throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`BOT M8, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2020-01288
`U.S. Patent No. 7,664,988
`____________
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioner Sony Interactive Entertainment
`
`LLC (“Petitioner”) submits the following objections to evidence that Bot M8, LLC,
`
`(“Patent Owner”) served in its Patent Owner Preliminary Response. These
`
`objections are timely filed and served within ten business days of the Board’s
`
`February 16, 2021, Institution Decision.
`
`Evidence
`
`Exhibit 2011
`
`
`
`
`
`Objections
`
`37 CFR § 42.63(a): This exhibit is a
`machine translation of a foreign
`language document, which is improper
`and fails to include an affidavit
`attesting to the accuracy of the
`translation as required by 37 CFR §
`42.63(a). See also Kingbright Elecs.
`Co. Ltd. v. Cree, Inc., IPR2015-00751,
`
`Paper 8 at 12-13 (P.T.A.B., Aug. 10,
`
`2015); Square, Inc. v. REM Holdings 3,
`LLC, IPR2014-00312, Paper 58 at 35-
`36 (P.T.A.B., July 7, 2015).
`
`FRE 401, 402 and 403: Petitioner
`objects to this evidence on the grounds
`that it is an unreliable machine
`translation and, therefore, irrelevant,
`and its probative value is substantially
`outweighed by a danger of unfair
`prejudice, confusing the issues, and
`wasting time.
`
`FRE 801, 802, and 803: This
`evidence is hearsay under FRE 801 and
`does not fall within a hearsay exception
`under FRE 802 and FRE 803.
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BY: /s/ Eric A. Buresh
`
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`Jason R. Mudd, Reg. No. 57,700
`Kathleen D. Fitterling, Reg. No. 62,950
`
`COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 2, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on March 2,
`
`2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`
`EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1) were served by electronic
`
`mail on Patent Owner’s lead and backup counsel at the following email addresses:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`James Hannah: jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`Jonathan S. Caplan: jcaplan@kramerlevin.com
`Jeffrey H. Price: jprice@kramerlevin.com
`svdocketing@kramerlevin.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /s/ Eric A. Buresh
`
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`Jason R. Mudd, Reg. No. 57,700
`Kathleen D. Fitterling, Reg. No. 62,950
`
`COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket