throbber
Trial@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 35
` Entered: September 3, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`DELL INC., ZTE (USA) INC., and ZTE CORPORATION,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`3G LICENSING S.A.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2020-01157 (Patent 7,274,933 B2)
`IPR2020-01158 (Patent 7,460,868 B2)
`IPR2020-01159 (Patent 7,596,375 B2)
`IPR2020-01160 (Patent 8,275,374 B2)
`IPR2020-01161 (Patent 8,472,955 B2)
`IPR2020-01162 (Patent 8,948,756 B2)1
`
`
`Before TERRENCE W. MCMILLIN, AMANDA F. WIEKER,
`MONICA S. ULLAGADDI, and RUSSELL E. CASS,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WIEKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial
`37 C.F.R. § 317; § 42.74
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in the above-captioned proceedings.
`The parties are not authorized to use a multi-case caption. Moreover, this is not an
`expanded panel. Each of the four listed judges are part of three-judge panels
`assigned to the listed proceedings.
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01157 (Patent 7,274,933 B2)
`IPR2020-01158 (Patent 7,460,868 B2)
`IPR2020-01159 (Patent 7,596,375 B2)
`IPR2020-01160 (Patent 8,275,374 B2)
`IPR2020-01161 (Patent 8,472,955 B2)
`IPR2020-01162 (Patent 8,948,756 B2)
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`
`On August 24, 2021, ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., and Patent Owner
`(hereinafter “Joint Movants”) filed, in each of the above-identified proceedings, a
`Joint Motion to Terminate the Proceeding and Reconstitute Petitioner as Dell Inc.
`due to settlement. See, e.g., IPR2020-01157, Paper 32 (“Motion”).2 The Joint
`Movants also filed, on August 24, 2021, a true copy of a settlement agreement and
`a Joint Request that the Settlement Agreement be Treated as Business Confidential
`Information and be Kept Separate under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). See, e.g., IPR2020-
`01157, Ex. 2012 (“Settlement Agreement”), Paper 33 (“Request”).
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`The Motion states: “[T]he ZTE entities [i.e., ZTE Corporation and ZTE
`
`(USA) Inc. (see Motion, 1)] and Patent Owner entered into a settlement agreement
`resolving their disputes in connection with the involved patent.” Id. at 3. The
`Motion also states: “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b), filed concurrently herewith as
`Ex. 2012 is a true copy of the settlement agreement entered between Patent Owner
`and the ZTE entities on August 4, 2021.” Id. at 4. The Motion further states:
`“The ZTE entities and Patent Owner certify that there are no collateral agreements
`or understandings made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination
`of the inter partes review.” Id. The Motion requests termination of the
`proceedings with respect to the ZTE entities. Id. at 5.
`
`
`2 For purposes of expediency, we cite to papers and exhibits filed in IPR2020-
`01157, unless otherwise noted. The Parties filed similar papers and exhibits in
`each of the above-identified proceedings.
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01157 (Patent 7,274,933 B2)
`IPR2020-01158 (Patent 7,460,868 B2)
`IPR2020-01159 (Patent 7,596,375 B2)
`IPR2020-01160 (Patent 8,275,374 B2)
`IPR2020-01161 (Patent 8,472,955 B2)
`IPR2020-01162 (Patent 8,948,756 B2)
`
`
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing
`of a settlement agreement, unless the Board has already decided the merits of the
`proceeding. PTAB Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, 86 (November 2019).3
`Here, although the Board has instituted inter partes review of the challenged
`patents, the Board has not decided the merits of these proceedings. Under these
`circumstances, we grant the Motion to terminate each proceeding, with respect to
`the ZTE entities. Accordingly, Petitioner is reconstituted as Dell Inc.
`Additionally, in the Request, the Joint Movants:
`jointly request that the settlement agreement be kept as a separate paper
`to be made available only under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). The settlement agreement has been filed for
`access “Access only the board.” The Joint Movants further jointly
`request that the Board order that in the event a person or entity makes
`a written request, as stated in 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)(1)-(2), for access to
`the settlement agreement, that any such written request be served upon
`the parties on the day the written request is provided to the Board.
`Paper 33, 1. We grant-in-part the Request. The Settlement Agreement in each
`proceeding shall be kept separate from the files of U.S. Patent No. 7,274,933 B2,
`U.S. Patent No. 7,460,868 B2, U.S. Patent No. 7,596,375 B2, U.S. Patent
`No. 8,275,374 B2, U.S. Patent No. 8,472,955 B2, and U.S. Patent No. 8,948,756
`B2, and will be made available only under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`However, we deny the portion of the Request seeking an order from the
`Board that, in the event a person or entity makes a written request as stated in
`
`
`3 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01157 (Patent 7,274,933 B2)
`IPR2020-01158 (Patent 7,460,868 B2)
`IPR2020-01159 (Patent 7,596,375 B2)
`IPR2020-01160 (Patent 8,275,374 B2)
`IPR2020-01161 (Patent 8,472,955 B2)
`IPR2020-01162 (Patent 8,948,756 B2)
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)(1)–(2) for access to the Settlement Agreement, any such
`written request be served upon the parties on the day the written request is
`provided to the Board. Neither the statute nor the rule includes such a requirement.
`
`III. ORDER
`In view of the foregoing, it is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate the Proceeding and
`
`Reconstitute Petitioner as Dell Inc. in each of the above-identified proceedings is
`granted with respect to ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc., and that ZTE
`Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc. are herein terminated from these proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request that the Settlement Agreement
`be Treated as Business Confidential Information and be Kept Separate under
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) in each of the above-identified proceedings is granted-in-part
`and denied-in-part, in the manner noted above; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement in each proceeding
`shall be kept separate from the files of U.S. Patent No. 7,274,933 B2, U.S. Patent
`No. 7,460,868 B2, U.S. Patent No. 7,596,375 B2, U.S. Patent No. 8,275,374 B2,
`U.S. Patent No. 8,472,955 B2, and U.S. Patent No. 8,948,756 B2, and will be made
`available only under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01157 (Patent 7,274,933 B2)
`IPR2020-01158 (Patent 7,460,868 B2)
`IPR2020-01159 (Patent 7,596,375 B2)
`IPR2020-01160 (Patent 8,275,374 B2)
`IPR2020-01161 (Patent 8,472,955 B2)
`IPR2020-01162 (Patent 8,948,756 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Brian M. Buroker
`Paul Torchia
`Nathan R. Curtis
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`bburoker@gibsondunn.com
`ptorchia@gibsondunn.com
`ncurtis@gibsondunn.com
`
`John R. Hutchins
`C. Andy Mu
`Wesley W. Jones
`BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.
`jhutchins@bannerwitcoff.com
`amu@bannerwitcoff.com
`wjones@bannerwitcoff.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Timothy Devlin
`Neil Benchell
`Stephanie Berger
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`td-ptab@devlinlawfirm.com
`nbenchell@devlinlawfirm.com
`sberger@devlinlawfirm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket