon Wireless), Perkins
`Coie, LLP (T-Mobile), Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch (US Cellular), Troutman Sanders, LLP
`(Kyocera Wireless), K&L Gates, LLP (Novatel Wireless)
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Complainant HTC, Corp.: HTC Corp. v. Apple Inc., United States International
`Trade Commission: Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software, Investigation No. 337-TA-721
`Subject: Technology tutorial before the International Trade Commission, and expert testimony at ITC trial on
`validity of two of Complainant HTC’s patents. Asserted patents address power management and data
`preservation methods for smart phones and portable electronic devices. 2010 – 2012.
`Status: Both patents found to be valid at trial; HTC-Apple Global Settlement, 2012.
`Counsel: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP; Washington, D.C.
`
`Technical Expert Witness for Defendant Verizon Wireless, Inc.: Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Verizon
`Wireless, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of TX, Tyler Div., Case No. 6-11-cv-348
`Subject: Expert witness on behalf of defendant Verizon Wireless, Inc. for non-infringement. Asserted patent
`addresses management of access to wireless networks. 2013.
`Status: Stipulation of non-infringement following dispositive claim construction ruling, 2013.
`Counsel: Wiley Rein, LLP.
`
`Technical

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket