`
`Paper No. __
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`LG ELECTRONICS INC., and
`LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`PARUS HOLDINGS INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00846
`Patent No. 7,076,431
`_____________
`
`PETITIONERS’ NOTICE OF FILING DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LISTING OF EXHIBITS
`
`1017
`
`Exhibit Description
`1001
`U.S. Patent 7,076,431 (“’431 patent”)
`1002
`Declaration of Stuart J. Lipoff (“Lipoff”)
`1003
`Curriculum Vitae of Stuart J. Lipoff
`1004
`U.S. Patent Publication 2001/0047262 (“Kurganov-262”)
`1005
`PCT Publication WO2001/050453 (“Kovatch”)
`1006
`U.S. Provisional Application 60/174,371 (“Kovatch-Provisional”)
`1007
`U.S. Patent 6,324,534 (“Neal”)
`1008
`U.S. Patent 6,418,433 (“Chakrabarti”)
`1009
`U.S. Patent 5,787,470 (“DeSimone”)
`1010
`U.S. Patent 5,855,020
`1011
`U.S. Patent 6,085,160
`1012
`U.S. Patent 6,434,524
`1013
`McGraw-Hill Electronics Dictionary (6th ed. 1997) (“McGraw-Hill”)
`1014
`American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (3d ed. 1996)
`1015
`Dictionary of Computing (4th ed. 2002)
`1016
`Scheduling Order (Dkt. 85), Parus v. Apple Inc., 6:19-cv-00432-ADA
`(consolidated cases) (W.D. Tex. Jan. 17, 2020)
`Parus Holding’s Inc.’s First Amended Complaint for Patent
`Infringement, Parus Holdings Inc. v. Apple Inc., 6:19-cv-00432-ADA
`(W.D. Tex. Oct. 21, 2019)
`Parus Holding’s Inc.’s First Amended Complaint for Patent
`Infringement, Parus Holdings Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:19-cv-00433-
`ADA (W.D. Tex. Oct. 21, 2019)
`Parus Holding’s Inc.’s First Amended Complaint for Patent
`Infringement, Parus Holdings Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al., 6:19-
`cv-00437-ADA (W.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2019)
`Parus Holding’s Inc.’s First Amended Complaint for Patent
`Infringement, Parus Holdings Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et
`al., 6:19-cv-00438-ADA (W.D. Tex. Nov. 19, 2019)
`U.S. Patent 9,451,084 (“’084 patent”)
`U.S. Provisional Application 60/180,344
`U.S. Provisional Application 60/233,068
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent Application 09/776,996
`(U.S. Patent 6,721,705)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent Application 10/821,690
`(U.S. Patent 7,076,431)
`
`1021
`1022
`1023
`1024
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1025
`
`i
`
`
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`1035
`
`1036
`
`1037
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent Application 11/409,703
`(U.S. Patent 7,386,455)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent Application 12/030,556
`(U.S. Patent 7,881,941)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent Application 12/973,475
`(U.S. Patent 8,185,402)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent Application 13/462,819
`(U.S. Patent 9,451,084)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent Application 15/269,776
`(U.S. Patent 10,096,320)
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent Application 16/155,523
`(pending)
`Order Granting Defendant LG’s Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28
`U.S.C. § 1404, Parus Holdings Inc. v. LG Elecs. Inc. & LG Elecs.
`U.S.A., Inc., 6:19-CV-00437-ADA (Aug. 6, 2020)
`Lauren A. Watt & Graham C. Phero, Success of Motions to Stay
`Rising, But Why?, https://www.sternekessler.com/news-
`insights/publications/success-motions-stay-rising-why (Feb. 2020)
`(last checked Aug. 25, 2020)
`Order Regarding Court Operation Under the Exigent Circumstances
`Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic (C.J. Garcia) (Mar. 13, 2020)
`Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operation Under the Exigent
`Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic (C.J. Garcia)
`(Apr. 15, 2020)
`Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operation Under the Exigent
`Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic (C.J. Garcia)
`(May 8, 2020)
`Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operation Under the Exigent
`Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic (C.J. Garcia)
`(June 18, 2020)
`Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operation Under the Exigent
`Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic (C.J. Garcia)
`(July 2, 2020)
`Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operation Under the Exigent
`Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic (C.J. Garcia)
`(Aug. 6, 2020)
`PACER Docket Activity Report (Criminal Matters) for the United
`Stated District Court, Western District of Texas, Austin and Waco
`Divisions (01/01/2000-08/28/2020) (last checked Aug. 28, 2020)
`
`ii
`
`
`
`1041
`
`1042
`
`1043
`
`1044
`
`1045
`
`1046
`
`1047
`
`1048
`1049
`
`1050
`
`1051
`
`1052
`
`1053
`1054
`1055
`
`1056
`
`1057
`1058
`
`Open Civil Matters Before J. Albright (W.D. Tex.) Not On Appeal,
`Lex Machina, https://law.lexmachina.com (last checked Aug. 31,
`2020)
`Open Civil Matters Before J. Albright (W.D. Tex.) Not On Appeal
`Filed Before 07-22-2019, Lex Machina, https://law.lexmachina.com
`(last checked Aug. 31, 2020)
`Open Patent Matters Before J. Albright (W.D. Tex.) Not On Appeal,
`Lex Machina, https://law.lexmachina.com (last checked Aug. 31,
`2020)
`Open Patent Matters Before J. Albright (W.D. Tex.) Not On Appeal
`Filed Before 07-22-2019, Lex Machina, https://law.lexmachina.com
`(last checked Aug. 31, 2020)
`Judge Albright’s Standing Sample Order Governing Proceedings –
`Patent Case (OGP Version v3.0) (W.D. Tex.)
`MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku, Inc., 6:18-cv-00308-ADA, Docket
`Summary (W.D. Tex.) (last checked Aug. 31, 2020)
`Scott McKeown, District Court Trial Dates Tend to Slip After PTAB
`Discretionary Denials, https://www.patentspostgrant.com/district-
`court-trial-dates-tend-to-slip-after-ptab-discretionary-denials/ (July 24,
`2020) (last checked Aug. 25, 2020)
`E-mail from Bill Trac (Aug. 31, 2020)
`Transcript of January 5, 2021, Deposition of Stuart J. Lipoff (“Lipoff-
`Depo.”)
`Transcript of March 10, 2021, Deposition of Alexander Kurganov
`(“Kurganov-Depo.”)
`Transcript of March 23, 2021, Deposition of Benedict Occhiogrosso
`(“Occhiogrosso-Depo.”)
`Transcript of March 25, 2021, Deposition of Paul K. Mulka (“Mulka-
`Depo.”)
`Declaration of Martin Walker (“Walker-Decl.”)
`Curriculum Vitae of Martin Walker
`Gookin, D., C for Dummies, Vol. 1, IDG Books Worldwide, Inc.,
`1996, pages 9-14, 84-93, 278-289, 495, 499, 509
`Kernighan, B. and Ritchie, D., The C Programming Language, Second
`Edition, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., 1988, pages 5-13
`Reply Declaration of Stuart J. Lipoff (“Lipoff-Reply-Decl.”)
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`iii
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e)(4)(ii), and the Board’s Trial Hearing Order
`
`(Paper 27), Petitioners herewith submit the following Exhibit:
`
`Exhibit
`1058
`
`Description
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`Date: July 22, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Google LLC et al.
`
`/Elisabeth Hunt/
`Elisabeth H. Hunt, Reg. No. 67,336
`Richard F. Giunta, Reg. No. 36,149
`Gregory S. Nieberg, Reg. No. 57,063
`Anant K. Saraswat, Reg. No. 76,050
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`(617) 646-8000 Phone
`(617) 646-8646 Fax
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6 (E)(4)
`I certify that on July 22, 2021, I will cause a copy of the foregoing
`
`document, including any exhibits filed therewith, to be served via electronic mail,
`
`as previously consented to by Patent Owner, upon the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael J. McNamara
`Michael T. Renaud
`William A. Meunier
`Andrew H. DeVoogd
`
`
`Date: July 22, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mmcnamara@mintz.com
`mtrenaud@mintz.com
`wameunier@mintz.com
`ahdevoogd@mintz.com
`
`/MacAulay Rush/
`MacAulay Rush
`Paralegal
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
