1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr.* (MO Bar No. 41072)
`
`rudy.telscher@huschblackwell.com
`Daisy Manning* (MO Bar No. 62134)
`
`daisy.manning@huschblackwell.com
`Jennifer E. Hoekel* (MO Bar No. 45880)
`
`jennifer.hoekel@huschblackwell.com
`HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
`190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600
`St. Louis, MO 63105
`314-480-1500 Telephone
`
`Nathan Sportel* (IL Bar No. 6304061)
`nathan.sportel@huschblackwell.com
`HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
`120 South Riverside Plaza Suite 2200
`Chicago, IL 60606
`312-655-1500 Telephone
`Dustin Taylor* (CO Bar No. 54463)
`dustin.taylor@huschblackwell.com
`HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
`1801 Wewatta St., Suite 1000
`Denver, CO 80205
`*admitted pro hac vice
`
`J. Christopher Jaczko (Bar No. 149317)
`chris.jaczko@procopio.com
`PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES
`& SAVITCH LLP
`12544 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`619-238-1900 Telephone
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Sotera Wireless, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`MASIMO CORPORATION, a
`California corporation,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`SOTERA WIRELESS, INC., a
`California corporation,
`HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY
`CO., LTD., a Taiwan corporation,
`Defendants.
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`Case No.: 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`DEFENDANTS SOTERA
`WIRELESS, INC. AND HON HAI
`PRECISION INDUSTRY CO.
`LTD.’S AMENDED LPR 3.3
`INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 1 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to the Case Management Order Regulating Discovery and Other
`Pretrial Proceedings in a Patent Case (ECF No. 41), and Local Patent Rules 3.3 and
`3.6, Defendants Sotera Wireless, Inc. (“Sotera”) and Hon Hai Precision Industry
`Co., Ltd. (“Hon Hai”) (collectively, “Defendants”) provide the following Amended
`Invalidity Contentions.
`The claims currently asserted by Plaintiff Masimo Corporation (“Masimo”)
`are as follows:
`Claim 20 of U.S. Patent No. 9,788,735 (“the ’735 patent”);
`Claims 16-20 of U.S. Patent No. 9,795,300 (“the ’300 patent”);
`Claims 1-19 of U.S. Patent No. 9,872,623 (“the ’623 patent”);
`Claims 1-22 of U.S. Patent No. 10,213,108 (“the ’108 patent”);
`Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23, 25, and 26 of U.S. Patent No. RE47,244
`(“the RE244 patent”);
`Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23, and 25 of U.S. Patent No. RE47,353
`(“the RE353 patent”);
`Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, and 24 of U.S. Patent No. RE47,249
`(“the RE249 patent”);
`Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. RE47,218
`(“the RE218 patent”); and
`Claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 10,255,994 (“the ’994 patent”).
`These are collectively referred to as the “Asserted Claims” of the “Asserted
`Patents.” The Amended Invalidity Contentions are limited to these Asserted
`Claims. Should Masimo be permitted to alter the Asserted Claims, Defendants
`reserve its right to supplement and amend its Amended Invalidity Contentions.
`Discovery and Defendants’ investigation is far from complete at this stage. It
`is possible that Defendants will hereafter discover additional prior art pertinent to
`the Asserted Claims of the Asserted Patents, and/or learn of earlier priority dates of
`Defendants’ Amended
`1
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 2 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`art, and Defendants reserve their right to seek to amend and/or supplement these
`contentions within a reasonable time after becoming aware of additional prior art.
`Prior art not included in these Invalidity Contentions, whether known or unknown
`to Defendants, may become relevant based on subsequent events. In particular,
`Defendants are currently unaware of the extent, if any, to which Masimo will
`contend that limitations of the Asserted Claims are not disclosed in the prior art
`identified by Defendants. To the extent that such an issue arises, Defendants
`reserve the right to identify other references, including in the file histories of the
`Asserted Patents, that would anticipate or render obvious the allegedly missing
`limitation(s) of the Asserted Claims.
`Defendants also reserve their right to supplement and/or amend these
`Invalidity Contentions after the Court has construed disputed claim terms.
`Defendants’ ultimate contentions concerning the validity of the claims of the
`Asserted Patents may change based upon the Court’s construction of the claims or
`positions that Masimo may take concerning infringement or validity issues after
`such construction. Nothing contained in these Invalidity Contentions or any
`accompanying exhibits or claim charts, however, should be understood or deemed
`to be an express or implied admission or contention with respect to the proper
`construction or scope of any terms in the Asserted Claims, nor should they be
`understood to adopt Masimo’s stated claim construction or its proposed scope of
`the Asserted Claims.
`II.
`INVALIDITY
`A.
`Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103
`Below Defendants provide specific portions of prior art references that
`disclose the elements of the Asserted Claims and render the claims anticipated
`and/or obvious under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103. Although Defendants have
`identified at least one citation per element for each reference, each and every
`disclosure of the same element in the reference is not necessarily identified. The
`Defendants’ Amended
`2
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 3 of 43
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`lack of a citation for an element should not be deemed an admission that the
`element is not disclosed or is not inherent in the reference. In an effort to focus the
`issues, Defendants identify only exemplary portions of cited references. It should
`be recognized that persons of ordinary skill in the art will generally read a prior art
`reference as a whole and in the context of other publications and literature and in
`light of the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art. To understand and
`interpret any specific statement or disclosure within a prior art reference, such
`persons would rely on other information within the reference, along with other
`publications and their scientific or engineering knowledge. Defendants
`consequently reserve the right to rely upon other unidentified portions of the prior
`art references and on other publications and expert testimony as to the knowledge
`of a person of ordinary skill to provide context, and as aids to understanding and
`interpreting the portions that art identified. Defendants also reserve the right to rely
`on other portions of the prior art references, other publications, and the testimony
`of experts to establish that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been
`motivated to modify or combine certain cited references so as to render the claims
`obvious. Further, where Defendants identify a particular figure in a prior art
`reference, the identification should be understood to encompass the caption and
`description of the figure and any text relating to the figure in addition to the figure
`itself. Similarly, where an identified portion of text refers to a figure, the
`identification should be understood to include the figure as well.
`1.
`Identification of Patents and Printed Publications (Patent
`L.R. 3.3a.)
`
`Defendants identify the following prior art patents and printed publications
`that render the Asserted Claims invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a), (b), (e), and/or
`35 U.S.C. § 103:
` U.S. Patent No. 4,425,921 to Fujisaki (“Fujisaki”) was filed on September
`11, 1981 and issued January 17, 1984.
`3
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 4 of 43
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
` U.S. Patent No. 5,539,706 to Takenaka (“Takenaka”) was filed on
`February 2, 1995 and issued July 23, 1996.
` U.S. Patent No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”) was filed on
`September 30, 1997 and issued February 2, 1999.
` U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to Money (“Money”) was filed on September
`13, 1996 and issued July 6, 1999.
` U.S. Patent No. 6,241,684 to Amano (“Amano”) was filed on February 2,
`1998 and issued June 5, 2001.
` U.S. Patent No. 6,597,933 to Kiani (“Kiani”) was filed on October 17,
`2001 and issued July 22, 2003.
` U.S. Patent No. 6,816,266 to Varshneya (“Varshneya”) was filed on
`November 19, 2002, published May 22, 2003, and issued November 9,
`2004.
` U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to Goldberg (“Goldberg”) was filed on October
`11, 2001, published April 17, 2003, and issued January 11, 2005.
` U.S. Patent No. 6,897,788 to Khair (“Khair”) was filed on April 17, 2002,
`published August 15, 2002, and issued May 24, 2005.
` U.S. Patent No. 7,079,035 to Bock (“Bock”) was filed on May 19, 2003,
`published November 24, 2004, and issued July 18, 2006.
` U.S. Patent No. 7,399,277 to Saidara (“Saidara”) was filed on June 3,
`2004, published February 17, 2005 as U.S. Patent Publication No.
`2005/0038332, and issued July 15, 2008.
` U.S. Patent No. 7,769,436 to Boileau (“Boileau”) was filed on June 4,
`2007 and issued August 3, 2010.
` U.S. Patent No. 8,792,949 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-2”) was filed on March 6,
`2009 and issued July 29 ,2014.
` U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0098807 to Saarnimo (“Saarnimo”) was
`filed on January 25, 2001 and published July 25, 2002.
`Defendants’ Amended
`4
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 5 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
` U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0220881 to Al-Ali (“Al-Ali”) was filed
`on March 1, 2006 and published October 5, 2006.
` U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0183054 A1 to Kroeger (“Kroeger”)
`was filed on January 25, 2008, published July 31, 2008, and identifies
`Provisional Application No. 60/887,168, filed on January 30, 2007, as a
`related U.S. application.
` U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0287756 to Lynn (“Lynn”) was filed on
`May 16, 2008 and published November 20, 2008.
` U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0247851 to Batchelder (“Batchelder”)
`was filed on March 24, 2009 and published October 1, 2009.
` U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0326340 to Wang (“Wang”) was filed
`June 30, 2008 and published December 31, 2009.
` European Patent No. EP 0 920 729 B1 to Zuckerman (“Zuckerman”) was
`filed August 18, 1997, published June 9, 1999, and issued April 5, 2000.
` European Patent Publication No. EP 0 880 936 A2 to Akai (“Akai”) was
`filed on October 30, 1997 and published December 2, 1998.
` PCT Publication No. WO96/15594 to Taylor (“Taylor”) was filed on
`November 14, 1995 and published May 23, 1996.
` PCT Publication No. WO99/13698 to Estep (“Estep”) was filed on August
`28, 1998 and published March 18, 1999.
` PCT Publication No. WO00/42911 A1 to Kiani (“Kiani-WO”) was filed
`on January 25, 2000 and published July 27, 2000.
` PCT Publication No. WO00/44274 to Pougatchev (“Pougatchev”) was
`filed on January 28, 2000 and published August 3, 2000.
` Malangi, Swaroop, Simulation and mathematical notation of alarms unit
`for computer assisted resuscitation algorithm (2003), Theses 526, New
`Jersey Institute of Technology, https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/526,
`was published no later than Fall 2003 (“Malangi”).
`5
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 6 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
` Rheineck-Leyssius, A.T. and Kalkman, C.J., Influence of Pulse Oximeter
`Lower Alarm Limit on the Incidence of Hypoxaemia in the Recovery
`Room, 79 British Journal of Anesthesia 460-464 (1997) (“Kalkman”).
` Tsien, Christine L., TrendFinder: Automated Detection of Alarmable
`Trends, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (June 2000) (“Tsien”).
` Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical
`Layer (PHY) specifications: High-speed Physical Layer in the 5 GHZ
`Band, IEEE Std 802.11(a)-1999, Supplement to IEEE Std 802.11-1999,
`Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1999) (“IEEE 802.11a”).
`2.
`Representative Claim Charts (Patent L.R. 3.3b–c.)
`Defendants contend that each of the Asserted Claims is anticipated by
`and/or is rendered obvious in view of one or more of the items or prior art
`identified above, either alone or in combination. Although Defendants reserve the
`right to rely on other prior art disclosed or incorporated by reference herein,
`Defendants identify below representative prior art that renders invalid one or more
`of the Asserted Claims and includes accompanying claim charts that identify
`where specifically in each item of prior art each element of each Asserted Claim is
`found.
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`A-01
`
`the ’735 patent
`
`A-02
`
`the ‘735 patent
`
`A-03
`
`the ‘735 patent
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under § 103 in view of
`EP0880936A2 (Akai), US Patent No. 6,840,904
`(Goldberg), US Patent No. 4,425,921 (Fujisaki), and
`WO2000/042911 (Kiani)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under § 103 in view of
`EP0880936A2 (Akai), US Patent No. 6,840,904
`(Goldberg), US2002/0098807 (Saarnimo), US Patent
`No. 4,425,921 (Fujisaki), and WO2000/042911
`(Kiani)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under § 103 in view of US
`Patent No. 6,840,904 (Goldberg) and
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani)
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`6
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 7 of 43
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`A-04
`
`the ‘735 patent
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under § 103 in view of US
`Patent No. 6,840,904 (Goldberg), US2002/0098807
`(Saarnimo), US Patent No. 4,425,921 (Fujisaki), and
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in
`view of U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to Goldberg
`(“Goldberg”), PCT Publication No. WO 00/42911 to
`Kiani et al. (“Kiani”), U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to
`Money (“Money”), U.S. Patent No. 4,425,921 to
`Fujisaki (“Fujisaki”), and PCT Publication No. WO
`99/13698 to Estep (“Estep”)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under § 103 in view of
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani) and US Patent No.
`6,897,788 (Khair)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under § 103 in view of
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani), US Patent No.
`6,241,684 (Amano), US2002/0098807 (Saarnimo),
`and US Patent No. 6,897,788 (Khair)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under § 103 in view of US
`Patent No. 5,919,141 (Money) and WO00/44274
`(Pougatchev)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under § 103 in view of US
`Patent No. 5,919,141 (Money), WO00/44274
`(Pougatchev), US2002/0098807 (Saarnimo), and
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani)
`Obviousness of Claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in
`view of U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to Money
`(“Money”) and EP0880936A2 to Akai (“Akai”) and
`PCT Publication No. WO 00/42911 to Kiani et al.
`(“Kiani”) and U.S. Patent No. 4,425,921 to Fujisaki
`(“Fujisaki”) and PCT Publication No. WO 99/13698
`to Estep (“Estep”)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`EP0880936A2 (Akai)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`EP0880936A2 (Akai) and EP0920729 (Zuckerman)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`EP0880936A2 (Akai), WO2000/042911 (Kiani), and
`EP0920729 (Zuckerman)
`B-03
`the ‘300 patent
`7
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`A-05
`
`the ‘735 patent
`
`A-06
`
`the ‘735 patent
`
`A-07
`
`the ‘735 patent
`
`A-08
`
`the ‘735 patent
`
`A-09
`
`the ‘735 patent
`
`A-10
`
`the ‘735 patent
`
`B-01
`
`B-02
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 8 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`B-08
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-09
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-10
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-11
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-12
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-13
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-04
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-05
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-06
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-07
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`US Patent No. 6,840,904 (Goldberg)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`US Patent No. 6,840,904 (Goldberg),
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani), and EP0920729
`(Zuckerman)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to
`Goldberg (“Goldberg”), PCT Publication No. WO
`00/42911 to Kiani et al. (“Kiani”), and U.S. Patent
`No. 5,919,141 to Money (“Money”)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`US Patent No. 6,840,904 (Goldberg),
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani), and IEEE 802.11(a)-
`1999
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to
`Goldberg (“Goldberg”), PCT Publication No. WO
`00/42911 to Kiani et al. (“Kiani”), U.S. Patent No.
`5,919,141 to Money (“Money”), and PCT
`Publication No. WO96/15594 to Taylor ("Taylor")
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani) and EP0920729
`(Zuckerman)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani) and US Patent No.
`6,897,788 (Khair)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani) and IEEE 802.11(a)-
`1999
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`WO2000/042911A1 (Kiani) and US Patent No.
`6,840,904 (Goldberg)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`US Patent No. 5,919,141 (Money) and WO00/44274
`(Pougatchev)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`US Patent No. 5,919,141 (Money), WO00/44274
`(Pougatchev), and EP0920729 (Zuckerman)
`B-14
`the ‘300 patent
`Defendants’ Amended
`8
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 9 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`B-15
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-16
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-17
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-18
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-19
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`B-20
`
`the ‘300 patent
`
`C-01
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`C-02
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`C-03
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`US Patent No. 5,919,141 (Money), WO00/44274
`(Pougatchev), and IEEE 802.11(a)-1999
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`US Patent No. 5,919,141 (Money) and US Patent No.
`5,539,706 (Takenaka)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`US Patent No. 5,919,141 (Money), US Patent No.
`5,539,706 (Takenaka), and EP0920729B1
`(Zuckerman)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under § 103 in view of
`US Patent No. 5,919,141 (Money), US Patent No.
`5,539,706 (Takenaka), and IEEE802.11(a)-1999
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to
`Money (“Money”), PCT Publication No. WO
`00/42911 to Kiani et al. (“Kiani”), and
`EP0880936A2 to Akai (“Akai”)
`Obviousness of Claims 16-20 under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to
`Goldberg (“Goldberg”), PCT Publication No. WO
`00/42911 to Kiani et al. (“Kiani”), EP0880936A2 to
`Akai (“Akai”), and PCT Publication No.
`WO96/15594 to Taylor ("Taylor")
`Obviousness of Claims 1-19 under § 103(a) in view
`of EP0880936A2 to Akai (“Akai”) and U.S. Patent
`No. 5,919,141 to Money (“Money”)
`Obviousness of Claim 1-19 under § 103(a) in view of
`EP0880936A2 to Akai (“Akai”) and PCT Publication
`No. WO2000/42911 to Kiani (“Kiani-WO”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 12, 14, 15, 16, and
`17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent
`No. 6,840,904 to Goldberg (“Goldberg”) and PCT
`Publication No. WO 00/42911 to Kiani (“Kiani-
`WO”)
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`9
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 10 of 43
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`C-04
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`C-05
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`C-06
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`C-07
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claims 6-11, 13, 18-19 under 35
`U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904
`to Goldberg (“Goldberg”) and PCT Publication No.
`WO 00/42911 to Kiani (“Kiani-WO”) and U.S.
`Patent No. 5,919,141 to Money (“Money”)
`Obviousness of Claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in
`view of U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to Goldberg
`(“Goldberg”) and PCT Publication No. WO
`00/42911 to Kiani (“Kiani-WO”) and U.S. Patent
`No. 4,425,921 to Fujisaki (“Fujisaki”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-19 under § 103(a) in view
`of U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to Money (“Money”)
`and EP0880936A2 to Akai (“Akai”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-2 and 4-19 under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to
`Money (“Money”), PCT Publication No. WO
`00/42911 to Kiani (“Kiani-WO”), and EP0880936A2
`to Akai (“Akai”)
`Obviousness of Claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in
`view of U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to Money
`(“Money”), PCT Publication No. WO 00/42911 to
`Kiani-WO (“Kiani-WO”), EP0880936A2 to Akai
`(“Akai”), and U.S. Patent No. 4,425,921 to Fujisaki
`(“Fujisaki”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-19 under § 103(a) in view
`of U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to Money (“Money”)
`and PCT Publication No. WO00/44274 to
`Pougatchev (“Pougatchev”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-19 under § 103(a) in view
`of PCT Publication No. WO2000/42911 to Kiani
`(“Kiani-WO”) and EP0880936A2 to Akai (“Akai”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-19 under § 103(a) in view
`of PCT Publication No. WO2000/42911 to Kiani
`(“Kiani-WO”) and PCT Publication No.
`WO00/44274 to Pougatchev (“Pougatchev”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-19 under § 103 in view of
`PCT Publication No. WO2000/42911 to Kiani
`(“Kiani-WO”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to
`Goldberg ("Goldberg")
`C-12
`the ‘623 patent
`10
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`C-08
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`C-09
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`C-10
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`C-11
`
`the ‘623 patent
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 11 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`D-01
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-02
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-03
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-04
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-05
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-06
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-07
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-08
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-09
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-22 under § 103(a) in view
`of EP0880936 to Akai ("Akai")
`Obviousness of Claims 1-22 under § 103(a) in view
`of EP0880936 to Akai (“Akai”), US Patent No.
`4,425,921 to Fujisaki (“Fujisaki”), and PCT
`Publication No. WO2000/042911 to Kiani (“Kiani-
`WO”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-5 and 9-18 under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 103(a) in view of EP0880936A2 to Akai (“Akai”)
`and PCT Publication No. WO 00/42911 to Kiani
`(“Kiani-WO”)
`Obviousness of Claims 6-8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`in view of EP0880936A2 to Akai (“Akai”), PCT
`Publication No. WO 00/42911 to Kiani (“Kiani-
`WO”), and U.S. Patent No. 4,425,921 to Fujisaki
`(“Fujisaki”)
`Obviousness of Claims 19-22 under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 103(a) in view of EP0880936A2 to Akai (“Akai”),
`PCT Publication No. WO 00/42911 to Kiani (“Kiani-
`WO”), and U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to Money
`("Money")
`Obviousness of Claims 1-22 under § 103(a) in view
`of US Patent No. 6,840,904 to Goldberg
`(“Goldberg”)
`Obviousness of Claim 1-22 under § 103(a) in view of
`U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to Goldberg (“Goldberg”),
`U.S. Patent No. 4,425,921 to Fujisaki (“Fujisaki”),
`and PCT Publication No. WO2000/042911 to Kiani
`(“Kiani-WO”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-5 and 9-18 under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to
`Goldberg (“Goldberg”) and PCT Publication No.
`WO 00/42911 to Kiani (“Kiani-WO”)
`Obviousness of Claims 6-8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to Goldberg
`(“Goldberg”), PCT Publication No. WO 00/42911 to
`Kiani (“Kiani-WO”), and U.S. Patent No. 4,425,921
`to Fujisaki (“Fujisaki”)
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`11
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 12 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`D-10
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-11
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-12
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-13
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`D-14
`
`the ‘108 patent
`
`E-01
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`E-02
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`E-03
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claims 19-22 under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to
`Goldberg (“Goldberg”), PCT Publication No. WO
`00/42911 to Kiani (“Kiani-WO”), and U.S. Patent
`No. 5,919,141 to Money (“Money”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-22 under § 103(a) in view
`of PCT Publication No. WO2000/042911A1 to Kiani
`(“Kiani-WO”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-22 under § 103(a) in view
`of PCT Publication No. WO2000/042911A1 to Kiani
`(Kiani-WO) and U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to
`Goldberg (“Goldberg”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-22 under § 103(a) in view
`of U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to Money (“Money”)
`and PCT Publication No. WO00/44274 to
`Pougatchev (“Pougatchev”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1-22 under § 103(a) in view
`of U.S. Patent No. 5,919,141 to Money ("Money")
`and U.S. Patent No. 6,840,904 to Goldberg
`("Goldberg")
`Anticipation of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25, 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 in view of Baker-1
`U.S. Patent No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”);
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25, 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of Baker-1
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25, 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S.
`Patent No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”) and
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0247851 to
`Batchelder (“Batchelder”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25, 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S.
`Patent No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”) and
`U.S. Patent No. 8,792,949 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-2”)
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`12
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 13 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`E-04
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`E-05
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`E-06
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`E-07
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`E-08
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`E-09
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`E-10
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25, 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S.
`Patent No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”), U.S.
`Patent Publication No. 2009/0247851 to Batchelder
`(“Batchelder”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,792,949 to
`Baker, Jr. (“Baker-2”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25, 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S.
`Patent Publication No. 2005/0038332 to Saidara
`(“Saidara”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25, 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S.
`Patent Publication No. 2005/0038332 to Saidara
`(“Saidara”) and Malangi, Swaroop, Simulation and
`mathematical notation of alarms unit for computer
`assisted resuscitation algorithm (2003), Theses 526,
`New Jersey Institute of Technology (“Malangi”)
`Obviousness of Claims 14 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. §
`103(a) in view of U.S. Patent Publication No.
`2005/0038332 to Saidara (“Saidara”), Malangi,
`Swaroop, Simulation and mathematical notation of
`alarms unit for computer assisted resuscitation
`algorithm (2003), Theses 526, New Jersey Institute
`of Technology (“Malangi”), and U.S. Patent
`Publication No. 2006/0220881 (“Al-Ali”)
`Obviousness of Claims 14 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. §
`103(a) in view of U.S. Patent Publication No.
`2005/0038332 to Saidara (“Saidara”) and U.S. Patent
`Publication No. 2006/0220881 (“Al-Ali”)
`Anticipation of Claims 1, 6-8, 13, 18, 19, 23, 25, 26
`under § 102 in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,816,266
`(Varshneya); Alternatively, obviousness of Claims 1,
`6-8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23, 25, 26 under § 103 in view of
`Varshneya
`Obviousness of Claim 14 under § 103 in view of
`U.S. Patent No. 6,816,266 (Varshneya) and U.S.
`Patent Publication No. 2009/0247851 to Batchelder
`(“Batchelder”)
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`13
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 14 of 43
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`E-11
`
`the RE244 patent
`
`F-01
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`F-02
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`F-03
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`F-04
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`F-05
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`F-06
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claim 26 under § 103 in view of
`Varshneya and U.S. Patent No. 5,865,736 (Baker)
`Anticipation of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 in view of Baker-1 U.S.
`Patent No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”);
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25, 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of Baker-1
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent
`No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”) and U.S.
`Patent Publication No. 2009/0247851 to Batchelder
`(“Batchelder”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent
`No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”) and U.S.
`Patent No. 8,792,949 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-2”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent
`No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”), U.S. Patent
`Publication No. 2009/0247851 to Batchelder
`(“Batchelder”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,792,949 to
`Baker, Jr. (“Baker-2”)
`
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent
`Publication No. 2005/0038332 to Saidara (“Saidara”)
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent
`Publication No. 2005/0038332 to Saidara (“Saidara”)
`and Malangi, Swaroop, Simulation and mathematical
`notation of alarms unit for computer assisted
`resuscitation algorithm (2003), Theses 526, New
`Jersey Institute of Technology (“Malangi”)
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-NLS
`
`
`14
`
`Defendants’ Amended
`Invalidity Contentions
`
`MASIMO 2007
`Sotera v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01082
`
`Page 15 of 43
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit Patent
`
`F-07
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`F-08
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`F-09
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`F-10
`
`the RE353 patent
`
`G-01
`
`the RE249 patent
`
`G-02
`
`the RE249 patent
`
`G-03
`
`the RE249 patent
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Claim(s) and Reference(s)
`Obviousness of Claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`in view of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0038332
`to Saidara (“Saidara”), Malangi, Swaroop,
`Simulation and mathematical notation of alarms unit
`for computer assisted resuscitation algorithm (2003),
`Theses 526, New Jersey Institute of Technology
`(“Malangi”), and U.S. Patent Publication No.
`2006/0220881 (“Al-Ali”)
`Obviousness of Claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`in view of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0038332
`to Saidara (“Saidara”) and U.S. Patent Publication
`No. 2006/0220881 (“Al-Ali”)
`Anticipation of Claims 1, 6-8, 13, 18, 19, 23, 25
`under § 102 in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,816,266
`(Varshneya); Alternatively, obviousness of Claims 1,
`6-8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23, 25, 26 under § 103 in view of
`Varshneya
`Obviousness of Claim 14 under § 103 in view of
`U.S. Patent No. 6,816,266 (Varshneya) and U.S.
`Patent Publication No. 2009/0247851 to Batchelder
`(“Batchelder”)
`Anticipation of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 24
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102 in view of Baker-1 U.S.
`Patent No. 5,865,736 to Baker, Jr. (“Baker-1”);
`Obviousness of Claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23,
`25, 26 un