`U.S. Patent 8,714,445 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS,LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`QWIKCASH, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2020-00972
`Patent No. 8,714,445
` ____________
`
`
` JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT 8,714,445
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. 42.72
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00972
`U.S. Patent 8,714,445 B1
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.72, Petitioner Unified Patents LLC
`
`
`
`(“Unified”) and Patent Owner Qwikcash, LLC jointly request dismissal and
`
`termination of the petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 8,714,445
`
`in IPR2020-00972.
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner have entered into a written confidential
`
`settlement agreement that fully resolves this matter. The parties are
`
`concurrently filing a copy of the settlement agreement as EX1027 along with
`
`a request to treat it as confidential business information pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 317(b). The undersigned represents that there are no other
`
`agreements, oral or written, between the parties made in connection with, or
`
`in contemplation of, the termination of the present proceeding and that
`
`EX1027 represents a true and accurate copy of the agreement between the
`
`parties that resolves the present proceeding.
`
`On September 23, 2020, the Parties informed the Board of the
`
`settlement via e-mail and requested authorization to file a joint motion to
`
`terminate the petition with respect to both the Patent Owner and the
`
`Petitioner. As set forth in an e-mail dated September 24, 2020, the Board
`
`authorized the filing of the requested joint motion to terminate this petition.
`
`Accordingly, Petitioner and Patent Owner jointly request termination of the
`
`present proceeding.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00972
`U.S. Patent 8,714,445 B1
`
`Public policy favors terminating the present petition for inter partes
`
`
`
`review. Congress and federal courts have expressed a strong interest in
`
`encouraging settlement in litigation. See, e.g., Delta Air Lines, Inc. v.
`
`August, 450 U.S. 346, 352 (1981) (“The purpose of [Fed. R. Civ. P.] 68 is to
`
`encourage the settlement of litigation.”); Bergh v. Dept. of Transp., 794 F.2d
`
`1575, 1577 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (“The law favors settlement of cases.”), cert.
`
`denied, 479 U.S. 950 (1986). The Federal Circuit places a particularly strong
`
`emphasis on settlement. See Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. U.S., 806 F.2d
`
`1046, 1050 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (noting that the law favors settlement to reduce
`
`antagonism and hostility between parties). And, the Board’s Trial Practice
`
`Guide stresses that “[t]here are strong public policy reasons to favor
`
`settlement between the parties to a proceeding.” Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 46,768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Ending this petition for IPR early promotes the Congressional goal of
`
`establishing a more efficient patent system by limiting unnecessary and
`
`counterproductive costs. See Changes to Implement Inter Partes Review
`
`Proceedings, Post-Grant Review Proceedings, and Transitional Program for
`
`Covered Business Method Patents, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,680 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00972
`U.S. Patent 8,714,445 B1
`
`Permitting termination provides certainty and fosters an environment
`
`
`
`that promotes settlements, creating a timely, cost-effective alternative to
`
`litigation.
`
`Additionally, termination of this petition for IPR is appropriate as the
`
`Board has not yet “decided the merits of the proceeding.” See, e.g., Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Unified filed its petition for inter partes review on May 29, 2020.
`
`The Board has not issued an Institution Decision instituting this proceeding.
`
`The parties have now settled their dispute and have reached agreement to
`
`terminate this proceeding. The USPTO can conserve its resources through
`
`terminating now, removing the need for the Board to further consider the
`
`arguments and to render an Institution Decision.
`
`The parties note that there is one pending district court litigation in
`
`which the patent-at-issue has been asserted, QwikCash, LLC, v. Blackhawk
`
`Networks Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 4:19-cv-876 (E.D. Tex. 2019).
`
`Petitioner is not a party to that proceeding. Further, there are no other
`
`USPTO proceedings pending regarding the patent-at-issue.
`
`Therefore, the Parties respectfully request termination of this Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent 8,714,445 (IPR2020-00972).
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00972
`U.S. Patent 8,714,445 B1
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /s/ Jason R. Mudd
`
`Jason R. Mudd, Reg. No. 57,700
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`Ashaf A. Fawzy, Reg. No. 67,914
`Alyssa Holtslander, Reg. No. 64,026
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`
`BY: /s/ Brian P. Lynch
`
`Brian P. Lynch, Reg. No. 58,794
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00972
`U.S. Patent 8,714,445 B1
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on
`September 25, 2020 the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT 8,714,445 UNDER 37 C.F.R.
`42.72 was served via electronic filing with the Board and via Electronic Mail
`on the following representatives of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Brian P. Lynch (blynch@niro-mcandrews.com)
`Raymond P. Niro (rnirojr@niro-mcandrews.com)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jason R. Mudd
`Jason R. Mudd, Reg. No. 57,700
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER
`
`