throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`__________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________
`
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS PHARMA AG,
`NOVARTIS TECHNOLOGY LLC,
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owners
`
`__________
`
`
`Case IPR2020-01318
`Patent 9,220,631
`
`__________
`
`
`PATENT OWNERS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A MODIFIED
`DEFAULT PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14, 42.22, and 42.54, Patent Owners Novartis
`
`Pharma AG, Novartis Technology LLC, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
`
`(collectively, “Novartis”) request entry of the Modified Default Protective Order
`
`submitted herewith as Exhibit 2047. A redline version showing differences
`
`between the proposed Modified Default Protective Order and the Default
`
`Protective Order is submitted as Exhibit 2048. The parties have met and conferred,
`
`and Petitioner does not oppose this motion.
`
`The parties have agreed to modify the Board’s Default Protective Order,
`
`located in Appendix B of the Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, to (1) remove
`
`default Section 2(A); (2) modify default Section 2(D) to limit in -house access to
`
`one in-house attorney; and (3) modify the language for marking confidential
`
`documents to match the language for designating confidential material set forth in
`
`the protective order entered in the parties’ parallel proceeding before the
`
`International Trade Commission (“ITC”).
`
`Good cause exists to enter the parties’ proposed Modified Default Protective
`
`Order. Consolidated Trial Practice Guide at 19-20; 37 C.F.R. § 42.54. The
`
`protections provided by the Modified Default Protective Order are necessary
`
`because Novartis will need to rely on information regarding its confidential
`
`product development efforts related to its development of the subject matter of the
`
`’631 patent and Novartis would likely suffer competitive harm if the details of its
`
`2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`research and development efforts are shared with the public or shared with
`
`Regeneron employees beyond the in-house counsel provided access in the
`
`Modified Default Protective Order. The Default Protective Order does not
`
`adequately protect against these competitive harms. The proposed Modified
`
`Default Protective Order is tailored to guard against harmful disclosures while
`
`balancing the public’s interest in accessing the substance of this proceeding and the
`
`need for Regeneron’s in-house counsel to adequately participate in this case.
`
`To accommodate the immediate need to file and serve confidential
`
`information in this proceeding, Novartis respectfully requests entry of this agreed
`
`upon Modified Default Protective Order.
`
`Dated: October 22, 2020
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`/Elizabeth J. Holland/
`Elizabeth J. Holland (Reg. No. 47,657)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owners
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`A copy of this Patent Owners’ Unopposed Motion for a Modified Default
`
`Protective Order has been served on Petitioner’s attorneys of record as follows via
`
`electronic mail:
`
`Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`767 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`T: 212-310-8022
`F: 212-310-8007
`elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com
`USPTO Reg. No. 55,721
`Anish R. Desai
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`767 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`T: 212-310-8730
`F: 212-310-8007
`anish.desai@weil.com
`USPTO Reg. No. 73,760
`
`Natalie Kennedy
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`767 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`T: 212-310-8730
`F: 212-310-8007
`natalie.kennedy@weil.com
`USPTO Reg. No. 68,511
`Andrew Gesior
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`767 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`T: 212-310-8730
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`F: 212-310-8007
`andrew.gesior@weil.com
`USPTO Reg. No. 76,588
`
`Brian E. Ferguson
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`2001 M Street, N.W., Suite 600
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`T: 202-682-7000
`F: 202-857-0940
`brian.ferguson@weil.com
`USPTO Reg. No. 36,801
`
`Christopher M. Pepe
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`2001 M Street, N.W., Suite 600
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`T: 202-682-7000
`F: 202-857-0940
`christopher.pepe@weil.com
`USPTO Reg. No. 73,851
`
`Regeneron.IPR.Service@weil.com
`Attorneys for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 22, 2020
`By:
`/Elizabeth J. Holland/
`Elizabeth J. Holland (Reg. No. 47,657)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owners
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`Phone: (212) 813-8800
`Fax: (212) 355-3333
`EHolland@goodwinlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket