`U.S. Patent No. 8,487,659
`
`Xilinx, Inc. et al., Petitioner
`v.
`Analog Devices, Inc., Patent Owner
`
`October 27, 2021
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 1
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds
`
`Ground
`
`35 U.S.C. §
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`102
`
`103
`
`103
`
`103
`
`103
`
`102
`
`103
`
`Claims
`
`5, 6, 9
`
`10
`
`1, 2
`
`7, 8
`
`3, 4
`
`9-11
`
`1, 5
`
`Prior Art Reference
`
`Yoshioka
`
`Yoshioka
`
`Yoshioka and AAPA
`
`Yoshioka and Fiscus
`
`Yoshioka, AAPA, and Fiscus
`
`Ajit
`
`Ajit and AAPA
`
`Institution Decision (Paper 9)
`
`2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 2
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`’659 Patent, Abstract
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Abstract
`
`3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 3
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 4
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Claim 5
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 5
`
`5
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 5
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 9
`
`6
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 6
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Applicant Admitted Prior Art - Fixed Delay
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Fig. 1
`
`7
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 7
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`’659 Patent, Fig. 3
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Fig. 3
`
`8
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 8
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`’659 Patent, Fig. 5
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 10
`
`9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 9
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`’659 Patent vs. ADI’s Design Review
`
`Missing
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 2
`
`10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 10
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`’659 Patent vs. ADI’s Design Review
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 3
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 4
`
`11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 11
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`qRESET Controls Latch
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 5
`
`12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 12
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`’659 Patent vs. ADI’s Design Review
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 6
`
`13
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 13
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`ADI’s Mapping of Timer Circuit to Comp_clkgen Schematic Is Inaccurate
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 7
`
`14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 14
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`ADI’s Mapping of Timer Circuit to Comp_clkgen Schematic Is Inaccurate
`
`Delay 1
`
`Delay 2
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 7
`
`15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 15
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`ADI’s Mapping of Timer Circuit to Comp_clkgen Schematic Is Inaccurate
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 8 (citing to POR at 21)
`
`16
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 16
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`ADI’s Comp_clkgen Schematic
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 10
`
`17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 17
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`ADI’s Gecko Comparator Schematic
`
`Gecko Comparator Schematic (Ex. 2017)
`
`18
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 18
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`ADI’s Design Review Fails to Establish “Inverse” Relationship
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 15, 16
`
`19
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 19
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`ADI’s Design Review Fails to Establish “Inverse” Relationship
`
`PVT Corner
`63: ssss, -40C, 1.32V
`67: ffff, -40C, 1.32V
`
`Comparator
`Latch response
`Response
`63: 27ps
`63: 521ps
`67: 31ps
`67: 712ps
`63 < 67
`63 < 67
`Not Inverse
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 15, 16; Ex. 1018, ¶¶ 38-41
`
`20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 20
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`ADI’s Design Review Fails to Establish “Inverse” Relationship
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 16
`
`21
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 21
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`ADI’s Design Review Fails to Establish “Inverse” Relationship
`
`PVT Corner
`
`62: ssss, 125C, 1.32V
`63: ssss, -40C, 1.32V
`
`Comparator
`Latch response
`Response
`62: 40ps
`62: 616ps
`63: 27ps
`63: 521ps
`62 > 63
`62 > 63
`Not Inverse
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 16; Ex. 1018, ¶¶ 42, 43
`
`22
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 22
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Yoshioka, Abstract
`
`Yoshioka (Ex. 1004) at Abstract
`
`23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 23
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Yoshioka, Fig. 1
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 17
`
`24
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 24
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Yoshioka, Fig. 3
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 24
`
`25
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 25
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Td Is Dependent Upon Comparator Delay
`
`ɸc = TC1+TC2+2Td
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 25; Yoshioka (Ex. 1004) at 22; Ex. 1018, ¶ 61
`
`26
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 26
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Yoshioka, Fig. 8
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 27
`
`27
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 27
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Yoshioka, Fig. 8
`
`Fast PVT
`
`Slow PVT
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 27; Yoshioka (Ex. 1004) at 22
`
`28
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 28
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Yoshioka, Fig. 9
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 29
`
`29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 29
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Ajit, Abstract
`
`Ajit (Ex. 1005) at Abstract
`
`30
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 30
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Slew Rate vs. Delay
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 30
`
`31
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 31
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Ajit, Fig. 1 – PVT Compensator 116
`
`Ajit (Ex. 1005) at Fig. 1
`
`32
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 32
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Ajit (Ex. 1005) at Fig. 2A
`
`33
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 33
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 70
`
`34
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 34
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 72
`
`35
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 35
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 73
`
`36
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 36
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 74
`
`37
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 37
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 76
`
`38
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 38
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Dr. Holberg’s Ajit Sketches
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 67
`
`39
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 39
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Dr. Holberg’s Ajit Sketches
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 67
`
`40
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 40
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Dr. Holberg’s Ajit Simulations
`
`Reply (Paper 21) at 36
`
`41
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 41
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`
`
`Dr. Hanumolu’s Simulations
`
`Reply (Paper 21) at 38
`
`42
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 42
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`