throbber
5/17/2021
`
`PERSONAL BUSINESS; Those Black Holes in Your Mobile Phone Service - The New York Times
`
`https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/24/business/personal-business-those-
`black-holes-in-your-mobile-phone-service.html
`
`PERSONAL BUSINESS
`
`PERSONAL BUSINESS; Those Black Holes in Your Mobile
`Phone Service
`
`By Amy Zuckerman
`
`Dec. 24, 2000
`
`See the article in its original context from
`December 24, 2000, Section 3, Page 8 Buy Reprints
`
`New York Times subscribers* enjoy full access to
`TimesMachine—view over 150 years of New
`York Times journalism, as it originally appeared.
`
`SUBSCRIBE
`
`*Does not include Crossword-only or
`Cooking-only subscribers.
`
`WHEN Andrea Levy signed up for cellular telephone service, she thought she was getting
`seamless coverage for the entire country. But Ms. Levy, a marketing executive from
`Manhattan, complains about being cut off intermittently everywhere from Westchester
`County to New Mexico, and she sometimes finds unexpected roaming and long-distance
`charges on her monthly bill.
`
`Stewart Cheifet, an independent video producer from Mountain View, Calif., also laments
`about coast-to-coast disruptions. ''I can drive around the San Francisco Bay area and lose
`service,'' he said. In New York, he added, ''I couldn't get a signal from a skyscraper on Wall
`Street.'' He said that he, too, had encountered unexpected charges.
`
`As cell phone use mushrooms -- there are an estimated 107 million users in the United
`States, up from 28 million just five years ago -- so has the number of consumer complaints.
`
`3G Exhibit 2009
`IPR2020-01157
`
`https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/24/business/personal-business-those-black-holes-in-your-mobile-phone-service.html?searchResultPosition=1
`
`1/5
`
`

`

`5/17/2021
`
`PERSONAL BUSINESS; Those Black Holes in Your Mobile Phone Service - The New York Times
`
`Roderick Porter, the acting chief of the Federal Communications Commission's consumer
`information bureau, says his department often hears complaints like those of Ms. Levy and
`Mr. Cheifet. And Lou Richman, the finance editor at Consumer Reports magazine, says he is
`swamped with reader letters about poor service or confusing billing. ''There's overloaded,
`congested networks, dropped calls and holes in coverage that are all sources of aggravation
`for consumers,'' Mr. Richman said.
`
`Most of the problems reflect an industry that is still in flux. The networks and infrastructure
`of the wireless service providers, analysts say, cannot fully support the vast and rapidly
`increasing number of customers. A cell phone customer, they say, should understand that he
`cannot simply buy a phone, sign a service contract and expect the phone to offer the same
`service as a traditional phone mounted on the kitchen wall.
`
`But consumers can take steps to find the kind of services that best meet their needs. First,
`experts say, they should understand something about the technology and how it works -- or
`doesn't -- with various carrier service plans.
`
`Many users, for example, may not know the difference between a digital and analog phone.
`(The analog system, which is being phased out, breaks conversation into sound waves that
`are carried over radio signals. The newer digital method, which provides clearer calls with
`greater security, breaks a voice message into a binary computer code and sends it in short
`bursts.) And consumers also may not understand what is meant by ''anytime minutes'' --
`basically, no restrictions for calling times.
`
`Consumers may complain about costly roaming fees, which wireless providers charge when
`customers use their phones outside their service area. They may not realize that their
`phones may be set on ''roam'' even when they are not traveling outside their service area.
`To save money, they can simply shut off the roaming feature, said Scott Relf, a senior vice
`president for marketing and product development for Sprint PCS, based in Kansas City, Mo.
`And because of technological incompatibilities, he added, different carriers' equipment may
`not be interchangeable.
`
`Consumers should also check the fine print of the plans -- and there are many from which to
`choose. For example, CellularOne in Boston -- soon to be absorbed into Cingular Wireless --
`offers 13 plans, ranging from $19.99 a month for a basic analog plan to $174 a month for a
`digital plan that offers 2,500 ''anytime'' minutes.
`
`The costs depend on several factors, including whether the customer has signed up for local
`or national service, or has opted for ''bundling of minutes,'' a combination of the two.
`
`https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/24/business/personal-business-those-black-holes-in-your-mobile-phone-service.html?searchResultPosition=1
`
`2/5
`
`

`

`5/17/2021
`
`PERSONAL BUSINESS; Those Black Holes in Your Mobile Phone Service - The New York Times
`
`Another catch phrase is ''buckets of minutes.'' ''Some providers will offer you so many
`minutes per dollar amount, whether that's local or long distance, whether you're at home or
`whether you're traveling,'' said Chris Pearson, executive vice president of the Universal
`Wireless Communications Consortium, an international group based in Bellevue, Wash.,
`that is working on standardizing incompatible cell phone technologies. ''Others will offer
`you 200 minutes, for example, but only for calls at certain times, on certain days or in your
`home area.''
`
`Today in Business
`
`Live Updates: ›
`Updated
`21 minutes ago
`
`Government help blunted the pandemicʼs financial fallout, but it still hit some hard.
`
`Redbox is going public as it tries to shift to streaming from DVD rentals.
`
`What you need to know about masks, vaccinations and going back to the office.
`
`Mr. Richman of Consumer Reports said users should understand what they're getting into.
`Buckets of minutes ''can be consumed far more quickly than you realize,'' he said, because
`billing policies count partial minutes as full ones, meaning that a 30-minute allotment can be
`used up in as little as 15 minutes.
`
`To decide how much time to buy, consumers may want to keep a log of all calls they make
`over a week or two, he added.
`
`Consumers should also ask about late fees and read the fine print on promotions.
`
`Then there is the issue of coverage. Most companies offer some form of local service with
`national service sometimes bundled in. But the advertisements promising no roaming or
`long-distance charges for the whole country can be confusing -- as both Ms. Levy and Mr.
`Cheifet have found.
`
`Ms. Levy, 37, a vice president for research at Shepardson Stern & Kaminsky, a New York
`advertising agency, chose Sprint last year, primarily because it did not require a long-term
`contract. Although she signed up for the basic $29.99 monthly package for 180 minutes, and
`has supplemented that with an additional $10 a month for 200 nighttime and weekend
`minutes, she has incurred about $50 in unexpected roaming or long-distance charges. Ms.
`Levy says that for as much as she is resigned to the fact that coverage is flawed, she expects
`future improvements.
`
`https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/24/business/personal-business-those-black-holes-in-your-mobile-phone-service.html?searchResultPosition=1
`
`3/5
`
`

`

`5/17/2021
`
`PERSONAL BUSINESS; Those Black Holes in Your Mobile Phone Service - The New York Times
`
`Mr. Cheifet, 61, who relies on his cell phone to keep abreast of business while meeting with
`clients around the country, first signed up with AT&T at $89.95 a month for 1,000 minutes.
`''The company was great and the bill was consistent, but the coverage was lousy,'' he said,
`referring to problems with dropped calls or dead zones. He said he switched to Sprint but
`eventually dropped that plan because of billing problems -- instead of the $75 a month he
`had expected, he was repeatedly billed $140 a month ''even though I never went over my
`600-minute maximum.''
`
`Thomas Murphy, a Sprint spokesman, said he could not comment directly on the complaints
`of Ms. Levy and Mr. Cheifet because he was unfamiliar with their service plans. He said
`there could have been errors in their bills, or they may have misunderstood their coverage
`plans. Reception or service problems could reflect a number of factors, including weather or
`clogged networks, Mr. Murphy and representatives of other providers said.
`
`Annabel Dodd, author of ''The Essential Guide to Telecommunications'' (Prentice-Hall) said
`that service ''isn't perfect yet nationwide'' but that she was optimistic that mergers like the
`one recently approved between SBC Wireless and Bell South Cellular to create Cingular
`Wireless would lead to truly seamless service nationwide.
`
`Industry experts say no single provider can yet cover the entire country. Those who
`advertise seamless service are doing so by creating alliances with other providers, Mr.
`Pearson said. When customers move into an alliance partner's network, he said, they may
`sometimes pay roaming charges.
`
`To help avoid them, Mr. Pearson advises consumers to request network maps so they can
`track -- on any given trip -- whether they will be in or out of their provider's network. But
`they should make sure they have the latest maps, he said, because coverage keeps
`changing.
`
`The major companies are rapidly expanding their coverage zones by combining operations
`through mergers, building coverage alliances and establishing additional cell phone
`transmission sites. But Michael Althschul, vice president and general counsel for the
`Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association, a trade group based in Washington, said
`providers as diverse as AT&T and Verizon Wireless were hampered by the lack of available
`spectrum, or frequency bands. To expand, he said, the industry has been negotiating with
`the F.C.C. to obtain additional frequencies.
`
`WILLIAM CLIFT, chief technical officer for Cingular Wireless, said his company has had
`difficulty expanding networks in dense markets like New York City.
`
`''When demand for wireless service outpaces a forecast, it can take six months to a year for
`some networks to catch up.'' he said.
`
`https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/24/business/personal-business-those-black-holes-in-your-mobile-phone-service.html?searchResultPosition=1
`
`4/5
`
`

`

`5/17/2021
`
`PERSONAL BUSINESS; Those Black Holes in Your Mobile Phone Service - The New York Times
`
`Kenneth Woo, a spokesman for AT&T Wireless in Redmond, Wash., said that ''people want
`service, but you can't imagine the protests we get because neighborhoods don't want cell
`phone transmission sites.'' Moreover, he said, ''cellular is not a perfect technology.''
`
`Equipment, of course, is another variable in reception, service and cost. Expect to spend
`more, for example, for Web-enabled phones. ''Newer is actually better,'' Mr. Pearson said,
`but there are still many users with old-fashioned analog phones trying to complete calls in
`areas where their equipment cannot pick up frequencies. Even dual-band or dual-mode
`phones, which can distinguish between different frequencies and various cell phone
`technologies, will not guarantee coverage from one carrier to another, he said.
`
`A version of this article appears in print on , Section 3, Page 8 of the National edition with the headline: PERSONAL BUSINESS; Those Black Holes
`in Your Mobile Phone Service
`
`https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/24/business/personal-business-those-black-holes-in-your-mobile-phone-service.html?searchResultPosition=1
`
`5/5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket