throbber
Brief Report
`
`Metformin for Weight Loss in Pediatric Patients
`Taking Psychotropic Drugs
`
`John A. Morrison, Ph.D.
`Elizabeth M. Cottingham, M.D.
`Bruce A. Barton, Ph.D.
`
`seven girls. In a 12-week open-label study, each patient received
`metformin, 500 mg t.i.d. Changes in weight and body mass in-
`dex were evaluated by using repeated measures analysis of
`variance.
`
`Objective: Metformin was assessed as a treatment for weight
`gain in children taking olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or
`valproate.
`
`Results: Of the 19 patients, 15 lost weight, three gained 1.6 kg
`or less, and one had no change. The mean changes in weight
`and body mass index at 12 weeks were highly significant.
`
`Method: The subjects were 19 patients aged 10–18 years; 15
`were white and four were black, and there were 12 boys and
`
`Conclusions: Metformin merits further study as a treatment
`for weight gain in patients taking psychotropic medications.
`
`(Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:655–657)
`
`Olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and valproate
`
`provide effective treatment of bipolar disorder and psy-
`chosis (1). Their use, however, is associated with weight
`gain in as many as 50% of patients (1–5). Metformin,
`which is prescribed for patients with non-insulin-depen-
`dent diabetes to control blood sugar levels, has been re-
`ported to effect weight loss in several groups of patients
`characterized by insulin resistance. These include women
`with polycystic ovary disease (6, 7) and obese hyperlipi-
`demic men and women with and without non-insulin-de-
`pendent diabetes (8). Metformin has recently been ap-
`proved for use in children. Within this framework, we
`conducted an open-label study of metformin and weight
`loss in pediatric patients who had gained weight while tak-
`ing target drugs. We hypothesized that metformin would
`manage weight gain and lead to weight loss.
`
`Method
`
`Patients taking olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or valpro-
`ate at Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, with weight
`gain over 10% of baseline were given metformin, 500 mg t.i.d. De-
`termination of weight gain was based on hospital records and the
`patient’s weight at enrollment. Weight and height were measured
`to the nearest 0.1 kg and 0.1 cm, respectively, according to a Na-
`tional Institutes of Health protocol (9). The first two patients were
`seen under an 8-week protocol; subsequent patients were seen
`under a 12-week protocol. The patients were instructed not to
`change diet or physical activity during the study. Safety monitor-
`ing tests for lactic acidosis and liver function were conducted at
`all visits. Postmenarchal girls took urine pregnancy tests monthly.
`The study’s primary outcome measures were change in weight
`and body mass index at 12 weeks of metformin treatment. For
`these outcomes, we used paired t tests to assess whether the
`mean changes were significantly different from zero. To control
`for multiple comparisons, we adjusted the critical alpha level by
`using Bonferroni adjustment, testing each outcome at an alpha of
`0.025. We tested changes in weight and body mass index at 4 and
`8 weeks as secondary outcomes, using a more conservative alpha
`of 0.01. All analyses were performed by using SAS version 8.0 (10).
`
`The Children’s Hospital Medical Center institutional review
`board approved the protocol. Written informed assent/consent
`was obtained. The participants were told that we wanted to see
`whether metformin affected weight loss independently of dietary
`changes or physical activity.
`
`Results
`
`Nineteen patients, aged 10–18 years (mean=14.1, SD=
`2.5), were treated. They included 15 white and four black
`subjects; 12 were male, and seven were female. Two pa-
`tients were taking valproate only, four were taking valpro-
`ate plus olanzapine, eight were taking olanzapine only,
`one was taking valproate plus risperidone, three were tak-
`ing risperidone only, and one was taking quetiapine only.
`The length of treatment with these drugs ranged from 1 to
`36 months (mean=10.4, SD=9.5), and weight gain ranged
`from 6.0 to 59.1 kg (mean=28.6, SD=15.3). Follow-up data
`were available for 19 patients at 4 weeks, 16 patients at 8
`weeks, and 12 patients at 12 weeks. Seven patients had less
`than 12 weeks of data. Two patients were seen under an 8-
`week protocol. One patient stopped taking olanzapine af-
`ter 8 weeks of weight loss and was lost to follow-up, al-
`though later admitted to the hospital. One patient moved
`away. One patient, who gained 0.6 kg in 4 weeks, dropped
`out to try a different, dietary approach and was counted as
`gaining weight. Two patients did not complete the 12-
`week protocol before funding and institutional review
`board approval expired. The weight change outcomes
`were based on patients’ results at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and
`the weight change classification was based on each pa-
`tient’s final visit, whether that was at 4, 8, or 12 weeks.
`Of the 19 patients, 15 lost weight, the weight of one re-
`mained unchanged, and three gained weight. Weight
`gains in these three patients were 0.2 kg (over 3 months),
`0.6 kg (over 1 month), and 1.6 kg (over 3 months). The
`mean changes in weight and body mass index by length of
`follow-up are summarized in Table 1. At 12 weeks, the
`
`Am J Psychiatry 159:4, April 2002
`
`655
`
`

`

`BRIEF REPORTS
`
`TABLE 1. Changes in Weight and Body Mass Index in Patients Aged 10–18 Years Who Took Metformin for 12 Weeks in Ad-
`dition to Psychotropic Drugsa
`
`Weight
`
`Change in Weight
`(kg)
`
`SD
`Mean
`Time
`1.68
`–0.93
`4 weeks (N=19)
`2.45
`–1.05
`8 weeks (N=16)
`3.13
`–2.93
`12 weeks (N=12)
`a Olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or valproate.
`b Two-sided probabilities.
`
`Paired t Testb
`df
`18
`15
`11
`
`t
`–2.41
`–1.71
`–3.24
`
`p
`0.03
`0.11
`0.008
`
`SD
`0.97
`1.52
`1.98
`
`Body Mass Index
`Change in Index
`(kg/m2)
`Mean
`–0.84
`–0.90
`–2.22
`
`Paired t Testb
`df
`18
`15
`11
`
`t
`–3.77
`–2.37
`–3.90
`
`p
`0.001
`0.03
`0.003
`
`mean weight change was –2.93 kg, and the mean change
`in body mass index was –2.22 kg/m2. Thus, both primary
`outcomes yielded highly significant results. Although
`there was weight loss and reduction in body mass index at
`weeks 4 and 8, only the reduction of body mass index at 4
`weeks reached significance at the adjusted alpha level of
`0.01 (Table 1). Four patients followed as private patients
`beyond the 12-week protocol to evaluate longer-term
`weight loss continued to lose weight, achieving losses of
`4.1, 4.6, 8.2, and 13.1 kg.
`The results of the safety tests for lactic acidosis were un-
`remarkable. That is, the readings outside the normal range
`were within laboratory error. Many of the patients with ab-
`normal results on the liver function tests had abnormal
`readings at baseline. One of the two patients with low
`SGOT levels had a low level at baseline. Of the 10 patients
`with high SGOT levels, six had high levels at baseline. Of
`the five patients with low SGPT levels, one had a low base-
`line level. Of the four patients with high SGPT levels, one
`had a high baseline level. Of the three patients with high γ-
`glutamyltransferase levels, two had high levels at baseline.
`All other laboratory results were within normal ranges.
`
`Discussion
`
`In this preliminary evaluation of metformin as a treat-
`ment for weight gain associated with psychotropic drugs,
`the steep increase in weight experienced from these drugs
`was arrested in all patients. In addition, 15 of 19 patients
`lost weight. One patient, experiencing a weight gain of 1.6
`kg, was also receiving intramuscular medroxyprogester-
`one acetate, an agent independently associated with
`weight gain.
`Lustig (11) reported that use of metformin led to weight
`loss in eight obese adolescent girls who had failed to lose
`weight after caloric restriction. The mechanism by which
`metformin effects weight loss is not presently understood,
`but evidence is accumulating that it influences metabo-
`lism. Metformin is known to improve insulin sensitivity.
`Lenhard et al. (12) found that metformin increased mito-
`chondrial metabolism, stimulating aerobic respiration
`and mitochondrial β-oxidation.
`This preliminary study has several limitations. First, it
`was an open-label study, and the open-label treatment of
`obesity is subject to the placebo effect. However, the pat-
`
`tern of sustained, continued weight loss suggests that the
`weight loss was not due to the placebo effect. Second, a
`small number of patients were enrolled, so comparisons
`of weight loss among the target drugs were not possible.
`Different mean levels of weight gain with the various tar-
`get drugs have been reported in previous studies (3, 5).
`Third, different doses of metformin were not evaluated.
`Fourth, data on the occurrence of side effects were not sys-
`tematically collected. Six patients reported diarrhea or wa-
`tery stools at one or more visits. Fifth, although the pa-
`tients reported making no change in energy intake or
`output, as instructed, hard data on dietary intake and
`physical activity were not collected. Sixth, long-term fol-
`low-up to determine the clinical significance of the mean
`weight loss was not conducted. The continued follow up
`of four patients beyond 12 weeks suggests clinically signif-
`icant weight loss.
`In this sample of 19 patients, metformin was well toler-
`ated. One additional patient enrolled in the study but
`withdrew in the first month because of diarrhea. This pa-
`tient was mentally retarded, wore diapers, and required a
`2-hour bus ride each weekday. The patients reporting spo-
`radic diarrhea, consisting of loose stools and/or increased
`frequency, indicated that it was not a cause for discontin-
`uation and resolved with time. The results of safety tests
`were unremarkable.
`We conclude that metformin holds promise as a treat-
`ment for weight gain in pediatric patients taking psycho-
`tropic medications. Further studies, including randomized
`controlled trials and longer follow-up periods, are war-
`ranted and required before a final evaluation is possible.
`
`Received Sept. 27, 2000; revisions received Feb. 7 and Aug. 14,
`2001; accepted Dec. 18, 2001. From the Divisions of Cardiology and
`Psychiatry, Children’s Hospital Medical Center; and the Maryland
`Medical Research Institute, Baltimore. Address reprint requests to Dr.
`Morrison, Division of Cardiology, OSB 4, Children’s Hospital Medical
`Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229; morrj2@chmcc.org
`(e-mail).
`Supported by funding from the Children’s Hospital Medical Center
`Research Foundation.
`The metformin for this study was provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb.
`
`References
`
`1. The Collaborative Working Group on Clinical Trial Evaluations:
`Adverse effects of the atypical antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry
`1998; 59:17–22
`
`656
`
`Am J Psychiatry 159:4, April 2002
`
`

`

`BRIEF REPORTS
`
`2. Egger J, Brett EM: Effects of sodium valproate in 100 children
`with special reference to weight. Br Med J 1981; 283:577–581
`3. Allison DB, Mentore JL, Heo M, Chandler LP, Cappelleri JC, In-
`fante MC, Weiden PJ: Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: a
`comprehensive research synthesis. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:
`1686–1696
`4. Sachs GS, Guille C: Weight gain associated with use of psycho-
`tropic medications. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 60(suppl 21):16–19
`5. Sikich L, Williamson K, Malekpour A, Bashford R, Sheitman B,
`Liberman J: Double-blind comparison of haloperidol, risperi-
`done, and olanzapine in psychotic youth, in Scientific Proceed-
`ings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of
`Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Washington, DC, AACAP, 1999,
`p 136
`6. Velazquez EM, Mendoza S, Hammer T, Sosa F, Glueck CJ: Met-
`formin therapy in polycystic ovary syndrome reduces hyperin-
`sulinemia, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism, and systolic
`blood pressure, while facilitating normal menses and preg-
`nancy. Metabolism 1994; 43:647–654
`7. Velazquez EM, Mendoza SG, Wang P, Glueck CJ: Metformin ther-
`apy is associated with a decrease in plasma plasminogen acti-
`
`vator inhibitor-1, lipoprotein(a), and immunoreactive insulin
`levels in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism
`1997; 46:454–457
`8. Glueck CJ, Fontaine RN, Wang P, Subbiah MT, Weber K, Illig E,
`Streicher P, Sieve-Smith L, Tracy TM, Lang JE, McCullough P:
`Metformin reduces weight, centripetal obesity, insulin, leptin,
`and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in nondiabetic, mor-
`bidly obese subjects with body mass index greater than 30.
`Metabolism 2001; 50:856–861
`9. Obesity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in black and
`white girls: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study. Am J Public
`Health 1992; 82:1613–1620
`10. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, version 8. Cary, NC, SAS Institute, 2000
`11. Lustig R: Childhood obesity, in A Current Review of Pediatric
`Endocrinology 1999. Rockland, Mass, Serono Symposia, 1999,
`pp 133–139
`12. Lenhard JM, Liewer SA, Paulik MA, Plunket KD, Lehmann JM,
`Weiel JE: Effects of troglitazone and metformin on glucose and
`lipid metabolism: alteration of two distinct molecular path-
`ways. Biochem Pharmacol 1999; 54:801–808
`
`Brief Report
`
`An Animal Model of Tourette’s Syndrome
`
`Jane R. Taylor, Ph.D.
`Syed A. Morshed, M.D., Ph.D.
`Salina Parveen, M.D.
`Marcos T. Mercadante, M.D., Ph.D.
`Lawrence Scahill, M.S.N., Ph.D.
`Bradley S. Peterson, M.D.
`Robert A. King, M.D.
`James F. Leckman, M.D.
`Paul J. Lombroso, M.D.
`
`Method: Sera from 12 patients with Tourette’s syndrome with
`high levels of antineural or antinuclear antibodies were in-
`fused bilaterally into the ventrolateral striatum of rats. Sera
`from 12 additional Tourette’s syndrome patients and 12 nor-
`mal subjects (both groups with low levels of autoantibodies)
`were infused for comparison. Rates of oral stereotypies were
`recorded by observers who were blind to the origin of the in-
`fused sera.
`
`Results: Oral stereotypies significantly increased in the rats in-
`fused with sera from the patients with high levels of autoanti-
`bodies.
`
`Objective: An animal model was used to investigate an au-
`toimmune etiology for some cases of Tourette’s syndrome.
`
`Conclusions: The results are consistent with an autoimmune
`etiology in a subset of cases of Tourette’s syndrome.
`
`(Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:657–660)
`
`Tourette’s syndrome is a complex neuropsychiatric dis-
`
`order characterized by fluctuating motor and phonic tics
`that may result in marked impairment (1). An autoimmune
`etiology has been suggested for at least some cases (2–5).
`The presence of tics or obsessive-compulsive symptoms
`has been linked to infection with group A β-hemolytic
`streptococci (2, 3). The molecular mimicry hypothesis pre-
`dicts that genetically vulnerable individuals produce anti-
`bodies against streptococci that recognize self-proteins
`within the central nervous system (CNS). Cross-reactivity
`results in compromised neuronal function.
`
`Several reports have shown that autoantibodies are
`present in a subset of patients with Tourette’s syndrome
`(2–5). However, the presence of autoantibodies does not
`indicate causality. An animal model in which these au-
`toantibodies reproduce symptoms of the disorder is an
`important step. A recent animal model for Tourette’s syn-
`drome reported the induction of stereotypies in rats after
`intrastriatal infusions of serum from Tourette’s syndrome
`patients (6). The present report extends these findings by
`1) infusing sera from patients with Tourette’s syndrome
`into a striatal region associated with oral stereotypy and
`
`Am J Psychiatry 159:4, April 2002
`
`657
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket