throbber
Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia
`
`Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia:
`Distinct Illnesses or a Continuum?
`
`Hans-Jürgen Möller, M.D.
`
`Bipolar disorder continues to present complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Originally
`considered 2 separate diseases (mania and depression), bipolar disorder is now recognized to be a
`single disorder characterized by different subtypes and degrees of severity. Despite the availability
`of official guidelines, such as the DSM-IV and ICD-10, diagnosis is still problematic. Traditionally,
`bipolar disorder has been considered a clinical entity distinct from schizophrenia, although that as-
`sumption is being increasingly challenged. Proponents of a bipolar continuum theory support the con-
`cept of an expanded psychiatric continuum ranging from unipolar to bipolar disorders all the way to
`schizophrenia. This notion is supported by various independent findings. Both bipolar disorder and
`schizophrenia demonstrate a high degree of genetic transmissibility. Some data reported in family and
`twin studies suggest hereditary overlap between the 2 disorders. Gene mapping for both diseases is in
`its early stages, but certain susceptibility markers appear to be located on the same chromosomes. Bi-
`polar disorder and schizophrenia also demonstrate some similarities in neurotransmitter dysfunction.
`As further indirect evidence of a possible association, many newer atypical antipsychotic agents ap-
`proved for the treatment of schizophrenia are also proving useful for bipolar disorder. Ongoing re-
`search should aid in the understanding of bipolar disorder and foster the development of more effec-
`tive treatment.
`(J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64[suppl 6]:23–27)
`
`BHippocrates in 400 BC. At that time, the illness was seen
`
`ipolar disorder, one of the earliest identified mental
`disorders, was recognized as early as the time of
`
`as encompassing 2 distinct disorders: mania and melan-
`cholia.1 The term manic-depressive insanity was coined in
`1921 by Kraepelin, who was instrumental in segregating
`the various psychotic disorders and pronouncing schizo-
`phrenia and manic-depressive disorder to be distinct syn-
`dromes.2,3 In the years since, definitions and diagnostic
`criteria for bipolar disorder have continued to evolve and
`generate scientific debate.
`
`DIAGNOSIS
`
`The concept of polarity was first reflected in the Ameri-
`can Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disor-
`
`From the Psychiatric Department of the University of
`Munich, Munich, Germany.
`Presented at the roundtable discussion “Bipolar Disorder:
`From Clinical Research to Therapeutic Intervention,” which
`was held June 30, 2001, in Berlin, Germany, and supported by
`an unrestricted educational grant from AstraZeneca
`Pharmaceuticals, L.P.
`Corresponding author and reprints: Hans-Jürgen Möller,
`M.D., Psychiatric Department, University of Munich,
`Nussbaumstrasse 7, D-80336 Munich, Germany
`(e-mail: hans-juergen.moeller@psy.med.uni-muenchen.de).
`
`ders, Third Edition (DSM-III), published in 1980. This
`classification system, still widely used in North America,
`relies on 2 primary subtypes of bipolar disorder, as
`described in the DSM-IV. Bipolar I is defined as 1 or more
`manic or mixed episodes, usually accompanied in the
`course of the disease by major depressive episodes. Bi-
`polar II is characterized by recurrent major depressive
`symptoms and 1 or more episodes of hypomania. The
`DSM-IV also includes a classification for cyclothymic
`disorder, distinguished by chronic periods of mild hypo-
`manic and depressive mood fluctuations.4 In 1992, the
`World Health Organization modified its International
`Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health
`Problems (ICD)5 to more closely reflect the classifications
`of the DSM. However, some important diagnostic differ-
`ences between ICD and DSM-IV remain, and it is prob-
`ably clinically relevant to review them.
`In general, whereas the DSM-IV classifies mood disor-
`ders into 2 categories, depressive disorders and bipolar
`disorders, the tenth revision of ICD, ICD-10,5 mainly used
`in Europe, divides affective disorders into manic episodes,
`depressive episodes, bipolar disorders, unipolar depres-
`sive disorder, recurrent affective disorder, and other affec-
`tive disorder. The ICD-10 differentiates unipolar mania
`(ICD 10: F30) more clearly from bipolar disorders than
`does the DSM-IV, which treats unipolar mania as part of
`bipolar disorder due to the increased probability of more
`than 1 affective episode in patients with bipolar disorder.
`
`© COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC. © COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC.
`J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64 (suppl 6)
`
`23
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 2140
`Slayback v. Sumitomo
`IPR2020-01053
`
`

`

`Hans-Jürgen Möller
`
`However, it is still controversial whether unipolar mania
`exists as a separate entity. Interestingly, in the ICD-10,
`single mixed episodes are specified in “other single mood
`(affective) disorders” (F38.00).
`According to DSM-IV, the spectrum of bipolar disor-
`ders encompasses several classifications, from a single,
`manic episode (bipolar I; DSM IV: 296.0x, .4x, .40, .5x,
`.6x, .7x) to recurrent depression with hypomania (bipolar
`II; DSM IV: 296.89). This clear differentiation is not fully
`implemented in the ICD-10, where the diagnosis of
`bipolar II disorder (ICD 10: F31.80) can only be found in
`the appendix of the manual. Similarly, rapid cycling,
`which specifies the longitudinal course of bipolar disorder,
`is mentioned as a diagnosis in the ICD-10 appendix
`(F31.81), but can be an additional specification to any af-
`fective episode within bipolar I or II disorder in DSM-IV.
`Furthermore, cyclothymic disorder is identified as a sepa-
`rate diagnosis of bipolar disorders in the DSM-IV, in con-
`trast to the ICD-10, which lists cyclothymia as a separate
`entity within persistent affective disorders.
`As a result of more meticulous course observations and
`increasing knowledge about the causes of illness, bipolar
`disorders are being further differentiated. Differences in
`the prognosis and treatment of the entire spectrum of bi-
`polar disorders are now being observed more accurately
`for the first time, and future classification systems will
`certainly place more emphasis on these newly observed
`features.
`The clinical usefulness of the DSM-IV classification
`system is hindered by several barriers. Clearly, bipolar dis-
`order comprises core features that are easily recognizable
`and lend themselves to a classic bipolar diagnosis. How-
`ever, in the presence of some anomaly or variant, the diag-
`nosis becomes more difficult. Furthermore, in general
`clinical practice, primary care physicians are not likely to
`think of bipolar disorder in terms of bipolar I or bipolar II.
`When the classifications are used, the reliability of a
`bipolar II diagnosis is often poor, as hypomania is harder
`to recognize than full-blown mania. The characterization
`of hypomania includes some degree of subjective assess-
`ment on the part of the physician, and one clinician may
`view a patient as having bipolar II whereas the other may
`view the same patient as having bipolar I. This phenom-
`enon even complicates the comparison of scientific data
`from independent studies if disease classification is not
`performed uniformly.
`
`THE BIPOLAR SPECTRUM
`
`Over the past 10 to 15 years, it has become accepted to
`view bipolar disorder as a continuum of symptom severity,
`ranging from features of relatively mild depression and
`brief hypomania to debilitating patterns of rapid cycling or
`frequent mania with psychotic features.6 Further compli-
`cating diagnosis and disease classification, individual pa-
`
`tient symptoms can vary with regard to degree of polarity,
`symptom severity from episode to episode, duration of
`episodes, and cycling frequency.2
`
`BIPOLAR-SCHIZOPHRENIA CONTINUUM
`
`these diagnostic controversies,
`the midst of
`In
`Kraepelin’s assumption that manic-depression and schizo-
`phrenia are 2 distinct disorders is also being challenged,
`although many experts continue to uphold this theory. Pro-
`ponents of the bipolar continuum theory support the con-
`cept of an expanded psychiatric continuum ranging from
`unipolar to bipolar disorder, to schizoaffective psychosis,
`all the way to schizophrenia. Much research continues to
`focus on this issue, and there is a good deal of published
`support for both positions.7 Much of the evidence support-
`ing the continuum concept is based upon genetic, bio-
`chemical, and pharmacologic findings.
`
`FAMILY LINKAGE STUDIES
`
`Although genetic mapping for affective disorders is far
`from complete, it is apparent from family linkage studies
`that bipolar disorder has a substantial genetic component,
`with possibly the highest degree of genetic loading among
`all major psychiatric diseases. In fact, families of patients
`with bipolar disorder seem to have a disproportionate fre-
`quency of mood disorders. Compelling evidence of dis-
`ease concordance has been presented in studies of twins
`with manic-depressive symptoms.
`Bertelsen et al.,8 in a study of 69 bipolar probands from
`monozygotic twin pairs, found 46 co-twins with manic-
`depressive disorders. An additional 14 co-twins displayed
`other psychoses or marked affective personality disorders
`or had committed suicide. Similarly, in a study of 106
`monozygotic twin probands with functional psychotic dis-
`orders, the concordance of mania in a co-twin was ap-
`proximately 37%.9
`It is possible that data from twin studies underestimate
`the concordance of bipolar disorder, as difficulties in diag-
`nosis may cause one twin to be labeled as unipolar and the
`other twin as bipolar, while in fact they may be expressing
`different features of the disease at the time of diagnosis.
`Misdiagnosis and improper categorization of bipolar
`illness may influence data gathered among relatively
`younger subjects before the full clinical picture of their
`disease becomes apparent. Diagnosis should be more
`reliable after the first episode, which, in the vast majority
`of patients, usually occurs before the age of 30. Differ-
`ences between twins can also confuse the diagnosis, par-
`ticularly in situations in which one twin’s case is compli-
`cated by such factors as drug abuse, neurologic insult, or
`extreme social adversity, while the other’s is not.
`In 1982, Gershon et al.10 published findings from a
`study of 1254 adult relatives of patients diagnosed with
`
`24
`
`© COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC. © COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC.
`J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64 (suppl 6)
`
`2
`
`

`

`various affective disorders and those of normal controls.
`Lifetime prevalences of major affective disorder (includ-
`ing schizoaffective) were 37%, 24%, 25%, and 20% in
`relatives of patients diagnosed as schizoaffective, bipolar
`I, bipolar II, or unipolar, respectively. Lifetime prevalence
`was 7% in relatives of normal controls. From this and
`other research has arisen the theory of a continuum of ge-
`netic vulnerability, wherein different degrees of “genetic
`loading” can raise or lower susceptibility to various forms
`of affective illness. In such a model, bipolar illness may
`manifest itself when vulnerability is more severe (severity
`defined as a capacity to transmit illness within a pedigree),
`whereas unipolar illness may surface in cases of less se-
`vere vulnerability.10
`Overall, the estimated lifetime risk of bipolar disorder
`in a first-degree relative of a bipolar patient ranges from
`40% to 70% in monozygotic twins to 5% to 10% in all
`other first-degree relatives. Despite this clear genetic link-
`age, the mode of transmission appears to be far more com-
`plex than simple Mendelian inheritance, possibly involv-
`ing several genes, genomic imprinting, and mitochondrial
`inheritance. It remains unclear why out of similar pedi-
`grees some patients may be affected only by mild depres-
`sion, whereas others develop a complete manic-depressive
`profile. However, it has been theorized that the large varia-
`tion in bipolar symptom profiles suggests that nongenetic
`factors, such as environmental and developmental factors,
`have a strong influence in disease expression.6
`
`COMPARISON OF
`BIPOLAR DISORDER AND SCHIZOPHRENIA
`
`In 1988, Gershon et al.11 studied 237 relatives of 48
`patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
`Relatives of patients with schizoaffective disorder had an
`increased incidence of bipolar disorder; an increase was
`not seen in relatives of patients with schizophrenia. Con-
`versely, Angst et al.12 found a slightly elevated morbidity
`risk for schizophrenia (1.9%) and schizoaffective disorder
`(1.5%) among first-degree relatives of patients having bi-
`polar disorder. Other familial and twin studies have re-
`ported concordance and overlap between the 2 illnesses.13
`
`Epidemiology
`Despite differences in clinical characteristics, etiology,
`and treatment strategies, schizophrenia and bipolar dis-
`order share certain epidemiologic characteristics, such as
`age at onset, lifetime risk, course of illness, worldwide
`distribution, risk for suicide, gender influence, and genetic
`susceptibility.14 Both illnesses exhibit similar etiologic
`risk factors, such as an excess of winter-spring births,
`abnormal dermatoglyphics, and a probable excess of peri-
`natal complications.15 Bipolar disorder, however, may be
`more prevalent among higher socioeconomic groups,
`whereas higher rates of schizophrenia are associated with
`
`Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia
`
`urban births and minor physical congenital defects. Ac-
`cording to one theory, there may be a subset of bipolar
`cases that represents a unique disease entity, while many
`cases fit into a “bipolar-schizophrenia” continuum.15
`The now-recognized diagnosis of schizoaffective disor-
`der, which by definition falls between schizophrenia and
`mood disorders, tends to add support for the continuum
`theory of these mental illnesses.16 It could be argued that if
`the Kraepelinian dichotomy between affective disorders
`and schizophrenia is legitimate, the occurrence of interme-
`diate variations, such as schizoaffective psychosis, should
`be quite rare. To the contrary, the prevalence of schizo-
`affective disorder has been reported to range from 5.7% in
`adult psychiatric patients to 8% in psychotic patients.7
`
`Neuroanatomy
`Various structural abnormalities have been found in im-
`aging studies of patients with bipolar disorder or schizo-
`phrenia, although none has yet provided any clear answers
`regarding a possible relationship between the 2 disorders.
`Two studies using magnetic resonance imaging found
`indications of bilateral amygdala enlargement with no
`change in the hippocampus in bipolar patients.17,18 In con-
`trast, the amygdala and other focal areas of the brain have
`been found to be reduced in schizophrenic patients.17,19
`One of the more consistent findings among patients
`with bipolar disorder is an enlargement of the lateral and
`third ventricle.20,21 Nasrallah et al.,22 using computerized
`tomography scans, found significantly larger ventricles in
`both manic and schizophrenic subjects compared with
`control subjects. Ventricle size was associated with cer-
`ebellar atrophy, observed more commonly in manic pa-
`tients, but not associated with cerebral atrophy, which was
`more common in schizophrenia patients.
`The prefrontal cortex, in particular, exhibits changes in
`bipolar disorder. Functional neuroimaging studies in pa-
`tients with bipolar disorder and depression have shown
`decreased metabolism compared with normal controls in
`the prefrontal cortex.23,24 A decrease in neuronal and glial
`cell density associated with glial hypertrophy in prefrontal
`area 9 was reported from necropsy findings taken from
`patients with bipolar disorder compared with those taken
`from controls. These findings resemble those in major de-
`pressive disorder but not schizophrenia.25
`
`Genetics
`Molecular genetic studies continue searching for chro-
`mosome linkage in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.
`Certain potentially relevant gene loci have been identified
`in bipolar disorder, including 12q24, 18p11, 18q22, 4p16,
`21q21, 22q11, and Xq26, although specific genes have not
`yet been consistently implicated.6,26 At least 2 of these re-
`gions, 18p11 and 22q11, may also be linked to schizophre-
`nia, suggesting a possible genetic overlap between the 2
`disorders.26
`
`© COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC. © COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC.
`J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64 (suppl 6)
`
`25
`
`3
`
`

`

`Hans-Jürgen Möller
`
`Pathophysiology
`Early investigations of the underlying pathophysiology
`of bipolar disorder centered around a theory of imbalance
`between cholinergic and catecholaminergic neuronal activ-
`ity, an idea based on the known antimanic properties of
`centrally active cholinergic agonists.6 However, it has be-
`come apparent that this complex disorder is likely medi-
`ated through multiple neurotransmitter pathways and bio-
`logical interactions.27 Several neurotransmitters, including
`norepinephrine, dopamine, glutamate, and (cid:97)-aminobutyric
`acid (GABA), have been implicated in bipolar disorder to
`some degree, at least during symptomatic episodes.
`Several neurobiological and pharmacologic findings
`provide further evidence that schizophrenia and bipolar
`disorder may not be completely unique disease states.
`Many neurotransmitter abnormalities identified in bipolar
`disorder resemble those associated with schizophrenia, fur-
`ther supporting the continuum theory. For example, one of
`the foremost neurotransmitters implicated in schizophrenia
`pathology is dopamine, and most antipsychotic medica-
`tions possess some degree of antidopaminergic effect.28
`The administration of amphetamine to individuals with
`schizophrenia has been shown to provoke excess dopa-
`mine release and precipitate schizophrenic behaviors, sug-
`gesting a labile dopamine system.29
`Similar research has not yet been conducted in patients
`with bipolar disorder, although dopamine agonists have
`been found to precipitate mania in these patients. However,
`abnormalities in dopaminergic activity have been noted in
`bipolar disorder, including decreased concentrations of the
`dopamine metabolite homovanillic acid in the cerebro-
`spinal fluid of depressed patients.6 The administration of
`L-dopa has been found to precipitate mania in a nonbipolar
`individual and even shorten the manic-depressive cycle
`length in a bipolar patient.30–32 Amphetamine and cocaine
`intoxication may lead to manic-like symptoms. Altered
`serotonergic activity has also been noted in both schizo-
`phrenia and depression, with a slightly less clear role in
`bipolar disorder.27,33,34 It is possible that neurotransmitter
`disruptions in bipolar disorder, especially of the dopamine
`and serotonin pathways, are an active phenomenon of the
`disease but may not actually play an etiologic role.
`Hyperactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
`(HPA) axis has been documented in bipolar disorder, in
`which the presence of increased HPA activity has been cor-
`related with depression, mixed manic states, and occasion-
`ally classic manic episodes. Results of a study of patients
`with major depression suggest that HPA-axis hyperactivity
`constitutes a primary dysfunction leading to compensatory
`abnormalities in the serotonergic, and possibly other, neu-
`rotransmitter systems.27,35 Hyperactivation of the HPA axis
`and resulting elevations in glucocorticoid levels have even
`been suggested to play a role in hippocampal cell death and
`atrophy in animal models.27 HPA-system abnormalities
`have also been demonstrated in schizophrenia, although
`
`the degree of dysfunction appears to be less than that ob-
`served in bipolar disorder.36
`The presence of similarities in neurotransmitter irregu-
`larities between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia may
`account for the finding that some newer atypical antipsy-
`chotic agents, such as olanzapine, risperidone, and quetia-
`pine, have been found useful in the treatment of patients
`with bipolar disorder. The antimanic activity of olanzapine
`and risperidone is attributed to blockade of dopamine D2
`receptors and antagonism of other monoaminergic recep-
`tors. Both olanzapine and risperidone have higher anti-
`serotonergic (5-HT2A receptor) potency than quetiapine,
`which has pharmacologic antagonism at multiple sites
`in the central nervous system, including serotonergic,
`dopaminergic, histaminic, and (cid:95)-adrenergic receptors.
`Although all 3 atypical antipsychotics mentioned above
`were originally studied and marketed for the treatment of
`schizophrenia, olanzapine is now approved for the treat-
`ment of bipolar mania, and preliminary studies have re-
`ported efficacy for risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone,
`and aripiprazole in patients with bipolar disorder.37–42 It is
`interesting to note that from 1999 to 2001, more than 70%
`of prescriptions written for atypical antipsychotic drugs
`were for conditions other than schizophrenia, including bi-
`polar disorder.43
`
`SUMMARY
`
`A conceptual case can be made for a relationship be-
`tween schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. If each of these
`disorders is an etiologically heterogeneous syndrome, a
`single etiology could result in different phenotypes at the
`clinical level but with a shared etiology at the genetic, bio-
`chemical, or physiologic levels. If each syndrome is the
`result of multiple effects of a single gene (pleiotropic),
`e.g., change in phenomenology over time such that clini-
`cal features differ over time, subsets of persons with clini-
`cally diagnosable schizophrenia or bipolar disorder may in
`fact have the same illness at the etiologic level. For ex-
`ample, both iron deficiency anemia and vitamin B12 defi-
`ciency have symptoms of pallor, fatigue, and tachycardia.
`B12 deficiency can initially appear to be iron deficiency
`anemia, but, when fully developed, can include psychotic
`features and other localized neurologic findings.
`In summary, the Kraepelinian dichotomy between bi-
`polar disorder and schizophrenia may be gradually suc-
`cumbing to a theory of disease overlap and continuum.
`Regardless of which theory eventually proves to be accu-
`rate, the most pressing clinical need is to find safe and ef-
`fective treatments for these disorders. The emerging data
`regarding potential biological and chemical similarities
`between the 2 disorders will not only aid in the under-
`standing of these very complex diseases but, most impor-
`tantly, should bring us closer to the development of opti-
`mal management strategies.
`
`26
`
`© COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC. © COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC.
`J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64 (suppl 6)
`
`4
`
`

`

`Drug names: aripiprazole (Abilify), olanzapine (Zyprexa), quetiapine
`(Seroquel), risperidone (Risperdal), ziprasidone (Geodon).
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Evans DL. Bipolar disorder: diagnostic challenges and treatment
`considerations. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61(suppl 13):26–31
`2. Bowden CL. Update on bipolar disorder: epidemiology, etiology, diagno-
`sis, and prognosis. Available at: http://linkage.rockefeller.edu/wli/reading/
`bipolar.html. Accessed Feb 5, 2002
`3. Emental-health.com. History of bipolar disorder. Available at: http://
`www.emental-health.com/bipo_history.htm. Accessed Feb 5, 2002
`4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
`Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric
`Association; 1994
`5. World Health Organization. The International Statistical Classification
`of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th rev. Available at:
`http://www.who.int/whosis/icd10. Accessed Feb 4, 2003
`6. Muller-Oerlinghausen B, Berghofer A, Bauer M. Bipolar disorder. Lancet
`2002;359:241–247
`7. Varma SL. Genetics of schizophrenia and affective disorder: an overlap.
`Psychiatry On-Line, 1997. Available at: http://www.priory.com/psych/
`genetics.htm. Accessed Feb 5, 2002
`8. Bertelsen A, Harvald B, Hauge M. A Danish twin study of manic-
`depressive disorders. Br J Psychiatry 1977;130:330–351
`9. Cardno AG, Marshall EJ, Coid B, et al. Heritability estimates for
`psychotic disorders: the Maudsley twin psychosis series. Arch Gen
`Psychiatry 1999;56:162–168
`10. Gershon ES, Hamovit J, Guroff JJ, et al. A family study of schizoaffec-
`tive, bipolar I, bipolar II, unipolar, and normal control probands. Arch
`Gen Psychiatry 1982;39:1157–1167
`11. Gershon ES, DeLisi LE, Hamovit J, et al. A controlled family study of
`chronic psychoses: schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Arch Gen
`Psychiatry 1988;45:328–336
`12. Angst J, Frey R, Lohmeyer B, et al. Bipolar manic-depressive psychoses:
`results of a genetic investigation. Hum Genet 1980;55:237–254
`13. Dalby JT, Morgan D, Lee ML. Schizophrenia and mania in identical twin
`brothers. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986;174:304–308
`14. Berrettini WH. Are schizophrenic and bipolar disorders related? a review
`of family and molecular studies. Biol Psychiatry 2000;48:531–538
`15. Torrey EF. Epidemiological comparison of schizophrenia and bipolar
`disorder. Schizophr Res 1999;39:101–106
`16. Aubert JL, Rush AJ. Schizoaffective disorder. In: Widiger TA, Frances AJ,
`Pincus HA, et al, eds. DSM-IV Sourcebook, vol 2. Washington, DC:
`American Psychiatric Association; 1996:65–96
`17. Altshuler LL, Bartzokis G, Grieder T, et al. Amygdala enlargement in
`bipolar disorder and hippocampal reduction in schizophrenia: an MRI
`study demonstrating neuroanatomic specificity. Arch Gen Psychiatry
`1998;55:663–664
`18. Strakowski SM, DelBello MP, Sax KW, et al. Brain magnetic resonance
`imaging of structural abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen
`Psychiatry 1999;56:254–260
`19. Hulshoff Pol HE, Schnack HG, Mandl RC, et al. Focal gray matter den-
`sity changes in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:1118–1125
`20. Strakowski SM, DelBello MP, Adler C, et al. Neuroimaging in bipolar
`disorder. Bipolar Disord 2000;2(3 pt 1):148–164
`21. Bearden CE, Hoffman KM, Cannon TD. The neuropsychology and neuro-
`anatomy of bipolar affective disorder: a critical review. Bipolar Disord
`2001;3:106–150
`22. Nasrallah HA, McCalley-Whitters M, Jacoby CG. Cortical atrophy in
`schizophrenia and mania: a comparative CT study. J Clin Psychiatry
`
`Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia
`
`1982;43:439–441
`23. Stoll AL, Renshaw PF, Yurgelun-Todd DA, et al. Neuroimaging in bipolar
`disorder: what have we learned? Biol Psychiatry 2000;48:505–517
`24. Drevets WC. Neuroimaging studies of mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry
`2000;48:813–829
`25. Rajkowska G, Halaris A, Selemon LD. Reductions in neuronal and glial
`density characterize the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in bipolar disorder.
`Biol Psychiatry 2001;49:741–752
`26. Berrettini WH. Molecular linkage studies of bipolar disorders. Bipolar
`Disord 2001;3:276–283
`27. Manji HK, Lenox RH. The nature of bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry
`2000;61(suppl 13):42–57
`28. Laruelle M, Abi-Dargham A, Gil R, et al. Increased dopamine transmis-
`sion in schizophrenia: relationship to illness phases. Biol Psychiatry
`1999;46:56–72
`29. Abi-Dargham A, Gil R, Krystal J, et al. Increased striatal dopamine
`transmission in schizophrenia: confirmation in a second cohort.
`Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:761–767
`30. Ko GN, Leckman JF, Heninger GR. Induction of rapid mood cycling
`during L-dopa treatment in a bipolar patient. Am J Psychiatry
`1981;138:1624–1625
`31. Harsch HH, Miller M, Young LD. Induction of mania by L-dopa in a
`nonbipolar patient. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1985;5:338–339
`32. Murphy DL, Brodie HK, Goodwin FK, et al. Regular induction of
`hypomania by L-dopa in “bipolar” manic-depressive patients. Nature
`1971;229:135–136
`33. Lee MA, Meltzer HY. 5-HT1A Receptor dysfunction in female patients
`with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2001;50:758–766
`34. Duval F, Mokrani MC, Bailey PE, et al. Dopaminergic and serotonergic
`function in untreated schizophrenia. Presented at the 56th Scientific
`Convention of the American Society of Biological Psychiatry;
`May 3–5, 2001; New Orleans, La
`35. Pitchot W, Herrera C, Ansseau M. HPA axis dysfunction in major depres-
`sion: relationship to 5-HT1A receptor activity. Neuropsychobiology
`2001;44:74–77
`36. Lammers CH, Garcia-Borreguero D, Schmider J, et al. Combined
`dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing hormone test in patients with
`schizophrenia and in normal controls, 2. Biol Psychiatry 1995;38:
`803–807
`37. Ghaemi SN, Katzow JJ. The use of quetiapine for treatment-resistant
`bipolar disorder: a case series. Ann Clin Psychiatry 1999;11:137–140
`38. Sajatovic M, Brescan DW, Perez DE, et al. Quetiapine alone and added
`to a mood stabilizer for serious mood disorders. J Clin Psychiatry
`2001;62:728–732
`39. Sachs GS, Grossman F, Ghaemi SN, et al. Combination of a mood
`stabilizer with risperidone or haloperidol for treatment of acute mania:
`a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of efficacy and safety.
`Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:1146–1154
`40. Sachs G, Mullen JA, Devine NA, et al. Quetiapine versus placebo as
`adjunct to mood stabilizer for the treatment of acute bipolar mania.
`Presented at the 3rd European Stanley Foundation Conference on
`Bipolar Disorder; September 12–14, 2002; Freiburg, Germany
`41. Keck PJ, Ice K, Mandel F. A 3-week, double-blind, randomized trial of
`ziprasidone in the acute treatment of mania. Presented at the 22nd annual
`meeting of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum;
`July 9–13, 2000; Brussels, Belgium
`42. Jody D, Marcus R, Keck P. Aripiprazole vs placebo in acute mania.
`Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2002;5(suppl 1):S57
`43. Glick ID, Murray SR, Vasudevan P, et al. Treatment with atypical anti-
`psychotics: new indications and new populations. J Psychiatr Res
`2001;35:187–191
`
`© COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC. © COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC.
`J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64 (suppl 6)
`
`27
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket