`US Patent No. RE47,244
`
`
`
`Paper No. 34
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________
`
`SOTERA WIRELESS, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`MASIMO CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2020-00967
`US Patent No. RE47,244
`_____________________
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, JENNIFER MEYER CHAGNON, and
`AMANDA F. WIEKER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00967
`Patent No. RE47,244
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Scheduling Order dated December 1, 2020 (Paper
`
`14), Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument for the trial scheduled for
`
`September 8, 2021. Petitioner requests that the hearing take place remotely.
`
`Alternatively, if held in person, Petitioner consents to a hearing in Alexandria, VA,
`
`as per the Board’s Scheduling Order.
`
`Petitioner requests one (1) hour of argument time to address the below issues
`
`(or, if Patent Owner requests and is permitted more than 1 hour of oral argument
`
`time, Petitioner requests the same amount of time for oral argument as Patent
`
`Owner).
`
`On January 6, 2021, the PTAB indicated it “anticipates that a consolidated
`
`oral argument will be held for these three proceedings.” As such, Petitioner
`
`requests that Case Nos. IPR2020-00967; IPR2020-01019; and IPR2020-01033 be
`
`consolidated into a single oral hearing.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), and as stated above, Petitioner requests
`
`one hour of time for each side and specifies the following issues, without intent to
`
`waive consideration of any issue not requested, to be argued for this proceeding:
`
`I. Whether Claims 1-26 of the RE244 Patent are obvious under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a) based on the grounds presented in the Petition;
`
`II. Any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral argument;
`
`and
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00967
`Patent No. RE47,244
`
`
`III. Those issues of interest to the Board as raised in the parties’ papers
`
`and/or the Board’s institution decision.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 21, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr./
`Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr., Reg. No. 36,032
`Daisy Manning, Reg. No. 66,369
`Nathan P. Sportel, Reg. No. 67,980
`Jennifer E. Hoekel, Reg. No. 48,330
`HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
`190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600
`St. Louis, MO 63105
`(314) 480-1500 Telephone
`(314) 480-1505 Facsimile
`PTAB-RTelscher@huschblackwell.com
`PTAB-DManning@huschblackwell.com
`Nathan.Sportel@huschblackwell.com
`PTAB-JHoekel@huschblackwell.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`Sotera Wireless, Inc.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00967
`Patent No. RE47,244
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 21st day of July 2021, the foregoing was served
`
`via electronic mail to the attorneys of record for the RE244 patent at the following
`
`address:
`
`Stephen W. Larson, (Reg. No. 69,133), 2swl@knobbe.com
`Jacob Peterson, (Reg. No. 65,096), 2jup@knobbe.com
`Irfan A. Lateef (Reg. No. 51,922), 2ial@knobbe.com
`Brian C. Claassen (Reg. No. 63,051), 2bcc@knobbe.com
`Jarom D. Kesler (Reg. No. 57,046), 2jzk@knobbe.com
`Jeremiah S. Helm, Ph.D. (admitted pro hac vice) jeremiah.helm@knobbe.com
`SoteraIPR244@knobbe.com
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr./
`By:
`Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr.
`Reg. No. 36,032
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
