throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Murphy, Brian P.; Trials
`Polins, Greg; Sernel, Marc; hari.santhanam@kirkland.com; #AdvancedBionics-PTAB; Reitboeck, Georg; Rualo,
`Tess; Medelipr
`RE: MED-EL v. Advanced Bionics, IPR2020-01016 and IPR2021-00044 -- Renewed Motion for Consolidation
`Friday, February 25, 2022 9:45:20 AM
`
`Counsel:
`Petitioner’s request for authorization to file a motion to consolidate IPR2020-01016 and
`IPR2021-00044 is granted.
`
`Any motion shall be limited to seven substantive pages and filed no later than March 3, 2022.
`Patent Owner may file an opposition, also limited to seven substantive pages, and filed no later
`than March 10, 2022.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Maria King
`Deputy Chief Clerk for Trials
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`703-756-1288
`
`
`
`
`From: Murphy, Brian P. <BMurphy@haugpartners.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 5:42 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Polins, Greg <greg.polins@kirkland.com>; Sernel, Marc <msernel@kirkland.com>;
`hari.santhanam@kirkland.com; #AdvancedBionics-PTAB <AdvancedBionics-PTAB@kirkland.com>;
`Reitboeck, Georg <GReitboeck@haugpartners.com>; Rualo, Tess <TRualo@haugpartners.com>;
`Medelipr <Medelipr@haugpartners.com>
`Subject: RE: MED-EL v. Advanced Bionics, IPR2020-01016 and IPR2021-00044 -- Renewed Motion for
`Consolidation
`
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Petitioner Med-El respectfully requests authorization to file a 7-page renewed motion to
`consolidate IPR2020-01016 and IPR2021-00044. By Order dated July 2, 2021, the Board
`granted in part Petitioner’s May 24, 2021 Motion to Consolidate, allowing for a consolidated
`hearing (which took place on January 5, 2022), but maintaining the two proceedings “for
`administrative ease.” See IPR2020-01016, Paper 30; IPR2021-00044, Paper 23. Petitioner
`now seeks to renew its motion to fully consolidate the two proceedings in light of (1) the fact
`
`IPR2020-01016
`IPR2021-00044
`
`1
`
`Ex. 3003
`
`

`

`that at this point, there is no further need to keep the proceedings apart for administrative
`ease, and (2) to account for the recent decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal
`Circuit addressing the issue of estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(1), Intuitiv Surgical, Inc.
`v. Ethicon LLC, No. 2020-1481, 2022 WL 414252 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2022). Petitioner’s
`request is made pursuant to the Board’s authority under 35 U.S.C. § 315(d) and 37 CFR §
`42.122(a).
`
`Petitioner is advised by Patent Owner’s counsel the Patent Owner opposes this request. If
`the Board grants Petitioner authorization to file a renewed motion, Patent Owner requests
`an opposition of equal length as Petitioner’s motion.
`
`Counsel are available for a telephone conference at the Board’s convenience if so desired.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Brian Murphy
`Partner
`
`Haug Partners LLP
`745 Fifth Avenue, 10th Floor
`New York, NY 10151
`+1 212.588.0800 Main
`+1 212.863.2040 Direct
`
`bmurphy@haugpartners.com
`www.haugpartners.com
`
`
`
`This email originates from Haug Partners LLP. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named herein, and may contain confidential and/or
`legally privileged information. The dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is
`strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, please promptly notify us at firm@haugpartners.com or
`(212) 588-0800.
`
`IPR2020-01016
`IPR2021-00044
`
`2
`
`Ex. 3003
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket