`PROSECUTION
`1
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`03-18-
`PERSONALIZED DIGITAL MEDIA ACCESS SYSTEM - PDMAS
` 13/740,086
`2020::16:21:32
`PART II
`This application is officially maintained in electronic form. To View: Click the desired Document
`Description. To Download and Print: Check the desired document(s) and click Start Download.
`Available Documents
`Document Description
`Mail Room Date Document Code
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`11-21-2019
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`TRIAL.REQ.D Request for Trial Denied
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`TRIAL.CERT.M Trial Certificate Mailed
`TRIAL.TRMFWD Trial Termination or Final Written Decision
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`TRIAL.REQ.G Request for Trial Granted
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`LET.
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`TRIAL.TRMFWD Trial Termination or Final Written Decision
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`08-20-2019
`
`08-20-2019
`
`06-25-2019
`
`09-14-2018
`06-21-2018
`06-18-2018
`
`06-18-2018
`
`03-08-2018
`
`03-08-2018
`
`02-20-2018
`01-11-2018
`09-27-2017
`09-06-2017
`07-05-2017
`06-30-2017
`
`06-20-2017
`06-02-2017
`06-02-2017
`05-09-2017
`
`04-28-2017
`
`04-28-2017
`
`04-26-2017
`
`04-26-2017
`04-26-2017
`04-25-2017
`
`04-25-2017
`
`04-25-2017
`
`04-25-2017
`
`04-07-2017
`04-07-2017
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`14
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`2
`4
`1
`50
`2
`
`2
`2
`2
`1
`
`1
`
`3
`
`1
`
`1
`5
`3
`
`6
`
`1
`
`1
`
`7
`1
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`EWS-003315
`
`Early Warning Services 1007
`IPR of U.S. Pat. No. 8,887,308
`
`
`
`03-13-2017
`02-10-2017
`02-10-2017
`02-06-2017
`01-18-2017
`01-18-2017
`12-30-2016
`12-30-2016
`12-30-2016
`12-30-2016
`12-27-2016
`
`12-27-2016
`
`09-10-2016
`08-16-2016
`05-23-2016
`
`05-02-2016
`
`02-19-2016
`
`02-19-2016
`
`11-25-2015
`
`06-18-2015
`
`06-18-2015
`
`05-26-2015
`
`05-20-2015
`05-15-2015
`05-06-2015
`
`03-25-2015
`12-29-2014
`12-29-2014
`12-29-2014
`12-29-2014
`12-12-2014
`12-12-2014
`11-24-2014
`
`07-16-2014
`07-16-2014
`06-16-2014
`06-16-2014
`05-31-2014
`05-31-2014
`05-31-2014
`
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`LET.
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`LET.
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`TRAN.LET
`Transmittal Letter
`REF.OTHER Other Reference-Patent/App/Search documents
`REF.OTHER Other Reference-Patent/App/Search documents
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SES.LOSS.ELC Notification of loss of entitlement to small entity
`status via PAIR
`TRIAL.REQ.D Request for Trial Denied
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`TRIAL.TRMFWD Trial Termination or Final Written Decision
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`REF.OTHER Other Reference-Patent/App/Search documents
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`REF.OTHER Other Reference-Patent/App/Search documents
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`NPL
`Non Patent Literature
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`Notification of loss of entitlement to small entity
`status
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`
`SES.LOSS
`N417
`N417
`LET.
`LET.
`N417
`LET.
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`1
`4
`2
`1
`4
`2
`1
`14
`31
`2
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`22
`1
`
`1
`
`3
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`3
`1
`
`1
`13
`2
`7
`2
`7
`2
`1
`
`1
`2
`2
`3
`40
`2
`40
`
`EWS-003316
`
`
`
`05-31-2014
`04-03-2014
`
`04-01-2014
`04-01-2014
`04-01-2014
`03-13-2014
`
`03-06-2014
`
`12-19-2013
`
`12-19-2013
`
`12-19-2013
`
`12-18-2013
`
`12-17-2013
`
`11-26-2013
`11-25-2013
`11-25-2013
`11-18-2013
`11-12-2013
`10-19-2013
`10-19-2013
`10-17-2013
`10-13-2013
`10-13-2013
`10-13-2013
`09-19-2013
`09-16-2013
`09-16-2013
`09-16-2013
`09-16-2013
`09-13-2013
`09-13-2013
`09-13-2013
`09-10-2013
`09-10-2013
`09-10-2013
`09-10-2013
`08-21-2013
`08-05-2013
`08-05-2013
`08-05-2013
`08-01-2013
`08-01-2013
`08-01-2013
`08-01-2013
`05-31-2013
`05-31-2013
`
`COCOUT
`
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`LET.
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`SOL.NTC.SUIT Report on the filing or determination of an action
`regarding a patent
`Certificate of Correction - Post Issue
`Communication
`SPE Response - Certificate of Correction under
`1.323/1.324
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`Miscellaneous Internal Document
`Certificate of Correction - Post Issue
`Communication
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`SPE Response - Certificate of Correction under
`1.323/1.324
`Request for Certificate of Correction
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`Miscellaneous Internal Document
`Request for Certificate of Correction
`Request for Certificate of Correction
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`Request for Certificate of Correction
`Request for Certificate of Correction
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`Request for Certificate of Correction
`Request for Certificate of Correction
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`Issue Notification
`Response to Amendment under Rule 312
`Amendment After Final or under 37CFR 1.312,
`initialed by the examiner.
`Response to Amendment under Rule 312
`Miscellaneous Communication to Applicant - No
`Action Count
`Transmittal Letter
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`Application Data Sheet
`Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)
`List of references cited by examiner
`
`COCX
`LET.
`N417
`IMIS
`COCOUT
`LET.
`N417
`COCX
`COCIN
`WFEE
`N417
`IMIS
`COCIN
`COCIN
`WFEE
`N417
`COCIN
`COCIN
`N417
`COCIN
`COCIN
`WFEE
`N417
`ISSUE.NTF
`N271
`ANE.I
`N271
`M327
`TRAN.LET
`N417
`ADS
`NOA
`892
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`2
`9
`
`1
`12
`2
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`1
`2
`1
`2
`3
`2
`1
`2
`2
`2
`1
`2
`1
`2
`2
`2
`4
`2
`2
`1
`2
`2
`1
`14
`1
`1
`3
`1
`2
`4
`21
`1
`
`EWS-003317
`
`
`
`05-31-2013
`
`05-31-2013
`05-31-2013
`
`05-31-2013
`
`05-31-2013
`
`05-31-2013
`
`05-31-2013
`05-31-2013
`05-31-2013
`05-31-2013
`05-31-2013
`05-31-2013
`05-31-2013
`05-31-2013
`02-20-2013
`02-16-2013
`02-16-2013
`02-16-2013
`02-16-2013
`02-16-2013
`02-16-2013
`02-16-2013
`02-16-2013
`02-12-2013
`02-12-2013
`02-04-2013
`02-04-2013
`02-04-2013
`01-31-2013
`01-31-2013
`01-31-2013
`01-30-2013
`01-30-2013
`01-30-2013
`01-13-2013
`
`01-13-2013
`01-13-2013
`01-13-2013
`01-13-2013
`01-13-2013
`01-11-2013
`01-11-2013
`01-11-2013
`01-11-2013
`01-11-2013
`01-11-2013
`01-11-2013
`01-11-2013
`
`1449
`
`BIB
`1449
`
`1449
`
`1449
`
`SRFW
`
`List of References cited by applicant and
`considered by examiner
`Bibliographic Data Sheet
`List of References cited by applicant and
`considered by examiner
`List of References cited by applicant and
`considered by examiner
`List of References cited by applicant and
`considered by examiner
`Search information including classification,
`databases and other search related notes
`Issue Information including classification,
`IIFW
`examiner, name, claim, renumbering, etc.
`SRNT
`Examiner's search strategy and results
`FWCLM
`Index of Claims
`IFEE
`Issue Fee Payment (PTO-85B)
`A.NA
`Amendment after Notice of Allowance (Rule 312)
`CLM
`Claims
`WFEE
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`TRACK1.GRANT TrackOne Request Granted
`DIST.E.FILE
`Terminal Disclaimer-Filed (Electronic)
`WFEE
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`DISQ.E.FILE Terminal Disclaimer-Electronic-Approved
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`A.PE
`Preliminary Amendment
`CLM
`Claims
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`WFEE
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`APP.FILE.REC Filing Receipt
`WFEE
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Form
`IDS
`(SB08)
`NPL
`Non Patent Literature
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`A.PE
`Preliminary Amendment
`CLM
`Claims
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`A.PE
`Preliminary Amendment
`CLM
`Claims
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Form
`IDS
`(SB08)
`Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Form
`IDS
`(SB08)
`TRAN.LET
`Transmittal Letter
`NPL
`Non Patent Literature
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`TRAN.LET
`Transmittal Letter
`TRNA
`Transmittal of New Application
`OATH
`Oath or Declaration filed
`TRACK1.REQ TrackOne Request
`WFEE
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`N417
`EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
`DRW
`Drawings-only black and white line drawings
`TRAN.LET
`Transmittal Letter
`Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Form
`IDS
`(SB08)
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`6
`
`1
`6
`
`6
`
`4
`
`1
`
`3
`20
`1
`2
`1
`15
`2
`2
`1
`2
`2
`1
`2
`1
`11
`2
`1
`3
`1
`4
`89
`2
`1
`11
`2
`1
`11
`2
`6
`
`6
`1
`174
`2
`1
`1
`4
`1
`2
`3
`7
`1
`6
`
`EWS-003318
`
`
`
`01-11-2013
`01-11-2013
`01-11-2013
`
`SPEC
`CLM
`ABST
`
`Specification
`Claims
`Abstract
`
`Close Window
`
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`PROSECUTION
`
`25
`9
`1
`
`EWS-003319
`
`
`
`Case: 1:1?‘vcv—0?300 Document-#116 titted: 11l21f18 Page 1 01:1 PageiD #:1???)
`
`A0 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`Northern District Of Illinois
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`
`on the following
`
`D Trademarks 0r
`
`EPatents.
`
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`17cv7300
`PLAINTIFF
`
`William Grecia
`
`DATE FILED
`10/10/2017
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Northern District of Illinois
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Discover Financial Services, Inc.
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
` CLERK
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above%ntit1ed case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK N0
`
`D Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`D Answer
`
`B Cross Bill
`
`D Other Pleading
`
`In the aboveientitled case, the following decision has been rendered 0r judgement issued:
`DECIS ION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Thomas G. Bruton
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Anya Ellis
`
`DATE
`
`11/21/2018
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Up0n termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Up0n filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`EWS-003320
`
`EWS-003320
`
`
`
`Case: 1:18-cv-01848 Document #: 5 Filed: 03/14/18 Page 1 of 1 PageiD #:39
`
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`'
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 andfor 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Northern District of Illinois
`on the following
`
`El Trademarks or
`
`IE Patents.
`
`( I] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.
`18 cv 1848
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`3/1412018
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Northern District of Illinois
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WILLIAM GRECIA
`
`
`WALGREEN 00.,
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`2 m: w o —
`——
`
`
`
`_—
`
`
`
`
`In the above4entitled case, the following patent(s);I trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`
`1] Amendment
`
`El Answer
`
`[I Cross Bill
`
`I] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER 0F PATENT 0R TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered orjudgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`31142018
`
`CLERK
`
`Thomas G. Bruton
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Yvette Pearson
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation ofaction, mail this copy to Director Copy 3-—-Upon termination ofoction. mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`EWS-003321
`
`EWS-003321
`
`
`
`Case: 1:18-cv-01848 Document #: 5 Filed: 03/121118 Page 1 of 1 PagelD #:39
`
`A0 120 (Rev. 08/10
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`TO‘
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the us. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313—1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the US. District Court
`Northern District Of Illinois
`on the following
`
`El Trademarks or M Patents.
`
`(
`
`[:1 the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`18 cv 1848
`PLAINTIFF
`
`
`
`DATE FILED
`3/14f2018
`
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Northern District of Illinois
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`WILLIAM GRECIA
`
`
`WALGREEN 00..
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`El Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`I] Answer
`
`|:I Cross Bill
`
`[:| Other Pleading
`
`
`
`HOLDER 0F PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`CLERK
`
`
`
`Thomas G. Bruton
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Yvette Pearson
`
`DATE
`
`3f‘14l2018
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation ofaction, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination ol'action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Cnsc file copy
`
`EWS-003322
`
`EWS-003322
`
`
`
`Case: 1:18~CV-01885 Document #: 5 Filed: 03(16/18 Page 1 of 1 PagelD #234
`
`A0 120 Rev. 08110
`
`
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Northern District of Illinois
`on the following
`
`El Trademarks or
`
`I] Patents.
`
`( l] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`1:18-cv-1885
`PLAINTIFF
`
`William Grecia
`
`DATE FILED
`3/1512018
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Northern District of Illinois
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Sears Holdings Corporation
`
`Iggfkagififgg
`
`HOLDER 0F PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 g 5—33 :99 C)
`
`TRKQEEEATRERNQ
`—_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)l lrademark(s) have been included:
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`I] Amendment
`I] Answer
`[:| Cross Bill
`D Other Pleading
`
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT on TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`3/16/2018
`
`CLERK
`Thomas G. Bruton
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`Michelle Copeland
`
`DATE
`
`Copy I—Upon initiation ofaction, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—~Up0n termination oraction, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director
`Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`EWS-003323
`
`EWS-003323
`
`
`
`Caates :1118CV {318E936 Document it: 5 Fiieti:03i16!18 Page 1 of 1 PageiD #:34
`
`
`
`A0 120 (Rev. 0‘ ' ‘
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Step 8
`Director Of the US. Patent and Trademark ()ffiee
`RU. Box 145%}
`Alexandria, VA, 22313-1459
`
`REPGRT ON THE
`FILING 0R DETERNEENATTON OF AN
`ACTEGN REGARDENG A PATENT 0R
`TRADERTARK
`
`{n Cemplianee with 35 USC: § 290 and/or 15 USE. § 1116 yam are hereby advised that a mutt action has been
`Northern District of “HF-Oi?) on the following
`
`
`
`filed in the US District Court
`
`:] 'E‘radetnatks m’
`
`MI’atents.
`
`( Z the patent action involves 35 U SC. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`DATE FELED
`
`Us. DESTRHCT COURT
`
`1:18-Cv-1886
`P LAlNTEFF
`
`3/15/2018
`
`.
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Northern Dietriet of Eilénoés
`
`Wilttam Gre :ia
`
`True Value Campany
`
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`8,533 860
`
`(1’20. 3
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK Ni).
`
`: Amendment
`DATE OF FATE NT
`
`[: Answer
`
`[n the above 77777emitied ease. the follmving decision has been rendered (it judgement issued:
`DECIS ION/JUDG EM ENT
`
`Amanda Seherer
`
`CLERK
`
`Themas G. Bruten
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`(20m 1 -----Upen initiaiien (if aetiem maifl this sepy tn Direetnr Cepy 3------Upon terminatinn (if aetiim, maii this cepy t0 Directer
`Cepy 2-----iJpon filing (imminent adding patenfls}3 maifl this €pr
`tn Directer Cepy 4------Case fiie (tepy
`
`EWS-003324
`
`EWS-003324
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto. gov
`571 272 7822
`
`Paper 7
`Entered: June 21, 2018
`
`,
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`WILLIAM GRECIA,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2018-00419
`
`Patent 8,533,860 B1
`
`Before JAIVEESON LEE, MICHAEL W. KIM, and
`NIICPIELLE N. WORMIVIEESTER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WORMMEESTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`
`Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review
`35 US. C. § 314(a)
`
`EWS-003325
`
`EWS-003325
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00419
`
`Patcnt 8,533,860 B1
`
`1.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition (Paper 2,
`
`“Pet.”) requesting inter partes review of claims 9, 10, and 21—30 of US.
`
`Patent No. 8,533,860 B1 (Ex. 1001, “the ’860 patent”). William Grecia
`
`(“Patent Owner”) filed a Preliminary Response (Paper 6, “Prelim. Resp”).
`
`We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 314 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.4(a). Under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 314(a), an inter partes review may not be instituted “unless .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect
`
`to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” For the reasons that
`
`follow, we decline to institute an inter partes review of the challenged
`
`claims.
`
`11. BACKGROUND
`
`A. Related Proceedings
`
`The parties identify several federal district court cases relating to the
`
`’860 patent. Pet. 2; Ex. 1011; Paper 4. The parties also identify several
`
`other petitions for inter partes review relating to the ’860 patent. Pet. 2—3;
`
`Paper 4.
`
`B. The ’860 Patent
`
`The ’860 patent describes a digital rights management system, that
`
`manages access rights across a plurality of devices Via digital media
`
`personalization, to protect digital media subject to illegal copying. Ex. 1001,
`
`1:19—26; 4:47—48. Figure 3 of the ’860 patent, which illustrates how an
`
`example of such a system works, is reproduced below.
`
`EWS-003326
`
`EWS-003326
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00419
`
`Patent 8,533,860 B1
`
`0
`_______6.1--"
`
`KODEKEY GUI
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`I
`
`07
`_-_____r_i_____
`APKWEBSITE .com cu:
`LOG IN TO CONTINUE.
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`I
`1 PLEASE ENTER YOURCODE 1
`1
`AND PRESS THE REDEEM ;
`.
`BUTTON.
`
`306
`
`I
`I
`u
`1
`l
`f‘
`:
`: OGINID.
`I USEREMAIL@MEMBER.COM .
`PASSWORD :
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`'
`
`Iu
`
`I
`I
`I
`
`XY2987654321
`
` 309
`
`DATABASE
`
`305
`
`
`
`DATABASE
`
`1*
`
`lPRODUCTMETADATA
`
`302
`
`FIG. 3
`
`In particular, Figure 3 provides a flow chart of a digital media
`
`personalization process. Id. at 4:23—25. A user who wishes to access certain
`
`digital media posts a branding request via Kodekey GUI 301, which prompts
`
`the user to enter a token and press the redeem button. Id. at 6:65—7:3. The
`
`branding request is a request to read or write metadata of the digital media,
`
`and includes a membership verification token corresponding to the digital
`
`media. Id. at 5:47—50. The token represents the digital media provider’s
`
`permission to grant access rights. Id. at 9:20—21. Kodekey GUI 301 is
`
`connected to token database 305, which is used to authenticate the token. Id.
`
`at 7:6—7, 8: 19—21. After authentication, the user is redirected to
`
`EWS-003327
`
`EWS-003327
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00419
`
`Patent 8,533,860 131
`
`APIwebsite.com GUI 307, which prompts the user to enter a login ID and
`
`password to access the digital media from database 309. Id. at 7: 10—1 1, 14—
`
`17. The APIwebsite.com GUI interfaces to a web service membership (e.g.,
`
`Facebook), where an electronic identification for the user is collected and
`
`sent to Kodekey GUI 301. Id. at 7:10—14, 10:41—44. Kodekey GUI 301
`
`also is connected to product metadata 302, which is readable/writable
`
`metadata associated with the digital media to be acquired. Id. at 7:3—4.
`
`Product metadata 302 is branded by writing the token and the user’s
`
`electronic identification reference into the metadata. Id. at 8:27—30. For a
`
`subsequent access request, the user’s electronic identification reference is
`
`compared against the electronic identification reference in metadata 302. Id.
`
`at 13:53—57. If there is a match, access rights are granted to the user. Id. at
`
`13:57—58.
`
`C. Challenged Claims
`
`Petitioner challenges claims 9, 10, and 21—30 of the ’860 patent.
`
`Claims 9 and 21 are independent. Claim 9 is illustrative of the claims under
`
`challenge:
`
`9. A system for authorizing access to digital content using a
`worldwide cloud system infrastructure,
`the worldwide cloud
`system infrastructure
`comprising
`connected modules
`in
`operation as computing and storage, the computing and storage
`comprising a server, a database, devices and users, wherein the
`digital content is at least one of encrypted or not encrypted, the
`system facilitating access rights between a plurality of data
`processing devices, the system working as a front-end agent for
`access rights authentication between the plurality of data
`processing devices, the system further comprising:
`
`a first receipt module, the first receipt module receiving a
`digital
`content
`access
`request
`from at
`least one
`
`EWS-003328
`
`EWS-003328
`
`
`
`IPR2018—00419
`
`Patent 8,533,860 B1
`
`the plurality of data
`console of
`communications
`processing devices, the access request being a read or
`write request of metadata of the digital content, wherein
`the read or write request of metadata is performed in
`connection with a combination of a device, the server, the
`database and the cloud system,
`the metadata further
`comprises one or more of a software or contents of a web
`page, the request comprising a verification token provided
`by a user corresponding to the digital content, wherein the
`verification token is one or more of a password, e-mail
`address, payment system, credit card, authorize ready
`device,
`rights
`token, or one or more
`redeemable
`instruments of trade;
`
`an
`
`authentication module,
`
`the
`
`authentication module
`
`authenticating the verification token;
`
`a connection module, the connection module establishing a
`connection with the at least one communications console,
`wherein the communications console is a combination of
`
`interface (GUI) and an Application
`a graphic user
`Programmable Interface (API) wherein the API
`is
`obtained from a verified web service, the web service
`capable of facilitating a two way data exchange to
`complete a verification process wherein the data exchange
`session comprises at least one identification reference;
`
`request module, the request module requesting the at least one
`identification
`reference
`from the
`at
`least
`one
`
`console, wherein the identification
`communications
`reference comprises one or more of a verified web service
`account identifier,
`letter, number, rights token, e-mail,
`password,
`access
`time,
`serial
`number,
`address,
`manufacturer identification, checksum, operating system
`version, browser version, credential, cookie, or key;
`
`a secondary receipt module, the secondary receipt module
`receiving the at least one identification reference from the
`at least one communications console; and
`
`EWS-003329
`
`EWS-003329
`
`
`
`IPR2018-004l9
`
`- Patent 8,533,860 D1
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`_ -
`
`a branding module, the branding module writing at least one
`of the verification token or the identification reference into
`
`the metadata.
`
`D. Asserted Grounds of Unpatentabz’lity
`
`Petitioner challenges claims 9, 10, and 21—30 of the ’860 patent on the
`
`following grounds. Pet. 1, 50—76.
`
`Ameerally,1 Gautier,2 Frakes,3 Zweig,4
`and Venkataramu5
`
`§ 103
`
`Claims Challen-ed
`9 and 10
`
`
`
`Ameerallv, Gautier, Frakes, Zweig,
`Venkataramu, Suitts,6 and Kondrk7
`
`§ 103
`
`21—30
`
`In support ofIts arguments, Petitioner relies on a Declaration of Dr. Aviel
`
`Rubin (Ex. 1002), a Declaration of Amisha Manek (Ex. 1023), and an
`
`Affidavit of Christopher Butler (EX. 1024).
`
`1 Ameerally, U.S. Publ’n No. 2006/0212401 A1, published Sept. 21, 2006
`(Ex. 1004).
`2 Gautier, U.S. Publ’n No. 2005/0021478 A1, published Jan. 27, 2005
`(Ex. 1005).
`I
`iTunes Digital Copy, Macworld,
`3 Dan Frakes, First Look:
`http://www.macworld.com/article/131751/2008/01/digitalcopy.html, last
`visited Jan. 10, 2017 (Ex. 1006).
`4 Zweig, U.S. Publ’n No. 2007/0233606 A1, published Oct. 4, 2007
`(Ex. 1008).
`5 Ramya Venkataramu, Analysis and Enhancement of Apple’s Fairplay
`Digital Rights Management (May 2007) (Project Report, San Jose State
`University) (Ex. 1007).
`6 Suitts, U. S. Publ’n No. 2008/0040379 A1, published Feb. 14, 2008
`(Ex. 1009).
`7 Kondrk, U. S. Publ’nNo. 2004/0254883 A1, published Dec. 16, 2004
`(Ex. 1010).
`
`'
`
`EWS-003330
`
`EWS-003330
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00419
`
`Patent 8,533,860 B]-
`
`E. Claim Construction
`
`We construe claims in an unexpired patent by applying the broadest
`
`reasonable interpretation in light of the specification of the patent in which
`they appear. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b); Cuozzo Speed Techs, LLC v. Lee,
`136 S. Ct. 2131, 2144—46 (2016) (upholding the useofthe broadest
`
`reasonable interpretation standard). Under this standard, claim terms
`
`generally are given their ordinary and customary meaning, as would be
`
`understood by one of ordinary skill in the art in the context of the entire
`
`disclosure. See In re Translogz'c Tech, Inc., 504 F.3d 1249, 1257 (Fed. Cir.
`
`2007). A “claim term will not receive its ordinary meaning if the patentee
`
`acted as his own lexicographer,” however, and clearly set forth a definition
`
`of the claim term in the specification. CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp,
`
`288 F.3d 1359, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
`
`Petitioner argues proposed constructions for various limitations of the
`
`claims. Pet. 18—29. Patent Owner does not respond. See generally Prelim.
`
`Resp. For purposes of this Decision, we conclude that no claim term
`
`requires express interpretation at this time to resolve any controversy in this
`
`proceeding. See Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng ’g, Inc, 200 F.3d 795,
`
`803 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (“[O]nly those terms need be construed that are in
`
`controversy, and only to the extent necessary to resolve the controversy”).
`
`III. ANALYSIS
`
`Petitioner relies on Venkataramu as a printed publication for each of
`
`its asserted grounds. Pet. 1; see also id. at 24 (referring to Venkataramu as a
`
`“prior art publication[]”); 37 C.F.R. §42.104(b)(2) (the petition “must
`
`identify .
`
`.
`
`. the patents or printed publications relied upon for each ground”).
`
`EWS-003331
`
`EWS-003331
`
`
`
`IPR2018-OO419
`
`, Patent 8,533,860 B1-
`
`Patent Owner contends that Petitioner has failed to establish that
`
`Venkataramu was publicly accessible before the “critical date”8 for the ’860
`
`patent, and that Petitioner has thus failed to establish that Venkataramu
`
`qualifies as a printed publication. Prelim. Resp. 2, 4—8.9 For the reasons
`
`explained below, we agree with Patent Owner.
`
`According to the Federal Circuit, “[b]ecause there are many ways in
`
`which a reference may be disseminated to the interested public, ‘public
`
`accessibility’ has been called the touchstone in determining whether a
`
`reference constitutes a ‘printed publication’” under Section 102. Kyocera
`
`Wireless Corp. v. Int ’1 Trade Comm ’n, 545 F.3d 1340, 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
`
`(quoting In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 898—99 (Fed. Cir. 1986)). A reference is
`
`publicly accessible “upon a satisfactory showing that such document has
`
`been disseminated or otherwise made available to the extent that persons
`
`interested and ordinarily skilled in the subject matter or art exercising
`
`reasonable diligence, can locate it.” SR1 Int ’1, Inc. v. Internet Sec. Sys., Inc,
`
`3 The parties disagree as to the invention date to which Patent Owner is
`entitled for the challenged claims. The earliest possible effective filing date
`for the ’860 patent is March 21, 2010. Ex. 1001, 1:7—14. Petitioner asserts
`that it will assume for purposes of its Petition that the ’860 patent is entitled
`to an invention date of February 10, 2010. Pet. 10. Patent Owner asserts an
`invention date of March 21, 2009. Prelim. Resp. 4, 6. Because we find that
`Petitioner does not show sufficiently that Venkataramu was publicly
`accessible prior to the earliest possible effective filing date for the ’860
`patent, as explained in this section, we need not evaluate further for purposes
`of this Decision the possibility of an earlier date of invention for the ’860
`patent.
`9 Patent Owner did not number the pages