`Patentamt
`European
`Patent Office
`Office europeen
`des brevets
`
`I llllll lllll lllll lllll 111111111111111111111111111111111
`
`Grunecker, Kinkeldey,
`Stockmair & Schwanhausser
`Anwaltssozietat
`Maximilianstrasse 58
`80538 Munchen
`ALLEMAGNE
`
`European Patent Office
`80298 MUNICH
`GERMANY
`Tel. +49 (0)89 2399 - 0
`Fax +49 (0)89 2399 - 4465
`
`For any questions about
`this communication:
`Tel.:+31 (0)70 340 45 00
`
`27.12.07
`
`Reference
`EP36141 DK900kap
`
`Applicant/Proprietor
`Aruze Corp.
`
`Application No./Patent No.
`I
`05018280.7 - 2210
`
`The extended European search report is enclosed.
`
`Communication
`
`The extended European search report includes, pursuant to Rule 62 EPC, the European search report
`(R. 61 EPC) or the partial European search report/ declaration of no search (R. 63 EPC) and the European
`search opinion.
`
`Copies of documents cited in the European search report are attached.
`
`6a'
`
`1 additional set(s) of copies of such documents is (are) enclosed as well.
`
`The following have been approved:
`D
`6a'
`
`Abstract
`
`D
`
`Title
`
`The Abstract was modified and the definitive text is attached to this communication.
`
`The following figure will be published together with the abstract: 1
`
`Refund of the search fee
`If applicable under Article 9 Rules relating to fees, a separate communication from the Receiving Section
`on the refund of the search fee will be sent later.
`
`EPO Form 1507N
`
`12.07
`
`Patent Owner, Bot M8 LLC - Ex. 2007, p. 1
`
`
`
`Datum
`Date
`Date
`
`cf Form 1507
`
`Blatt
`Sheet
`Feuille
`
`1
`
`Anmelde-Nr.:
`Application No.:
`Demande n°:
`
`05 018 280.7
`
`The examination is being carried out on the following application documents:
`
`The application documents as originally filed
`
`****
`
`1. The following documents are referred to in this communication; the numbering
`will be adhered to in the rest of the procedure:
`
`01: JP-A-09319445 and the corresponding English abstract;
`02: JP-A-2000035888 and the corresponding English abstract;
`03: EP-A-0774716.
`
`2.) The present application does not meet the requirements of Article 52(1) EPC
`because the subject-matter of claim 1 does not involve an inventive step within
`the meaning of Article 56 EPC; for the following reasons:
`
`The applicant's attention is drawn to 01 which discloses:
`
`an information process device comprising:
`a first memory device (FROM 104) for storing a boot program executed when the
`information process device is started to operate;
`a second memory device (HOO 111) for storing an application program ("AP");
`a control device (CPU 103) for executing a fault inspection program (diagnosing
`routine) to inspect whether or not a fault occurs in the second memory device
`(HOO 111; see abstract of 01 ); wherein the fault inspection program (diagnosing
`routine for diagnosing the hardware equipment; see abstract of 01) is stored in the
`first memory device (FROM 104; see abstract of 01 ); and
`wherein the control device (CPU) executes the fault inspection program (when
`the information process device is started to operate (when the power source is
`turned on; see abstract of 01 ).
`
`01 does not explicitely mentions a mother board on which the first memory device
`(FROM 104) is provided but it is obvious to the skilled person that for the kind of
`device mentioned on 01 (combined FAX and telephone) all the harware
`elements should preferably be concentrated on a single circuit board. It is also
`obvious that the HOO must be connected to this board.
`
`Therefore all the features of 01 can in an obvious manner be derived from 01.
`
`EPA Form 2906 12.0?CSX
`
`Patent Owner, Bot M8 LLC - Ex. 2007, p. 2
`
`
`
`Datum
`Date
`Date
`
`cf Form 1507
`
`Blatt
`Sheet
`Feuille
`
`2
`
`Anmelde-Nr.:
`Application No.:
`Demande n°:
`
`05 018 280.7
`
`The subjet-matter of claim 1 also lacks an inventive step with respect to 02 for
`similar reasons (see 02 , HOD 24 containing an application program, ROM 22
`containing fault processing program run by the CPU (20), it is obvious to the
`skilled person to have the ROM containing the system boot program and the CPU
`and the ROM on a mother board).
`
`3.) The additional feature of claim 2 is known from either 01 or 02 and adds
`nothing inventive.
`
`4.) The additional feature of claim 3 is known from 02 and adds nothing inventive.
`
`5.) If the application is pursued and new claims are filed the indications listed
`below should be followed:
`- The applicant should indicate in the letter of reply the difference of the
`subject-matter of the new claim vis-a-vis the state of the art and the significance
`thereof. Any argument showing the presence of an inventive step should be
`mentioned in the letter of reply.
`- The two part form should be used for the independent claims on the basis of
`01, 02 or 03 (Rule 43(1) EPC).
`- Reference signs in parentheses should be inserted in the claims to increase their
`intelligibility, Rule 43(7) EPC. This applies to both the preamble and characterising
`portion (see the Guidelines, C-111, 4.19).
`- To meet the requirements of Rule 42(1 )(b) EPC, the documents 01 ,02,03
`should be identified in the description and the relevant background art disclosed
`therein should be briefly discussed.
`- The text of the description should be put into conformity with the new claims
`(Rule 42(1 )(c) EPC).
`- In order to facilitate the examination of the conformity of the amended application
`with the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC, the applicant is requested to clearly
`identify the amendments carried out, irrespective of whether they concern
`amendments by addition, replacement or deletion, and to indicate the passages of
`the application as filed on which these amendments are based.
`If the applicant regards it as appropriate these indications could be submitted in
`handwritten form on a copy of the relevant parts of the application as filed.
`
`EPA Form 2906 12.0?CSX
`
`Patent Owner, Bot M8 LLC - Ex. 2007, p. 3
`
`
`
`European Patent
`Office
`
`EUROPEAN SEARCH REPORT
`
`Application Number
`EP 05 01 8280
`
`x
`
`x
`
`X
`
`A
`
`A
`
`Category
`
`DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED TO BE RELEVANT
`Citation of document with indication, where appropriate,
`of relevant passages
`JP 09 319445 A (NEC SHIZUOKA LTD)
`12 December 1997 (1997-12-12)
`* abstract *
`
`JP 2000 035888 A (YAMAHA CORP)
`2 February 2000 (2000-02-02)
`* abstract *
`
`CLASSIFICATION OF THE
`APPLICATION
`(IPC)
`
`INV.
`G06F3/06
`G11B19/04
`
`Relevant
`to claim
`1-3
`
`1-3
`
`EP 0 774 716 A (MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC IND CO 1-3
`LTD [JP]) 21 May 1997 (1997-05-21)
`*column 4, line 46 - column 5, line 3 *
`*column 7, line 7 - line 20; figures 5,7
`*
`(EDWARDS DAVID A [US] ET
`US 6 449 735 Bl
`AL) 10 September 2002 (2002-09-10)
`*column 9, line 44 - line 55; figure 2 *
`
`1-3
`
`EP 0 801 387 A (CANON KK [JP])
`15 October 1997 (1997-10-15)
`*column 5, line 34 - line 42; figure 1 *
`
`1-3
`
`TECHNICAL FIELDS
`SEARCHED
`(IPC)
`GllB
`G06F
`
`Place of search
`
`Date of completion of the search
`
`Examiner
`
`0
`0 "
`
`The present search report has been drawn up for all claims
`2 1--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_._~~~---L~~~~~~~~---1
`Chaumeron, Bernard
`Munich
`11 December 2007
`~1--~~~~~~~~~~~_._~~~~~~~~~~~~----1.~~~~~~~~~~~--1
`CATEGORY OF CITED DOCUMENTS
`T: theory or principle underlying the invention
`E : earlier patent document, but published on, or
`after the filing date
`D: document cited in the application
`L : document cited for other reasons
`
`N
`~
`"'
`:il
`2
`a:
`0
`LL
`0
`[L
`w~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
`
`X: particularly relevant if taken alone
`Y: particularly relevant if combined with another
`document of the same category
`A: technological background
`0 : non-written disclosure
`P : intermediate document
`
`& : member of the same patent family, corresponding
`document
`
`Patent Owner, Bot M8 LLC - Ex. 2007, p. 4
`
`
`
`ANNEXTOTHEEUROPEANSEARCHREPORT
`ON EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION NO.
`
`EP 05 01 8280
`
`This annex lists the patent family members relating to the patent documents cited in the above-mentioned European search report.
`The members are as contained in the European Patent Office EDP file on
`The European Patent Office is in no way liable for these particulars which are merely given for the purpose of information.
`11-12-2007
`
`Patent document
`cited in search report
`
`Publication
`date
`
`Patent family
`member(s)
`
`Publication
`date
`
`NONE
`12-12-1997
`A
`JP 9319445
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------
`JP 2000035888 A
`02-02-2000
`NONE
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------
`EP 0774716
`A
`21-05-1997
`DE
`69626463 Dl
`10-04-2003
`DE
`69626463 T2
`26-02-2004
`us
`5860122 A
`12-01-1999
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------
`us 6449735
`Bl
`10-09-2002
`AU
`3580697 A
`21-01-1998
`DE
`69730430 Dl
`30-09-2004
`DE
`69730430 T2
`15-09-2005
`EP
`0909416 Al
`21-04-1999
`HK
`1017451 Al
`06-05-2005
`KR 20000022506 A
`25-04-2000
`WO
`9800781 Al
`08-01-1998
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------
`EP 0801387
`A
`15-10-1997
`JP
`9274541 A
`21-10-1997
`us
`6233108 Bl
`15-05-2001
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`(J) "' C';
`
`[L
`2
`a:
`0
`LL
`0
`8:J For more details about this annex : see Official Journal of the European Patent Office, No. 12/82
`
`Patent Owner, Bot M8 LLC - Ex. 2007, p. 5
`
`