throbber
IPR2020-01219
`U.S. Patent No. 8,487,659
`
`Xilinx, Inc. et al., Petitioner
`v.
`Analog Devices, Inc., Patent Owner
`
`October 27, 2021
`
`1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 1
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Instituted Grounds
`
`Ground
`
`35 U.S.C. §
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`102
`
`103
`
`103
`
`103
`
`103
`
`102
`
`103
`
`Claims
`
`5, 6, 9
`
`10
`
`1, 2
`
`7, 8
`
`3, 4
`
`9-11
`
`1, 5
`
`Prior Art Reference
`
`Yoshioka
`
`Yoshioka
`
`Yoshioka and AAPA
`
`Yoshioka and Fiscus
`
`Yoshioka, AAPA, and Fiscus
`
`Ajit
`
`Ajit and AAPA
`
`Institution Decision (Paper 9)
`
`2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 2
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`’659 Patent, Abstract
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Abstract
`
`3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 3
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Claim 1
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 4
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Claim 5
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 5
`
`5
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 5
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Claim 9
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 9
`
`6
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 6
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Applicant Admitted Prior Art - Fixed Delay
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Fig. 1
`
`7
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 7
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`’659 Patent, Fig. 3
`
`’659 patent (Ex. 1001) at Fig. 3
`
`8
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 8
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`’659 Patent, Fig. 5
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 10
`
`9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 9
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`’659 Patent vs. ADI’s Design Review
`
`Missing
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 2
`
`10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 10
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`’659 Patent vs. ADI’s Design Review
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 3
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 4
`
`11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 11
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`qRESET Controls Latch
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 5
`
`12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 12
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`’659 Patent vs. ADI’s Design Review
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 6
`
`13
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 13
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`ADI’s Mapping of Timer Circuit to Comp_clkgen Schematic Is Inaccurate
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 7
`
`14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 14
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`ADI’s Mapping of Timer Circuit to Comp_clkgen Schematic Is Inaccurate
`
`Delay 1
`
`Delay 2
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 7
`
`15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 15
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`ADI’s Mapping of Timer Circuit to Comp_clkgen Schematic Is Inaccurate
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 8 (citing to POR at 21)
`
`16
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 16
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`ADI’s Comp_clkgen Schematic
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 10
`
`17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 17
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`ADI’s Gecko Comparator Schematic
`
`Gecko Comparator Schematic (Ex. 2017)
`
`18
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 18
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`ADI’s Design Review Fails to Establish “Inverse” Relationship
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 15, 16
`
`19
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 19
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`ADI’s Design Review Fails to Establish “Inverse” Relationship
`
`PVT Corner
`63: ssss, -40C, 1.32V
`67: ffff, -40C, 1.32V
`
`Comparator
`Latch response
`Response
`63: 27ps
`63: 521ps
`67: 31ps
`67: 712ps
`63 < 67
`63 < 67
`Not Inverse
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 15, 16; Ex. 1018, ¶¶ 38-41
`
`20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 20
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`ADI’s Design Review Fails to Establish “Inverse” Relationship
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 16
`
`21
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 21
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`ADI’s Design Review Fails to Establish “Inverse” Relationship
`
`PVT Corner
`
`62: ssss, 125C, 1.32V
`63: ssss, -40C, 1.32V
`
`Comparator
`Latch response
`Response
`62: 40ps
`62: 616ps
`63: 27ps
`63: 521ps
`62 > 63
`62 > 63
`Not Inverse
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 16; Ex. 1018, ¶¶ 42, 43
`
`22
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 22
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Yoshioka, Abstract
`
`Yoshioka (Ex. 1004) at Abstract
`
`23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 23
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Yoshioka, Fig. 1
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 17
`
`24
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 24
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Yoshioka, Fig. 3
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 24
`
`25
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 25
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Td Is Dependent Upon Comparator Delay
`
`ɸc = TC1+TC2+2Td
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 25; Yoshioka (Ex. 1004) at 22; Ex. 1018, ¶ 61
`
`26
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 26
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Yoshioka, Fig. 8
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 27
`
`27
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 27
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Yoshioka, Fig. 8
`
`Fast PVT
`
`Slow PVT
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 27; Yoshioka (Ex. 1004) at 22
`
`28
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 28
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Yoshioka, Fig. 9
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 29
`
`29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 29
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Ajit, Abstract
`
`Ajit (Ex. 1005) at Abstract
`
`30
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 30
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Slew Rate vs. Delay
`
`Redacted Reply (Paper 22) at 30
`
`31
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 31
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Ajit, Fig. 1 – PVT Compensator 116
`
`Ajit (Ex. 1005) at Fig. 1
`
`32
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 32
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Ajit (Ex. 1005) at Fig. 2A
`
`33
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 33
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 70
`
`34
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 34
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 72
`
`35
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 35
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 73
`
`36
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 36
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 74
`
`37
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 37
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Ajit, Fig. 2A
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 76
`
`38
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 38
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Dr. Holberg’s Ajit Sketches
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 67
`
`39
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 39
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Dr. Holberg’s Ajit Sketches
`
`Petition (Paper 2) at 67
`
`40
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 40
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Dr. Holberg’s Ajit Simulations
`
`Reply (Paper 21) at 36
`
`41
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 41
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

`

`Dr. Hanumolu’s Simulations
`
`Reply (Paper 21) at 38
`
`42
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Exhibit 1020 Page 42
`Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Analog Devices, Inc. IPR2020-01219
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket